Anniversary of Tiananmen Square crackdown passes off quietly
Security was tight on Wednesday around Beijing's Tiananmen Square, where weeks of student-led protests shook the party in 1989.
Under then-leader Deng Xiaoping, the military was sent in to end the protest on the night of June 3-4. Using live ammunition, soldiers forced their way through crowds on the streets that tried to block them from reaching the square.
Hundreds and possibly thousands of people were killed, including dozens of soldiers.
The ruling Communist Party has tried, with some success, to erase what it calls the 'political turmoil' of 1989 from the collective memory. It bans any public commemoration or mention of the June 4 crackdown, scrubbing references from the internet.
In recent years, that ban has been extended to Hong Kong, where a once-massive annual candlelight vigil is no longer permitted.
It is only in Taiwan, the self-governing island that is claimed by China but runs its own affairs, that large June 4 gatherings can still take place.
University students occupied Tiananmen Square in the spring of 1989. Their calls for freedoms divided the party leadership. The decision to send in the troops marked a decisive turning point in the evolution of modern China, keeping the party firmly in control as it loosened economic restrictions.
Chinese officials have said the country's rapid economic development since then proves the decisions made at the time were correct.
'On the political turmoil that happened in the late 1980s, the Chinese government has already reached a clear conclusion,' Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said on Wednesday.
He added that China would continue along its current path of what it calls 'socialism with Chinese characteristics'.
Tiananmen Mothers, a group formed by relatives of the victims, made an annual online appeal to the government. Signed by 108 members, it called for an independent investigation into what happened on June 4, 1989, including a list of all who died.
The group also demanded compensation for the families and a legal case against those responsible for the deaths.
The British and German Embassies in Beijing posted videos commemorating the anniversary on Weibo, a Chinese social media platform, but they were later taken down. The Canadian and German Embassies displayed images of a single lit candle on large screens facing the main street.
In Hong Kong, a carnival showcasing Chinese food and products was held in Victoria Park, where tens of thousands of people used to gather in the evening for a candlelight vigil to mark the anniversary.
Hong Kong authorities first shut down the vigil during the Covid-19 pandemic and arrested the organisers in 2021. The moves were part of a broader crackdown on dissent following monthslong anti-government protests in 2019 that turned violent and paralysed parts of the city.
Police were out in force to try to prevent any protest.
Jailed vigil organiser Chow Hang-tung said she would go on a 36-hour hunger strike to remember the events of the day.
The British and Canadian consulates posted social media messages about not forgetting June 4. Hong Kong was a British colony until 1997. The American consulate posted a message from US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on its website.
'The CCP actively tries to censor the facts,' Mr Rubio said, referring to China's Communist Party. 'But the world will never forget.'
Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te used the anniversary to position the island he leads on the frontline of defending democracy against authoritarianism. In a Facebook post, he drew a distinction between Taiwan's multiparty democracy and China's one-party rule.
'Authoritarian governments often choose to remain silent and forget about history, while democratic societies choose to preserve the truth and refuse to forget those who have contributed to the ideals of human rights and the dreams they embrace,' Mr Lai wrote.
Taiwan transitioned from authoritarianism to democracy in a process that began in the late 1980s. It relies on support principally from the US, along with other democratic partners, to deter China from an invasion.
The Communist Party says it favours peaceful reunification but does not renounce the use of force.
A commemoration and candlelight vigil remembering June 4 was planned for Wednesday evening.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
China demonstrates coast guard capability to Pacific nations, step towards high seas patrols
SYDNEY, June 6 (Reuters) - China is taking further steps towards high seas boarding of fishing boats in the Pacific for the first time, risking tensions with Taiwanese fleets and U.S. Coast Guard vessels that ply the region, Pacific Islands officials told Reuters. The Chinese Coast Guard demonstrated the capabilities of one of its largest ships, used to enforce maritime law in the Taiwan Strait, to Pacific Island ministers last week. It is also actively involved in debates on the rules of high seas boarding, according to documents and interviews with Pacific fisheries officials. The fisheries officials said it was anticipated China will soon begin patrols in a "crowded" fisheries surveillance space. "Hosting the leaders, demonstrating their capabilities in terms of maritime operations, those kind of things are indications they want to step into that space," said Allan Rahari, director of fisheries operations for the Forum Fisheries Agency, in an interview with Reuters. The agency runs enforcement against illegal fishing for a group of 18 Pacific Island countries, with assistance from navy and air force patrols by Australia, the United States, France and New Zealand. The biggest fishing fleets in the Pacific, attracting the most infringement notices by inspectors, are Chinese and Taiwanese. But China is also the largest fisheries partner to some Pacific Island countries, and Rahari said agreements for Chinese coast guard patrols in coastal waters could be struck under security deals with these countries. China registered 26 coast guard vessels with the Western & Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) in 2024 for high seas boarding and inspections in a vast region where the U.S. and Australia have the biggest inspection fleets. The commission has not received a notification from China that it has conducted any inspection, but Chinese officials have become active in debate over the rules on boardings, WCPFC executive director Rhea Moss-Christian told Reuters. China last year called for a review of the guidelines, and in March, Chinese officials attended a video meeting about an Australian-led effort to strengthen voluntary rules, she said. WCPFC inspectors in international waters need to gain permission for each inspection from the suspected vessel's flag state before boarding. Rahari said it could be "very complicated" diplomatically if a Chinese coast guard vessel sought to board a Taiwanese fishing boat. Beijing does not recognise Taiwan as a separate country. Chinese officials and the Chinese Coast Guard did not respond to Reuters requests for comment. Australia declined to comment, while Taiwan and the U.S. Coast Guard did not respond to requests for comment. Foreign ministers from 10 Pacific Island nations visited the coastal Chinese city of Xiamen and toured Haixun 06, which can travel 18,500 km (11,470 miles or 10,000 nautical miles) or 60 days without resupply. Papua New Guinea (PNG) foreign minister Justin Tkatchenko said 10 Pacific Island ministers saw the Chinese coast guard demonstrate a maritime emergency drill, but told Reuters they did not discuss Pacific patrols. PNG is negotiating a new defence treaty with Australia, and struck a 2023 security deal with the United States allowing the U.S. Coast Guard to patrol PNG's 2.7 million square kilometre exclusive economic zone. Fiji said it had approved a new maritime security agreement with Australia this week. Nauru's government broadcaster posted photographs on social media of the Haixun 06 drill, which it said "reaffirmed the importance of maritime cooperation between China and Pacific Island nations". Under a security treaty struck in December, Nauru must notify Australia before the Chinese navy comes to port. The U.S. Coast Guard has maritime law enforcement agreements with a dozen Pacific Island nations allowing it to enter nations' exclusive economic zones, and increased its patrols last year. "The key considerations for China is stepping into that space without stepping on other partners toes, because that will then create conflicts within the region and that is something we don't want," Rahari said. Reuters previously reported the first U.S. Coast Guard patrol in Vanuatu's waters saw local officials board several Chinese fishing boats in 2024, finding infringements, which Beijing criticised. Since 2008, Chinese fishing vessels were issued with 158 infringements, or 46% of Chinese boardings by WCPFC inspectors including the U.S., France and Australia, WCPFC data shows. Taiwanese fishing boats were issued 233 infringements.
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
New DWP update on State Pension payments for people not due annual uprating
Nearly half a million people will not get new State Pension payments of up to £230.25 per week this year. Following the 4.1 per cent rise in April, the full New Sate Pension is now worth £921 every four-week payment period, while the full Basic State Pension has increased to £705.80. However, an estimated 453,000 pensioners are living in a country which does not have a reciprocal agreement with the UK Government resulting in them not receiving the annual State Pension uprating. This is despite having paid the necessary amount of National Insurance Contributions to receive the state Pension. Campaigners have fought tirelessly to rectify the policy, but on Thursday the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) confirmed it has 'no plans to review such reciprocal social security agreements'. Pensions Minister Torsten Bell gave the written response to Liberal Democrat MP Liz Jarvis, who asked if the DWP 'plans to review its policy on freezing State Pensions for people who move abroad'. Just last month, campaigners wrote to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney ahead of the state opening of parliament on May 27, calling for an end to the so-called 'Frozen Pensions' scandal which affects more than 100,000 expats living in the country. Campaigners urged the former governor of the Bank of England, to 'insist' that addressing the frozen State Pensions 'must form part of any further trade, defence or cultural agreements between the UK and Canada'. Around the globe, some 442,000 British pensioners are living in a country which does not have a reciprocal agreement with the UK Government resulting in them not receiving the annual State Pension uprating. The result is that many retired expats living in Canada receive such low levels of UK State Pension that they fall under Canadian minimum income thresholds, thus qualifying for Canadian taxpayer-funded benefits. After Australia, the country is the second largest host of UK pensioners impacted by the Frozen Pensions scandal. In the letter to Mr Carney on May 20, the 'End Frozen Pensions' campaign argues that 'bringing an end to this discrimination would reduce Canada's costs,' insisting that ending the Frozen Pensions policy is now 'a matter of fairness, dignity, and economic justice' that is 'long overdue for resolution.' Second World War veteran, Mrs Anne Puckridge, is among the victims of the Frozen Pensions scandal. The 100-year-old moved to Canada in 2001 to be closer to her daughter and receives just £72.50 per week from the UK State Pension. This is less than half the £176.45 weekly rate she would be entitled to if she had remained in the UK, or lived across the border in the USA. Campaigners said the policy has caused her severe emotional distress as, like most other victims, she says she was never told her UK State Pension would be frozen at the point of emigration. As a result, the Canadian government is providing her with additional means-tested financial support to help her afford basic living costs. At the time, Edwina Melville-Gray, Chair of End Frozen Pensions Canada, said: 'It is clear this outdated and deeply hurtful policy is heightening tensions between Canada and the UK." She explained how the State Opening of Parliament was Mr Carney's "chance to set the record straight and insist that it will no longer tolerate paying for British pensioners in Canada while the UK shows no interest in fulfilling its moral duty towards them". The campaigner continued: "Canada more than meets its end of the bargain here by paying out a fully indexed State Pension to all its citizens worldwide, including Canadians in the UK. Mr Carney should insist that if the UK is to meaningfully trade and negotiate with Canada, it must reconsider its own approach to overseas state pensions.' However, despite the letter and turnout of campaigners on the day to have their voices heard, the topic was not raised. The Canadian government has been publicly calling for an end to the 'Frozen Pensions' policy for over four decades and in October last year, a total of 158 Canadian and UK parliamentarians united to urge the Labour Government to redress the situation. Campaigners are urging Prime Minister Carney to leverage this issue ahead of key trade and defence spending negotiations expected between the two countries amid a complex and volatile geopolitical backdrop. The 'End Frozen Pensions' campaign argues: 'Canada fairly adjusts pensions for its citizens living in the UK, but the UK's refusal to enter into a reciprocal agreement not only creates an unjust disparity but also imposes a financial burden on Canadian social services.'
New Statesman
2 hours ago
- New Statesman
Elon Musk's surreal war on Donald Trump will fail
Few predicted Elon Musk's time in the White House would end with him accusing the president of cavorting with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. But here we are. Perhaps it was inevitable. The split between Musk and Trump was fast, public and potentially fuelled by ulterior substances. Musk unleashed an assault on the president's flagship legislation on X last night, called for the president to be impeached and replaced by JD Vance, and polled his followers on whether a third party should be established. He was flinging out tweets to his 220 million followers with relish and abandon. The New York Times reported last week that Musk was inhaling ecstasy, ketamine and magic mushrooms during his time leading Doge at a greater rate than previously thought. That was when he was gutting key departments such as foreign aid and firing thousands of federal workers. Trump never seemed that interested in restructuring government bureaucracy. He let Musk maraud through Washington out of what looked like a personal affection for the erratic tech billionaire. At his farewell press conference in the Oval Office last week, Trump gave Musk a token key to the White House while the Tesla executive stood awkwardly by, sporting a suspicious black eye. In the end, Musk's promise to cut spending by two trillion dollars was made redundant by what he calls the 'Debt Slavery bill', which is predicted to increase the deficit by $2.4 trillion. Musk is convinced the country is facing an imminent debt crisis, a prospect leading to growing alarm within the financial markets. In May, one major credit rating agency downgraded the quality of US debt for the first time since 1917. The split means that Musk's credibility has cratered within the Maga movement. Trump still reigns unchallenged. His grip on Maga is total and most of his fans – regardless of how many retweets Musk can muster – hang on his word with religious fealty. Now, Musk has been exiled from the kingdom. Entering the blacklist in Trumpland neuters any influence a wannabe Maga player might have with the movement. He has been expelled from the fiefdom with his reputation in tatters. It's a warning – if any was needed – that Trump's collaborators get burnt. That said, Musk is not your average lackey. Many wily Republicans on the Hill will remember that he spent nearly $300 million to get Trump elected. Wealth wields power. The Republicans are polling poorly, with the midterms only eighteen months away. Maybe Musk will use his galactic wealth to rally some support within Congress by dangling donations in front of fiscal hawks. Or perhaps he is amputating himself from an administration which he now sees as fiscally incontinent and flirting with default. Within the Maga movement, chalk this down as a defeat for the tech bros in the war against the nationalist populists. The latter celebrated last night. While the war on X unfolded, British ambassador Peter Mandelson toasted the unveiling of a plaque marking the 'Ambassador's sofa' at Maga hideout Butterworth's with restauranteur Raheem Kassam over English sparkling wine. The former Farage advisor then popped outside wielding a cigarette and a pint of Guiness to heckle a passing Tesla Cybertruck. 'Today was really important,' Kassam told me. 'Remember in 2012 the Tea Party effectively got captured by the corporatists. They sold out the Tea Party to the Koch network. Whereas today, Maga showed that it is not for sale. No policy is for sale. No fealty is for sale, and this allows, once again, Donald Trump to be Donald Trump.' Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Butterworth's regular Steve Bannon, whom Kassam used to work for, celebrated his victory against the arch techno-feudalist by calling for South African-born Musk to be deported. Another Bannon agent told me: 'Steve isn't the type to say I told you so, but I told you so'. Control shifted during this surreal war between world powerbrokers. This was the exercise of power as entertainment, delivered in meme-form. It unfurled with the tone of a bitter livestream between rival Minecraft junkies. [See also: The Biden cover-up] Related
