Third day of immigration policy protests continue downtown Los Angeles
For the third day, demonstrators continued protesting the Trump administration's immigration policies in downtown Los Angeles, with some neighboring high school students joining the effort as they walked off campus midday.
Groups of students from Marshall High School, James A. Garfield High School and Bravo Medical Magnet School walked off campus in student-led demonstrations.
Aerial footage showed a large group of Boyle Heights students as they walked along sidewalks from Bravo Medical Magnet School toward city hall.
School officials encouraged students to stay on campus for safety purposes, and to "express their views on campus." Los Angeles Unified School District Superintendent Alberto M. Carvalho encouraged students not to stay home, and to protest "within the school facilities."
By 1 p.m. on Tuesday, a large group convened at city hall.
Protests kicked off on Sunday, where up to 3,000 demonstrators caused traffic disruptions as they closed the 101 Freeway for hours. Police ultimately declared an unlawful assembly and forced the group to disperse. The freeway fully reopened by Sunday night.
Los Angeles Police Department officials said five officers sustained minor injuries while responding to the daylong incident pm Sunday. Two arrests were made, one for felony vandalism to an MTA bus and another for assault with a deadly weapon for throwing objects at officers. Four vandalism reports were made for damage to police vehicles, which included slashed tires, and one crime report was filed for pointing a laser at officers.
On Monday's National Day of Action, demonstrators took to the streets again, moving through downtown Los Angeles, leading police to issue a dispersal order in the early evening. LAPD officials said by the afternoon, the group had grown to about 800 pedestrians and 200 vehicles. California Highway Patrol officers blocked "multiple attempts" made by demonstrators to get onto the 101 Freeway.
By 2:15 p.m., demonstrators breached city hall barriers and "continued to vandalize the area," as fireworks were set off and vehicles burned out. Police said fireworks were being directed toward officers and projectiles were thrown as the crowd grew to about 1,000. Two officers suffered minor injuries but no arrests were made on Monday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
6 minutes ago
- UPI
NATO leaders propose 5% defense investment by member states
June 5 (UPI) -- NATO defense ministers are proposing a 5% annual investment in defense spending by member nations to enhance defensive capabilities during a meeting in Brussels on Thursday. The proposed defense investment plan would require member nations to invest 5% of their respective gross domestic products in defense, NATO officials announced. The change would make NATO a "stronger, fairer, more lethal alliance and ensure warfighting readiness for years to come," according to NATO. The ministers' plan describes "exactly what capabilities allies need to invest over their coming years ... to keep our deterrence and defense strong and our one billion people safe," NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said. U.S. supports increased NATO member spending Many NATO members currently spend about 2% of their respective GDPs, which President Donald Trump has said is insufficient. The 5% defense investment by NATO member states is virtually assured, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told media upon arriving for Thursday's meeting. "We're here to continue the work that President Trump started, which is a commitment to 5% defense spending across this alliance, which we think will happen," Hegseth said. "There are a few countries that are not quite there yet," Hegseth added. "I won't name any names, [but] we will get them there." If approved during the upcoming NATO Summit, defense investments would require respective member nations to spend equal to 3.5% of GDP on core defense spending, plus 1.5% in annual defense and security investments, including infrastructure. The two-day NATO Summit is scheduled to start on June 24 at The Hague. Ukraine support and nuclear deterrence An ad hoc NATO-Ukraine Council also met and reaffirmed NATO's support of Ukraine and agreed that nuclear deterrence is its primary goal. Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustem Umerov and European Union Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Minister Kaja Kallas joined the council to discuss support for Ukraine. Rutte said NATO allies have pledged nearly $23 billion in security assistance for Ukraine in 2025 and are focused on preventing the use of nuclear weapons by Russia and other nations. The final meeting of NATO ministers during the summit also affirmed the alliance's focus on nuclear deterrence. "Nuclear deterrence remains the cornerstone of alliance security," Rutte said. "We will ensure that NATO's nuclear capability remains strong and effective in order to preserve peace, prevent coercion and deter aggression." Trump nominates U.S. general for NATO commander Trump also nominated U.S. Air Force Lt. Gen. Alexus Grynkewich to lead combined U.S. and NATO forces in Europe. If approved during the NATO Summit, Grynkewich would become NATO's supreme allied commander for Europe and commander of the U.S. European Command. Trump is scheduled to attend the NATO Summit. If approved by NATO member states, Grynkewich would replace current Supreme Allied Commander Gen. Chris Cavoli. Grynkewich is an experienced fighter pilot, and his nomination affirms that the United States would continue to emphasize defensive security for Europe. A U.S. officer has been NATO's supreme allied commander since Gen. Dwight Eisenhower first held the post in 1951.
Chicago Tribune
6 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Donald Trump and Elon Musk's relationship flames out
WASHINGTON — Donald Trump and Elon Musk's alliance took off like one of SpaceX's rockets. It was supercharged and soared high. And then it blew up. The spectacular flameout Thursday hit a crescendo when Trump threatened to cut Musk's government contracts and Musk said without providing evidence that Trump's administration hasn't released all the records related to sex abuser Jeffrey Epstein because Trump is mentioned in them. The messy blow-up between the president of the United States and the world's richest man played out on their respective social media platforms after Trump was asked during a White House meeting with Germany's new leader about Musk's criticism of his spending bill. It came less than a week after they appeared together at the White House for a subdued goodbye and Trump thanked Musk for his brief time in the U.S. government by handing him a symbolic but nonfunctional golden key. Trump had largely remained silent as Musk stewed over the last few days on his social media platform X, condemning the president's so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill.' But Trump clapped back Thursday in the Oval Office, saying he was 'very disappointed in Musk.' Musk responded on social media in real time. Trump, who was supposed to be spending Thursday discussing an end to the Russia-Ukraine war with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, ratcheted up the stakes when he turned to his own social media network, Truth Social, and threatened to use the U.S. government to hurt Musk's bottom line by going after contracts held by his internet company Starlink and rocket company SpaceX. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote on his social media network. 'This just gets better and better,' Musk quickly replied on X. 'Go ahead, make my day.' Musk then said, without offering evidence of how he might know the information, that Trump was 'in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' The insinuation tapped into long-standing suspicions among conspiracy theorists and online sleuths that incriminating and sensitive files in the government's possession have yet to be released. The deepening rift unfurled much like their relationship started — rapidly, intensely and very publicly. It also quickly hit Musk financially, even before Trump's threat. After Trump started speaking about Musk, shares of his electric vehicle company Tesla fell over 10%, their latest notable move since the election. The shares doubled in the weeks after Trump was elected, gave back those gains and more during Musk's time at DOGE and then rallied after he vowed in April to focus much more on Tesla and his other companies. Politicians and their donor patrons rarely see eye to eye. But the magnitude of Musk's support for Trump, spending at least $250 million backing his campaign, and the scope of free rein the president gave him to slash and delve into the government with the Department of Government Efficiency is eclipsed only by the speed of their falling-out. Musk offered up an especially stinging insult to a president sensitive about his standing among voters: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' Musk retorted. 'Such ingratitude,' Musk said in a follow-up post. Musk announced his support for Trump shortly after the then-candidate was nearly assassinated on stage at a Butler, Pennsylvania, rally last July. News of Musk's political action committee in support of Trump's election came days later. Musk soon became a close adviser and frequent companion, memorably leaping in the air behind Trump on stage at a rally in October. Once Trump was elected, the tech billionaire stood behind him as he took the oath of office, flew with him on Air Force One for weekend stays at Mar-a-Lago, slept in the White House's Lincoln Bedroom and joined his Cabinet meetings wearing a MAGA hat (sometimes more than one). Three months ago, Trump purchased a red Tesla from Musk on the White House driveway as a public show of support for his business as it faced blowback. Musk bid farewell to Trump last week in a somewhat somber news conference in the Oval Office, where he sported a black eye that he said came from his young son but that seemed to be a metaphor for his messy time in government service. Trump, who rarely misses an opportunity to zing his critics on appearance, brought it up Thursday. 'I said, 'Do you want a little makeup? We'll get you a little makeup.' Which is interesting,' Trump said. The Republican president's comments came as Musk has griped for days on social media about Trump's spending bill, warning that it will increase the federal deficit. Musk has called the bill a 'disgusting abomination.' 'He hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that will be next,' Trump said Thursday in the Oval Office, presaging his future. 'But I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' Trump later said on social media that 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave.' Musk's government employment status, however, limited him from continuing to work. 'He just went CRAZY!' Trump said. Observers had long wondered if the friendship between the two brash billionaires known for lobbing insults online would flame out in spectacular fashion. It did, in less than a year. Trump said Thursday that he and Musk had had a great relationship but mused: 'I don't know if we will anymore.' He said some people who leave his administration 'miss it so badly' and 'actually become hostile.' 'It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome, I guess they call it,' he said. He brushed aside the billionaire's efforts to get him elected last year, including a $1 million-a-day voter sweepstakes in Pennsylvania. The surge of cash Musk showed he was willing to spend seemed to set him up as a highly coveted ally for Republicans going forward, but his split with Trump, the party's leader, raises questions about whether they or any others will see such a campaign windfall in the future. Trump said Musk 'only developed a problem' with the bill because it rolls back tax credits for electric vehicles. 'False,' Musk fired back on his social media platform as the president continued speaking. 'This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' In another post, he said Trump could keep the spending cuts but 'ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.' Besides Musk being 'disturbed' by the electric vehicle tax credits, Trump said another point of contention was Musk's promotion of Jared Isaacman to run NASA. Trump withdrew Isaacman's nomination over the weekend, days after Musk left his government role. 'I didn't think it was appropriate,' Trump said Thursday, calling Isaacman 'totally a Democrat.' Musk continued slinging his responses on social media. He shared some posts Trump made over a decade ago criticizing Republicans for their spending, musings made when he, too, was just a billionaire lobbing his thoughts on social media. 'Where is the man who wrote these words?' Musk wrote. 'Was he replaced by a body double!?'
Buzz Feed
10 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Elon Musk Tweets That Trump Is In Epstein Files
THE GIRLS ARE FIGHTING — and by the girls, I mean President Donald Trump and his former advisor, Elon Musk. To catch you up, Musk has been on a tirade against Trump's championed "One Big, Beautiful Bill..." Trump is referring to the bill's call to eliminate tax credits for electric vehicles — an industry in which Musk, who is the CEO of Tesla, is heavily involved. Well, Musk shot back with a series of tweets where he refers to Trump's words as a show of "ingratitude," saying, "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate." And it didn't end there! With the apparent ball in Trump's court, he took to Truth Social and threatened to "terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts." Which lead to this moment: Yes, Elon Musk claimed that Trump "is in the Epstein files," and "that is the real reason they have not been made public." The "Epstein files" are, of course, a reference to the US government's documentation on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Trump has previously denied connections to Epstein. Last year, he wrote on Truth Social: "I was never on Epstein's Plane, or at his 'stupid' Island. Strong Laws ought to be developed against A.I. It will be a big and very dangerous problem in the future." BuzzFeed reached out to the White House for comment. We'll update you if we hear back. Well! That catches you up to this afternoon. Who knows what tonight will entail.
