Recap of ‘Diddy' trial: Hotel security guard says Sean Combs paid $100k in cash for video of assault
A former hotel security officer and a financial executive for Bad Boy Entertainment took the stand Tuesday in Sean 'Diddy' Combs federal racketeering and sex trafficking trial.
The money-focused testimony came as the prosecution sought to prove that Combs created a criminal enterprise using his business empire that aided him in coercing women into 'Freak Offs' and to protect his image.
Combs has pleaded not guilty to charges of racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution. His defense has acknowledged Combs was violent but has questioned the motives of those testifying and has said the accusations fall short of a racketeering conspiracy.
The prosecution has said its coming witnesses will be Frank Piazza, a forensic video expert, and Bryana Bongolan, who has accused Combs of dangling her from a balcony. An accuser who will testify under the pseudonym 'Jane,' and who has been referred to as 'Victim-2' in the indictment, is set to testify afterward. Prosecutors indicated she will likely be on the stand for several days.
Here's what we learned in testimony Tuesday.
Eddy Garcia, who worked as a security officer at the InterContinental Hotel in March 2016, testified that Combs gave him $100,000 in cash to obtain surveillance video of Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura.
The video of the hotel assault has played a key role in the trial so far. CNN first published surveillance video of the incident last year.
Garcia testified under an immunity order after he invoked his fifth amendment right not to incriminate himself. He is the second witness in the trial to testify under an immunity order.
Garcia testified that shortly after the assault, Kristina Khorram – who identified herself to Garcia as Combs' personal assistant – called hotel security and visited the hotel, asking to view or obtain a copy of the video. Combs also asked for the video in calls with Garcia on the security desk phone line and on Garcia's personal cell phone, Garcia said.
'He stated that I sounded like a good guy, that I sounded like I wanted to help, that something like this could ruin him,' Garcia testified. 'He was concerned that this video would get out and that it would ruin his career.'
Garcia testified that Combs also said he 'would take care of me' if Garcia helped him. Garcia said he believed at the time Combs was making a reference to money.
Garcia said he initially told Combs and Khorram to contact hotel management or obtain a subpoena for the video, but after the call from Combs to his personal cell, he called his boss, Bill Madrano, to tell him Combs was willing to pay for the video. Madrano said he would do it for $50,000, according to Garcia.
'Eddy, my angel, I knew you could help,' Combs said after learning the news, Garcia testified.
The next day, Madrano downloaded the video onto a USB thumb drive and gave it to Garcia, who then delivered it to Combs, he testified.
Garcia said Combs asked if it was the only copy of the video. Garcia then called Madrano, who confirmed it was the only copy and he had removed it from the server, he testified.
Garcia expressed to Combs that he was concerned about what would happen if Ventura filed a police report about the incident later.
Combs then called who Garcia said was Ventura on FaceTime and directed her, 'Let him know that you want this to go away, too,' according to Garcia. Ventura said on the FaceTime call that 'it wasn't a good time for this to come out and she wanted this to go away,' Garcia testified. Garcia testified it looked like Ventura but the woman was wearing a hoodie and the lighting was bad.
He said Combs asked for IDs for Garcia, Madrano and the security officer who responded to the incident, Israel Florez. 'This only works if we're all on the same page,' Combs said, according to Garcia. Garcia said that he believed Florez wouldn't agree to cooperate, so he and Madrano gave Combs the ID of a different security officer, Henry Elias.
Combs then had Garcia sign paperwork, including a declaration that it was the only existing copy of the video and a non-disclosure agreement, according to Garcia. The jury saw photos of the documents, which were printed on Combs' company letterhead and referenced the company and its New York office address.
After Garcia signed the papers, Combs left with the documents and returned with a brown bag and a money counter, he said. Combs put a total of $100,000 through the money counter in stacks of $10,000 at a time, Garcia said. Garcia testified he assumed the extra $50,000 was for himself and the other security officer.
Garcia said he gave $50,000 to Madrano and $20,000 to Elias. With the remaining $30,000, he bought a used car and did not deposit any of the money into a bank account or report it on his taxes, he said.
Garcia said that about a week or two afterward, he noticed the incident report and attached security footage were no longer on the security computer. He said he did not report it to anyone because that would 'draw more attention to the situation.'
Combs reached out to Garcia a few weeks later to ask if anyone had asked about the incident or video, Garcia testified. He said he hadn't heard anything.
Garcia testified he was contacted by law enforcement in June 2024 about the incident and said he wasn't honest about his own involvement in the situation at the time. He also testified that he deleted his messages with Florez and Elias about it.
Garcia said he later met with the government again and disclosed that Combs had paid him for the video. He said he was truthful in that meeting and all his subsequent meetings with prosecutors.
On cross-examination, defense attorney Brian Steel reviewed sections of the non-disclosure agreement and noted that it included provisions for when Garcia could discuss the information with law enforcement or other government bodies, but it also specified he had to tell notify Combs' company if he did.
Derek Ferguson – the former chief financial officer at Bad Boy Entertainment, the company that included the record label founded by Combs – testified Tuesday about the overlap of Combs' personal and business finances.
Ferguson worked for Combs and his companies from 1998 to 2017, including as the CFO at Bad Boy from 1998 to 2012. He said his responsibilities included setting budgets, accounting and record-keeping, as well as some joint ventures and strategic partnerships. Combs' personal finances were also sometimes part of Ferguson's responsibilities, he said, but there were periods during his tenure when third parties were assigned to handle them.
Ferguson said Combs would charge business and personal expenses on his corporate card 'from time to time.' Ferguson said members of his team would determine which business or entity a charge pertained to, and then they'd use that business's account to pay that charge.
Ferguson testified that the finance department managed the finances for Combs' properties that he owned in Miami, the Hamptons and New York City. Ferguson also confirmed he knew Combs would provide financial support to family and friends through his personal salaries and distributions.
The jury saw December 2011 bank statements for Combs' bank account for his home in Alpine, New Jersey. On December 14, the records showed the account transferred $20,000 to his ex-girlfriend and key trial witness Cassie Ventura. On December 23, the records show an incoming wire transfer from Rodrick Ventura, Cassie Ventura's father, for $20,000, and on December 27, Combs' account returned the $20,000.
The records match up with testimony from Regina Ventura, Cassie Ventura's mother, who said she wired $20,000 to Bad Boy on Combs' request because she was 'scared about my daughter's safety' after Cassie Ventura sent her a text saying Combs was going to release sexually explicit videos and threatened to have her physically hurt. The money was returned to her account days later, she testified.
On cross-examination, Ferguson confirmed that there were employees in the finance department who went through the corporate credit card statements to determine which charges were valid business expenses and which were personal expenses. He testified it wasn't his job or Combs' to categorize credit card expenses.
Defense attorney Marc Agnifilo asked Ferguson how he currently feels about Combs. After pausing for several seconds, Ferguson shook his head and said, 'I don't know how to respond to that.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News24
31 minutes ago
- News24
'Very disappointed' Trump in stunning live break-up with Musk
Trump says he is 'very disappointed' in Elon Musk after criticism of his tax and spending bill. Musk hits back on X, calling Trump 'ungrateful' and claiming he helped him win the 2024 election. Tesla shares drop 8% as public fallout between the two billionaires rattles markets. Tensions between Donald Trump and Elon Musk exploded into public view on Thursday, as the US president said he was 'very disappointed' by his billionaire former aide's criticisms and Musk hit back in real time on social media. 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office after Musk slammed his tax and spending mega-bill as an 'abomination'. The world's richest man responded by live-tweeting on his X social media platform as Trump spoke on television, saying that the Republican would not have won the 2024 election without him and slamming him for 'ingratitude.' Where is the man who wrote these words? Was he replaced by a body double!? — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 In an extraordinary rant as visiting German Chancellor Friedrich Merz sat mutely beside him, 78-year-old Trump unloaded on SpaceX and Tesla boss Musk in his first comments on the issue. 'I'm very disappointed, because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here... All of a sudden, he had a problem,' Trump said when asked about Musk. The clash comes less than a week since Trump held a grand Oval Office farewell for Musk as he wrapped up his time leading the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). South African-born Musk, 53, hit back minutes later, saying Trump's claims he had advance sight of the bill were 'false.' 'Whatever,' he added above a video of Trump saying Musk was upset about the loss of subsidies for electric vehicles. Whatever. Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill. In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful.… — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 Musk then ratcheted up the public spat even further, saying the Republican would have lost the election without his support. He was the biggest donor to Trump's campaign, to the tune of nearly $300 million. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' Musk said on X. 'Such ingratitude.' Tesla shares fell sharply on Wall Street, down 8%, after his comments, in a sign of the huge stakes for a falling out between the world's richest man and its most powerful. 'A little make-up?' A wistful-sounding Trump took reporters through the break-up with Musk on live television, in what at times sounded more like a therapy session than a meeting with a foreign leader. Trump talked about Musk's farewell appearance in the Oval Office on Friday, when he turned up with a black eye that he said was caused by a punch from his son. Musk, at the time, was also facing reports of drug use on the Trump campaign trail. 'You saw a man who was very happy when he stood behind the Oval desk, and even with the black eye. I said, you want a little makeup? We'll get you a little makeup,' Trump said. 'But he said, 'No, I don't think so,' which is interesting and very nice. He wants to be who he is.' Trump said he could understand why Musk was upset with some of the steps he had taken, including withdrawing a nominee to lead the NASA space agency, which the tech tycoon had backed. Through it all, the visiting German chancellor sat silently. Merz had prepared to avoid a repeat of the ambushes that Trump unleashed on the Ukrainian and South African presidents in the Oval Office - but in the end it was Musk that the US president ambushed. At the center of the bitter row is Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' on tax and spending. The centrepiece of his domestic agenda, it aims to continue tax cuts from his first term - and could define his second term and make or break Republican prospects in the 2026 midterm elections. Musk, however, called it a 'disgusting abomination' on Tuesday on the grounds that it will increase the US deficit. A day later, the magnate called for Republicans to 'kill the bill,' and for an alternative plan that 'doesn't massively grow the deficit.'


Bloomberg
35 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Bankruptcy Was Good for 23andMe
Sometimes a public company has a controlling shareholder who wants to take it private by buying out all of the other shareholders, and that's always messy. 1 The controlling shareholder will to some extent be negotiating with herself: She will want to buy the company for a low price, but the company's shareholders will want to get a high price, but she's the controlling shareholder and can vote for the low price. There are standard solutions to the problem, but they are only partial solutions: In the past few months, I have written a few times about 23andMe Holding Co. as an illustration of these problems. 23andMe is a publicly traded genetic testing company that was once worth about $6 billion, but it has now fallen on hard times. Its founder, Anne Wojcicki, owns about 49% of the voting power of the stock, making her effectively a controlling shareholder. She offered to buy all the stock she didn't own, to take the company private and fix its problems 'outside of the short term pressures of the public markets.' But the board of directors, whose job was to find an 'actionable proposal that is in the best interests of the non-affiliated shareholders,' didn't think her offer was good enough.


New York Times
35 minutes ago
- New York Times
Live Updates: Trump-Musk Alliance Dissolves as They Hurl Personal Attacks
Pinned President Trump and Elon Musk's alliance dissolved into open acrimony on Thursday, as the two men hurled personal attacks at each other after the billionaire had unleashed broadsides against the president's signature domestic policy bill. While meeting with Friedrich Merz, Germany's new chancellor, in the Oval Office, Mr. Trump broke days of uncharacteristic silence and unloaded on Mr. Musk, who until last week was a top presidential adviser. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon,' Mr. Trump said. 'I've helped Elon a lot.' As the president criticized Mr. Musk, the billionaire responded in real time on X, the social media platform he owns. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Mr. Musk wrote. 'Such ingratitude,' he added, taking credit for Mr. Trump's election in a way that he never has before. Mr. Musk had been careful in recent days to train his ire on Republicans in Congress, not Mr. Trump himself. But he discarded that caution on Thursday, ridiculing the president in a pattern familiar to the many previous Trump advisers who have fallen by the wayside. What started as simply a fight over the domestic policy bill sharply escalated in just a few hours. Within minutes of one another, Mr. Trump was making fun of Mr. Musk's unwillingness to wear makeup to cover a recent black eye, and Mr. Musk was raising questions about Mr. Trump's competency as president. The public break comes after a remarkable partnership between the two men. Mr. Musk deployed hundreds of millions of dollars to support Mr. Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. After Mr. Trump won, he gave Mr. Musk free rein to slash the federal work force. And just last week, Mr. Trump gave Mr. Musk a personal send-off in the Oval Office. The president praised Mr. Musk as 'one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced' and gave him a golden key emblazoned with the White House insignia. Mr. Musk promised to remain a 'friend and adviser to the president.' But now Mr. Musk, who has left his temporary role, has turned into the most prominent critic of a top presidential priority. Mr. Musk has lashed out against the far-reaching policy bill in numerous posts on X. He has called it a 'disgusting abomination,' argued that the bill would undo all the work he did to cut government spending and hinted that he would target Republican members of Congress who backed the legislation in next year's midterm elections. Mr. Trump on Thursday said Mr. Musk's criticism of the bill was entirely self-interested, saying he only opposed the legislation after Republicans took out the electric vehicle mandate, which would benefit Tesla, Mr. Musk's electric vehicle company. (Mr. Musk has previously called for an end to those subsidies.) The president also downplayed Mr. Musk's financial support for him during the campaign, arguing he would have won Pennsylvania without Mr. Musk, who poured much of his money and time into the critical battleground state. Mr. Musk also on Thursday rebutted Mr. Trump's statement that Mr. Musk 'knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here.' 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' Mr. Musk wrote, sharing a video of Mr. Trump saying he was disappointed in Mr. Musk.