Dean of Guernsey warns of implications if rectory funding axed
The Dean of Guernsey says a proposal to stop ratepayers funding rectories will lead to "significant implications". The States of Guernsey is due to debate a Policy and Resources Committee report on Wednesday linked to a dispute involving Torteval and St Saviour parishes over the maintenance costs of a Church of England rectory.Currently, Guernsey's parishes are required to provide housing for rectors with the costs covered by ratepayers, but two deputies have proposed ending the policy from 2035.The Very Reverend Tim Barker said he respected the "clear resolution of the States", but he cautioned work was needed to "consider the consequences".
'Difficult to justify'
An amendment from Deputies Al Brouard and Susan Aldwell to the Parochial Church Property (Guernsey) Law 2015 called for a requirement for parishes to provide and cover clergy housing costs to be stopped from 2035.The deputies said they felt the obligation to provide rectories free of charge had become "difficult to justify" in the 21st Century.Dean Barker said: "There will be significant implications, primarily for the clergy and their families who will be directly affected by the decision, but also for the Deanery of Guernsey and the work and ministry of our churches."We need to work carefully with the parishes and others to consider the consequences of the States resolution and what happens next."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 days ago
- The Independent
States are rolling out red carpets for data centers. But some lawmakers are pushing back
The explosive growth of the data centers needed to power America 's fast-rising demand for artificial intelligence and cloud computing platforms has spurred states to dangle incentives in hopes of landing an economic bonanza, but it's also eliciting pushback from lawmakers and communities. Activity in state legislatures — and competition for data centers — has been brisk in recent months, amid an intensifying buildout of the energy-hungry data centers and a search for new sites that was ignited by the late 2022 debut of OpenAI's ChatGPT. Many states are offering financial incentives worth tens of millions of dollars. In some cases, those incentives are winning approval, but only after a fight or efforts to require data centers to pay for their own electricity or meet energy efficiency standards. Some state lawmakers have contested the incentives in places where a heavy influx of massive data centers has caused friction with neighboring communities. In large part, the fights revolve around the things that tech companies and data center developers seem to most want: large tracts of land, tax breaks and huge volumes of electricity and water. And their needs are exploding in size: from dozens of megawatts to hundreds of megawatts and from dozens of acres up to hundreds of acres for large-scale data centers sometimes called a hyperscaler. While critics say data centers employ relatively few people and pack little long-term job-creation punch, their advocates say they require a huge number of construction jobs to build, spend enormous sums on goods and local vendors and generate strong tax revenues for local governments. In Pennsylvania, lawmakers are writing legislation to fast-track permitting for data centers. The state is viewed as an up-and-coming data center destination, but there is also a sense that Pennsylvania is missing out on billions of dollars in investment that's landing in other states. 'Pennsylvania has companies that are interested, we have a labor force that is capable and we have a lot of water and natural gas,' said state Rep. Eric Nelson. "That's the winning combination. We just have a bureaucratic process that won't open its doors.' It's been a big year for data centers Kansas approved a new sales tax exemption on goods to build and equip data centers, while Kentucky and Arkansas expanded pre-existing exemptions so that more projects will qualify. Michigan approved one that carries some protections, including requirements to use municipal utility water and clean energy, meet energy-efficiency measures and ensure that it pays for its own electricity. Such tax exemptions are now so widespread — about three dozen states have some version of it — that it is viewed as a must-have for a state to compete. 'It's often a nonstarter if you don't have them, for at least the hyperscalers,' said Andy Cvengros, who helps lead the data center practice at commercial real estate giant JLL. 'It's just such a massive impact on the overall spend of the data center.' Zoning, energy fights often frustrate developers In West Virginia, lawmakers approved a bill to create 'microgrid' districts free from local zoning and electric rate regulations where data centers can procure power from standalone power plants. Gov. Patrick Morrisey, a Republican, called the bill his 'landmark policy proposal' for 2025 to put West Virginia 'in a class of its own to attract new data centers and information technology companies.' Utah and Oklahoma passed laws to make it easier for data center developers to procure their own power supply without going through the grid while Mississippi rolled out tens of millions of dollars in incentives last year to land a pair of Amazon data centers. In South Carolina, Gov. Henry McMaster signed legislation earlier this month that eased regulations to speed up power plant construction to meet demand from data centers, including a massive Facebook facility. The final bill was fought by some lawmakers who say they worried about data centers using disproportionate amounts of water, taking up large tracts of land and forcing regular ratepayers to finance the cost of new power plants. 'I do not like that we're making customers pay for two power plants when they only need one,' Senate Majority Leader Shane Massey told colleagues during floor debate. Still, state Sen. Russell Ott suggested that data centers should be viewed like any other electricity customer because they reflect a society that is 'addicted' to electricity and are 'filling that need and that desire of what we all want. And we're all guilty of it. We're all responsible for it.' Some lawmakers are hesitant In data center hotspots, some lawmakers are pushing back. Lawmakers in Oregon are advancing legislation to order utility regulators to ensure data centers pay the cost of power plants and power lines necessary to serve them. Georgia lawmakers are debating a similar bill. In Virginia, the most heavily developed data center zone in the U.S., Gov. Glenn Youngkin vetoed a bill that would have forced more disclosures from data center developers about their site's noise pollution and water use. In Texas, which endured a deadly winter blackout in 2021, lawmakers are wrestling with how to protect the state's electric grid from fast-growing data center demand. Lawmakers still want to attract data centers, but a bill that would speed up direct hookups between data centers and power plants has provisions that are drawing protests from business groups. Those provisions would give utility regulators new authority to approve those agreements and order big electric users such as data centers to switch to backup generators in a power emergency. Walt Baum, the CEO of Powering Texans, which represents competitive power plant owners, warned lawmakers that those provisions might be making data center developers hesitant to do business in Texas. 'You've seen a lot of new announcements in other states and over the last several months and not as much here in Texas," Baum told House members during a May 7 committee hearing. "I think everybody right now is in a waiting pattern and I worry that we could be losing to other states while that waiting pattern is happening.' ___
The Independent
5 days ago
- The Independent
Judge spares Trump from massive DOGE lawsuit — leaving Elon Musk holding the bag for ‘unauthorized role'
Donald Trump has been dropped from a lawsuit accusing his administration of illegally wielding power to slash government agencies and purge the federal workforce. But a federal judge won't let Elon Musk escape the case. Musk — tapped by the president to lead the so-called Department of Government Efficiency — is facing a lawsuit from a group of 14 states arguing that the world's wealthiest person lacks any legal authority to carry out mass firings, terminate grants and access sensitive government information and taxpayer data. Attorneys for the Trump administration claimed Musk is only serving a temporary advisory role as a 'special government employee' serving under the president. But District Judge Tanya Chutkan shot down the White House's attempt to 'minimize' his role as 'a mere advisor without any formal authority.' Musk instead 'occupies a continuing position' and 'exercises significant authority,' all without 'proper appointment' by Congress, Chutkan wrote. The states suing the administration plausibly allege that Musk 'makes decisions about 'federal expenditures, contracts, government property, and the very existence of federal agencies,'' she added. DOGE caused 'financial harm' to states by slashing federal funding while gaining 'unauthorized access' to 'private and proprietary information,' according to the lawsuit. 'The Constitution does not permit the Executive to commandeer the entire appointments power by unilaterally creating a federal agency pursuant to Executive Order and insulating its principal officer from the Constitution as an 'advisor' in name only,' Chutkan wrote. Musk and Trump have characterized DOGE — operating as the U.S. Doge Service, formerly the U.S. Digital Service — as 'tech support' to end 'waste, fraud and abuse.' His DOGE agents, or federal workers doing work on its behalf, are deployed across all federal agencies Musk's position as a 'special government employee' is limited to 130 days within the year, which would mean the tech billionaire could no longer be working at the White House by the end of this month. But White House officials told The Independent that those working hours don't fall neatly within the calendar. Musk is expected to remain a fixture within the administration, though he announced he plans to limit his time in Washington, D.C. — and how much money he spends on political campaigns — to focus on his company Tesla, which saw profits drop by 71 percent within the first three months of the year. The lawsuit is among several accusing the Trump administration of unconstitutionally running roughshod through federal agencies. That breakneck effort to keep up with DOGE's actions in court has been met with what appears to be attempts from administration officials to obfuscate the true nature of Musk's role — or scramble to name someone else in charge. After weeks of secrecy in court and refusals from the White House to answer who, exactly, was running DOGE, reporters were sent a message on February 25 from an unnamed White House spokesperson naming Amy Gleason as the DOGE administrator. Administration officials have insisted that Musk is not the administrator for DOGE. Trump, however, has said the exact opposite. Musk has 'no actual or formal authority to make government decisions himself,' according to a sworn statement from a senior White House official on February 18. The next day, Trump himself said he 'signed an order creating the Department of Government Efficiency, and put a man named Elon Musk in charge.' In a statement, New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez, who brought the case against DOGE, called Judge Chutkan's decision 'an important milestone for preserving America's system of checks and balances.' 'We are proud to move this case forward and help bring Elon Musk's reign of terror to an end,' he added.
The Guardian
26-05-2025
- The Guardian
Monday briefing: How racial justice is going backwards, five years on from the killing of George Floyd
Good morning. I'm Aamna Mohdin, the Guardian's community affairs correspondent, and I'll be bringing you First Edition alongside Archie over the next couple of months. It's been five years since George Floyd's agonising cry – 'I can't breathe' – sent shockwaves around the world. His killing by a white police officer sparked what may have been the largest social movement in US history, and protests in the UK were the most widespread since the abolition of slavery. Millions took to the streets, led by young people, to assert the power of three simple words: Black Lives Matter. More than 260 towns and cities across the UK held protests in June and July 2020, from Monmouth in south Wales to Shetland in Scotland. An unprecedented reckoning that featured statements of solidarity from institutions, including the Bank of England and Cambridge university, and pledges to pay reparations by the Church of England, was followed by an intense backlash. Anti-migrant rioters attacked mosques and set fire to asylum hotels. Donald Trump returned to the US presidency last year and Reform UK surged in this month's local elections, vowing to dismantle equality initiatives. How did we get here? To try to answer that, I worked with the Guardian's community affairs correspondent in Manchester, Chris Osuh, to analyse nearly 600 recommendations across 12 government-commissioned race reports dating back to 1981. What we found was a pattern of symbolic progress and systemic inaction. For today's newsletter, I spoke to Chris about how this moment fits into the UK's long and hostile history of responding to racial reckoning. That's after the headlines. Gaza | Israeli strikes over the past 24 hours have killed at least 38 people in Gaza, health officials in the Palestinian territory have said, bringing the death toll to more than 100 in less than three days. Meanwhile, reports emerged that a doctor caring for severely wounded babies, Alaa al-Najjar, lost nine of her 10 children in an Israeli strike. Ukraine | Donald Trump has warned that if Vladimir Putin attempts to conquer all of Ukraine, it will lead to the 'downfall' of Russia, while also criticising Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a Sunday night post on Truth Social. Trump said he was considering new sanctions, saying of Putin: 'He's killing a lot of people. What the hell happened to him?' Banking | Fred 'the Shred' Goodwin, the disgraced ex-boss of Royal Bank of Scotland, is estimated to be receiving an annual pension worth nearly £600,000, as the government prepares to declare a £10bn loss after selling its final stake. The banking group, now known as NatWest, is expected to return to full private ownership within days. Europe | The bodies of five skiers have been found in the mountains near Switzerland's luxury resort of Zermatt, police said. A helicopter was sent to survey the area around the Rimpfischhorn after climbers alerted authorities to abandoned skis near the summit on Saturday. Media | Alan Yentob, the former BBC executive and TV presenter, has died at the age of 78, his family has announced. His wife, Philippa Walker, said: 'He was curious, funny, annoying, late and creative in every cell of his body. But more than that, he was the kindest of men and a profoundly moral man.' At the height of the 2020 UK protests, then prime minister Boris Johnson announced a new inquiry into racial disparities. The response was met with widespread frustration, including from David Lammy, now the foreign secretary, who pointed out that the UK had already produced numerous inquiries on the subject (including his own) and whose recommendations remained unimplemented. This cycle is depressingly familiar. When there's a riot, an uprising, or a national tragedy, the government commissions an inquiry. These often produce profound conclusions, only to be quietly shelved. After the 1981 Brixton riots, there was the Scarman inquiry. After the racist murder of Stephen Lawrence, the Macpherson report, which famously concluded the Met Police was 'institutionally racist'. After the 2001 northern riots, the Cantle report, and after the Windrush scandal, there was the 2018 Windrush review. Guardian analysis found fewer than a third of those reports' recommendations have been fully actioned, and that progress on a number of recommendations has been reversed or significantly eroded during years of government austerity policies. The data shows that around a third of recommendations were not implemented at all. The remainder were either partially enacted or deemed not measurable. Even where implementation was claimed, changes were often fragmented, underfunded, or lacked clear oversight and accountability. The findings led some of the commissioners involved to urge ministers to finally break this 'doom loop' of inaction. A waste of time? The analysis is stark and left me wondering about the intent of holding these types of inquiries. Aamna: Were you surprised by the findings? Chris: Not really. It fits the pattern: the process of holding an inquiry becomes more important than its conclusions. These reports often contain powerful findings, but they don't lead to action. Aamna: I can't help but wonder whether these inquiries are a waste of time? Chris: I wouldn't say that. They serve an important purpose in putting these issues on the public record. They make it impossible to deny that these disparities exist. But I agree that we need to move beyond documenting the problem and start delivering change. Aamna: What I found particularly interesting is that some of the recommendations focused on unconscious bias training, celebrating the UK's diverse communities, as well as attempts to increase representation of the workforce. These became cornerstones of corporate and public sector equality and inclusion strategies. The pendulum swings Five years ago, Keir Starmer, newly appointed leader of the Labour party, took the knee in solidarity with Black Lives Matter. But earlier this month, Starmer the prime minister was accused of echoing Enoch Powell after warning, during the launch of the government's immigration white paper, that Britain risked becoming an 'island of strangers'. His claim that 'uncontrolled' migration had caused 'incalculable' damage to British society marked a watershed moment in Labour's relationship with Black and Asian voters. The contrast between the two Starmers captures just how sharply the political pendulum has swung to the right, in both the UK and the US, on issues of racial justice. Institutions that once rushed to issue statements of solidarity with ethnic minority communities are now retreating. Industry experts describe a chilling effect on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) efforts. The Bank of England's regulatory arm, the Prudential Regulation Authority, and the Financial Conduct Authority recently announced they would not impose new diversity rules on financial firms, opting instead to back voluntary industry-led initiatives. Meanwhile, pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline, BT and Lloyds Banking Group have all announced cutbacks to diversity targets and inclusion programmes. Wider ramifications The picture appears to show the consequences of this rollback will likely affect many different groups. Aamna: What happens next, and how far back might the backlash go? Chris: I'm not sure people realise just how far-reaching the fallout from this backlash against DEI will be. There's a perception that, since George Floyd's murder, efforts to tackle inequality have somehow meant Black people are being favoured over white people. But what's often missed is that DEI has benefited a wide range of groups across society. Rolling back DEI doesn't just impact racial equality. It has serious consequences for all kinds of workers, from women's rights to disability inclusion. The conversation may have started with race, but the broader goal was always to make workplaces more inclusive across the board. Aamna: Even left wing critics of DEI, who argue it's often a shallow, corporate box-ticking exercise, are sounding the alarm. They see the backlash not just as opposition to diversity, but part of a deeper ideological project: an attempt to resegregate our economy and society. Chris: Exactly. The signs are there that dismantling DEI is part of a wider, more aggressively rightwing political agenda. Aamna: So lots to be cheerful about, then. Chris: It's easy to feel frightened by all this. But there are reasons for hope. In the UK, you might hear a particular narrative from government or politicians, but they can't control everything. There are businesses and institutions still determined to stay the course, despite the reactionary noise. And industry leaders I spoke to said that despite the backlash, DEI will likely survive in a 'rebranded' form in the UK. Aamna: I want to end on something I've been thinking about a lot: what does it mean to be a Black journalist covering this moment? So many people fought hard for our jobs, and for our specialisms to be taken seriously. I'm reminded of what Gary Younge once said that we've seen so many dogs biting people we've become numb to it, yet we're still trained to chase the more spectacular 'man bites dog' stories. The real scandal is being overlooked: dogs keep biting men, again and again. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Chris: In so much of the media, Black experiences are talked about rather than expressed by Black people themselves. There's a constant, low hum of discrimination, it is so normalised it often goes unremarked. Its important to be able to challenge that and to call out injustice. But there's also great deal of positivity about minority communities in Britain, particularly at this time, that is not covered, so to be able to also celebrate the tangible, joyful things our communities achieve is a real privilege. Read more: Only a third of recommendations to tackle endemic racism in UK implemented Five years on from Black Lives Matter, has the UK made progress on ethnic equalities? George Floyd's family fights for sacred ground where he took his last breath: 'That's my blood' One should know to never miss Nesrine Malik's column. But this morning's piece on the world's changing tone on Israel, and whether this 'moment' will really mean anything for the people of Gaza after months of violence, is a must-read. Charlie Lindlar, acting deputy editor, newsletters For Saturday magazine, I wrote about my son Max, who changed how I think about the world. It took absolutely ages, frankly, so I hope you'll read it. Hardcore Max enthusiasts may wish to listen to the episode of Today in Focus below. Archie Remember Elon Musk? At one point you couldn't go a day without reading about the richest man alive's latest plan to scythe away at the US government – so why has he recently gone so quiet? David Smith examines how Musk slipped out of Trump's inner circle. Charlie Heather Stewart has a perceptive column on Labour's winter fuel U-turn, and a looming decision about whether to scrap the two-child benefit cap. As much as the vacillation, she argues, the problem is: has Keir Starmer given voters any sense of what he is for? Archie Heterosexual artists who toy with sexuality, along with straight actors who play gay characters, are often accused of 'queerbaiting' – or using the supposed cache of queer identity. But does such a thing really matter, as long as LGBTQ+ stories get told? Ryan Gilbey explores in this fascinating extract from his new book. Charlie Football | On a frantic final day of the Premier League: after drawing with Crystal Palace, Liverpool finally lifted the Premier League trophy, weeks after mathematically securing the title; Chelsea beat Nottingham Forest to a secure top-five spot and end Forest's Champions League dream. Aston Villa's hopes for the Champions league spot ended in fury after a controversial loss to Manchester United; and relegation-bound Leicester saw their sorry season limp to a close with a 2-0 defeat at Bournemouth. All the match reports are here. Formula One | Lando Norris won the Monaco Grand Prix for McLaren, closing the gap on teammate Oscar Piastri in the drivers' championship race. His fellow driver claimed third spot on the podium. Football | After 26 years as the host of Match of the Day, an emotional Gary Lineker bade farewell to his career at the BBC on Sunday night. 'Rather like my football career, everyone else did the hard work and I got the plaudits,' he said. 'It's been utterly joyous.' 'Decades of failure to act on racism inquiries leaves UK in 'doom loop'' is the splash on the Guardian today. 'Scandal of fat cats on first ever NHS rich list,' says the Daily Mail, while the Mirror highlights fresh strikes in the Ukrainian capital, with: 'Trump's silence did this.' 'Ministers weigh delay to soften welfare cuts,' is the main focus at the Times, as the Express delves into 'Labour's fuel U-turn in total chaos.' Meanwhile the i has: 'HS2 plunged into fresh chaos as major tax fraud claims emerge.' 'Oil chiefs warn of end to shale boom as prices fall and Opec boosts output,' is the lead story over at the Financial Times, while the Telegraph looks across the pond with 'Trump pressures PM over Connolly.' My son Max, the boy who came back to life Archie Bland tells Helen Pidd the story of the day his seven-week-old son stopped breathing, and the life he has led in the two years since. A bit of good news to remind you that the world's not all bad Casey Johnston found empowerment in weightlifting after years of restrictive dieting and exhausting cardio. Strength training reshaped her relationship with food, eliminated cravings, and helped her challenge toxic fitness culture. Her new book, A Physical Education, encourages people to reconnect with their bodies beyond societal pressures. Johnston puts the emphasis on trusting your own experience and listening to your body. Even during pregnancy, Johnston defied outdated fitness advice, advocating for a sustainable, intuitive approach to health. Like many women she has found a new confidence by getting strong in the gym. And finally, the Guardian's puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply
