Supreme Court rules in favor of Utah crude oil railway
The Surface Transportation Board's environmental review of the proposed Uinta Basin Railway was proper, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday in an 8-0 decision that overturns a lower court's order that blocked construction of the 88-mile Utah railroad.
The STB in December 2021 approved the project, noting that the transportation merits of the rail line outweighed its potential environmental impacts. The line would be used to transport waxy crude oil from the remote Uinta Basin to a connection with Union Pacific's former Rio Grande main line. From there the crude would be hauled to Gulf Coast refineries.
Eagle County, Colorado, and several environmental groups subsequently filed suit against the STB and the Seven County Infrastructure Coalition, the Utah group seeking to build the railway.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled in 2023 that the STB's 3,600-page environmental review did not consider the railroad's broader impacts, including increased drilling in the Uinta Basin and refining the oil the railroad would haul. The decision vacated the STB's environmental impact statement and its order approving construction.But the Supreme Court said Thursday that the STB's environmental impact statement (EIS), was sufficient and was in line with the National Environmental Policy Act, or NEPA.
'Under NEPA, the Board's EIS did not need to address the environmental effects of upstream oil drilling or downstream oil refining. Rather, it needed to address only the effects of the 88-mile railroad line. And the Board's EIS did so,' Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote.
The 1970 law requires federal agencies to review major construction projects and their 'reasonably foreseeable' environmental impacts.
The Supreme Court said government agencies are only required to consider the direct impacts of the project under review, and that courts should defer to agencies' judgments in environmental and other assessments, known as preemption.'NEPA is a procedural cross-check, not a substantive roadblock. The goal of the law is to inform agency decisionmaking, not to paralyze it,' Kavanaugh wrote.
Kavanaugh noted that the Uinta Basin Railway would give oil producers a more efficient way to reach refineries. 'As of now, oil from the Basin is carried by trucks that must navigate mountain passes on narrow roads, a difficult and slow journey in any season,' he wrote.
'Over the years, some have sought to abuse NEPA by unlawfully turning a procedural tool into an ideological weapon,' STB Chairman Patrick Fuchs told FreightWaves, in an email. 'Today's decision is a victory for common sense, economic growth, and meaningful environmental review. I strongly supported the Board's approval decision and subsequent legal defense, and I am pleased the Supreme Court has upheld the diligent work of the agency for the benefit of the public.'
Justice Neil Gorsuch recused himself from the case because of work he did in private practice for Colorado billionaire Philip Anschutz, whose companies include one involved in oil exploration in Utah.
Subscribe to FreightWaves' Rail e-newsletter and get the latest insights on rail freight right in your inbox.
This railroad has 100 extra locomotives ready to handle a container surge
Baun joins railcar builder Greenbrier as chief commercial officer
Norfolk Southern expands short line interchange improvement program
Rail agenda steams up as short lines blitz Congress
The post Supreme Court rules in favor of Utah crude oil railway appeared first on FreightWaves.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
29 minutes ago
- Fox News
Booker, Cruz spar over threats to US judges in fiery Senate spat
Sens. Cory Booker, D-N.J., and Ted Cruz, R-Texas., sparred Tuesday over the uptick in threats made to federal court judges during President Donald Trump's second term. Their heated standoff comes as federal judges have issued a record number of injunctions against the flurry of executive actions by the president. The testy exchange took place during a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee hearing titled "The Supposedly Least Dangerous Branch: District Judges v. Trump." Cruz, the subcommittee chair, used his remarks at the outset of the hearing to take aim at Democrats on the subcommittee, who he said were "utterly silent" about judicial threats under the Biden administration, including after threats were made against conservative Supreme Court justices. Cruz took aim at Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., for "unleashing" protesters who gathered outside the homes of Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh prior to their decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization – the landmark ruling that overturned a 50-year-old abortion rights precedent – which he later said was ironic given the current "pearl-clutching" stance of Democrats on the panel. His remarks sparked a quick rebuke from Booker, who said, "Something you said is actually dangerous, and it needs to be addressed." "This implication that there was silence [from Democrats on the panel] at a time there were threats on people's houses is absolutely absurd," he continued. "I remember the rhetoric and the comments, the concern from [Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del.]," Booker said. "I actually distinctly remember you, chairman, on more than one occasion, condemning those attacks on Republican-appointed jurists." "To say things like that just feeds the partisanship in this institution, and it feeds the fiery rhetoric. And it's just plain not true," Booker added. In response, Cruz argued the "angry mobs" that appeared outside the homes of conservative Supreme Court justices prior to their decision in Dobbs were in violation of U.S.C. Section 1507. That law prohibits picketing outside the homes of judges or justices' homes in a way that could influence their decision or otherwise obstruct justice. Despite the protests, Cruz said, the Biden-led Justice Department "prosecuted nobody." "I really appreciate that you have now shifted the accusation you made earlier," Booker shot back. "Your accusation was that we were silent in the face of protests at Supreme Court justices' homes. Again, we joined together in a bipartisan way, not only to condemn that but to pass legislation to extend round-the-clock security protection. So if you're saying we didn't criticize –" he started before Cruz interjected. "Did the Biden DOJ go out and arrest a single person under this law?" the Texas lawmaker asked. Booker attempted to respond before Cruz interrupted again, "Did the Biden DOJ arrest even one [person]? Again, the answer is no." Booker attempted once more to respond before Cruz interrupted again, prompting Booker to raise his voice. "I did not interrupt you, sir, I would appreciate it if you would let me finish," he told Cruz. "I am sick and tired of hearing the kind of heated partisan rhetoric, which is one of the reasons why we have such divisions in this country," Booker continued, prompting Cruz to laugh openly in response. "The attacks we see from the president of the United States of America, trolling and dragging judges through is what we should be talking about," Booker said. "I'm simply taking issue with the claim that you made at the top, that people on the Democratic side of the aisle do not care about the safety and the security of judges and said nothing," he continued, adding that the notion that his Democrat colleagues said nothing in the face of Supreme Court justice threats "is a patent lie." The two continued arguing before Cruz said, "Let the record reflect that Spartacus did not answer the question and did not tell us whether the criminal law" under U.S.C. Section 1507 should be enforced, "because he knows the answer is yes." The hearing comes as the number of threats against federal judges has spiked during Trump's second term, which has seen hundreds of federal lawsuits filed in courts across the country seeking to either pause or halt the flurry of sweeping executive orders and actions taken by the president. Trump has repeatedly criticized what he called "activist judges," prompting Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts to issue a rare public warning. The U.S. Marshals Service said last week that it has investigated more than 370 threats against federal judges since Trump's inauguration in January, which is a sharp rise from 2024, when 509 people were investigated during the entire year. Democrats on the panel used Tuesday's hearing to renew requests for the Justice Department and FBI to investigate an uptick in anonymous "pizza deliveries" sent to federal judges, which can be used as a threat or warning to let judges know their home address is known.
Wall Street Journal
34 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
When Donald Trump and Sheldon Whitehouse Agree
President Trump's Truth Social broadside last week against his erstwhile allies in the conservative legal movement was widely panned on the right. But it did have one thrilled follower on the left: Sheldon Whitehouse, the Rhode Island Senator and scourge of the current Supreme Court. 'Trump's mad rant unloads on Court-fixer Leonard Leo—has Trump FINALLY figured out that he was chumped big-time by Leo, McGahn and the creepy billionaires (Koch) who REALLY controlled 'his' judicial appointments? Slow learner,' Mr. Whitehouse tweeted.
CBS News
34 minutes ago
- CBS News
Minneapolis man sentenced to 25.5 years for shooting, killing man who interjected in a fight
A Minneapolis man was sentenced Tuesday to 25.5 years for shooting and killing a man who got involved in a fight with his mother. Michael Garrett, 23, pleaded guilty to one count of second-degree intentional murder on April 28. An autopsy showed that the victim, Dijon Legore-Banks, had been shot eight times. "Dijon's loved ones are in my thoughts as our prosecution comes to an end," Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty said. "Mr. Garrett involved himself in an altercation and escalated it needlessly by restoring to extreme violence. Today's sentence holds him accountable and protects our community." Garrett has 259 days of credit for time already served. Charging documents say the fatal shooting was preceded by a fight between several women on the 1100 block of Morgan Avenue North in Minneapolis. Legore-Banks "interjected" in the fight and said something to one of the women, investigators said. Garrett, whose mother was allegedly involved in the fight, pulled up in a vehicle and shot at Legore-Banks, documents said. Legore-Banks died at a hospital.
