Tulsi Gabbard, Pete Hegseth out: Meet Trump's 'Tier One' group deciding on Iran
Nobody is discussing anything on Iran with Pete Hegseth or Tulsi Gabbard, claimed reports.
As President Donald Trump weighs in on the Middle East crisis, dropping all indications that he may strike Iran, reports claimed that he is relying on a high-profile group of Cabinet picks and not those who are supposed to be advising him by the virtue of their posts: Defense secretary
Pete Hegseth
and Director of National Intelligence
Tulsi Gabbard
. Instead, Trump is leaning more on Vice President JD Vance, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine, Secretary of State
Marco Rubio
and CIA Director John Ratcliffe.
This group of four is also being called the "Tier One Group". Another crucial member is Army Gen Michael Erik Kurilla, commander of U.S. Central Command, which has operational authority for the Middle East.
Why Hegseth, Tulsi Gabbard sidelined? 'Experience over star power'
Pete Hegseth served in Afghanistan, Iraq and Guantanamo Bay, Cuba but he is more of an ex-Fox star. Tulsi Gabbard is a war veteran but she has apparently upset Trump by issuing a video where she spoke against fresh conflicts and said "political elite warmongers" are carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers.
The Washington Post reported that Trump even confronted Gabbard at a White House meeting while others were present and said: "I saw the video, and I didn't like it."
In March, Gabbard testified that US intelligence agencies asserted that Iran has not started a nuclear weapons program. Trump recently shot down the remark and said he doesn't care what Tulsi Gabbard said. Trump said he thinks Iran is very close to having one nuclear program.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
[Click Here] - 2025 Top Trending Search - Local network access
Esseps
Learn More
Undo
Both Hegseth and Gabbard camps downplayed their diminishing importance. Gabbard said she and the president were on the same page. But Gabbard was not there when Trump held a meeting on June 8 at Camp David presidential retreat. Insiders believe Trump is prioritizing experience over star power.
Pentagon chief spokesman Sean Parnell said it is not true that Hegseth had been sidelined. 'The Secretary is speaking with the President multiple times a day each day and has been with the President in the Situation Room this week,' Parnell said in a statement. 'Secretary Hegseth is providing the leadership the Department of Defense and our Armed Forces need, and he will continue to work diligently in support of
President Trump
's peace through strength agenda.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Shipwrecks: HC raises concern over state forming panel to negotiate claim details with vessel owners
Kochi: High court on Thursday raised concerns over the state govt forming a committee to negotiate compensation details with the owners of MSC ELSA 3, the cargo vessel which capsized off the Kerala coast. A bench of Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Basant Balaji observed that since the state proposes to invoke the high court's admiralty jurisdiction to seek compensation, it may be appropriate to defer the negotiation process for the time being. The observation came while HC was hearing public interest litigations filed by former MP T N Prathapan and Ummer Ottummal of Malappuram, seeking a comprehensive compensation package for fishermen and other stakeholders affected by recent shipwrecks along the Kerala coast. During hearing, the state submitted that the environment department special secretary has been appointed as the principal impact assessment officer. It was also stated that the state disaster management department has constituted a committee of govt officers to negotiate compensation for the damage caused by MSC ELSA 3. The committee has been tasked with addressing the cost of restoring the coastline and marine environment, removal of wrecks, economic losses suffered by fishermen and environmental degradation. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo HC noted that if such is the case, concerns raised by the petitioners would merit consideration. It could be argued that negotiations involving substantial environmental damage should not be conducted behind closed doors and take place without public disclosure or procedural safeguards. Questions may arise regarding the transparency and fairness of such a process. It could be further argued that since the harm directly affects the public, the process of settlement cannot remain confidential or hidden from public view. The public has a right to know the basis of the negotiations, the extent of damage assessed, the terms being proposed, and the principles on which the settlement is being structured. The court also observed that a binding settlement between the state and the respondent company might affect claims in the proposed Admiralty suit. There is a risk that once an agreement is signed, it could influence subsequent legal proceedings, even if the terms are inadequate. On the other hand, a settlement arrived at in court after the filing of a suit would allow judicial scrutiny, ensuring transparency and bringing the terms into the public domain, the court said. Accordingly, the bench adjourned the petitions to July 2 for further response from the state and other stakeholders.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
State second in Centre-funded infra expenditure
Gandhinagar: A Union govt report on central infrastructure projects exceeding Rs 150 crore for May states that Gujarat is second, behind Andhra Pradesh, among all states and Union territories for cumulative expenditure on ongoing projects. The '475th Flash Report on Central Sector Infrastructure Projects (Rs 150 crore & above)' for May 2025, stated that the cumulative expenditure by the Union govt in Andhra Pradesh is Rs 96,957.04 crore, followed by Gujarat, where the cumulative expenditure in infrastructure projects is Rs 86,950.93 crore. A total of 1,637 centrally-funded infrastructure projects are ongoing in the country, of which 90 are in Gujarat, the report says. It states that the original cost of these infrastructure projects in Gujarat was Rs 1.67 lakh crore, the revised cost was Rs 1.73 lakh crore, and the anticipated cost is Rs 1.74 lakh crore. The report stated that out of a total of 40 central govt-funded infrastructure projects completed in May 2025, four were in Gujarat, with three in the roads sector and one in the railways sector. These include the Mehsana-Palanpur doubling project of the railways, a section of the expressway project at Vadodara, four-laning of the Bhavnagar-Talala section of NH-8E, and four-laning of the Una-Kodinar section of NH-8E. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Hausbesitzer jubeln! Wer Heute noch ohne Solar lebt sollte nun die Lauscher aufsperren. Solar Nachrichten Aktuell Mehr erfahren Undo According to the report, among the 15 new centrally-funded infrastructure projects added in May this year, one was in Gujarat — a 50MW wind power project, approved in July 2022 with an estimated cost of Rs 383.84 crore. It was expected to be commissioned by June this year, but the anticipated commissioning date has now been revised to Jan 2026, the report says. According to the report, a total of eight centrally-funded infrastructure projects were 'frozen' or deleted in May, of which none were in Gujarat.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
9,000 undertrials released through Maharashtra's legal aid model: CM
1 2 Nagpur: Around 9,000 undertrial prisoners, nearly 45% of the 20,000 aided so far, were released through a pioneering legal aid initiative launched under chief minister Devendra Fadnavis in 2018. The first-of-its-kind model in the country, this effort has since been adopted by the central govt and is now being expanded nationwide with dedicated funding, a statement released by the govt says. Conceived as a response to the disproportionately high number of undertrials in Indian jails, the initiative focuses on providing structured legal assistance to inmates who often remain incarcerated due to lack of representation or inability to afford bail. As per the Prison Statistics India Report 2021, over 77% of inmates in India are undertrials, with an average jail occupancy rate of 130%. "This effort began with a clear objective, to deliver justice to those trapped in the system for no fault other than poverty or lack of support," said Fadnavis, highlighting the need for equity within the criminal justice framework. The project began with a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the Maharashtra govt and the Azim Premji Foundation. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS) and National Law University, Delhi also partnered in operationalising the programme. Initially rolled out across eight major prisons — Nagpur, Arthur Road, Byculla, Kalyan, Taloja, Latur, Thane, and Pune — it involved the appointment of trained social work and legal fellows within jails and District Legal Services Authorities (DLSAs). These professionals assist prisoners in preparing legal documents, understanding court procedures, and securing effective legal representation. The initiative has not only helped secure bail or case closure for thousands but has also strengthened the prison-based legal aid system and triggered policy-level reforms. With the success of the pilot phase, the state govt recently renewed its MoU with the Azim Premji Foundation. The next phase will focus on strengthening information systems, scaling legal clinics in prisons, and building institutional capacities to deliver justice more efficiently. Officials said that the initiative has become a national model for legal aid, demonstrating how administrative will and structured partnerships can transform access to justice for the most marginalised.
