Elon Musk Trying to Figure Out Who's to Blame for His Massive Unpopularity
As his time in DC disintegrated this week, Musk intimated to the Washington Post that he was very surprised by what he saw in American government — but not as surprised as he was by everyone's reaction.
"The federal bureaucracy situation is much worse than I realized," the billionaire told the newspaper. "I thought there were problems, but it sure is an uphill battle trying to improve things in DC, to say the least."
That "uphill battle" apparently included getting people on board with his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), the cost-cutting agency that Musk was seemingly gifted in exchange for his help getting Donald Trump elected.
While the boy-brained billionaire wasn't exactly popular before his debut in American politics, he and his agency have become downright detested in 2025. From its iffy mandate and its enormous failure to reach its savings goals to its massive professional and competence breaches, DOGE has been a major dud — and Musk's companies are bearing the brunt.
But ask Musk, and he has no idea why everybody is so mad. As he told it to WaPo, the agency mysteriously became the "whipping boy for everything."
"Something bad would happen anywhere," Musk said, "and we would get blamed for it even if we had nothing to do with it."
Despite his attempts at a breezy reboot this week, it's clear the uber-wealthy memelord is aware that the public hates him and his politics — but the alleged "free speech absolutist" can't seem to figure out why people would want to take their righteous anger out on his company's cars.
"People were burning Teslas," he lamented. "Why would you do that? That's really uncool."
This isn't the first time Musk has searched around dumbfounded, like a confused John Travolta in "Pulp Fiction," looking for the reason people are taking their anger out Teslas.
In March, the world's sometimes-richest man took to the social network he purchased to claim that an "investigation" had found five individuals, along with a liberal-leaning fundraising platform, were behind the widespread protests against his electric vehicle company.
He didn't acknowledge, of course, the crux of those protests: that even Republicans and former fanboys consider the mass firing of civil servants toxic, and that his own poor approval ratings were bringing down Trump's.
Despite his unceremonious exit from government, DOGE's work will go on in Musk's stead, and the agency will soon be "tackling projects with the highest gain for the pain, which still means a lot of good things in terms of reducing waste and fraud."
Today in Washington, as in South Texas, it's business as usual as the White House prepares to send a new slew of DOGE cuts to Congress in a spending bill and SpaceX launches more than two dozen Starlink satellites aboard a Falcon 9 rocket.
Life in DC has gone on after Musk has left the building — not with a bang, but with a whimper.
More on Musk: You Can Suddenly Sense Elon Musk's Desperation
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
8 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump 'a Little Desperate' For Xi Call: Ashton
The Asia Trade President Donald Trump is positioning a personal discussion with his Chinese counterpart as the key to preventing the world's largest economies from spiraling deeper into their trade and technology fight. Ashton Analytics founder Anna Ashton speaks on The Asia Trade about the dynamics between the two superpowers. (Source: Bloomberg)
Politico
12 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump, Senate GOP grapple with the House's SALT math
Top Senate GOP tax writers are doubling down on their interest in scaling back the House's deal on the contentious state and local tax deduction, even as they emerged Wednesday from a meeting with President Donald Trump without an agreement on the politically sensitive issue. Speaking to reporters outside the White House, Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he and his colleagues 'start from a position that there really isn't a single Republican senator who cares much about the SALT issue.' Thune was reiterating a sentiment he shared in an exclusive interview the day before, where he indicated that the House's SALT deal — on which moderate Republicans from high-tax blue states conditioned their votes on the megabill in the House — would need to change in order to get the votes in the Senate. Back at the Capitol, Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) also told reporters Wednesday that because 'there's not a single [Republican] senator from New York or New Jersey or California,' there's not a lot of appetite 'to do $353 billion for states that, basically, the other states subsidize.' But Senate Republicans are also acknowledging that they want to be responsive to the House's own math challenges: If they change the hard-fought deal Speaker Mike Johnson cut with his members to cap the SALT deduction to $40,000, it could present a major vote count dilemma for the Louisiana Republican. 'We are sensitive to the fact that, you know, the speaker has pretty narrow margins, and there's only so much that he can do to keep his coalition together. At the same time it wouldn't surprise people that the Senate would like to improve on their handiwork,' Sen. Todd Young (R-Ind.) told reporters. This was something that came up during the meeting with Trump, with Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) recalling that while the president didn't directly tell lawmakers not to meddle with the House's SALT deal, he said, 'you do this, do we lose three votes here? If you do that, do you lose three votes here?'' Even Thune ultimately conceded, 'we understand that it's about 51 and 218,' referring to the numbers each chamber must meet in order to advance the megabill, 'so we will work with our House counterparts and with the White House.' Yet the tricky tax decision wasn't the focus of the White House meeting, according to Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kansas), who estimated that topic took up only three minutes of the conversation. Instead, Senate Republicans on the Finance Committee wanted to use their audience with Trump to push for their top priority in the massive domestic policy package: How to make the business tax cuts permanent, with Thune warning in an interview earlier this week that it was a red-line for several of his members. 'We're working through the options. We had a very constructive conversation about that. And our members will sit down and figure out the path forward. But there is a path forward,' Thune said after the White House meeting. The typically tight-lipped Crapo also cautioned that he wouldn't 'say anything is settled,' but hinted at the behind-the-scenes push by GOP senators to ensure it's in the final party-line tax and spending legislation. 'We're going to do permanence if I have anything to do with it,' Crapo reiterated. The meeting at the White House came as Senate Republicans have been ramping up their closed-door discussions in a race to get a bill through the chamber and to Trump's desk by their July 4 deadline. Trump in the meeting 'made a pitch' to senators about the importance of getting the bill done, according to Thune. Republicans are also up against the clock amid increasing public pressure from Elon Musk, a Trump ally with a huge megaphone who this week called the bill an 'abomination.' Musk's commentary came up briefly during the White House meeting with Trump, with Thune saying Trump made a 'passing reference' and Marshall suggesting the former DOGE chief was brought up as a joke. 'It was a conversation for 30 seconds,' Marshall said, adding that the comment 'was very much in jest, in laughing.' Mia McCarthy contributed to this report.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Roma's Financial Fair Play restrictions to be lifted in 2026
Roma are heading into the final year of major financial restrictions on the market imposed by UEFA. As evidenced by several news outlets in Italy today, the constraints imposed by the Settlement Agreement with UEFA will officially expire in June 2026. Advertisement Until then, the Giallorossi will have to continue to operate with narrow margins, respecting the parameters of Financial Fair Play. But the horizon is finally starting to clear. From 2026, barring new violations, Roma will exit the sanctions regime that has forced it in recent years to adopt a policy of containment, made up of forced sales and targeted signings, often on a free transfer or with creative formulas involving loans deals. A necessity rather than a choice, due to the obligations undertaken with UEFA to return to the expected economic parameters. For the Friedkins, this will be a turning point. Once freed from the restrictions, the American ownership will no longer have any excuses: it will finally be able to build a Roma that lives up to its declared ambitions. More freedom on the market, more room for investment and, consequently, fewer constraints in building a competitive squad for the top of Serie A.
