logo
The Netherlands' government collapses after exit of ‘Dutch Trump'. Who is Geert Wilders?

The Netherlands' government collapses after exit of ‘Dutch Trump'. Who is Geert Wilders?

First Post2 days ago

Geert Wilders, known for his anti-Islam, anti-immigration and anti-EU stance, has risen close to power in the Netherlands. Often called the 'Dutch Trump' for his striking dyed hair and fiery speeches, Wilders on Tuesday pulled his PVV party out of the ruling coalition following a disagreement over stricter migration rules. The move is expected to lead to fresh elections read more
Wilders' decision brings an end to a shaky coalition that has struggled to agree on key issues since it was formed last July. Reuters/File Photo
Often called the 'Dutch Trump' for his striking dyed hair and fiery speeches, Geert Wilders has risen to the edge of power with his anti-Islam, anti-immigration and anti-EU stance.
On Tuesday, he withdrew his PVV party from the ruling coalition in the Netherlands after a disagreement over stricter migration rules. This move is likely to lead to fresh elections.
Wilders' decision brings an end to a shaky coalition that has struggled to agree on key issues since it was formed last July.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
If a snap election is called, it would take place at a time when far-right movements are gaining ground in Europe. Public frustration over migration and living costs is also testing Europe's unity in handling Russia and US President Donald Trump.
Wilders explained that he pulled out because the other three parties in the coalition did not support his plans on asylum and immigration.
'No signature under our asylum plans. The PVV leaves the coalition,' he said in a post on X.
Despite legal troubles, including a conviction for insulting Moroccans, and ongoing death threats that have kept him under police protection since 2004, he has remained defiant in his views.
He made headlines for comments like calling Moroccans 'scum' and for organising cartoon contests of the Prophet Mohammed, framing his career around stopping what he describes as an 'Islamic invasion' of the West.
Now, his latest move has brought down the coalition government he helped create, in what appears to be another attempt to fulfil his long-standing goal of becoming the Dutch prime minister.
After spending many years on the sidelines of Dutch politics, the 61-year-old made a strong comeback in 2023 with a surprise election victory that caught Europe's attention.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
His far-right Freedom Party (PVV) won 37 seats in the 150-member parliament, defeating more established parties like the Green/Left and the liberal VVD.
He has remained defiant in his views. Reuters/File Photo
During the campaign, Wilders softened his tone on immigration. In the final debate before the vote, he even said there were 'bigger problems than fighting against the flood of asylum seekers and immigrants'.
He promised to put his anti-Islam statements 'in the freezer' in exchange for a chance to move into the 'Little Tower', the nickname for the Dutch prime minister's office in The Hague.
But who is Geert Wilders? And what do we know about his political path and his views on Islam?
Let's take a look:
Who is Geert Wilders?
Born in 1963 in southern Venlo, close to the German border, Wilders grew up in a Catholic family with his brother and two sisters.
His mother was half-Indonesian, a fact Wilders rarely mentions.
He developed an interest in politics in the 1980s, his older brother Paul told Der Spiegel magazine.
'He was neither clearly on the left or the right at the time, nor was he xenophobic. But he was fascinated by the political game, the struggle for power and influence,' Paul Wilders said.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
His hatred of Islam appeared to have developed slowly. He spent time in Israel on a kibbutz, witnessing first-hand tensions with the Palestinians.
He also voiced shock at the assassinations of far-right leader Pim Fortuyn in 2002 and the radical anti-Islam filmmaker Theo van Gogh in 2004.
When he heard the news of Van Gogh's murder: 'I remember my legs were shaking with shock and indignation,' he wrote in a 2012 book.
'I can honestly say that I felt anger, not fear.'
Wilders entered politics in 1998 in the VVD party. During his early days in politics, he started dyeing his brown hair blonde and learnt his media-savvy ways.
Over the years, he vowed not to be silenced, despite being convicted of insulting Moroccan-Dutch citizens.
In 2006, he quit the VVD to found his own party, and in 2017, it became the second largest in parliament, falling back to the third largest in 2021.
Wilders grew up in a Catholic family with his brother and two sisters. Reuters/File Photo
By tapping into a seam of Dutch discontent, Wilders also managed to push the political discourse in the Netherlands to the right.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
But Wilders also cut an isolated figure.
He was married to a Hungarian woman but they had no children. When not posting anti-Islamic invective on his one social media account, he posted pictures of their cats on another.
His party consisted of just one person: himself. And his security meant he had little contact with the outside world.
'Geert's world has become very small,' his brother told Der Spiegel. 'It consists of the parliament, public events and his apartment. He can hardly go anywhere else.'
What are his ambitions?
But his coalition partners had other ideas.
The Dutch political system is based on consensus, meaning no one party can dominate, and two of the four party leaders were queasy at the thought of Wilders leading the country.
He reluctantly stepped aside to clinch a coalition deal, writing on X: 'The love for my country and voters is bigger and more important than my own position.'
By tapping into a seam of Dutch discontent, Wilders also managed to push the political discourse in the Netherlands to the right. Reuters/File Photo
After rollercoaster talks, the four parties agreed on Dick Schoof as a compromise PM, with a mandate to introduce the 'strictest-ever' asylum policy seen in the country.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
But Wilders' ambitions were unsated and he frequently voiced his desire to become premier.
He also again ramped up his anti-Islam rhetoric.
'Walk the streets of Western Europe… and you will see that it often looks like a mediaeval Arab city, full of headscarves and burqas,' he alleged in a recent speech.
'Islam is rising but I do not want Islam to rise… for Islam and freedom are incompatible.'
With inputs from AFP

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Influencer Sharmishta Panoli Gets Interim Bail From Calcutta High Court
Influencer Sharmishta Panoli Gets Interim Bail From Calcutta High Court

NDTV

time5 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Influencer Sharmishta Panoli Gets Interim Bail From Calcutta High Court

Quick Read Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed. Sharmishta Panoli, a 22-year-old influencer from Kolkata, was granted interim bail after her arrest over a controversial post. A case has also been filed against the complainant, Wajahat Khan Qadri. Kolkata: Sharmishta Panoli, the 22-year-old social media influencer from Kolkata arrested over a communally charged video linked to Operation Sindoor, has been granted interim bail by the Calcutta High Court. Ms Panoli was arrested on May 31, over two weeks after she made the controversial remarks in response to a post questioning India's military action after the Pahalgam attack. The interim bail comes a day after the Kolkata Police filed a first information report (FIR) against Wajahat Khan Qadri, the man whose complaint led to the arrest of Ms Panoli. Mr Qadri faces allegations of hurting religious sentiments. He is on the run, the police said. An Assam Police team has also reached Kolkata with an arrest warrant for Mr Qadri. The Assam Police filed a case against him earlier this week for posting content on social media that contained hate speech and derogatory remarks, which hurt religious sentiments. He was not found at his Kolkata house when the police team went there on Wednesday. Mr Khan also faces many cases in other states. Ms Panoli was arrested from Gurugram last week after her Instagram post drew protests. Her arrest sparked a political row, with the BJP and its allies targeting the Mamata Banerjee government in West Bengal. She was produced in court and sent to judicial custody for 14 days. Ms Panoli even received support from nearly 7,000 km away. Geert Wilders, a member of the Dutch Parliament and the leader of the right-wing Party for Freedom, has said the influencer's arrest is a "disgrace for freedom of speech" and urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to ensure she is freed.

Hungary's anti-LGBTQ law broke EU rules: court advisor
Hungary's anti-LGBTQ law broke EU rules: court advisor

Time of India

time11 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Hungary's anti-LGBTQ law broke EU rules: court advisor

AP file photo LUXEMBOURG: The European Court of Justice's top legal advisor recommended Thursday that Hungary be declared in breach of EU law over anti-LGBTQ legislation adopted in 2021, in a case pitting Budapest against a majority of its EU partners. The European Commission, 16 of 27 member states, and the European Parliament took Hungary to the EU's top court over the law, in what has been billed as the largest human rights case in the bloc's history. Originally aimed at toughening punishments for child abuse, the law was amended to ban the "promotion of homosexuality" to under-18s. It outraged activists and leaders across the EU who criticised it for stigmatising LGBTQ people and equating same-sex relations to paedophilia. The top legal advisor to the Luxembourg court, Tamara Capeta, considers the bill to violate core EU precepts of non-discrimination and fundamental rights as well as undermining its rules on services and audiovisual media, a court statement said. She recommended that the court declare Budapest in "infringement" of Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), which sets out the fundamental values on which the bloc is founded. Capeta "considers that by calling into question the equality of LGBTI persons, Hungary... has negated several of those fundamental values and, thus, has significantly deviated from the model of a constitutional democracy, reflected in Article 2 TEU," the statement said. The opinion of the advocate general is not binding on the court, which is expected to issue a ruling later this year. The case, the latest confrontation between Brussels and the government of Hungary's nationalist Prime Minister Viktor Orban, could have far-reaching consequences. A finding against Budapest could lead to a large fine and potentially kickstart a procedure to suspend Hungary's voting rights in EU meetings. Provisions in the Hungarian bill, the advocate general found, "interfere" with a number of protections under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. The rights in question are the prohibition of discrimination on grounds of sex and sexual orientation, the respect for private and family life, the freedom of expression and information, and the right to human dignity. Capeta also deemed the Hungarian law to infringe EU rules on the "freedom to provide and receive services". The central European country, under Orban's rule, has passed a series of laws slammed as curbing the rights of sexual and gender minorities, including a bill seeking to ban the Pride march set for June 28 that is based on the 2021 legislation. Since the law was implemented, broadcasters have been forbidden to show LGBTQ content during the day, and shops have been prevented from selling LGBTQ-themed products within a 200-metre (220-yard) radius of churches and schools. Some bookshops have faced fines for carrying graphic novels and other titles with LGBTQ characters in their youth sections, according to advocacy group Reclaim.

EU redirects 335 billion Euros of Covid relief money to defence projects
EU redirects 335 billion Euros of Covid relief money to defence projects

United News of India

time16 minutes ago

  • United News of India

EU redirects 335 billion Euros of Covid relief money to defence projects

Brussels, June 5 (UNI) The European Union will redirect 335 billion euros from the Resilience and Recovery Facility (RRF), which was established for COVID relief, to defence projects, after receiving permission from the European Commission. According to Politico, the Commission, while declaring the amount to be eligible for defence expenditure, said that countries have until August 2026 to meet the certain agreed targets in order to receive the funds. On Wednesday, the body told countries that defence projects under common EU plans such as the satellite communication programmes were now eligible. The European Commission has called for lawmakers and governments to include in the European Defence Industry Programme (EDIP) regulations - a provision to make it possible for countries to use the recovery money - to make contributions to the defence fund. 'These alternatives could help the Recovery Facility to deliver additional important benefits from common European priorities, including in the areas of security and defense,' Economy Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis told reporters, listing a large number of ways in which countries can redesign their plans. This move signals a significant shift in Europe's priorities since the pandemic, as the Russia-Ukraine war has both greatly impacted the European economy, as well as led to most of the EU stand with Ukraine and become increasingly hostile towards Russia, necessitating its need for greater defence spending to ensure it security, as well as the advancement of its weapons and arms industry. The idea behind the initiative is, that if a country diverts RRF-backed money to make contributions to the EU's target plans, then it can easily secure the required funds. When asked how defense investments can contribute to the RRF's green and digital goals, Dombrovskis said the current rules provide no specific treatment for defence-related measures. However, there is no clear consensus on the issue, as several countries which include Spain and Italy - the top beneficiaries of the funds - have asked for the postponement of the 2026 deadline. Additionally, the EU executive has also rejected the idea, meaning that a deal has to be reached between countries and then ratified by 20 parliaments, a process that would not only add considerable time to the initiative, but could outright stall it for a very long and uncertain time. UNI ANV PRS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store