
Opponents warn bill will lead to racial profiling in Montana
Feb. 7—Opponents of a bill that encourages local law enforcement to check people's immigration status say the legislation amounts to little more than legalized racial profiling.
House Bill 278, cosponsored by Rep. Amy Regier, R-Kalispell, was introduced into the Montana House of Representatives under the title "An Act Requiring a Peace Officer to Check and Report the Immigration Status of a Person During a Lawful Stop." After strong opposition from law enforcement organizations, though the bill's language was softened to authorize, rather than require, immigration status checks. The amended bill also requires officers to have reasonable cause to question someone's immigration status.
Even with the changed language, Kalispell Police Chief Jordan Venezio expressed concerns about how departments and officers would implement the bill.
"How is a police officer to decide which person to choose to check immigration status? You're relying on different descriptors that will lead to bias," said Venezio.
From a practical level, Venezio said local law enforcement has no way to independently verify someone's immigration status, and getting in touch with federal immigration officials often takes hours or days.
Both these issues arose in a 2013 lawsuit known as Rios-Diaz v. Montana Highway Patrol. The plaintiffs included several Latino men who had been held for up to two hours during routine traffic stops as patrolmen attempted to call federal immigration officials. The court sided with the plaintiffs and handed down a settlement that included new monitoring, training and reporting policies related to racial profiling.
During a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Jan. 29, Patrick Yawakie linked the bill to the recent detainment of members of the Navajo Nation. According to the Navajo Nation Council, over a dozen tribal members were detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials last month, despite carrying state- or tribal-issued IDs. Yawakie, who spoke on behalf of the Blackfeet Tribe, the Chippewa Cree Tribe of Rocky Boy and the Fort Belknap Indian Community, said fears of wrongful detainment were spurred by accounts of federal immigration officials driving through Montana reservations.
"As the largest minority who shares similar physical characteristics as Central and South American peoples, we see how House Bill 278 will create high risks of wrongful detention and higher risks of trauma induced in our communities," said Yawakie.
Lawmakers largely dismissed concerns of racial profiling, saying the practice was already illegal under state law and that the bill would only allow patrolmen to ask about immigration status if they had reasonable suspicion.
"In [Highway Patrol] policies, I'm fairly certain you would find something that prohibits your officers from stopping, detaining anyone based on their race or skin color, correct?" asked Rep. Steven Kelly, R-Kalispell, during the hearing.
Field forces commander for the Montana Highway Patrol Lt. Col. Kyle Hayter responded to the question, agreeing that the department maintains antidiscrimination policies.
The bill passed the House Judiciary Committee Monday with 13 votes in favor and 7 votes against and will likely appear before the full House in the coming days.
Reporter Hailey Smalley can be reached at hsmalley@dailyinterlake.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fact Check: Noem didn't tell Congress that Republicans voted for Jan. 6 rioters to work for ICE
Claim: Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem testified to Congress that Republicans voted to allow U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) employ participants in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Rating: Context: The rumor appeared to have its origin in an amendment Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove proposed on April 30, 2025, during a House Judiciary Committee hearing discussing budget resolutions for fiscal year 2025. The amendment proposed that the budget "may not be used to hire any personnel who participated in the January 6, 2021, insurrection and attack on the U.S. Capitol" for a role within the Department of Homeland Security. However, the amendment failed in a vote of 15-17. In June 2025, a rumor surfaced that U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem testified to Congress that Republicans voted to allow U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to employ people who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Internet users shared an image of Noem riding along with ICE agents on social media, particularly across Facebook (archived, archived, archived) and Instagram (archived). The posts featured text that read, "Kristi Noem, head of homeland security, admitted, UNDER OATH, that Republicans voted to allow January 6th rioters to serve in ICE roles. Including the ones who assaulted police officers during the attack." The post also said, "Explains a lot about why ICE officers are wearing masks and refusing to show ID." The rumor spread on social media following Noem's appearances before various committees to discuss the budget of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which are discussed in further detail below. However, there was no evidence that Noem testified to Congress that Republicans voted to allow Jan. 6 rioters to be employed by ICE, and as a result we've rated the claim that she did false. Instead, the rumor appeared to have its origin in an amendment Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove, D-Ill., proposed on April 30, 2025, during a House Judiciary Committee hearing discussing budget resolutions for fiscal year 2025. During the hearing, a number of Democratic representatives introduced amendments to limit the ways in which the budget would be allowed to facilitate the operation of ICE. Among the presented additions was Kamlager-Dove's amendment that proposed the approved funds "may not be used to hire any personnel who participated in the January 6, 2021, insurrection and attack on the U.S. Capitol, even if such individual was pardoned for a crime associated with their participation in such insurrection and attack." A full video of the House Judiciary Committee is available to view on YouTube. Kamlager-Dove introduces the amendment in question around 5 hours and 50 minutes in. However, Kamlager-Dove's amendment failed in a 15-17 vote, with 15 votes of "aye" coming from Democrats and 17 votes of "no" coming from Republicans. Eight Republicans and four Democrats abstained from voting altogether. It's likely this vote is where the language in the claim that reads, "Republicans voted to allow January 6th rioters to serve in ICE roles" originated — though it remains false that Noem said as much during her appearances before Congress. The rumor also made its way into a letter to the editor published in the Arizona Daily Star, which read in part, "Kristi Noem told Congress that they were using Jan. 6 traitors as ICE personnel. They are criminals themselves, racist fascists. I suspected #47 was forming his own secret police. Noem is just a puppet." Snopes reached out to DHS and ICE for comment on these claims and will update this article should we receive a response. We also attempted to contact the author of the letter but were unsuccessful. In May 2025, Noem appeared at multiple hearings to address the DHS budget for fiscal year 2026. On May 8, she testified before the United States Senate Committee on Appropriations for the subcommittee hearing "A Review of the President's Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Request for the Department of Homeland Security." The full hearing is available to view on YouTube. It includes no mention of the attack on the U.S. Capitol that occurred on Jan. 6, 2021. Then, on May 14, Noem appeared before the Homeland Security Committee for the meeting "A New Era of Homeland Security: A Review of the Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Request for the Department of Homeland Security." The full hearing is available to view on YouTube. The only mention of the Capitol riots occurred around 23 minutes in, when Rep. Bennie Thompson addressed National Police Week — observed May 11 through May 17 — in honor of law enforcement officers who defended the Capitol on Jan. 6. There was no mention of any allegations that Republicans voted to allow ICE to employ Jan. 6 rioters. Finally, Noem last spoke on the DHS budget before the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs on May 20. The full committee hearing, "The Department of Homeland Security's Budget Request for Fiscal Year 2026," is available to view in full on YouTube. Noem made headlines during the same hearing when she was unable to correctly define habeas corpus. There was one mention of Jan. 6 during the May 20 hearing, which occurred when Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., addressed alleged civil liberty violations against United States citizens, including an alleged air marshal whose "wife might've been at January 6 or something." While we cannot definitively say there are no Jan. 6 rioters currently deputized or otherwise working for ICE as of this writing, and Republicans did indeed vote down an amendment intended to prohibit funding being used to hire Jan. 6 rioters for DHS, it is false to say that Kristi Noem testified as much to Congress. - YouTube. Accessed 6 June 2025. ---. Accessed 6 June 2025. ---. Accessed 6 June 2025. ---. Accessed 9 June 2025. A New Era of Homeland Security: A Review of the Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Request for the Department of Homeland Security – Committee on Homeland Security. Accessed 6 June 2025. AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE TO THE COMMITTEE PRINT. "Home." National Police Week, Accessed 6 June 2025. Ibrahim, Nur. "Kristi Noem Said Habeas Corpus Gives Trump Right 'to Remove People from This Country.' Here's What It Really Does." Snopes, 21 May 2025, Norman, Greg. "Federal Air Marshals Surveilled Trump Cabinet Member Gabbard in 2024, Rand Paul Says." Fox News, 20 May 2025, Testimony, Download. A Review of the President's Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Request for the Department of Homeland Security | United States Senate Committee on Appropriations. Accessed 6 June 2025. "The Department of Homeland Security's Budget Request for Fiscal Year 2026." Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs, Accessed 6 June 2025. Vail, David E. Leon. "Letter: Traitors from January 6 Are ICE Officers." Arizona Daily Star, 5 June 2025, Vote on Kamlager-Dover Amendment (#14) to the Committee Print ADS.


USA Today
31 minutes ago
- USA Today
How common are National Guard deployments over unrest? A look at past presidents' actions
How common are National Guard deployments over unrest? A look at past presidents' actions Show Caption Hide Caption Trump sends National Guard to LA as ICE protests escalate Crowds converged in downtown L.A. after National Guard troops arrived to quell any protests opposing President Trump's immigration policies. After more than 30 years since the 1992 Los Angeles Rodney King riots, an order from the president has once again ushered in hundreds of National Guard troops to California's largest city, brought in to respond to multi-day demonstrations over federal immigration raids. The protests began Friday, June 6 after Homeland Security officials detained dozens of people across multiple locations in a city where nearly half of residents are Hispanic or Latino. By that evening, more than 100 people gathered at a downtown Los Angeles federal detention center where some immigrants had been held, and demonstrations continued through Saturday and into Sunday, June 8, reaching nearby neighborhoods of Paramount and Compton. National Guard troops, deployed by President Donald Trump, arrived in downtown Los Angeles Sunday, June 8. It's not the first time a president has exercised their control over the Guard to respond to protests and demonstrations − here's a look at when prior administrations deployed the force in cases of civil unrest and crisis. Live updates: Gov. Newsom challenges Trump on National Guard deployment What is the National Guard? Unlike other branches of the military, the National Guard can be deployed by both states and the federal government, and members serve simultaneously in their state National Guards and in either the Army or Air National Guard of the U.S. National Guard members can be deployed by the governors of their resident states and by the president of the U.S. Statewide mobilizations often are to support communities during and after natural disasters and amid protests, the Guard website says, and have recently been used to respond to the pandemic and to border security. The president can deploy the guard to serve missions overseas, which the Council on Foreign Relations says has happened more frequently in recent years, pointing to deployments to Afghanistan, Iraq, Poland, and the Horn of Africa. What is the Insurrection Act? Here's what Trump has said about invoking it amid LA protests When have presidents called in the National Guard amid protests? While presidents have called on the National Guard dozens of times since the nation's inception to respond to "civil unrest," it wasn't until 1967 that presidents federalized the Guard to further assist law enforcement agencies responding to protests and demonstrations. The earliest instances of presidents sending the Guard in to quell civil unrest are in 1794 and 1799, when Presidents George Washington and John Adams called upon state militia and volunteer units to suppress the Whiskey Insurrection and Fries' Rebellion, according to a 2020 report by the National Guard Bureau. Presidents avoided calling upon the militia in response to civil disturbances for most of the 19th century, the Bureau said, with state militias quelling "labor riots and slave revolts" most of the time. Following the Civil War, the modern National Guard says it played active roles in "quelling the race riots and labor strikes throughout the late 19th and early 20th centuries," and for 90 years between the beginning of Reconstruction and the early years of the Civil Rights era, no president federalized the force for civil disturbance operations. The Civil Rights movement marked the beginning of a more present federalized Guard in instances of unrest like protests, demonstrations and riots. Throughout this period, Presidents Dwight D. Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson federalized the National Guard 'to enforce the expansion of civil rights and to ensure public order,' the National Guard Bureau said. The Guard was involved in many of the most pivotal Civil Rights-era events, such as the school desegregations and ensuing violence in Little Rock, Arkansas, in 1957, the University of Mississippi in 1962, and at the University of Alabama in 1963. The Alabama National Guard was also called into federal service for the Selma-Montgomery March in 1965, the National Guard Bureau said. National Guard members were also called in during the 'Detroit Rebellion' of 1967, and to respond to the protests and violence that followed Martin Luther King Jr.'s assassination in 1968. After Trump's deployment of the National Guard on Sunday, June 8, the two most recent times a president federalized the National Guard for civil disturbance operations were approximately 55 and 33 years ago, respectively. President Richard Nixon deployed the force in 1970 in response to the Postal Strike that was the first and largest walkout ever against the federal government. Most recently, President George W. Bush in 1992 called on Guard members to respond to the 1992 Rodney King riots, which broke out after the acquittal of the Los Angeles Police Department officers who beat Black motorist Rodney King. The unrest left 60 people dead and 2,300 injured, according to the Bill of Rights Institute, and thousands of members of the Guard, the U.S. Army and the Marine Corps were deployed in the city. National Guard deployments in LA: A brief history The National Guard has been deployed to Los Angeles several times in response to civil disorder and natural disasters, at the request of state and local officials. The Guard is an especially familiar force with large swaths of the state that have experienced historic wildfires over the past decades, greater Los Angeles included. In 1965, nearly 14,000 Guard troops were sent to Los Angeles amid the Watts protests at the request of the California lieutenant governor, according to Stanford University's Martin Luther King, Jr., Research and Education Institute. In 1992, former President George H.W. Bush ordered National Guards to respond to the Rodney King protests in Los Angeles, which left left more than 60 people dead and 2,300 injured, according to the Bill of Rights Institute. It was the last time the Insurrection Act was invoked by a president. In 1994, the Guard was sent to assist with the aftermath of the Northridge earthquake. The magnitude 6.7 earthquake caused billions in damages primarily in the San Fernando Valley, 20 miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles, and killed at least 57 people. It is the first time in decades a president has moved to deploy troops in such a manner without a governor's consent or explicit invitation, Reuters reported, and the move has prompted California Gov. Gavin Newsom to say he plans to sue the administration over the deployment. Contributing: Thao Nguyen, USA TODAY; Reuters. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr.


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump sends troops to L.A. after immigration crackdown protests: What to know
President Trump authorized the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops, following days of protests against immigration enforcement actions in the Los Angeles area. The rare move bypassed the consent of California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) and has garnered criticism from local Democrats who warned the move could risk further inflaming tensions. The federalizing of the California National Guard also has prompted some legal questions about the extent of the president's authority. Here's what to know about the troop deployment: The protests began Friday in downtown Los Angeles. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arrested immigrants in L.A.'s fashion district, as well as in a Home Depot parking lot and other locations. On Saturday, the protests spread to other areas, including Compton and Paramount, a predominantly Latino city south of L.A. As word spread of another possible ICE raid at a Home Depot in Paramount, protesters descended upon a nearby Department of Homeland Security (DHS) office. Federal authorities, however, later said that no action was planned for that location. Federal authorities said the weeklong tally of immigrant arrests in the Los Angeles area rose to more than 100 — not including the arrests that took place during the protests. The president took notice this weekend of the rowdy demonstrations, which included instances of vandalized cars and property in the greater Los Angeles areas. He dared local authorities to respond more forcefully, noting the Los Angeles Police Department had not initially been involved in responding to the protests. The LAPD also confirmed it was not involved. Trump said California Democrats Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass were to blame for the unrest that began as a result of ICE raids. 'If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. Trump on Saturday announced he authorized the deployment of 2,000 National Guard soldiers. By Sunday afternoon, about 300 troops were stationed in three locations in the greater Los Angeles area. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the move is a result of 'violent mobs' attacking 'Federal Law Enforcement Agents carrying out basic deportation operations' in recent days. Trump said Sunday that he directed relevant Cabinet officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, 'to take all such action necessary to liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion, and put an end to these Migrant riots.' Hegseth said Sunday morning that Marines were ready to be deployed to Los Angeles if needed. A statement from U.S. Northern Command on Sunday indicated that approximately 500 U.S. Marines are 'in a prepared to deploy status should they be necessary to augment and support the [Defense Department's] protection of federal property and personnel efforts.' Democrats across the country have sharply pushed back against the administration's move to federalize the National Guard. Newsom and Bass have been particularly forceful in pushing back against the administration's efforts. Newsom warned the federal response is 'inflammatory' and said deploying soldiers 'will erode public trust.' 'LA authorities are able to access law enforcement assistance at a moment's notice,' Newsom wrote in a Saturday X post, adding, 'We are in close coordination with the city and county, and there is currently no unmet need.' Newsom's office on Sunday sent a letter to Hegseth's office asking him to rescind the order deploying armed forces into the city. He also vowed to sue the Trump administration for bypassing his consent over the California National Guard. Bass urged protesters to remain peaceful but slammed the troop deployment as a 'chaotic escalation' amid rising tensions. 'What we're seeing in our city is chaos provoked by the Trump Administration,' Bass said in a message to Los Angeles residents late Sunday. 'When you raid Home Depots and workplaces, when you tear parents and children apart, and when you run armored caravans through our streets, you cause fear and panic,' she added. 'And deployment of federalized troops on the heels of raids is a chaotic escalation.' All 23 Democratic governors issued a statement Sunday afternoon slamming Trump's decision to federalize California's National Guard, using a law that hasn't been used in decades, arguing it was both unnecessary and escalatory. Former Vice President Harris also criticized the deployment of troops in her home city of Los Angeles, calling it a 'dangerous escalation meant to provoke chaos.' 'This Administration's actions are not about public safety — they're about stoking fear,' she added. 'Fear of a community demanding dignity and due process.' She also stressed her support for peaceful protests, saying, 'I continue to support the millions of Americans who are standing up to protect our most fundamental rights and freedoms.' The federalization of the California National Guard represents a rare and legally murky step that bypassed Newsom's consent. The last time the federal government mobilized National Guard members without the consent of a governor was in 1965, when President Lyndon Johnson sent Guard members to Selma, Ala., to protect civil rights protesters there. The National Guard is relatively limited in its scope, since members are deployed specifically to protect federal buildings, which includes the downtown Los Angeles detention center where much of the unrest centered. The military is generally barred from carrying out domestic law enforcement duties. Declaring the Insurrection Act is seen as a potential path around those restrictions. Trump did not rule out invoking the Insurrection Act during a gaggle with reporters before boarding Air Force One on Sunday, but he suggested the current protests against immigration raids had not yet risen to insurrection. Shortly after the gaggle, Trump issued a statement on Truth Social claiming that 'violent, insurrectionist mobs are swarming and attacking our Federal Agents to try and stop our deportation operations.' The Associated Press contributed.