Labour 'a family' says MP amid Morgan-Starmer differences
A Labour MP has said the party in Wales is like a family that will always fall out but will "knuckle down and come together" ahead of the Senedd election.
Ruth Jones was speaking after the First Minister distanced herself from some of Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's policies for the first time, in a speech earlier this week.
It also follows a meeting between Eluned Morgan and Welsh MPs in which she is believed to have accused them of not standing up for Wales.
This week an ITV Wales / Cardiff University poll suggested Labour had sunk to a historic low, in third place in Wales at 18% behind Plaid Cymru at 30% and Reform at 25%.
Jones, the MP for Newport West and Islwyn, said: "We understand what is going on on the doorstep. We do get it.
"Going forward, we need to make sure there is a good message getting out there.
"In terms of the relationship with the Senedd, we are brothers and sisters in the same party, we will always have rows, we will always fall out but we are always family and at the end of the day we will come together to make sure we get the best Senedd result for the Labour Party that we can."
Wales' Labour first minister says she'll call out Starmer
Wales' first minister hopes to 'jolt' Downing Street
First minister leads Wales' tributes to new Pope
Labour has come first in every assembly Senedd election since the start of Welsh devolution in 1999.
Deputy First Minister Huw Irranca-Davies told Politics Wales the most recent poll was "more surprising than others" but he felt it reflected the "reality of where politics in Wales, and across the UK, currently is".
"There is a real battle going on and, on that basis I, Eluned Morgan and the whole of the Labour family can take nothing for granted," he said.
"We have got to battle to earn people's votes over the year ahead before the Senedd election."
Former Plaid Cymru Assembly Member Nerys Evans said the poll summed up the public's feelings towards a "failing" government.
"A third of our children are in poverty, reading and writing rates are the lowest in the UK, economic productivity is the worst in the UK," she said.
"The challenge for Plaid is to show they are the alternative progressive left of centre government in waiting because this government is not doing what it should be doing in terms of protecting our young people, jobs and public services."
Meanwhile, the Welsh Conservatives are set to meet in Llangollen, Denbighshire, for their conference next week, at a time when they are coming under huge pressure from Reform.
Sian Jones, a former advisor to the Conservative UK Government, said: "It is quite a pivotal moment for the leadership of Darren Millar.
"It's not just about setting out what a possible alternative Conservative vision could look like in a way that is different from the more protest-driven policies of Reform, but also how do they galvanise their membership base?
"How do they motivate their members to make sure they are ready to knock on doors come the election next year? That is the challenge he has."
Is Welsh Labour turning away from Keir Starmer?
Wales needs fair rail deal, FM tells Starmer
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
35 minutes ago
- New York Times
England's High Court Warns Lawyers to Stop Citing Fake A.I.-Generated Cases
The High Court of England and Wales warned lawyers on Friday that they could face criminal prosecution for presenting to judges false material generated by artificial intelligence, after a series of cases cited made-up quotes and rulings that did not exist. In a rare intervention, one of the country's most senior judges said that existing guidance to lawyers had proved 'insufficient to address the misuse of artificial intelligence' and that further steps were urgently needed. The ruling by Victoria Sharp, president of the King's Bench Division of the High Court, and a second judge, Jeremy Johnson, detailed two recent cases in which fake material was used in written legal arguments that were presented in court. In one case, a claimant and his lawyer admitted that A.I. tools had generated 'inaccurate and fictitious' material in a lawsuit against two banks that was dismissed last month. In the other case, which ended in April, a lawyer for a man suing his local council said she could not explain where a series of nonexistent cases in the arguments had come from. Judge Sharp drew the two examples together using rarely exercised powers that were designed to enable the 'court to regulate its own procedures and to enforce duties that lawyers owe.' 'There are serious implications for the administration of justice and public confidence in the justice system if artificial intelligence is misused,' she wrote, warning that lawyers could be convicted of a criminal offense or barred from practicing for using false A.I.-generated material. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Who owns the news? It must not be a group of foreign powers
Who owns the news? Much of the Left has been obsessed with the issue for over a century. They have long railed against press barons and their supposed bias. So it is perhaps surprising that this Labour Government is taking such a lackadaisical approach to foreign states having substantial holdings in British newspapers. The last Conservative government back in December 2023 intervened to put on hold and scrutinise the proposed sale of The Telegraph to a company backed by Sheikh Mansour, the deputy prime minister of the United Arab Emirates. Columnists, including Charles Moore, The Telegraph's former editor, rightly argued that even if there was no actual interference in the newspaper's editorial line, there would be the perception that the paper would no longer be independent. This would fatally undermine the newspaper's standing by throwing away its reputation for fearless reporting, whatever the reality of the situation. The then government listened and last year, in the Digital, Media and Competitions Act, introduced a new regulatory regime to restrict foreign state ownership of newspapers and news magazines. But this Act only set out the broad principle, not the details of how it would be implemented. A total ban would come with its own problems. There would be little risk of editorial interference if, say, the sovereign wealth fund of Norway was a passive investor owning 3pc or 4pc in a UK-listed media company. During the consultations, it was proposed that a 5pc limit may be appropriate to allow for such holdings. Last month the new Government announced that the threshold would not be 5pc, but actually 15pc. I and many of my colleagues in the House of Lords have serious misgivings about this much higher limit, but it is one we can live with. However, there is another aspect of the draft regulations which is unacceptable. The 15pc threshold is not cumulative, it applies to each individual holding. This means that there would be nothing to stop multiple states each owning 15pc of a newspaper. It has been reported that after The Telegraph's proposed takeover by RedBird Capital, Sheikh Mansour intends to retain up to a 15pc stake in the newspaper. With the current proposals there would be nothing to stop, say, Saudi Arabia, Oman and Bahrain from each taking 15pc holdings. A cumulative 60pc of a British newspaper owned by foreign states is a very different proposition. The guarantees against foreign control would have evaporated. Has this potential scenario arisen as a result of an oversight by Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary? Alongside 50 of my fellow peers, I have written to Ms Nandy asking for clarification. Signatories include former chancellor Lord Lamont, former trade secretary Lord Lilley, long-time chairman of the 1922 committee Lord Brady, ex-director of public prosecutions Lord Macdonald and the current chairman of Ipso, the independent press regulator, Lord Faulks. Our fears could be easily assuaged by simply amending the proposed regulations to ensure that 15pc is a cap on total foreign ownership. If the move is deliberate, it raises serious questions about this Government's commitment to a free press. The statutory instrument implementing the Government's regulations has now been laid and will shortly come before both Houses of Parliament. If the proposals reach the Lords in their current form, I and many of my colleagues will not be able to support the measure. The Telegraph's ownership has been left in limbo for two years so far. It is time for the new regulatory framework to be put in place that will allow its smooth transfer to new owners. But this must be done in a way that entrenches the traditional freedoms of our press. The issues are much wider than the future of just one newspaper. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.


Bloomberg
3 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Allegra Stratton: Can Restoration, not Revolution, Work for UK?
Today I'd love you to read this wonderful dispatch from our Irina Anghel. She's been to Lewis in the Outer Hebrides, the island where Donald Trump's mother was born, to see how they are braced for the effect of her son's tariffs. It's illustrated with a beautiful photo portrait by Emily Macinnes of fourth-generation Harris Tweed weaver Iain Martin, dressed in a handsome wool blazer, working on his loom at home.