How proposed federal cuts are threatening Maine's free school meals for all
Students getting their l lunch at a primary school in Atlanta, Georgia. (Photo by Amanda Mills/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
Maine's universal free school meals program is under threat as a result of proposed federal budget cuts, combined with the drop in bipartisan support at the state level.
Five years ago, Maine became one of the first states nationwide to make school meals free for all students regardless of family income. That resulted in a majority of students benefiting from the program and led to increases in the number of students eating at school, but with a proposed $12 billion federal funding cut to school meals and cuts to Medicare and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and the inability of the state to make up for the loss of federal funding in the state budget, advocates are sounding the alarm to try and preserve free breakfast and lunch, as well as summer and after school meals for all public school students.
For a state such as Maine, which faces the highest child food insecurity in New England, that presents serious cause for concern, according to experts from several nonprofit organizations, the Maine Department of Education and food bank leaders.
'We're very concerned about these overlapping cuts as they pile on,' said Anna Korsen, policy and program director at Full Plates Full Potential, a nonprofit working with the state on several nutrition programs.
'We know that school budgets cannot shoulder those cuts. We know that the state budget can't afford these cuts. So we're concerned about how all of them together will impact funding for these programs.'
Under the universal meal program, the state pays districts to offer meals without charging students, but the amount of money that comes from the federal government depends on the percentage of low-income families each public school serves. The higher the percentage of families that qualify for free meals, the bigger the federal reimbursement. Traditionally, this percentage was determined by parents filling out free-and-reduced meal applications, but now that school meals are free for all students, the state shifted away from relying on the applications and now uses different ways of determining the free and reduced meal eligibility in each school, which is an important data point used for various federally funded programs.
One option is the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP), which at least 75 schools are using this year, according to Maine Department of Education and federal data. CEP simplifies the process by automatically qualifying schools with a high percentage of low-income students for the higher reimbursement rate.
Under the Biden administration, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which oversees school lunch programs, lowered the CEP eligibility threshold from 40% to 25%, meaning more schools could receive federal meal funding starting the 2024-25 school year. However, Maine has not yet adopted this change. If it does, nearly 400 schools could qualify for CEP starting next year. The 75 schools currently using the provision all qualified using the 40% threshold.
But the $12 billion cut proposes raising the CEP threshold to 60%, drastically reducing the number of eligible schools in Maine from hundreds to just 31. This would put the burden on the state or districts, which does not have the budget to support the lack of funding, Korsen said.
Cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program would further strain the free meals program by reducing eligibility for federal reimbursement, because CEP takes into account participation in these programs to determine which families can be considered economically disadvantaged.
Last year, the Maine Department of Education also started using this data (called direct certification) to determine student eligibility for free or reduced-price lunch.Any child who is enrolled in SNAP or MaineCare, the state's Medicaid program, is automatically deemed eligible for free and reduced price school meals, so that means that the school is going to receive federal funding to support feeding those students even without being a CEP school, Korsen said.
If work requirements or other restrictions are added to SNAP and MaineCare, fewer families would qualify for these programs. As a result, even the 31 schools that currently meet the 60% threshold for CEP could lose their eligibility.
'At some point there's going to have to be hard choices, and we don't want school meals for all to suffer because of that,' she said.
Finally, Korsen warned that although Gov. Janet Mills has called for extending the universal meal program in her budget proposal, its once bipartisan support is 'unraveling at the state level,' as the cost of the program has grown with inflation.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Opinion: Budget bill's Medicaid cuts hurt all Utahns
One Big Beautiful Bill, or One Big Budget Bust? This one act of legislation will affect everyone, not just those on Medicaid. Even if you don't think cuts to Medicaid will affect you, they will, and not in a good way. This legislation will ultimately decrease the health of Utahns, inadvertently increase the cost of healthcare and increase wasteful spending of taxpayer dollars. The 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' includes provisions that slash Medicaid coverage through the guise of work/education requirements. While this may sound like a great way to increase accountability for Medicaid enrollees, this is costly to states and is confusing for enrollees. When Arkansas implemented Medicaid work and reporting requirements in 2018, enrollees reported both confusion and misunderstanding about what was required. Due to these requirements, 18,000 individuals, or 25% of enrollees, lost their insurance coverage. Researchers in 2020 looked at the impact of Arkansas' program and found that the loss of coverage led to poorer medication adherence, delays in receiving care and increased medical debt. In 2019, the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) — a federal office that provides fact-based, non-partisan information used to improve government spending and save taxpayers billions of dollars — estimated that state expansion of Medicaid work/education requirements would cost anywhere from under $10 million to over $250 million just on administrative costs. Accounting for inflation, this alone can cost Utah anywhere from about $13 million to $310 million just to set up this program. While this cost may be partially covered by the federal government, this has proven to be a waste of government spending. In one year of Georgia's implementation of a similar program, their own state Medicaid agency reported that it cost both state and federal taxpayers a combination of $40 million, with 80% of it going towards administrative costs rather than medical care. If implemented in our state, which prides itself on being fiscally responsible, removing red tape and deregulation, adding additional work/education requirements goes against these core beliefs. Hidden in the 'Big Beautiful Bill' are provisions to cut Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Programs by $3.5 billion, claiming this work 'can be conducted [and funded] more effectively by States,' according to the Fiscal Year 2026 budget request. States would need to develop programs and funding for employees to assist in this goal of shifting from the federal focus to state focus at the taxpayers' expense. Additionally, the budget includes provisions that block federal funding for preventive care at facilities offering family planning, reproductive health and related medical services. By blocking funding to these facilities, the healthcare system will shift from prevention to crisis response. Important public health research is also on the 'Big Beautiful Bill' chopping block. As the president proposes almost $18 billion in cuts to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) — the United States' medical research arm — projects will lose ground and become stagnant. You may be asking yourself, why does this matter to me? What if I have commercial insurance? Why should I care about research? The damaging effects of these budget cuts touch every aspect of society, creating a domino effect. These policies don't operate in isolation — they compound each other, ultimately raising costs, lowering care quality and destabilizing institutions relied upon by people across the income spectrum. Millions will lose access to primary, routine and preventive care. Conditions will go undetected and unmanaged, especially among children, women and people with chronic illnesses. Hospitals — especially children's hospitals and safety-net facilities — will absorb more unpaid care. This reduces operating margins and strains staff and resources. Hospitals will increase charges to private insurers to recoup losses. This drives up insurance premiums and out-of-pocket costs for middle-income families and employers. Fewer pediatricians, OB/GYNs and community health providers will stay in underfunded or unstable systems. Burnout and turnover will rise, especially in high-need communities. Biomedical research will come to a standstill, jeopardizing our ability to find new cures for debilitating diseases like cancer, diabetes and Alzheimer's. These cuts harm the entire healthcare system, threatening access, affordability and quality of care for everyone, regardless of insurance status. Protect your health by contacting your senators and telling them to block this One Big Budget Bust.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
UHC Medicare Advantage patients will lose coverage at Brown Health hospitals on July 1
PROVIDENCE, R.I. (WPRI) — A spokesperson for Brown University Health confirmed to 12 News on Wednesday that negotiations with UnitedHealthcare have ended, and UHC's Medicare Advantage plans will not be accepted at Brown Health's four Rhode Island hospitals starting July 1. Target 12 initially reported back in May that UHC had notified affected patients about the ongoing negotiations via a letter. According to a spokesperson for Brown Health, the hospital system had asked UHC to increase its reimbursement rate, as well as 'eliminate their administrative policies that deviate from traditional Medicare, such as unnecessary prior approval and utilization management, that cause frustration for patients and result in extra cost to our health care system.' 'Since both parties held firm in their positions, we mutually decided to end our Medicare Advantage hospital contract,' the Brown Health spokesperson said. 'We proposed extending our contract through the end of the year to provide Medicare Advantage members continued access to Brown University Health's hospitals while we negotiate,' a UHC spokesperson said in a statement on Wednesday. 'Unfortunately, the health system refused.' Both Brown Health and UHC emphasized that this change only applies to Hasbro Children's Hospital, The Miriam Hospital, Newport Hospital, and Rhode Island Hospital. Physicians associated with Brown Health and the group's urgent care clinics will continue to accept UHC's Medicare Advantage plans through Dec. 31, 2025, as will St. Anne's Hospital and Morton Hospital in Massachusetts. Medicare Advantage is a type of health plan offered by Medicare-approved private companies as an alternative to original Medicare. Like Medicare, it is available for Americans 65 and older, as well as those with certain severe disabilities or illnesses. Federal data shows that about 60% of Rhode Island Medicare recipients utilize Medicare Advantage plans. In Rhode Island, they're offered by Aetna, Blue Cross & Blue Shield, and UHC. (UHC has not answered repeated requests for comment on the number of patients who will be affected by the change.) Brown Health hospitals will continue accepting UHC's Medicaid and commercial health insurance plans, as well as Medicare Advantage plans from other providers. Starting July 1, treatments at Brown Health hospitals will be billed to UHC Medicare Advantage patients as 'out-of-network' care. However, a UHC spokesperson stressed that in an emergency, members should go to the nearest hospital even if it's not 'in-network,' as the company covers emergency visits at its in-network benefit level. Dr. Johnny Luo, a health insurance expert from Doctor's Choice, told 12 News there are ways to get a new insurance plan if needed. Outside of Medicare's open enrollment period, which lasts from Oct. 15 to Dec. 17, Luo said, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have been known to offer special election periods throughout the year on a case-by-case basis. Brown Health also encouraged UHC Medicare Advantage members to find out if they're eligible for 'continuity of care' protections by calling UHC Customer Service at 1-800-711-0646. Download the and apps to get breaking news and weather alerts. Watch or with the new . Follow us on social media: Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
AMR says May 'particularly deadly' for overdoses in Manchester, Nashua
May was a 'particularly deadly' month for fatal overdoses in the state's two largest cities, according to data released Wednesday by American Medical Response (AMR). AMR medics responded to a total of 43 suspected opioid overdoses in Nashua and Manchester last month — 31 in Manchester and 12 in Nashua. Eleven of those incidents were fatal; nine in Manchester, two in Nashua. Chris Stawasz, regional director of AMR, said 11 deaths in one month are nearly twice the average of monthly deaths reported over the past year. 'October 2023 was the last time we observed a double-digit loss of life in a single month between the two cities,' Stawasz said in a statement. Twenty-six percent of the suspected opioid ODs AMR medics responded to in May were fatal, data shows. An Overdose Response Strategy Situational Awareness Bulletin from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued June 6 reported a surge in both fatal and non-fatal overdoses across Connecticut, Stawasz said. According to the bulletin, between May 16 and June 6 there were 61 suspected fatal overdoses statewide in Connecticut, with 'noticeable clustering' along the I-91 and I-95 corridors and in the cities of New Haven and Hartford. 'That Connecticut surge seems to correlate to the surge in deaths we experienced here in Nashua and Manchester,' Stawasz said. 'The bulletin suggests that polysubstance combinations and higher concentrations of fentanyl may be contributing factors to the current spike in overdose deaths.' May did continue the recent trend of lower overall opioid overdose totals in both communities, 16% below the rolling 12-month average, data shows. Manchester continues to trend well below last year (down 34%) for total opioid overdoses and 13% below last year for suspected fatal overdoses. Nashua also continues to be trending lower in total opioid ODs (down 9%) but trends significantly higher (up 69%) in suspected opioid related deaths. In 2024, Manchester and Nashua recorded the lowest number of overdoses in a year since the COVID pandemic. There were 710 suspected overdoses in Manchester and Nashua in 2024 — 526 of those occurred in Manchester, 184 in Nashua. Sixty-six overdoses were fatal in 2024 — 46 in Manchester, 20 in Nashua. Nashua recorded both the lowest number of suspected opioid overdoses and lowest number of suspected opioid deaths in one year since AMR began tracking the data in 2015. 'Keep in mind that due to the nature of the opioid epidemic and its clear history of unpredictability, it is always possible that the trend of lower numbers could quickly change — as evidenced this month,' Stawasz said. 'These seemingly marked statistical improvements by no means signal that the opioid epidemic is 'under control' or close to elimination. With Narcan now widely available and free, it is highly likely that many overdoses are continuing to occur, but without 911 intervention.' According to AMR, of the 43 suspected opioid overdoses reported in May in both Manchester and Nashua, 53% occurred in a home or residence, 21% happened in a public building or area and 9% were in vehicles or in a roadway. Five percent were in a jail or prison. Two percent occurred in a hotel or motel. In 21% of the overdoses, a bystander or member of the public administered Narcan before EMS personnel arrived. Overall, 42% of those involved in suspected opioid overdoses gave no fixed address or said they were homeless. Of the 43 suspected overdoses in both cities, 58% were males, 42% females. The majority of victims, 72%, were Caucasian. Ninety-three percent of overdose response calls involved a first encounter with an individual and 7% involved repeat encounters. In New Hampshire, anyone can seek substance use disorder treatment by accessing the N.H. Doorway program 24/7. To access the N.H. Doorway program, call 211 at any time of the day or night, or visit If you believe someone is overdosing, call 911 immediately.
