
Biblioracle: To blurb or not to blurb? Simon & Schuster flagship imprint will no longer require them
Folks, it's time to talk about blurbs.
You know blurbs, the choice little quotations from other writers or public figures touting the excellence of the book you are considering purchasing. They are often effusive, sometimes unbelievably so, and coming from august persons whose names are known, are meant to make the book at hand impossible to pass up.
In the publishing industry, blurbs are somehow both incredibly important and also meaningless, given that most blurbs come through a system that connects the blurber and the book's author, rather than being an independent, uncompromised judgment.
Many years ago when I published a parody of writing advice books ('Fondling Your Muse: Infallible Advice from a Published Author to the Writerly Aspirant'), I decided to firmly straddle the fence by getting real blurbs from actual prominent people (Patton Oswalt, Michael Ian Black and Dave Eggers), while also inventing blurbs (with a disclaimer that they weren't real) from very famous writers, Tom Clancy, Maya Angelou, Toni Morrison and Anne Lamott. Maya Angelou's invented blurb read, 'After reading this book, I know what the caged bird will be crapping on.'
I thought it was sort of fun, but I was having my cake and eating it too.
We're talking about blurbs because Sean Manning, publisher of one of the nation's premier legacy imprints, Simon & Schuster, wrote recently in Publishers Weekly about his decision to end the practice of requiring blurbs on the books he publishes.
In the piece, Manning observes several things that have gone into his decision. In reviewing the full past catalog of Simon & Schuster books, he saw that 'many of the biggest-selling, prize-winning, most artistically revered titles in the flagship's history did not use blurbs for their first printings.'
The list of the un-blurbed includes 'Psycho,' 'Catch-22,' 'All the President's Men' and 'Lonesome Dove,' among numerous others.
Manning also observed that the blurbing industrial complex seems to have gotten out of control, something I've seen for myself where some writers say they're being asked to secure blurbs prior to selling the book to a publisher. This hunger for blurbs has put a significant strain on the capacities of the writers whose blurbs carry weight with readers, many of whom are (reluctantly) having to opt out so they can do their real work of writing books, not blurbs.
Manning says he's not going to turn down a blurb if it comes in organically, but he's no longer going to put stock in the blurbs as a determiner of which books are worthy of being backed by his publishing imprint.
I think by and large this is a worthy and even brave step. As both a blurber, and blurbee, these things are often fraught, and particularly when it comes to fiction, I think they're largely not necessary. Just let me know enough to see if the book is for me, and I'm set. I don't need to know if a bestselling author calls the book 'astonishing.'
I find blurbs somewhat more useful for non-fiction books where a good blurb can help contextualize what's inside. On the other hand, I'm too far inside the machinery to know if blurbs are a real reader service.
Tell me, faithful readers, should we blurb or not blurb?
John Warner is the author of 'Why They Can't Write: Killing the Five-Paragraph Essay and Other Necessities.'
Twitter @biblioracle
Book recommendations from the Biblioracle
John Warner tells you what to read based on the last five books you've read.
1. 'Conquistador' by S.M. Stirling
2. 'The Nickel Boys' by Colson Whitehead
3. 'The Affair' by Lee Child
4. 'Locked On' by Tom Clancy with Mark Greaney
5. 'Embassytown' by China Mieville
— Mike C., Itasca
I've got a hunch that Mike will enjoy tackling this long, unrestrained, semi-autobiographical classic, 'Shantaram' by Gregory David Roberts.
1. 'In a Lonely Place' by Dorothy B. Hughes
2. 'To Kill a Mockingbird' by Harper Lee
3. 'A River Runs Through It' by Norman Maclean
4. 'Night Boat to Tangier' by Kevin Barry
5. 'Someone' by Alice McDermott
— Marianne B. (on behalf of her book club), Evanston
Marianne says they generally pick books under 350 pages, which makes sense if you want to have everyone read the book. At 313 pages, 'Homegoing' by Yaa Gyasi fits that requirement, while also giving the gang much discussion fodder.
1. 'And No Birds Sang' by Farley Mowat
2. 'Ada Blackjack: A True Story of Survival in the Arctic' by Jennifer Niven
3. 'The Last Voyage of the Karluk' by William Laird McKinlay
4. 'Undertones of War' by Edmund Blunden
5. 'The Expanse' series by James S. A. Corey
— Susan C., Chicago
I see an interest in stories about the wilds, be it on Earth or in space. 'North Woods' by Daniel Mason feels like a good fit here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
How to Watch ‘RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars' Season 10 Online
All products and services featured are independently chosen by editors. However, Billboard may receive a commission on orders placed through its retail links, and the retailer may receive certain auditable data for accounting purposes. Who will take the crown? RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars tenth season premieres on Paramount+ on Friday (May 9). More from Billboard Every Lip Sync From 'RuPaul's Drag Race' Season 16, Ranked You Have to See Light Wire, the Brazilian LED Dance Team That Earned Simon's Golden Buzzer on 'America's Got Talent' Premiere 'America's Got Talent': How to Watch Season 20 Premiere For season 10, the show is switching up the usual formula. This season will not only feature more All Stars than any other season – 18 to be exact – it will also debut an all-new bracket-style competition. This time around, queens will be divided into three groups of six and will compete within their brackets over the course of three episodes. When the group period ends, the three queens with the most points will move on to the semifinals round where they will continue to compete against each other to make it into the Drag Race Hall of Fame and win the $200,000 cash prize. Alongside the increased amount of queens, this season will also features many surprised guests judges, including Wicked co-stars Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo, Chappell Roan, and Sarah Michelle Gellar. Read on to find out how to watch the new season of RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars for free. Season 10 of RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars will premiere with two all-new episodes on Friday, May 9. The show will stream exclusively on Paramount+. This season of RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars will feature the largest group of queens in the show's history, including: Acid Betty (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 8) Aja (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 9, RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars Season 3) Alyssa Hunter (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 14) Bosco (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 14) Cynthia Lee Fontaine (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 8, RuPaul's Drag Race Season 9) Daya Betty (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 14) DeJa Skye (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 14) Denali (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 13) Ginger Minj (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 7, RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars Season 2, RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars Season 6) Irene the Alien (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 15) Jorgeous (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 14, RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars Season 9) Kerri Colby (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 14) Lydia B. Kollins (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 17) Mistress Isabelle Brooks (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 15) Nicole Paige Brooks (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 2) Olivia Lux (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 13) Phoenix (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 3) Tina Burner (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 13) A new season of RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars will be available exclusively on Paramount+ starting on Friday, May 9. If you're not already subscribed, join today and receive a free trial for the first week to stream Drag Race All Stars and other programs on the platform, including RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars: Untucked. The streaming service costs $7.99/month for the ad-supported, Essential plan. Paramount+ with Showtime usually costs $12.99/month. Get: paramount+ free trial Here What else is streaming on Paramount? Subscribers can enjoy tens of thousands of episodes of hit shows and must-watch movies, including Knuckles, The Good Fight, Mayor of Kingstown, Star Trek: Discovery, Star Trek: Picard, Why Women Kill, and Before I Forget, in addition to NFL on CBS, local CBS stations (with Paramount+ Premium) and 24-hour news with CBSN. Want more ways to stream? Paramount+ is also on Prime Video! You can stream episodes from the current season and earlier seasons of Drag Race All Stars with a free trial from Paramount+ on Prime Video. Get: paramount+ on prime video here And if you're looking for Drag Race merch to celebrate the current season, check out the adorable RuPaul Little People Collector's set, The Official Trixie and Katya Coloring Book and RuPaul's Drag Race Monopoly. $23.95 Buy Now On Amazon $12.69 $18.00 30% off Buy Now On Amazon $34.97 Buy Now on walmart Watch the trailer for the new season of Ru-Paul's Drag Race All-Stars below.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Bill Belichick keeps relitigating his disastrous CBS interview
Bill Belichick is one of the greatest football coaches of all time. His P.R. instincts leave much to be desired. Beyond entrusting his personal brand to his 24-year-old girlfriend, Jordon Hudson, Belichick has a bad habit of not letting sleeping dogs lie and/or dead horses go unbeaten. Case in point, now reports that Belichick's book publicist assured Belichick that the disastrous CBS interview would be only about Belichick's book. Advertisement The report emerged today, more than a month after the CBS interview aired. And it has reanimated a dormant issue. The article cites an April 9 email from Simon & Schuster's senior director of publicity David Kass to Belichick. Wrote Kass: "I can assure you that the conversation [will be] about the book." Kass also reportedly told Belichick the CBS interview would be a "puff piece . . . designed to make everyone look good and sell books." (Somewhat surprisingly, the new report doesn't blame Kass for suggesting that Belichick wear an old football jersey with a giant hole in the neck to the CBS interview.) Per Belichick was "furious" when the CBS interview strayed beyond book topics. Then there's this: "Sources say Belichick had actually shot down several interview opportunities Kass had put in front of him over concerns the media outlets would use his book promotion as a way to pry into subjects not related to the actual book." Advertisement It's a fascinating development, for several reasons. First, the story is smeared with Belichick's (or Hudson's) fingerprints. Which means that one or both decided to dredge up a dead story, weeks after the fact. Which also means that one or both believed the new story would cause people to say, "Well, now we understand why she weirdly refused to let him answer the basic question of how they met." Second, one or both decided to throw Kass under the bus, both directly and by potentially instigating a stray, conspiracy theory-inducing remark that Kass "once helped Jeff Benedict's Robert Kraft-themed book, The Dynasty, reach the New York Times' bestseller list." Kass is painted as the villain in this, the one who lied to Belichick about what the CBS interview was going to be. Third, Belichick did other interviews in which questions unrelated to the book were asked — after the CBS sit-down. Michael Strahan asked a few personal questions on Good Morning America. Ryan Clark asked questions about Hudson on The Pivot Podcast. (Then again, those questions apparently were scripted to help Belichick undo the CBS-related P.R. damage.) Advertisement Fourth, Belichick and/or Hudson apparently have decided to try to get on their side by spoon-feeding information to the outlet. Given the extent to which had been hammering all things Belichick and Hudson, a subtle quid pro quo that gets to play nice in exchange for current and future information would be a smart move by Belichick. Make no mistake about it. The issue is back on the front burner because Belichick and/or Hudson decided it would be a smart move to point a finger at Kass, weeks after the fact. And it's just the latest time Belichick and/or Hudson have blamed others for their own blunders. He/she/they have blamed CBS for editing the interview to create a "false narrative." He/she/they have blamed North Carolina for not having a sufficient P.R. function in place when he arrived. He/she/they now blame Kass for failing to (wait for it) "do his job" properly. It's always someone else's fault. It's never their fault. And they presumably think people will buy the idea that they're the victims of widespread incompetence and malfeasance.

NBC Sports
3 days ago
- NBC Sports
Bill Belichick keeps relitigating his disastrous CBS interview
Bill Belichick is one of the greatest football coaches of all time. His P.R. instincts leave much to be desired. Beyond entrusting his personal brand to his 24-year-old girlfriend, Jordon Hudson, Belichick has a bad habit of not letting sleeping dogs lie and/or dead horses go unbeaten. Case in point, now reports that Belichick's book publicist assured Belichick that the disastrous CBS interview would be only about Belichick's book. The report emerged today, more than a month after the CBS interview aired. And it has reanimated a dormant issue. The article cites an April 9 email from Simon & Schuster's senior director of publicity David Kass to Belichick. Wrote Kass: 'I can assure you that the conversation [will be] about the book.' Kass also reportedly told Belichick the CBS interview would be a 'puff piece . . . designed to make everyone look good and sell books.' (Somewhat surprisingly, the new report doesn't blame Kass for suggesting that Belichick wear an old football jersey with a giant hole in the neck to the CBS interview.) Per Belichick was 'furious' when the CBS interview strayed beyond book topics. Then there's this: 'Sources say Belichick had actually shot down several interview opportunities Kass had put in front of him over concerns the media outlets would use his book promotion as a way to pry into subjects not related to the actual book.' It's a fascinating development, for several reasons. First, the story is smeared with Belichick's (or Hudson's) fingerprints. Which means that one or both decided to dredge up a dead story, weeks after the fact. Which also means that one or both believed the new story would cause people to say, 'Well, now we understand why she weirdly refused to let him answer the basic question of how they met.' Second, one or both decided to throw Kass under the bus, both directly and by potentially instigating a stray, conspiracy theory-inducing remark that Kass 'once helped Jeff Benedict's Robert Kraft-themed book, The Dynasty, reach the New York Times' bestseller list.' Kass is painted as the villain in this, the one who lied to Belichick about what the CBS interview was going to be. Third, Belichick did other interviews in which questions unrelated to the book were asked — after the CBS sit-down. Michael Strahan asked a few personal questions on Good Morning America. Ryan Clark asked questions about Hudson on The Pivot Podcast. (Then again, those questions apparently were scripted to help Belichick undo the CBS-related P.R. damage.) Fourth, Belichick and/or Hudson apparently have decided to try to get on their side by spoon-feeding information to the outlet. Given the extent to which had been hammering all things Belichick and Hudson, a subtle quid pro quo that gets to play nice in exchange for current and future information would be a smart move by Belichick. Make no mistake about it. The issue is back on the front burner because Belichick and/or Hudson decided it would be a smart move to point a finger at Kass, weeks after the fact. And it's just the latest time Belichick and/or Hudson have blamed others for their own blunders. He/she/they have blamed CBS for editing the interview to create a 'false narrative.' He/she/they have blamed North Carolina for not having a sufficient P.R. function in place when he arrived. He/she/they now blame Kass for failing to (wait for it) 'do his job' properly. It's always someone else's fault. It's never their fault. And they presumably think people will buy the idea that they're the victims of widespread incompetence and malfeasance.