JSW Group's Energy Business Chooses Wrench SmartProject PMIS Over Global Brands
PNN
Bengaluru (Karnataka) [India], May 22: JSW Energy Limited, one of India's leading renewable energy and power companies, has selected the Wrench SmartProject Project Management Information System (PMIS) after an intensive one-year evaluation of nine leading global PMIS solutions.
According to Harish Parihar, India Business Head at Wrench Solutions, "JSW was looking for a system that would enable an integrated project management information system capable of proactively monitoring their projects and consolidating project data across various software systems. They found that the solution designed by Wrench was the most optimal for their needs."
Jigishu Shah, Head-IPMS, JSW Energy, said, "We had very stringent criteria, and Wrench met those, surpassed others based on industry reference. Their domain knowledge and track record in the industry are impressive, and we look forward to using SmartProject PMIS on all our upcoming renewable projects with progressively scaling up to group level."
K.V. Daniel, CEO of Wrench Solutions, added, "We're delighted to welcome JSW to the Wrench family. I'm confident our solution will help them plan, manage, and execute deliverables in an integrated and cohesive way, improving outcomes across all aspects of the project cycle--including data management, collaboration, progress tracking, risk and issue management, forecasting, quality, safety, and more. Ultimately, it will enable them to deliver every project on time and on budget."
Wrench will initially roll out SmartProject PMIS across JSW's portfolio of wind and solar projects, with plans to progressively expand it to other group companies.
(ADVERTORIAL DISCLAIMER: The above press release has been provided by PNN. ANI will not be responsible in any way for the content of the same)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
10 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
Insolvency regime needs hard reform
The Supreme Court's recent annulment of JSW Steel's Rs 19,700-crore acquisition of Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd (BPSL) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) has reignited a deeper question about the balance between legal form and economic function. The Court's reasoning was sound: material deviations from the approved resolution plan were made without returning to the Committee of Creditors (CoC) or the NCLT for consent. Legally, the process mattered. But the implications of this decision go far beyond legality. They touch the foundations of India's financial case serves as a reminder that while India's insolvency regime has made significant progress, the broader financial infrastructure on which it relies remains incomplete. The JSW-BPSL outcome isn't a failure of law; it's a signal that the institutions surrounding it must evolve to support more complex economic resolution plan used a Special Purpose Vehicle, a standard acquisition structure, and financed part of the deal through Optionally Convertible Debentures, an established instrument globally. Yet, under Indian insolvency procedure, such post-approval changes must receive renewed creditor and tribunal consent. The absence of that step rendered the plan invalid, despite repayment having message isn't one of malfeasance or manipulation, but of a system that hasn't yet adapted to the evolving needs of modern restructuring. JSW acted within widely accepted financial logic but discovered that process constraints flexibility. The broader lesson is that strategic capital may hesitate to engage with distressed assets unless resolution mechanisms allow for well-regulated innovation. That holds consequences not only for bidders but also lenders, employees, and the JSW case reveals the need for deeper institutional capacity in insolvency governance. The CoC, composed mainly of banks, brings financial skin in the game, but often lacks the commercial restructuring expertise to evaluate unconventional plans. Meanwhile, the NCLT, pivotal to resolution, continues to face resource to advanced economies, where restructuring decisions are shaped by capital market actors, specialist advisers, and commercial courts, India's process leans heavily on legal formalism. India must bring in independent expertise and strengthen the interplay between legal and financial perspectives to enable effective resolution. Encouragingly, these gaps are not insurmountable; they are reform out, this episode reflects a broader challenge in India's financial evolution. The post-liberalisation decision to convert Development Finance Institutions into commercial banks was bold, but it assumed the rise of a vibrant corporate bond market. That market remains most long-term credit still flows through banks and NBFCs, intermediaries not designed to handle complex risk-pricing over time. Corporate bond issuances are often private, illiquid, and difficult to trade. The result is that bankruptcy resolution ends up doing work that well-functioning capital markets would normally share: absorbing risk, repricing assets, and enabling JSW case demonstrates that even when operations resume and creditors are paid, a procedural lapse can unwind a resolution. For capital to engage sustainably, investors need assurance not just of legality, but of must solution is not to weaken the IBC but to fortify it with institutional and market reforms. A regulated, liquid secondary market for distressed debt would allow for dynamic pricing, risk-sharing, and investor entry without the delays of judicial vital is enhancing the capability of the NCLT. Resolution decisions with major economic impact should benefit from commercial expertise and capital market insight. The process must evolve beyond a legal tribunal into a financially informed once a resolution plan is approved and executed in good faith, it should enjoy legal stability, subject to apparent exceptions like fraud. This would strengthen investor trust. And as India continues its financial modernisation, it's worth reconsidering the current ban on leveraged buyouts, which are globally standard tools that, if properly regulated, can enable efficient asset thoughtful financial structuring should be seen not as a risk, but as a route to economic recovery. Mergers and acquisitions during insolvency are not loopholes but part of the JSW-BPSL episode is not a story of legal overreach or corporate miscalculation; it is a moment of reckoning for how far India's financial ecosystem has come and how much farther it needs to go. It calls for the next chapter of reform: one that builds out institutional capacity, deepens capital markets, and ensures that law and finance move in step, not in conflict. India has made bold strides in building an insolvency regime. With the right reforms, the regime can now deliver not just resolution but real renewal..(The writer teaches finance at IIT Kharagpur)
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
JSW Steel Share Price Live Updates: JSW Steel's performance shows a slight negative shift
Stay up-to-date with the JSW Steel Stock Liveblog, your trusted source for real-time updates and thorough analysis of a prominent stock. Explore the latest details on JSW Steel, including: Last traded price 968.55, Market capitalization: 236854.44, Volume: 2398032, Price-to-earnings ratio 67.6, Earnings per share 14.33. Get a comprehensive understanding of JSW Steel with our coverage of both fundamental and technical indicators. Stay informed about breaking news that can have a significant impact on JSW Steel's performance. Our expert opinions and recommendations empower you to make well-informed investment choices. Trust the JSW Steel Stock Liveblog to keep you informed and equipped in the dynamic market landscape. The data points are updated as on 08:43:25 AM IST, 05 Jun 2025 Show more Show less
Time of India
3 days ago
- Time of India
New Tajpur port tender in mths; JSW, DP World may bid
K olkata: The new tender for the Tajpur deep sea port would be floated in a few months and JSW, DP World and Port of Singapore may be interested in the project, sources said on Tuesday. This comes after the Bengal cabinet on Monday said it would issue a fresh tender for the project, effectively scrapping the first tender that had gone to Adani Ports and SEZ (APSEZ) in 2021. Sources said the state decided on a fresh tender because necessary clearances from the Centre were not received. In 2021, when the first tender was floated, JSW competed with APSEZ but lost by a narrow margin. JSW currently has a special focus on airport and port infrastructure and has already expressed its interest in Andal airport, now run by Bengal Aerotropolis Ltd. DP World and Port of Singapore had expressed interest in the Tajpur project in 2021 as well. According to the 2021 tender, which valued the project at Rs 25,000 crore, the successful bidder was to be given 125 acres of seafront to develop the port.
