
‘Sextortion' ring targeting thousands of minors worldwide was just disrupted by the FBI, officials say
It was news that Pauline Stuart thought might never come: The man believed to be responsible for the death of her teenage son years earlier is finally behind bars.
'It still seems a little unreal that it happened,' she told CNN on Thursday. 'I kind of believed that it would never happen, but law enforcement never gave up.'
The suspect, Alfred Kassi, was recently arrested in his native country of Côte d'Ivoire in West Africa, more than 7,000 miles away from the Northern California home where Stuart's 17-year-old son, Ryan Last, died by suicide in 2022.
US federal prosecutors say that Kassi and a group of three accomplices were all arrested in Côte d'Ivoire, charged for their alleged 'role in an international 'sextortion' scheme that targeted thousands of victims, including minors, throughout the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, France, Spain, and Italy.'
Because Côte d'Ivoire does not extradite its citizens to other countries, Kassi and his alleged accomplices will be prosecuted there under the nation's cybercrime laws, US officials said. CNN is attempting to determine if the four individuals have legal representation.
Sextortion is a scheme where victims, including minors, are deceived into sending online perpetrators explicit images, and then blackmailed in exchange for money or the continued production of additional graphic content.
US law enforcement agencies have seen an explosion in complaints from victims, leading the FBI to ramp up a campaign to warn parents from coast to coast.
Ryan Last received a message on a school night in February 2022 from someone he believed to be a girl.
Within hours, the 17-year-old, straight-A student and Boy Scout had died by suicide.
'Somebody reached out to him pretending to be a girl, and they started a conversation,' Stuart previously told CNN, fighting back tears as she described what happened to her son days after she and Ryan had finished visiting several colleges he was considering attending after high school.
The online conversation quickly grew intimate and then turned criminal.
The scammer – posing as a young girl – sent Ryan a nude photo and then asked Ryan to share an explicit image of himself in return. Immediately after Ryan shared an intimate photo of his own, the cybercriminal demanded $5,000, threatening to make the photo public and send it to Ryan's family and friends.
The San Jose, California, teen told the cybercriminal he could not pay the full amount, and the demand was ultimately lowered to a fraction of the original figure – $150. But after paying the scammers from his college savings, Stuart said, 'They kept demanding more and more and putting lots of continued pressure on him.'
At the time, Stuart knew none of what her son was experiencing. She learned the details after law enforcement investigators reconstructed the events leading up to his death.
She had said goodnight to Ryan at 10 p.m. and described him as her usually happy son. By 2 a.m., he had been scammed and taken his life. Ryan left behind a suicide note describing how embarrassed he was for himself and the family.
'He really, truly thought in that time that there wasn't a way to get by if those pictures were actually posted online,' Stuart said. 'His note showed he was absolutely terrified. No child should have to be that scared.'
In announcing the new arrests in the case, the Justice Department said: 'At the time of his arrest, Kassi allegedly still had the sextortion messages he sent to (Ryan) in February 2022 on his phone.'
Medical experts say there's a key reason why young males are especially vulnerable to sextortion-related scams.
'Teen brains are still developing,' said Dr. Scott Hadland, chief of adolescent medicine at Mass General for Children in Boston. 'So when something catastrophic happens, like a personal picture is released to people online, it's hard for them to look past that moment and understand that in the big scheme of things they'll be able to get through this.'
Hadland said there are steps parents can take to help safeguard their kids from online harm.
'The most important thing that a parent should do with their teen is try to understand what they're doing online,' Hadland said. 'You want to know when they're going online, who they're interacting with, what platforms they're using. Are they being approached by people that they don't know, are they experiencing pressure to share information or photos?'
It's critical, Hadland added, that parents specifically warn teens of scams like sextortion, without shaming them.
'You want to make it clear that they can talk to you if they have done something, or they feel like they've made a mistake,' he said.
Ryan's mom agrees.
'You need to talk to your kids because we need to make them aware of it,' Stuart said.
The FBI was assisted in the investigation by San Jose police, the US State Department and the social media company Meta, which prosecutors said provided 'critical information' that helped identify the suspects.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UK judge warns of risk to justice after lawyers cited fake AI-generated cases in court
LONDON (AP) — Lawyers have cited fake cases generated by artificial intelligence in court proceedings in England, a judge has said — warning that attorneys could be prosecuted if they don't check the accuracy of their research. High Court justice Victoria Sharp said the misuse of AI has 'serious implications for the administration of justice and public confidence in the justice system.' In the latest example of how judicial systems around the world are grappling with how to handle the increasing presence of artificial intelligence in court, Sharp and fellow judge Jeremy Johnson chastised lawyers in two recent cases in a ruling on Friday. They were asked to rule after lower court judges raised concerns about 'suspected use by lawyers of generative artificial intelligence tools to produce written legal arguments or witness statements which are not then checked,' leading to false information being put before the court. In a ruling written by Sharp, the judges said that in a 90 million pound ($120 million) lawsuit over an alleged breach of a financing agreement involving the Qatar National Bank, a lawyer cited 18 cases that did not exist. The client in the case, Hamad Al-Haroun, apologized for unintentionally misleading the court with false information produced by publicly available AI tools, and said he was responsible, rather than his solicitor Abid Hussain. But Sharp said it was 'extraordinary that the lawyer was relying on the client for the accuracy of their legal research, rather than the other way around.' In the other incident, a lawyer cited five fake cases in a tenant's housing claim against the London Borough of Haringey. Barrister Sarah Forey denied using AI, but Sharp said she had 'not provided to the court a coherent explanation for what happened.' The judges referred the lawyers in both cases to their professional regulators, but did not take more serious action. Sharp said providing false material as if it were genuine could be considered contempt of court or, in the 'most egregious cases,' perverting the course of justice, which carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. She said in the judgment that AI is a 'powerful technology' and a 'useful tool' for the law. 'Artificial intelligence is a tool that carries with it risks as well as opportunities,' the judge said. 'Its use must take place therefore with an appropriate degree of oversight, and within a regulatory framework that ensures compliance with well-established professional and ethical standards if public confidence in the administration of justice is to be maintained.' Jill Lawless, The Associated Press Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


CNET
an hour ago
- CNET
Is It Worth Reporting Scams? Why I Do and Why You Should Too
Reporting fraud to the FTC and the FBI helps educate the public and can help authorities catch at CNET commonly suggest victims contact the Federal Trade Commission or the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center to share their experience if they've endured any type of fraud or identity theft. But even if you didn't suffer monetary loss or mistakenly coughed up your personal information — like your Social Security number — you should still report a scam. According to the FTC, only 38% of fraud reports to the agency in 2024 involved monetary losses. Fraud reports help the FTC and FBI inform and educate the public about popular scams, and they aid local and federal authorities in catching criminals. The latter especially is why I've reported fraud in the past, even though I didn't lose money. The scam on social media was just so clever, I thought others may fall for it because I almost did. If you fall victim to a scam, there are other steps you can take, like signing up for identity theft protection, freezing your credit reports or reaching out to your bank or credit card company to recover stolen funds. Just don't forget to let the FTC and FBI know about it. Why should you report instances of fraud? When you report fraud, you're being a good samaritan, and you may help reduce the chances of a scam hurting someone else. Both the FTC and the FBI's IC3 division study trends and update the public about popular swindles orchestrated by cybercriminals using information provided by everyday Americans. Some popular scams the agencies have warned about in recent months include toll road scams, fake Postal Service texts about online orders and cons related to hurricane relief. "The more information the FTC and IC3 receive, the better statistics they can get and use to alert consumers," said Chelsea Binns, a certified fraud examiner and associate professor at CUNY John Jay College of Criminal Justice. The FTC and IC3 also release annual reports that detail trends from the previous year using submitted complaints. Data is broken down by age, state, the frequency of specific crimes and dollars lost to each fraud type. Both agencies allow consumers to receive email alerts about popular scams year-round. To sign up for FTC alerts, click here. To sign up for IC3 alerts, click here. The FTC and IC3 also work with law enforcement to help catch cybercriminals. When you file a report with the FTC, it's added to its Consumer Sentinel database, which 2,800 federal, state, and local law enforcement partners across the country can access. Trained IC3 analysts similarly review and research complaints and pass along information to authorities. "This is how they can potentially build cases against fraudsters," Binns said. How do I report fraud to the FTC and FBI? You can report scams to the FTC at Cyber-related crimes should also be reported to IC3 at Combined, these agencies received over 3.4 million complaints last year. Keep in mind it's unlikely that you'll hear from the FTC or IC3 after you file a report, despite your complaint being used to corroborate information or inform trends. If someone posing as a government official reaches out to you and demands money, offers you a prize or threatens to arrest you, it's a scam. If you're a victim of identity theft, a specific category of fraud, you can report your case to the FTC at or by calling 1-877-438-4338. The FTC will lay out steps to recover your identity based on the information you provide. Each of these steps, like calling bill collectors and contacting bank fraud departments, can be time-consuming and may cost you money, especially if you have a lawyer handle it for you. If you have an identity theft protection service with white glove restoration services, this checklist can be completed for you. Can I get my money back after a scam? Unauthorized debit and credit card purchases are usually easier to reverse. But if you send money to scammers yourself, like in a gold bar scam, then getting your money back is more difficult. You should contact your bank immediately so they can potentially cancel a transaction. In cases where cryptocurrency is involved, payments are pretty much irreversible. Depending on the type of fraud you suffered, you'll want to take basic steps like changing your password, enrolling in two-factor authentication and turning on alerts for purchases made on your credit and debit cards. You should also consider deleting saved payment info from websites, Binns said. In the weeks and months after falling victim to fraud, it's essential to be on guard against any stranger who contacts you promising to get your money back. "What will happen is the original fraudster will come to you posing as an organization or service that is going to help you recover the funds you've lost," she said. "And, in turn, it'll just be another scam."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
NEWS OF THE WEEK: Sean 'Diddy' Combs accuser sues Harvey Weinstein for sexual assault
Crystal McKinney, a former model, accused the disgraced movie mogul of sexually assaulting her and a friend at a hotel in New York City in 2003. The lawsuit against Weinstein was first filed anonymously on 28 February. It claimed that a modelling company executive set up a meeting for McKinney to "discuss a potential business opportunity" with Weinstein one evening on the pretence that meeting Weinstein would allow McKinney to "make it big". In her lawsuit, she alleged that the executive told her, "Don't f**k him until he puts you in a movie'.