Pakistani politicians, activists call on govt to review Trump's nomination for Nobel peace prize
Several Pakistani politicians and notable figures have asked the government to reconsider its decision to recommend President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize after the US bombed Iran's three nuclear sites. Pakistan said it would support US President Donald Trump's nomination for a Nobel peace prize(AP)
The government, in a surprise move on Friday, announced that it would nominate Trump for the prestigious award due to his peacemaking efforts during the recent India-Pakistan conflict.
A letter of recommendation, signed by Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, has already been sent to the Nobel Peace Prize Committee in Norway.
But the decision came under scrutiny after the US bombed Iran's Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites, joining Israel to dent Tehran's nuclear programme.
Also Read: Pakistan condemns US strike on Iran day after nominating Trump for Nobel Peace Prize
The Dawn newspaper reported that some leading politicians demanded the government review its decision in light of the latest development.
Veteran politician Maulana Fazlur Rehman, who heads the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam (JUI-F), demanded that the government rescind its decision.
'President Trump's claim of peace has proven to be false; the proposal for the Nobel Prize should be withdrawn,' Fazl told workers at a party meeting in Murree on Sunday.
He said that Trump's recent meeting and lunch with Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Field Marshal Asim Munir 'pleased Pakistani rulers so much' that they recommended nominating the US president for the Nobel Prize.
"Trump has supported the Israeli attacks on Palestine, Syria, Lebanon and Iran. How can this be a sign of peace?' Fazl questioned.
'With the blood of Afghans and Palestinians on America's hands, how can he claim to be a proponent of peace?'
Trump had campaigned for office as a 'peacemaker' who would use his negotiating skills to quickly end wars in Ukraine and Gaza, but both conflicts are still raging five months into his presidency.
Former senator Mushahid Hussain wrote on X: 'Since Trump is no longer a potential peacemaker, but a leader who has willfully unleashed an illegal war, Pakistan government must now review, rescind and revoke his Nobel nomination!'
He said Trump had been 'trapped by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the Israeli war lobby, committing the" biggest blunder of his presidency'.
'Trump will now end up presiding over the decline of America!'
Trump 'engaged in deception and betrayed his own promise not to start new wars', Mushahid said in another post, strongly condemning the US attacks on Iran.
Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) lawmaker Ali Muhammad Khan wrote 'reconsider' on his X account, highlighting the 'US attack on Iran and continuous US support of Israeli killings in Gaza'.
In a separate post, the Opposition PTI condemned the 'unprovoked' US strikes and voiced 'total support' for Iran's sovereignty.
Raoof Hasan, head of PTI's political think-tank, said the government's decision was now a 'cause of unmitigated shame and embarrassment for those who were instrumental in making the choice'.
'That's why it is said that legitimacy can neither be bought nor gifted,' said Hasan, as he took a jibe at the government.
He also denounced the US' 'total disregard for international covenants' through attacks on Iran.
Former senator Afrasiab Khattak said, 'The sycophancy adopted by the Pakistani ruling elite in nominating President Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize is not part of normative conduct in international diplomacy.'
'It was most embarrassing to announce the nomination hours before Trump ordered to bomb Iranian nuclear sites,' the veteran politician noted.
Jamaat-i-Islami chief Naeemur Rehman has said the decision 'undermines our national dignity and grace'.
Maleeha Lodhi, Pakistan's former ambassador to the US, termed the move 'unfortunate' and said it did not reflect the public's views.
Senior journalist Mariana Baabar, in a post on X, said that 'today Pakistan does not look too good either', sharing the government's post announcing its intention to nominate Trump for the Nobel.
Author and activist Fatima Bhutto asked: 'Will Pakistan withdraw its nomination for him to receive the Nobel Peace Prize?'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
22 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Shashi Tharoor calls for 'greater backing' of PM Modi's energy, dynamism: ‘Prime asset'
Congress leader Shashi Tharoor has heaped big praise on Prime Minister Narendra Modi, calling his energy and dynamism an asset for India. His remarks came days after the Operation Sindoor delegations, one of which Tharoor led, came back after representing India overseas. Prime Minister Narendra Modi greets Congress MP Shashi Tharoor as he meets members of the seven multi-party delegations at his residence in Delhi on Tuesday. (PTI)(HT_PRINT) In a news article with an English daily, Tharoor wrote at length about his takeaways from leading such a delegation, representing India's stance against terrorism. "Prime Minister Narendra Modi's energy, dynamism and willingness to engage remains a prime asset for India on the global stage, but deserves greater backing," he wrote in The Hindu article. Tharoor, who led the Indian delegation to the United States, Panama, Guyana, Colombia, and Brazil, termed Operation Sindoor "a moment of national resolve". He also emphasised the value of unity as a nation and of public diplomacy. He also highlighted his engagement in the Washington DC and said that US officials recognised India's concerns, even in the presence of Pakistani representatives. "Even as a Pakistani delegation was simultaneously present, we found US representatives, including those who met the Pakistani officials, echoing our concerns and urging decisive action against terror groups such as the Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed," Tharoor wrote. As part of the Operation Sindoor outreach, members cutting across party lines travelled to 32 countries to put forth India's resolve to tackle terrorism amid tensions with Pakistan following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. Shashi Tharoor had drawn criticism from Congress after being chosen to lead the Operation Sindoor delegation, as he was not among the names formally recommended by the party to be included in the delegations. 'BJP's super spokesperson' After Tharoor praised the 2015 Uri strike during his Panama leg and said that India never crossed the Line of Control before that, Congress leader Udit Raj termed him "BJP's super spokesperson", further escalating Congress's internal rift. "My dear Shashi Tharoor, Alas! I could prevail upon PM Modi to declare you as super spokesperson of BJP, even declaring (you) as foreign minister before landing in India. How could you denigrate the golden history of Congress by saying that before PM Modi, India never crossed LoC and International border." This post by Udit Raj was also reshared by Congress MP Jairam Ramesh on X. Reacting to the controversy, Shashi Tharoor had said he cannot dwell on the criticism. "'Undoubtedly, in a thriving democracy, there are bound to be comments, criticisms. But I think at this point, we can't afford to dwell on it, when we get back to India, no doubt we have a chance to speak to our colleagues, critics, and media there," Tharoor had said.
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Before & after: Satellite images show damage caused to Iran's Fordow, Isfahan, Natanz nuclear sites after US strike; see pics
US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities New satellite imagery has revealed significant damage to Iran's key nuclear facilities following Saturday's US strikes. Iran has warned of consequences while maintaining a measured initial response. Satellite photos from Maxar Technologies show multiple impact sites at the Fordow nuclear facility, including new craters, potentially collapsed tunnel entrances, and holes along a mountain ridge. While a large support building used for ventilation control remained intact, the status of the underground uranium enrichment centrifuges remains unconfirmed. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported no radiation releases from the site. At Natanz, another critical nuclear site, imagery revealed a new 5.5-meter (18-foot) diameter crater directly above part of the underground enrichment facility. However, the images don't conclusively show whether the strikes penetrated the heavily fortified facility, which lies 40 meters underground and is protected by an 8-meter thick concrete and steel shell. Fordow Nuclear facility Fordow, situated approximately 100 kilometers southwest of Tehran, is a heavily fortified uranium enrichment facility built deep within a mountain. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo Its existence remained secret until Western intelligence uncovered it in 2009. Though smaller than Natanz, Fordow's mountain protection and anti-aircraft systems make it an exceptionally challenging military target. The facility houses sophisticated centrifuges for uranium enrichment. Its deep underground location means that only specialised weapons, specifically the US-made GBU-57 "bunker buster" bombs, could potentially penetrate its defences. These 30,000-pound bombs can only be delivered by American B-2 Spirit stealth bombers, making any serious attack on Fordow virtually impossible without direct US military involvement. Natanz Nuclear Facility Natanz, located 220 kilometers southeast of Tehran, serves as Iran's primary uranium enrichment centre. The facility has been a frequent target of Israeli military operations and has experienced significant damage both above and below ground. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Natanz had achieved uranium enrichment levels of 60% purity, approaching weapons-grade material. The facility has suffered multiple setbacks, including damage from Israeli airstrikes and the notorious Stuxnet cyberattack, believed to be a joint US-Israeli operation. In response to these vulnerabilities, Iran began constructing new sections deeper underground near Kuh-e Kolang Gaz La (Pickax Mountain) to better protect its operations. Despite the attacks, the IAEA has confirmed that radioactive contamination has remained contained within the facility. Isfahan Nuclear Technology Center The Isfahan facility, positioned 350 kilometers southeast of Tehran, functions as Iran's principal nuclear research facility. This expansive complex employs thousands of scientists and features three Chinese-supplied research reactors. The site includes essential laboratories and a uranium conversion facility, crucial for the initial stages of nuclear fuel production. While the facility has been targeted by Israeli strikes, particularly the conversion plant, the IAEA has verified that these attacks have not resulted in any radiation leakage or elevated radiation levels in the surrounding areas.
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Oil routes wobble: Two tankers turn back from Hormuz as US strikes on Iran raise fears of wider conflict
Two supertankers , each capable of carrying around 2 million barrels of crude oil, made a U-turn in the Strait of Hormuz after US airstrikes on Iran triggered fears of retaliation that could affect commercial shipping through the region, Bloomberg reported. The Coswisdom Lake and South Loyalty had both entered the key waterway before abruptly reversing course on Sunday, according to vessel tracking data compiled by Bloomberg. The two empty tankers then sailed south, away from the entrance to the Persian Gulf. Although jamming of ship signals and electronics in the Persian Gulf has increased since Israeli airstrikes on June 13, the movement and subsequent turnarounds of the two vessels resemble routine tanker behaviour rather than irregular incidents. Despite signal interference and attempts by ships to stay further away from the Iranian coastline, oil and gas tankers have continued transiting the strait following the US airstrikes. However, the decision by the Coswisdom Lake and South Loyalty to turn back marks the first indication of possible re-routing. Vessel owners and oil traders are now watching closely for signs that the broader conflict in the Middle East could begin to influence shipping flows. Earlier on Sunday, the Greek shipping ministry issued a notice advising its vessels to reassess voyages through Hormuz and instead take shelter in safe ports until the situation stabilises. The United States launched one of its largest aerial attacks in decades on Sunday, striking Iran's key nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed that the operation—named Operation Midnight Hammer —was 'an incredible and overwhelming success,' carried out on the direct orders of President Donald Trump . Following the strikes, Iran is now considering the option of shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, according to a EuroNews report published on Sunday. The strait is one of the world's most vital maritime chokepoints for oil shipping. Commercial satellite images suggest the US attack may have severely damaged—or even destroyed—the underground Fordow nuclear facility and the centrifuges used for uranium enrichment. However, experts said on Sunday there was no official confirmation yet. Sardar Esmail Kowsari, a commander in Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and a member of parliament, told local media that closing the Strait of Hormuz 'is under consideration,' and added, 'Iran will make the best decision with determination.' Given the rising tensions, vessels might now prefer to wait outside the strait rather than proceed to their designated loading ports if delays are expected upon arrival. Even before the weekend attacks, benchmark tanker earnings had risen by nearly 90%. On Sunday night, freight derivatives appeared to surge, reflecting expectations of disruption. EuroNews also reported that, in case of further escalation, Iran could use its short- and medium-range missiles to target oil platforms and pipelines in the strait, or launch attacks on commercial ships. Surface-to-surface missiles could be aimed at tankers or coastal facilities, while drones and airstrikes could potentially disable radar and navigation systems at major terminals.
