Chandigarh: GMCH-32 to fill UT pool seats based on NEET-PG merit despite exceeding all-India quota
Government Medical College and Hospital (GMCH), Sector 32, has stuck with the decision of filling half of the state quota seats for admission to PG courses (MD/MS) for the 2024-25 session on the basis of rank obtained in NEET-PG 2024 despite facing opposition from parents for exceeding the all-India quota of 50%.
The PG medical courses seats are divided into state and all-India quota. Earlier, in Chandigarh, the state quota pool was further divided into institutional preference and residence/domicile based. However, on January 29, a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court (SC) had ruled that the domicile quota for admission to PG courses at GMCH-32 is not allowed.
On April 9, based on the apex court's judgement, the UT administration had issued a notice to convert the UT Chandigarh pool seats of the state quota into institutional preference for the third counselling round of admissions to the PG courses. Some students had then approached the high court (HC) against the UT administration's notice and for sharing grievances due to other reasons. The HC had dismissed the pleas in its order on May 27 and directed the UT administration to carry out admissions in accordance with the SC's judgement of January 29 and decisions of the HC division bench on April 23, 2019.
Following the HC's order on May 27, the UT administration had again notified about the third counselling round on June 3, stating that filling of the UT pool seats of the state quota will be held on all-India merit basis of NEET - PG. This notice has been challenged by a parent in the HC for exceeding the all-India quota limit. The hearing for the case is scheduled for Tuesday.
Regarding the June 3 notice, GMCH-32 stated that the third counselling round for the remaining state quota seats will be held on the basis of institutional preference and rank obtained in NEET - PG. Parents are opposing this decision, stating that withhalf of the state quota seats being filled through all-India merit basis, the all-India quota would go up to 75%, exceeding the 50% limit demarcated for it.
While some parents, whose wards are enrolled in medical courses outside Chandigarh, are favouring the decision, the other group, whose wards are studying at GMCH, is favouring institutional preference. The UT administration has been unable to keep its stance stable regarding the admission. A parent who has filed a petition against the notice released recently by the administration termed it arbitrary and said it to be favouring applicants seeking admission through the all-India quota. Health secretary Ajay Chagti said, 'We are going to go ahead with the third counselling as per our June 3 notice that is based on HC's judgement which was upheld by the SC in January. In our clarification plea regarding the remaining seats under the state quota, the SC had directed us in March to go ahead as per the HC's judgment. In the HC's decision on May 27, same directions were issued.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC to state: Justify SC/ST/OBC quotas in minority institutions
Mumbai: Bombay high court on Tuesday questioned state govt on what basis had it issued the govt resolution (GR) including SC, ST and OBC reservations for FYJC admission in minority institutions in the state. "Justify your stand," said Justices Makarand Karnik and Nitin Borkar and posted the hearing on Wednesday. They heard a petition by Solapur's APD Jain Pathashala, a trust that runs Walchand College of Arts and Science and Hirachand Nemchand College of Commerce, filed through advocate Sandeep Waghmare, challenging the May 6 GR issued by the school education and sports department applying constitutional/social reservations in minority education institutes. Even as HC began hearing this case, colleges such as St Xavier's, Jai Hind, HR, KC and Maharashtra College that filed a joint petition with the Maharashtra Association of Minority Educational Institution against the GR, sought a hearing too. All matters will be heard on Wednesday. Advocate S C Naidu, for the Solapur colleges, argued that Article 15 (5) of the Indian Constitution excludes minority educational institutions, aided or unaided, from applicability of reservations for socially and educationally backward classes. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed! IC Markets Start Now Undo He said that under Article 30 (1) (Right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions), the right of admission is exclusively with the management of the minority institution. Naidu also questioned the timing of implementation of the reservations. "This they do at the last minute," he said, adding that it disturbs the admission procedure. Naidu said an identical GR was issued on March 7, 2019, by state govt and was "simply" withdrawn after petitions were filed in HC. "They are playing not only with colleges, but also with students ...Students have to go through stress for studies, for exams and now this stress of uncertainty in admission," Naidu added. The judges then asked the state's advocate to take instruction and inform. Naidu said the finalisation of the merit list is scheduled for Wednesday. The judges then directed that it will be subject to the outcome of the petition. The petition, filed by Maharashtra Association of Minority Institutions and Mumbai colleges, through advocate Manorama Mohanty, said being minority educational institutions, they are governed by an indefeasible right guaranteed under Article 30 to establish, administer and manage educational institutions of their own choice. Further, this right has been acknowledged and reiterated in a series of judgments of Supreme Court as well as Bombay HC "which have consistently held that the minority educational institutions are not subject to any social reservations". The petitioners urged HC to quash and set aside the contentious portion of the May 6 GR and to stay it pending hearing. They also sought directions to state govt to update/rectify the in-house and management quotas and to follow the seat distribution matrix used in 2024-25 academic year. This year, the seat distribution matrix has reduced the management and in-house quota share to half. Mumbai: Bombay high court on Tuesday questioned state govt on what basis had it issued the govt resolution (GR) including SC, ST and OBC reservations for FYJC admission in minority institutions in the state. "Justify your stand," said Justices Makarand Karnik and Nitin Borkar and posted the hearing on Wednesday. They heard a petition by Solapur's APD Jain Pathashala, a trust that runs Walchand College of Arts and Science and Hirachand Nemchand College of Commerce, filed through advocate Sandeep Waghmare, challenging the May 6 GR issued by the school education and sports department applying constitutional/social reservations in minority education institutes. Even as HC began hearing this case, colleges such as St Xavier's, Jai Hind, HR, KC and Maharashtra College that filed a joint petition with the Maharashtra Association of Minority Educational Institution against the GR, sought a hearing too. All matters will be heard on Wednesday. Advocate S C Naidu, for the Solapur colleges, argued that Article 15 (5) of the Indian Constitution excludes minority educational institutions, aided or unaided, from applicability of reservations for socially and educationally backward classes. He said that under Article 30 (1) (Right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions), the right of admission is exclusively with the management of the minority institution. Naidu also questioned the timing of implementation of the reservations. "This they do at the last minute," he said, adding that it disturbs the admission procedure. Naidu said an identical GR was issued on March 7, 2019, by state govt and was "simply" withdrawn after petitions were filed in HC. "They are playing not only with colleges, but also with students ...Students have to go through stress for studies, for exams and now this stress of uncertainty in admission," Naidu added. The judges then asked the state's advocate to take instruction and inform. Naidu said the finalisation of the merit list is scheduled for Wednesday. The judges then directed that it will be subject to the outcome of the petition. The petition, filed by Maharashtra Association of Minority Institutions and Mumbai colleges, through advocate Manorama Mohanty, said being minority educational institutions, they are governed by an indefeasible right guaranteed under Article 30 to establish, administer and manage educational institutions of their own choice. Further, this right has been acknowledged and reiterated in a series of judgments of Supreme Court as well as Bombay HC "which have consistently held that the minority educational institutions are not subject to any social reservations". The petitioners urged HC to quash and set aside the contentious portion of the May 6 GR and to stay it pending hearing. They also sought directions to state govt to update/rectify the in-house and management quotas and to follow the seat distribution matrix used in 2024-25 academic year. This year, the seat distribution matrix has reduced the management and in-house quota share to half.
The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
The difficult task of keeping everyone happy
The recent Cabinet expansion in Telangana reflects the Congress's promised commitment to social justice. By inducting three Ministers — Gaddam Vivek and Adluri Laxman from the Scheduled Caste (SC) group and Vakiti Srihari from the Backward Classes (BC) group — as well as leaders from socially and economically backward communities for various posts, the party has attempted to realign its power structure to better represent historically marginalised groups. However, this has not come without friction, particularly from the dominant Reddy community, which feels ignored despite its numerical and political clout in the Assembly. Of the seven BC MLAs in the Congress, three have been given Cabinet posts and two have been appointed as chief whip and whip. Among Ministers, Ponnam Prabhakar is from the Goud community, Konda Surekha belongs to the Padmashali community (with her husband hailing from the Munnuru Kapu community), and Vakiti Srihari comes from the Mudiraj caste. Pradesh Congress Committee chief A. Mahesh Kumar Goud is a Goud from the BC community. BCs enjoy more representation not just in the Cabinet, but also in key political roles. Additionally, with the inclusion of Mr. Vivek and Mr. Laxman, the number of SC leaders in the Cabinet has increased to four. They are split equally between the Mala and Madiga sub-groups. This balance is critical in a State where internal divisions within SC communities have influenced political equations, particularly the Madiga Reservation Porata Samiti. Deputy Chief Minister Mallu Bhatti Vikramarka, a Mala, holds the Finance portfolio, while former Deputy Chief Minister Damodar Raja Narsimha holds the Health portfolio. Despite this progressive outlook, Congress has triggered dissatisfaction within its largest and historically most influential support base, the Reddy community. In the 119-member Assembly, 43 MLAs are from the Reddy community. Within the Congress, 26 of the 64 MLAs are from the Reddy community. Those who have been left out include strong aspirants such as Komatireddy Rajgopal Reddy, P. Sudarshan Reddy, T. Rammohan Reddy, and Malreddy Ranga Reddy. Mr. Rajgopal Reddy, who played a key role in boosting the Congress's prospects by jumping ship from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) before the elections, feels particularly aggrieved, especially since his political ally, Vivek Venkatswamy, was inducted into the Cabinet. Both leaders were promised a berth. When Mr. Rajgopal Reddy, Mr. Venkatswamy, and Ponguleti Srinivas Reddy from the Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) entered the Congress at around the same time, it created the perception that the BJP was losing ground and that the Congress was the only alternative to the BRS. No one can deny impact of these leaders on the overall performance of the party even though Revanth Reddy, who was then PCC chief, strongly built an anti-BRS narrative. The BJP, which was looking strong, lost steam when Mr. Rajgopal Reddy and Mr. Venkatswamy exited the party at a crucial juncture. Mr. Rajgopal Reddy's brother, Komatireddy Venkata Reddy, is a Minister and hails from Nalgonda — a Reddy bastion. While being progressive in its politics, the Congress would also do well in ensuring that its traditional support base, the Reddy community, is kept happy. While the Congress's caste arithmetic may have worked, the representation of regional and minority members leaves much to be desired. Key districts such as Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy, and Nizamabad have gone not represented in the Cabinet. Muslims, and Lambadas among the tribal communities, have also been left out. There is no Muslim MLA in the Congress fold. The party has only one Muslim MLC, Amer Ali Khan. To bridge this gap, Congress is considering fielding a Muslim candidate from Jubilee Hills in the coming by-election. The names of Mohd Azharuddin, a cricketer, and Faheem Qureshi, a confidante of the Chief Minister, are being floated. To compensate for the absence of the Lambada community, the Chief Minister nominated Ram Chander Naik, an MLA from Dornakal, as Deputy Speaker. This complements the appointment of Gaddam Prasad Kumar, a Dalit, as Speaker. As a result, Telangana is perhaps the only State where both the presiding officers of the Assembly belong to the SC and ST communities, respectively.
Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
Gujarat HC dismisses plea seeking injunction order to Mahatma Gandhi Sabarmati Ashram Memorial Trust from dispossessing family
Gujarat High Court (HC) on Tuesday dismissed a petition moved by a family living on a property within the Gandhi Ashram precincts, seeking injunction order to Mahatma Gandhi Sabarmati Ashram Memorial Trust (MGSAMT) from dispossessing them from two suit properties measuring a total of 6,000 square yards on which they claimed tenancy rights. The court of Justice Sanjeev Thaker passed the order. The MGSAMT is implementing the Rs 1,200 crore Sabarmati Ashram redevelopment project. The petition was moved by one Mohanbhai Rathod and his family members, who challenged the orders of a Small Causes Court and an appellate court rejecting their application to issue an injunction order for two properties over which they claimed tenancy rights. Originally, the plaintiff had moved a house rent petition (HRP) suit before the Small Causes Court with reference to three properties — A, B and C — situated within Sabarmati Ashram precincts. Property B is a residential accommodation and properties A and C are plots of land. They had also sought injunction orders against the concerned trust of the ashram in 2014 while claiming tenancy rights. The Small Causes Court had in 2019 granted injunction for Property B, while rejecting the application for properties A and C. This order was challenged before the appellate court which upheld the order. Following this, the plaintiff moved a revision application before the HC, which rejected the revision application while upholding the order of the appellate court. The plaintiff, among other things, had argued that the properties in dispute were handed over to the grandfather of the plaintiff by the trustee of the trust concerned somewhere in 1930. They also argued that the defendant trust accepted the rent for the all three properties since 1977. The defendant trust opposed the petition while arguing that there is nothing in the evidence, including rent receipts produced by the plaintiff, to suggest that the properties referred to in it are with respect to the property mentioned as Properties A and C.
