Man charged with murder of Hamilton woman struck by ute
Several bunches of flowers have been laid at the corner of State highways 1C and 3 in Hamilton where Jayde Gilbert was hit and killed last week.
Photo:
Libby Kirkby-McLeod
A man has been charged with the murder of a Hamilton woman who died after she was struck by a vehicle.
Jayde Gilbert, 30, was hit by a gold-coloured ute while standing next to a power pole at the corner of Ohaupo Road and Kahikatea Drive, near Waikato Hospital in May.
A
homicide investigation was launched
, and police on Friday said they had made an arrested that morning.
The suspect will appear in court on Friday afternoon, charged with Gilbert's murder.
"On behalf of the investigation team, I would like to thank the people who assisted Jayde after she was struck by the vehicle, and the many members of our community who responded to our appeals for information," Detective Senior Sergeant Scott Neilson said.
The suspect will appear in court on Friday afternoon, charged with Gilbert's murder.
A witness working at a shop nearby said a lot of people tried to help Gilbert after she was struck.
A funeral notice from Grinter's Funeral Home in Cambridge said Gilbert was a loved daughter, sister, granddaughter, niece, cousin, friend, and mother of two children.
Gilbert's mother started a Give a Little page to help support Gilbert's two children, calling it an "extremely devastating time". As of Friday, it had raised nearly $3500.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
35 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Wrong-way Auckland motorway driver Kingi Karanga turns to Appeal Court to quash convictions
By Ric Stevens, Open Justice reporter of Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi A judge was "literally holding my breath for other motorists" when he saw video footage of Kingi Karanga driving at speed the wrong way down two motorways - bringing "extreme danger to countless people". Karanga drove against Auckland motorway traffic on three occasions on the same afternoon trying to evade police and their Eagle helicopter as they tracked the stolen vehicle he was in. On the last occasion, he continued to drive at speed on three deflated tyres after they had been punctured by road spikes. Karanga, who is now 32, came to a stop and was arrested only when the ute he was driving hit two cars that had stopped in traffic. He also caused another accident after punching a motorist while trying to hijack his car, prompting the dazed man to drive off and accelerate into a lamppost, leaving him with head injuries. Karanga's afternoon of mayhem occurred in October 2017 but he was back before the courts last week, after a series of events that have kept him in prison for most of the time since then. After the highway havoc, Karanga pleaded guilty to "endangering transport", a serious charge that carries a maximum penalty of 14 years in prison and which is aimed at people who dangerously target transport facilities, including vehicles, ships, aircraft and navigation equipment. The Crown also laid reckless driving charges as an alternative to endangering transport - a much less serious charge with a maximum penalty of only three months in prison or a fine not exceeding $4500. In the end, however, it was the three counts of "endangering transport" that stuck - one for each instance of driving the wrong way on the motorways. On one of the legs of his pursuit, Karanga drove 3.1km on the Southwestern Motorway between Neilson St, Onehunga, and Walmsley Rd, Mangere, in one minute and 45 seconds, against the flow of traffic. Court documents state Karanga was driving at more than 100km/h and that the free-flowing traffic was also travelling about that speed, indicating a closing speed of more than 200km/h. Numerous other drivers had to take evasive action to avoid collisions. He also drove in the opposite direction on the Southwestern Motorway, also against the flow of traffic, before moving to the Southeastern Motorway. In 2018, the late Judge Rob Ronayne described the driving as "appalling" and extremely dangerous, and said it almost certainly would have caused a death had a high-speed collision occurred. "I ... watched the Eagle helicopter footage in my chambers and ... I was literally holding my breath for other motorists," the judge said at Karanga's sentencing hearing. Dashcam video footage taken by another motorist showed Karanga in a red utility driving between the fast lane and the median barrier towards oncoming vehicles, some of which swerved out of their lane to avoid him. Judge Ronayne jailed Karanga for six years and nine months - a sentence that also took into account other offences, including attempting to unlawfully take a motor vehicle, assault with intent to rob, reckless and dangerous driving, failing to stop, resisting police, and burglary. There were five burglaries, unrelated to the driving, in which Karanga ransacked houses, was confronted by a victim on one occasion, and urinated on people's clothes. Six and a half years after being sentenced, Karanga applied to appeal against the endangering transport convictions after learning about a Court of Appeal ruling in another case. In 2022, the court issued a decision in the other case that said driving the wrong way along a motorway, even at speed, could not be counted as "endangering transport" under Section 270 of the Crimes Act. This hinged on a technicality. The Court of Appeal ruled that to be convicted under that law, an offender would have to interfere with the road itself, a "transport facility" as specified in the Crimes Act. If the "transport facility" was another vehicle, it was not interference, the court ruled, to merely drive towards it. By the time Karanga made his bid to be heard, lawyers for both the Crown and defence had agreed that if the "endangering transport" charges were laid against him after that decision, they would be dismissed. Karanga argued that his driving would be more appropriately counted as reckless driving, with the much lighter penalty. At the heart of his application to the Court of Appeal was the question of his liberty. After being imprisoned by Judge Ronayne, Karanga received further sentences, while imprisoned, from two more judges for offending he committed earlier. These included aggravated robbery and theft, and added another 18 months to Karanga's sentence. Karanga was released on parole in March 2023 but was recalled eight months later after being charged with new counts of burglary, breaching release conditions, dangerous driving, and carrying a firearm and ammunition. He remains in prison. Currently, his release date is in January 2026 but he might have more time added when he appears for sentence in the Waitākere District Court this month for the offending while on parole. However, Karanga argued before the Court of Appeal that if the endangering transport charges could be reduced to reckless driving, this might affect the amount of time he has to spend in prison overall. In a decision released last week, the Court of Appeal ruled against allowing Karanga an extension of time to bring an appeal after so many years had passed. The appeal justices said they might view things differently if they believed substituting the less serious reckless driving charges might make a difference to the overall sentences added to by Judge Ronayne and the other judges for his serial offending. "If convicted of reckless driving rather than endangering transport, we think it is likely that some or all of the judges would have sentenced Mr Karanga differently on the other charges he faced, to reflect the overall criminality of Mr Karanga's actions," the Court of Appeal decision said. The court dismissed Karanga's application for an extension of time to bring an appeal. He is next due before the Parole Board in September this year. -This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .
RNZ News
35 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Police investigating unexplained death in Wellington
Photo: RNZ / REECE BAKER The police are investigating the unexplained death of a person in the Wellington suburb of Newtown. Emergency services were called to a Newtown address around 7.15pm on Saturday night. "At this stage, the circumstances around the death are being treated as unexplained and police are making enquiries into the matter," the police said. A scene guard was in place at the address overnight and a scene examination is due to take place on Sunday. "Members of the public may see an increased police presence in the area while enquiries are ongoing," the police said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
17 hours ago
- RNZ News
Carrington Resort trial: Former manager defends actions in court
By Shannon Pitman, Open Justice reporter of Belle Mumby (inset) defended forgery charges related to her time working at Carrington Resort. Photo: Supplied / NZME / Open Justice A judge-alone trial against a former manager of a luxury resort accused of fraudulent behaviour has wrapped up but not before she had her say, painting a picture of mounting workloads and rightful entitlements. "I could foresee it would get worse," Belle Mumby said, defending the long hours she claims were justified, despite the resort's insistence otherwise. The former Carrington Resort operations manager has spent the past two weeks facing charges of theft, deception, and forgery in a judge-alone trial in the Whangārei District Court. The Crown alleges Mumby photocopied CEO Jing Ma's signature on an overtime form and claimed payments she wasn't entitled to. She is also accused of using the company account for personal purchases and selling resort-owned equipment - a trailer and post rammer - for $3000 and keeping the proceeds. Mumby maintains Ma approved the photocopied overtime document because she was often unavailable to sign off. She also claims the purchases were for the resort and argues the equipment was unusable, with Ma allegedly pocketing some of the funds. The prosecution's key witness, Ma, faced five days of cross-examination by defence lawyer Wayne McKean. She repeatedly asserted Mumby had stolen from the resort and that none of the overtime claims, purchases, or equipment sales were authorised. Before Mumby took the stand on Tuesday, the resort's payroll clerk, Wendy Weng, said all the overtime forms needed approval with a higher authority signature. Weng was presented an email from Mumby which stated Ma was happy for her to sign off her leave forms from now on. Weng also assumed this included overtime as well. "I saw Jing was included in this email so I assumed Jing was in agreement and she didn't reply otherwise," Weng said. Mumby, taking the stand on Tuesday, said she foresaw her overtime hours increasing as summer approached and waiting for the CEO to sign off was impossible as she was never there. Belle Mumby said she was authorised to do the overtime and purchase items. Photo: Supplied / NZME / Open Justice She claimed Ma suggested signing blank forms that she could later photocopy and complete based on hours worked. "She indicated to me she would come less and less in the future so I [asked] her 'So what happens to my overtime?' I need the verification'," Mumby said. "She suggest[ed] no need to worry about that, she would sign on the blank form and I would go to photocopy it and fill out whatever hours I did, then I can claim it." Mumby said she followed the procedure she was told to do. Regarding the alleged unlawful purchases such as AirPods, iPads, a phone, security cameras and Oral B electric toothbrushes, Mumby insisted they were for the resort or for her job productivity. Ma had previously given evidence that the post rammer and trailer that Mumby allegedly sold were valued at $100,000. But Mumby said both the items were sitting with a pile of rusted machinery, were of no use and sold for $3000. During cross-examination by Crown lawyer Danica Soich, it was suggested to her that clients would never use Oral B electric toothbrushes that may have been previously used by others. Soich pointed out that several items purchased on the resort's account were found at Mumby's house or in her car, including an unopened security system. "There was never a plan to return those items, was there?" Soich asked. "No, I was going to bring them back after sorting myself out from Hong Kong," Mumby replied. "You felt entitled to more than what you were receiving from Carrington?" Soich pressed. "No, I'm happy," Mumby responded. "You bought those items for yourself," Soich alleged. "No, that is wrong," Mumby countered. Mumby said that upon her return from her trip to Hong Kong, she was brought into Ma's office, fired and promised a discussion that never happened. The trial closed on Thursday and Judge Taryn Bayley has reserved her decision. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald.
