
Israel is annihilating Palestinian children. Amer Rabea was one of them
Amer Mohammed Rabea was 14 years old. He was a US citizen. On 7 April 2025, he was shot and killed by Israeli forces in the occupied West Bank city of Turmus Ayya. There was no warning. No investigation. Just a bullet, a body and a silence so deep it threatens to swallow justice whole.
The killing of a child should rupture the world. Instead, Amer's death joined a growing ledger of erased Palestinian lives, tallied but never mourned by those in power. There was no state department briefing. No congressional statement. No public grieving for a child born under two flags, killed under a third. Even in death, Amer was made stateless.
Since October 2023, at least 17,000 Palestinian children have been killed in Gaza. The UN now confirms that at least 100 children have been killed or injured every single day since Israel resumed its offensive in March 2025. In 36 verified airstrikes, only women and children were found beneath the rubble. Not fighters. Not military targets. Just families.
But this war is not just about death. It is about the systematic erasure of Palestinian life – its rhythms, its generations, its futures. It is, as one UN official warned, the creation of conditions of life incompatible with the continued existence of Palestinians as a group.
According to Unicef, eight infants died of hypothermia in January. Medical personnel report a spike in miscarriages. Children are born premature, malnourished, and die in the first weeks of life. The UN warns that Gaza's children are being subjected to conditions 'incompatible with their continued existence'. According to Doctors Without Borders, children arrive at hospitals with rotting wounds, dehydrated, skeletal. Aid has been blocked. Water tanks have been bombed. Birth, in Gaza, is a threat Israel answers with airstrikes.
Israel has turned two-thirds of Gaza into a no-go zone, effectively stealing Palestinian land. There is no electricity. No medicine. No clean water. The siege does not just kill. It prevents life from beginning. And yet those who survive the bombs are hunted by other means.
But Israel's violence against children is not new. In the West Bank, the violence is personal, intimate. Children are executed at checkpoints. Soldiers raid homes at night. Human Rights Watch has documented numerous killings of Palestinian children who posed no threat, shot in the back, in the chest, while running, while walking to school, in a 2023 report.
Seventeen-year-old Mahmoud al-Sadi was gunned down on his way to class in Jenin. He was unarmed. A military vehicle 100 metres away fired a single shot. There were no clashes nearby. No justification. Just another morning turned into a funeral.
Wadea Abu Ramuz, 17, was shot in the back during a protest in East Jerusalem. After being taken to a hospital in critical condition, he was shackled to the bed, denied family visits and later buried at night under police supervision, with mourners limited and phones confiscated.
Fifteen-year-old Adam Ayyad, from the Dheisheh refugee camp, was killed by a sniper while throwing stones. No warning shots. No effort at de-escalation. Just live fire into a crowd of boys.
And now, at 12 years old, Rahaf Ayyad feels pain in her bones every day; there is no treatment, no help, and Rahaf often cries comparing her current state with photos of herself looking healthy before the war. In Rahaf's plight, it becomes clear – starvation is being used to kill Gaza's children.
Since March, Israel has blocked all food, fuel and medicine from reaching more than 2 million people. It has cut off not only supply lines, but the ability of Palestinians to produce or gather food themselves. Gaza's farmland has been destroyed. Its fishing boats bombed. Its bakeries shuttered. Its water undrinkable. Families are boiling weeds and eating turtles, and they are forced to spend $300 on a bag of flour. Some burn garbage just to cook whatever they can find.
According to Gaza's ministry of health, 57 people, mostly children, have already starved to death under the blockade. At least 10,000 cases of child malnutrition have been documented by the United Nations, with more than 1,400 of them classified as severe acute malnutrition, meaning their bodies are wasting away. These are the children who still made it to hospitals. Others die in their homes, in tents or while waiting in endless food lines that are often bombed.
Starvation is slow violence, and collectively starving 2 million further proves Israel's genocidal intentions. Starvation begins with fatigue and confusion and ends with organ failure and silence. It kills children first, because their bodies have less to lose. And in Gaza, that silence is growing.
What unites Gaza and the West Bank is the intent: to punish Palestinians for existing. To eliminate not only those who resist but those who could one day resist. In this logic, every child is a potential threat. Even in death, Palestinian children are punished. Bodies are withheld. Burials restricted. Flags banned. Schools interrogated. Grief criminalized. And so, Israel's campaign includes the detention of more than 1,200 Palestinian children since October 2023 – children who are tortured, starved and held without charges. One of them, 17-year-old Walid Ahmad, died in Israeli custody this year. His crime? Being Palestinian in a land where that alone can warrant execution.
International law is unambiguous: civilians must be protected. Children, especially. The Geneva conventions prohibit attacks on schools and hospitals. The convention on the rights of the child guarantees life and dignity. But law means little when it is not enforced – when the violator is armed with impunity and backed by billions.
The US funds Israel's military to the tune of $3.8bn a year. The bombs that collapse Gaza's homes are American. The bullets that pierced Amer Rabea's chest are American. And still, there is no accountability. No consequence. Only more weapons, more blank checks, more diplomatic cover.
To kill a child is to erase a future. When a child dies, a world ends. This is not just about bodies. It is about memory. About denying Palestinians the right to imagine tomorrow. What is left of a people who cannot bury their dead, teach their children or name their grief?
Israel knows this. It bombs archives and universities. It targets schools and hospitals not just because they house people, but because they carry meaning. A population deprived of memory and future is easier to govern. Easier to erase.
But Amer Rabea did not move on. He died in the place his parents had hoped he would come to know as home. He died a child of war and empire, killed for no reason other than being Palestinian. If even American citizenship cannot protect a 14-year-old boy, what protection exists for anyone?
This is not about Hamas. This is not about security. This is about annihilation. A future where Palestinian children are denied the most basic right: to live. We must reject the narrative that flattens this genocide into 'conflict'. We must say plainly that what is happening is the deliberate destruction of a people – and it begins with their children.
Amer had a name. He had a smile. He was loved. He was real. And now, he is gone.
We owe him more than silence. We owe Gaza's starving children more than silence.
Have you been silent?
Ahmad Ibsais is a first-generation Palestinian American, law student and poet who writes the newsletter State of Siege
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
CIA analyst who leaked Israel strike plan sentenced to three years
A former CIA analyst who leaked classified documents about Israel's plans to strike Iran has been sentenced to 37 months in William Rahman, 34, pleaded guilty in January to two counts of willful retention and transmission of national defence information under the Espionage say that, using his high-level security clearance, Rahman printed, photographed and sent out top secret documents. They later ended up being circulated on social carried out air strikes on Iran last October, targeting military sites in several regions, in response to the barrage of missiles launched by Tehran weeks earlier. "For months, this defendant betrayed the American people and the oaths he took upon entering his office by leaking some of our Nation's most closely held secrets," John Eisenberg, assistant attorney general for national security, said in a press October 2024, documents appearing to be from a Department of Defense agency were published on an Iranian-aligned Telegram documents, bearing a top-secret mark, were viewable between the Five Eyes intelligence alliance, made up of the US, Britain, Canada, New Zealand and Australia. The leaked documents are also said to have contained the US' assessment of Israeli plans ahead of the strike on Iran and the movements of military assets in referred to Israel's nuclear capabilities, which have never been officially asked about the leak, former President Joe Biden said he was "deeply concerned". Israel ended up carrying out those air strikes later in the month, targeting military sites in several regions in response to missiles fired by Tehran weeks who worked abroad, was arrested by the FBI in Cambodia and brought to the US territory of Guam to face charges.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Eradicating India's jungle insurgency – can it be done and at what human cost?
For decades, guerrilla communist warfare has raged deep in India's jungles. What began as an uprising in the 1960s, fuelled by inequality and discontent among the poorest, is now a fully fledged Maoist armed struggle vowing to overthrow the Indian state. But after decades of insurgency and a corresponding state-led crackdown that has left almost 12,000 civilians, militants and security personnel dead, India's home minister Amit Shah gave a clear-cut deadline earlier this year; the Maoist insurgency would be 'completely eradicated' by March 2026. Yet activists, lawyers and former officials have alleged that the operation has come at the cost of human rights abuses and loss of civilian life. They have also questioned the government's motives as well as whether it can truly erase the ideologically driven movement. Widely known as the Naxalites, a name taken from the West Bengal village where the first peasant rebellion took place, the movement follows the Marxist-Leninist ideology of class struggle and agrarian revolution and the philosophy, taken from the Chinese communist leader Chairman Mao, of achieving this through guerrilla armed struggle. The Naxalite cadre has largely been drawn from two of the most marginalised and oppressed groups in India: adivasis, the tribal Indigenous people who largely live in the forests and jungles, and Dalits, the lowest caste previously referred to as untouchables. The militant insurgency has surged at various intervals over the past half century. At its peak in the early 2000s it controlled large swathes of the country, known as the 'red corridor' which stretched from the Telangana-Andhra Pradesh border in southern India, right across the central states of Chhattisgarh, Odisha, Maharashtra, Jharkhand and up to West Bengal, and had more than 30,000 foot soldiers. Now, however, the number of active Naxalite fighters is estimated to be just 500, operating in limited districts, who pitch their fight as a David and Goliath struggle. It was in early 2024 that the government announced Operation Kagar, intended as the endgame for the Naxalite movement. Focusing on the vast forest areas of the Chhattisgarh, the remaining Maoist heartland, upwards of 60,000 security personnel were deployed as well as advanced drone and surveillance technology. As a result, 2024 was the bloodiest year for Maoist casualties in over a decade, with 344 killed in security operations according to the South Asia Terrorism Portal. Last month, security officials cornered and killed one of India's most wanted Maoist leaders, Nambala Keshava Rao – who was almost in his 70s – along with 26 others alleged to be militants. Shah called it a 'landmark blow' to the Naxalite movement. N Venugopal, a newspaper editor who has spent years documenting the movement, claimed that of the roughly 500 people killed since the escalation of the counter-insurgency at the beginning of 2024, around half were non-combatant adivasis, including children. 'This is not an anti-Maoist operation, it is a killing spree,' he said. 'Security forces have become like bounty hunters, killing for rewards.' The claims of atrocities against adivasis in the name of anti-Naxalite operations go back years. Organisations such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have documented over years how security forces have been implicated in extrajudicial killings – including allegations of what is referred to as 'encounter killings' in which police stage the deaths of civilians to look like the killing of Maoist fighters – and allegations of arbitrary detention, forced displacement and sexual violence. Bela Bhatia, a human rights lawyer in Chhattisgarh, alleged that forces in the area had always 'enjoyed impunity to carry out abuses and harassment and encounter killings, it's now just happening on a much bigger scale'. Bhatia was among several activists and lawyers in Chhattisgarh who said there was a newfound brutality to Operation Kagar, in which the focus was on 'neutralising' – meaning shooting to kill – any alleged Naxalite target, with police and paramilitary officers often incentivised with financial bonuses. 'Instead of prioritising arrests, the government has increasingly taken the path of elimination. Civilians are being lumped together with Maoists and killed,' said Malini Subramaniam, a human rights defender and journalist based in Bastar who has faced threats for her work. Subramaniam said entire adivasis villages in the Bastar area were being rounded up and coerced into surrendering, even if they had no involvement in the Naxalite uprising. 'The government has offered only two choices: either surrender or be killed,' she alleged. 'When we hear reports of people surrendering, it's often just ordinary villagers being forced to do so.' Sundarraj Pattilingam, Inspector Gen IG of Police Bastar Range leading the anti-Maoist operations, called the allegations 'completely baseless' and said the operations were all carried out 'as per the law'. He said: 'There is no intention to harm any civilians or to harm anyone who comes forward to surrender. The allegations are made up by the Maoists to put a question mark over the action of the security forces and boost up the morale of their cadres, who are already in a very bad shape.' Since the beginning of the year, leaders of the Naxalite movement, which operates as the Communist party of India (Maoist), have put out several statements calling for a ceasefire and expressed willingness to enter into peace negotiations with the government. However, the government has ignored calls for a political or rehabilitation process. That stance has reinforced a suspicion among activists and lawyers that the primary driver of the recent crackdown was not peace but instead corporate interests. The forests of Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand are rich with coal and minerals such as iron ore and some of India's biggest industrialists have set up mining operations there, with government-approved plans to expand. Soni Sori, a school teacher turned political leader fighting for adivasis rights in Chhattisgarh, claimed the targeting of adivasis was no accident. The tribal communities have blockaded and disrupted mining attempts in the forests as they fought back against their displacement and the destruction of the forests. 'This is a one-sided war— a war waged by the government against the people of this region, all to clear the way for industrialists desperate to seize the area's mineral wealth,' said Sori. The home ministry did not respond to request for comment. A home affairs statement in April said the government focused on 'security, development, and rights-based empowerment' in areas affected by the Naxal insurgency and said that 'the vision of a left wing extremism-free India is closer than ever'. Prakash Singh, the former commander of India's Border Security Force and author of a book on Naxalites, said he believed organisationally the Naxalites would ultimately be crushed and he called for a more 'humane' approach. 'Give them the opportunity to come out from the underground, lay down their arms and be given steps for rehabilitation,' he said. 'This way the government would achieve the same objective, without all this bloodshed.' Yet he also acknowledged that it was much harder to destroy the beliefs that have driven the insurgency. 'You can kill the cadre, you can liquidate the party,' said Singh. 'But as long as there is injustice, as long as there is exploitation or the displacement of the poor in any part of the country, the Naxal ideology is going to survive.'


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE How Greta Thunberg relishes being 'the poster girl for rebellious teenagers': JUDI JAMES reveals how she uses all the tricks of a political pro
Environment activist Greta Thunberg is projecting 'power and authority' by taking control of the narrative when she speaks, a body language expert said today. Judi James told MailOnline that the campaigner projects the 'image of a heroine' and her confidence on the global stage 'would match or even exceed seasoned leaders'. The activist was deported by Israel yesterday, a day after the Gaza-bound ship she was on was seized by the Israeli military. She has now returned to Sweden. Of the 12 activists on board the Madleen, which was carrying food and supplies for Gaza, four including 22-year-old Ms Thunberg agreed to be deported immediately. Ms Thunberg has now called for the release of the other activists who were detained aboard the Madleen, and described a 'quite chaotic and uncertain' situation. She also claimed Israel had 'kidnapped' the group in international waters and 'taken them against their will', adding that it was 'another intentional violation of rights'. Analysing her body language yesterday, Ms James said Ms Thunberg has 'several verbal and visual skills that could make her the poster girl for rebellious teenagers'. She claimed the activist still looks like a teenager despite her age, and her 'youthful appearance tends to add to the image of a heroine as she appears as a loner'. Ms James described Ms Thunberg as 'the isolated youth standing against the world of old male leaders and their nations', adding that her delivery is 'primarily political'. She continued: 'When she speaks she utilises many of the communication devices world leaders use to project power and authority. 'Her confidence levels on the global stage would match or even exceed seasoned leaders like Starmer as she looks firmly welded to her own message and view of what is right. 'Her body language suggests a sense of powerful self-affirmation for her messages. Her conviction looks unassailable. She seems to offer facts not opinions and there is her wry smile that seems to mock anyone who disagrees with her.' Ms James also noted a 'contrast of superiority and authority coming from the one who looks like the youngest in any room', saying that this created a 'counter-intuitive response in older heads while younger fans will see a path to power and the ability to change the world'. She continued: 'Her wry smile as she begins to talk gives that impression of superiority, as though she is silently mocking her critics. 'Like any good politician she uses pause and enunciation to pick out certain words she wants to be memorable and have emphasis. 'Her brows raise in an expression of authority and when she says more than once 'That is an illegal act' her staccato nod and her small shoulder shrugs help give the impression that she thinks she is on top of all the laws in this critical situation.' Ms James added that Ms Thunberg 'knows how to take control of the narrative' like most politicians, and she now appears calmer than in previous years when she had become known for 'dramatic emotional displays'. Her comment that 'That is not the real story' displayed skill in 'redirecting and taking control' during an interview, according to Ms James. The expert concluded: 'This version of Thunberg could project a contagious type of rebellion via the way her body bristles with defiance. 'Walking along alone in another clip though her body language tended to be more about teenage style stubbornness. Her arms were firmly folded, her lips clamped, and her chin lifted to suggest a refusal to back down or buckle under pressure.' Speaking upon arrival in Paris en route to her home country of Sweden yesterday, Ms Thunberg called for the release of the other activists who were detained aboard the Madleen. The conditions they faced during the detention 'are absolutely nothing compared to what people are going through in Palestine and especially Gaza right now,' she said. The trip was meant to protest against Israeli restrictions on aid to Gaza's population of over two million people after 20 months of war, according to the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, the group behind the journey. 'We were well aware of the risks of this mission,' Ms Thunberg said. 'The aim was to get to Gaza and to be able to distribute the aid.' She said the activists would continue trying to get aid to Gaza. On Monday, US President Donald Trump called Ms Thunberg 'a young angry person' and recommended she take anger management classes. 'I think the world need a lot more young angry women,' Ms Thunberg said yesterday in response.