Tech secretary asks ChatGPT for policy advice
The minister responsible for artificial intelligence (AI) turned to ChatGPT for policy advice, it has emerged.
Science and tech secretary Peter Kyle asked the AI chatbot why small businesses in the UK were slow to adopt the technology, records show.
Mr Kyle also asked the software which podcasts he could appear on to reach the widest audience possible, and for definitions of terms such as 'quantum' and 'digital inclusion'.
Records obtained under freedom of information laws by the New Scientist magazine show Mr Kyle asked ChatGPT: 'I'm secretary of state for science, innovation and technology in the United Kingdom. What would be the best podcasts for me to appear on to reach a wide audience that's appropriate for my ministerial responsibilities?'
The chatbot suggested The Infinite Monkey Cage and The Naked Scientists based on their number of listeners.
It comes after a January interview with Mr Kyle in which he said he often uses ChatGPT 'to try and understand the broader context where an innovation came from, the people who developed it, the organisations behind them'.
He told PoliticsHome: 'ChatGPT is fantastically good, and where there are things that you really struggle to understand in depth, ChatGPT can be a very good tutor for it.'
Sir Keir Starmer recently set out plans to 'mainline AI into the veins' of the British state, saying it offers a 'unique chance' to boost growth and raise living standards.
On Thursday the PM said it could help the government unlock £45 billion in efficiency savings, replacing or streamlining the work of civil servants.
He said: 'AI is a golden opportunity. You will already be thinking about how you use it in your work.
'That's an opportunity we are determined to seize. So we are going to get the best of best on AI working across government. I'm going to send teams into every government department with a clear mission from me to make the state more innovative and efficient.'
Responding to Mr Kyle's question about why businesses have been slow to adopt the technology, ChatGPT cited factors such as 'limited awareness and understanding', 'regulatory and ethical concerns' and 'lack of government or institutional support'.
'While the UK government has launched initiatives to encourage AI adoption, many [small and medium businesses] are unaware of these programs or find them difficult to navigate,' it said.
'Limited access to funding or incentives to de-risk AI investment can also deter adoption.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
US-UAE multi-billion dollar AI data campus deal far from finalised, sources say
ABU DHABI, June 6 (Reuters) - A multi-billion dollar deal to build one of the world's largest data centre hubs in the United Arab Emirates with U.S. technology is far from being concluded due to persistent concerns around security, sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. The U.S. and the wealthy Gulf state unveiled the massive artificial intelligence campus project set to contain a cluster of powerful data centres during President Donald Trump's two-day visit to Abu Dhabi last month. The planned 10-square-mile (26-sq-km) site is being funded by G42, an Emirati state-linked tech firm that is driving the development of its artificial intelligence industry. Technology giants Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab, OpenAI, Cisco (CSCO.O), opens new tab, and Oracle, along with Japan's SoftBank (9434.T), opens new tab, are working with G42 to build the first phase, opens new tab, known as Stargate UAE, set to go online in 2026. The project, which plans to use advanced Nvidia AI chips, has been promoted by Trump officials as a win in steering Gulf states toward U.S. technology over Chinese alternatives. But according to five sources briefed on the project, U.S. officials have yet to determine the security conditions to export the advanced chips or how the agreement with the Gulf state will be enforced, leaving the deal far from resolved. During Trump's visit, Abu Dhabi pledged to align its national security regulations with Washington, including safeguards to prevent the diversion of U.S.-origin technology. But U.S. officials remain cautious about the UAE's close relationship with China, four of the sources said, noting that the concerns are consistent with those raised during both the Biden administration and Trump's first term, primarily around the Gulf state's reliability as a strategic partner. The sources did not specify whether new evidence had emerged, but said existing concerns remain unresolved. During Trump's first term, the UAE and other Gulf states moved forward with deploying Huawei 5G technology despite U.S. objections. Others in the administration also doubt whether the UAE, despite its intentions, can prevent U.S. technology from reaching Washington's adversaries, four of the sources said. A White House spokesperson referred Reuters to the Commerce Department, which did not respond to a request for comment. Neither did the UAE government. Four sources said the U.S. administration had no clear timeline for finalising the deal. Abu Dhabi would need to accept yet-to-be-defined U.S. controls on the technology, but it could also request amendments that may delay final approval, they said. Two sources said U.S. controls would likely prohibit the use of Chinese technology and restrict the employment of Chinese nationals at the site that is being referred to as an AI campus. The administration remains committed to concluding the deal, four of the sources said, but noted there was opposition among Republicans and Democrats over concerns regarding the UAE's ties with China. Stargate UAE is scheduled to come online next year with an estimated 100,000 advanced Nvidia chips. The 1-gigawatt project will use Nvidia's Grace Blackwell GB300 systems, currently the most advanced AI server that Nvidia offers. Although smaller than the U.S. state of Maine, the UAE is a influential Middle Eastern player known for its strategic hedging that has seen it forge close ties with China and Russia. Last year, under pressure from the Biden administration, G42 ripped out Chinese hardware and sold its Chinese investments. In return, it gained better access to advanced American technology, while Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab acquired a $1.5 billion stake in G42. Nevertheless, major Chinese firms Huawei and Alibaba Cloud remain active in the Gulf state, and an organised AI chip smuggling ring to China has been tracked out of countries including the UAE. The Gulf state has also become a hub for companies evading sanctions imposed on Russia since 2022 over the war in Ukraine. The Trump administration has said that American companies would operate the Emirati-built data centres and offer "American-managed" cloud services throughout the region. The so-called AI campus in Abu Dhabi is supposed to eventually host 5 gigawatts worth of data centres.
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Why I'm scared by a report about Britain's 'minority white' future
A new study has predicted that 'white British' people are set to become a minority in Britain in the next 40 years. Cue the hysteria. I'm not surprised, it feels like this was exactly the intention behind this report. Conducted by Matt Goodwin of Buckingham University, who is also a regular voice on the right-wing TV channel GB News channel, the research claims that the proportion of white Brits will decline from 73% (where it currently stands) to 57% by 2050. It is then thought that white British people will become a minority by 2063 and that by the end of the century they will only constitute a third of the overall population. Referencing his study's findings, Goodwin said that those in favour of 'maintaining the way of life of the traditional majority population' will need their concerns 'recognised, respected and addressed.' Let's be real about what we're looking at here. This is not an impartial, apolitical study of demographic change. Goodwin's definition is so absurdly broad that figures such as King Charles and Winston Churchill wouldn't be considered 'White British' in this instance. Firstly, Goodwin makes frankly insulting and arbitrary decisions about what exactly is considered 'White British'. He defines this as those without at least one immigrant parent – creating a strange conclusion in which some people seem defined only by their 'foreign' side, creating a two-tiered system in which only those untainted by immigrant blood are considered genuinely 'White British' or native. By his definition, as a Muslim with one English parent and one Libyan, I'm not as British as a white non-Muslim, despite being born and raised here. This only reinforces what I have known my entire life – or at least, since I started looking visibly foreign by first wearing the hijab at 15: That I am always defined by my foreignness and never my Englishness. Goodwin's definition is so absurdly broad that figures such as King Charles and Winston Churchill wouldn't be considered 'White British' in this instance. But it is not white people with an American mother or a Greek father who are accused of diluting the native British population when it comes to studies like these. It's people like me whose brown, Muslim lineage renders me a foreigner, despite me being ethnically just as English as I am Libyan. Why else would Goodwin focus on his headline-grabbing statistic that 1 in 5 Britons will apparently be Muslim by the end of the century. In fact, Goodwin's main report on 'religious projections' doesn't even mention any other faiths, simply categorising the UK population along the lines of Muslim or non-Muslim. This sounds chillingly like 'us versus them', 'good guy versus bad guy' or 'native versus foreigner' – all of which fuel hysteria about a Muslim takeover and label Islam and Britishness as mutual exclusives. In fact, just this week we have seen Reform – a party that many predict could soon find its way in Number 10 – raising the issue of a Burka ban. For many, being British is about more than a passport. It looks, sounds and acts a certain way – and that is not Muslim. Studies like the one released this week embolden those holding Islamophobic views, giving them a statistical basis for their bigotry. Research conducted by someone with such incendiary views should be taken with far more suspicion than we have seen with these findings – but I suppose that doesn't matter when there are some catchy fear-mongering soundbites on offer. While the survey has predictably been used as evidence for lowering immigration levels, beneath the odd (frankly racist) categorisation of British identity, it also paints a picture of the birth rates of different communities in the UK and how that will impact future demographics. Given that Britain's birth rate is at an all-time low, we have seen pronatalist policies slowly creep into the mainstream as politicians panic about what the future will look like if nobody can afford to have babies. But what this survey seems to reinforce is that calls to raise the birth rate aren't simply about providing the nation with the next generation of workers and taxpayers. It is, for many, ensuring that the future face of the west remains white and that the so-called native population reproduces quickly enough to balance out other communities like my own, who traditionally tend to have larger families. Last year a peer in the House of Lords made a speech in which he warned about radical Muslims taking over Britain 'through the power of the womb'. More Trending Every year when the name Muhammad inevitably tops the list of most popular baby names, we see another wave of media-manufactured moral panic that Britain overrun by Muslims unless the white British population has more babies. Reports like these don't just legitimise conspiracy theories like this, they help manufacture them, and attempt to make people like me feel more othered, more unsafe. Who knows what this hypothetical Britain will look like in decades time? But if the children and grandchildren of people like me aren't considered part of the future British population, but a hostile outside force, then things are only going to get worse for all of us. Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: Donald Trump and Elon Musk might make peace – but it will never last MORE: What does Eid Mubarak mean and how should you reply to the greeting? MORE: Universal digital 'BritCards' on an app could soon be used to prove who you are
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
‘Momentum is building': Green industries praise clean energy rules for new homes
The Energy Department (Desnz) said on Friday that the future homes standard (FHS), which will be published in autumn, is expected to require new residential properties to have solar panels and low-carbon heating by default. With a significant amount of the UK's carbon footprint coming from gas heating of homes, the FHS will require new housing in England to produce fewer carbon emissions than those built under current regulations. The renewable energy sector, alongside green campaigners, have welcomed the 'common sense' proposals. Trevor Hutchings, chief executive of the Renewable Energy Association (REA) said: 'The growth of solar power has been one of the UK's biggest renewable energy success stories, demonstrating without a doubt that we don't have to choose between lowering our emissions and lowering household energy bills. 'Today's announcement – which the REA has long campaigned for – takes this one step further – not only enabling thousands of future homeowners to experience the benefits of affordable and clean power, but supercharging growth in the British renewable energy industry and driving forward our energy transition.' Chris O'Shea, chief executive of Centrica, said: 'The age of solar is well and truly upon us, with millions of households up and down the country already benefiting from generating their own free electricity from the sun. 'With the Future Home Standard expected in the autumn, momentum is building behind Great Britain's rooftop revolution.' Mike Childs, head of policy, science and research at Friends of the Earth, called the move 'plain common sense' but warned that ministers must act to help decarbonise homes that are already built. 'The Spending Review next week must ensure that the forthcoming Warm Homes Plan is sufficiently funded so that that everyone can enjoy these benefits, and no one is left behind because they can't afford the changes,' he said. Greenpeace UK's head of politics Ami McCarthy said: 'It's extraordinary that such a common-sense solution has taken so long to be rolled out, and this Government deserves full credit for this breakthrough. 'Now ministers need to urgently reform the UK's energy system as a whole and stop gas from setting the price of electricity so that everyone, whether living in a new build or not, gets to enjoy the lower bills that cheap, clean renewable power can bring.' Under the proposed changes, developers must meet solar panel coverage equivalent to 40% of the building's flood area – and those that cannot must install a 'reasonable amount of solar coverage'. The changes will be subject to practical limits with flexibility in place for new homes surrounded by trees or with lots of shade overhead, the Government said. Liberal Democrat MP Max Wilkinson praised the move after ministers previously rejected his 'Sunshine Bill' – a similar law which would have seen new builds come with solar panels equivalent to at least 40% of their ground floor area as standard. The Cheltenham MP told the PA news agency: 'This news will help us fight the cost-of-living crisis by lowering people's energy bills while reducing carbon emissions too. 'I've been campaigning on this since long before I was an MP and was determined to build on its success after I was elected. 'I welcome today's news from the Government and I'm pleased we can all look forward to a brighter future – but there will be more work to do to ensure solar for new builds begins without delay.' Housebuilders largely welcomed the announcement but warned against introducing burdensome paperwork which may harm the Government's efforts to reach its target to build 1.5 million new homes by 2029. Neil Jefferson, chief executive at the Home Builders Federations, said: 'Moving forward, as we look to meet the more challenging carbon reductions set by Government, we will see solar PV panels on the overwhelming majority of new homes. 'We welcome recognition from Government that there needs to be flexibility around the number of panels on roofs in some locations, to reflect orientation and house design. 'We need to ensure the process to agree the number of panels in such locations is workable and not overly bureaucratic such that it does not delay attempts to increase housing supply.' Mark Wakeford, national chairman of the National Federation of Builders, said: 'Solar panels on new homes make sense because they lower bills and progress the clean energy revolution we so desperately need. 'Credit must also be given for recent announcements on grid investment and connection reforms, as these were important challenges to recognise and solve for a rooftop revolution to happen in practice.'
