
Australia is failing families affected by child sexual abuse. We must listen to the intervention and prevention experts
Child sexual abuse is a global public health crisis that directly or indirectly affects every single human being on the planet and costs taxpayers billions of dollars each year. Its lasting harms are wide-ranging, complex, amorphous, generational.
In Australia, one in five boys and one in three girls are sexually abused before the age of 18. One in 10 men have a history of offending against children, online or offline. The most common adult perpetrator is a caregiver in the home. Child sexual abuse accounts for at least half of prosecuted sexual offences in this country. If you aren't a victim-survivor, perpetrator or both, the chances are you love someone who is.
Eight years ago, the royal commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse made a gamut of recommendations to address the problem from every angle. Among them was provision of national support services for non-offending family members of child sexual abuse offenders, who are typically left devastated and traumatised once the offending is revealed, as well as an early intervention service for people concerned about their sexual interest or behaviour towards children. Both measures feature in the 2021 National Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Child Sexual Abuse and its corresponding national action plan, overseen by the National Office for Child Safety (NOCS) – which falls within the Attorney-General's Department.
These services are designed to fill major gaps in the Australian response to child sexual abuse. And although tenders for these services were supposed to go to market in 2022, they weren't opened until a year later. They closed in February 2024. As of today, no contract has been signed for the delivery of these vital services. The process has been so protracted, unethical and mishandled that it warranted an independent audit conducted by the Australian National Audit Office (Anao).
The Anao report, released last week, found that the Attorney-General's Department is failing in its duty to deliver essential services to prevent sexual abuse before it occurs and support affected families. The procurement process was found to be flawed in multiple ways. Perhaps most alarmingly, the highest scoring tender for family support services was inexplicably struck out in favour of the second ranked tender. Out of 11 tenderers, seven failed to comply with one or more of the assessment criteria. In sourcing consultants for the procurement process, the department was found to have engaged in non-competitive practices, contravening its own commonwealth procurement rules.
Despite these shortcomings, the Attorney-General's Department is insisting that the audit will not change the outcome of the tenders. While the department's excuse for the delays is that these are 'complex' services, it is demonstrably unfair to apportion blame to the sector. The problem isn't an absence of services or experts able to manage complexity, it's government incompetence and insufficient funding.
More to the point, regardless of the reason, the dire consequences of the delays extend far beyond the service providers and traumatised consumers in need. There is an unknown but guaranteed number of children who have suffered otherwise preventable sexual abuse as a result.
In any other area of national crisis and priority, the contracting and delivery of critical services is unlikely to be so drawn out and poorly handled. How could something so widespread and urgent be treated with such blatant disregard? Because child sexual abuse is ugly, uncomfortable and impossible to sanitise for the mainstream.
The bleak reality of child sexual abuse is that it cannot be easily communicated in glossy advertising campaigns or public education programs. The fact is, people with a sexual interest in children need options to stop them before they offend, because the moment they take that step, they leave behind a trail of destruction that includes not just their victims and their families, but their own devastated partners and children.
The need for robust, specialised child sexual abuse intervention and prevention services could not be more apparent. Australia has had no national support for non-offending family members of child sexual abuse perpetrators for more than two years. After a police raid removes every device from a family home, who supports the mother? What does she do with her trauma? How does she care for her children? Who do the children of parents who've offended call?
The service models that Australia needs already exist. They've been built by experts, refined over years, and proven to work. Hope lies there, and with the stalwart frontline workers and advocates across the country who will keep fighting for funding because we believe that preventing child sexual abuse is a worthy and achievable goal that benefits all of us.
In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. If you or someone you know is affected by sexual assault, family or domestic violence, call 1800RESPECT on 1800 737 732 or visit www.1800RESPECT.org.au. In an emergency, call 000. International helplines can be found via www.befrienders.org. The Stop It Now! helpline is 1800 011 800.
Grace Tame was the 2021 Australian of the Year, and is director of the Grace Tame Foundation
This article has been co-signed by: Prof Michael Salter, director of the Childlight East Asia and Pacific Hub at UNSW; Prof Jon Rouse APM, Childlight East Asia and Pacific Hub at UNSW and AiLECs Lab Monash University; Hetty Johnston AM; Rosie Batty AO; Rachel Green, CEO of SANE; Natalie Walker, PartnerSPEAK founder
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
‘Your reservation is at risk': beware the Booking.com scam
You've booked the hotel and you're starting to look forward to your break when you get a message telling you to make a payment, or give your credit card details, to secure your holiday. It's come through the app, or in an email that looks legitimate, so you get out your credit card in panic and pay. As the summer holidays get into full swing many of us are primed to hear from travel providers – making it open season for scammers. One of many holiday-related frauds preys on customers who have booked somewhere to stay via the platform either via its website or app. In the UK, Action Fraud received 532 reports of the scam between June 2023 and September 2024, with victims losing a total of £370,000. It says that it is likely hackers are using phishing attacks against accommodation providers and then using the details to contact customers – sometimes via WhatsApp but often through the real platform. This means the usual things to look out for – odd email addresses, or texts, may not apply. Cases seen by Guardian Money have typically involved the theft of several hundred pounds. The global nature of the platform means it can happen to you wherever in the world you live, or plan to holiday. Regulators in countries including Australia have warned of the issue. said: 'Unfortunately, there is an increasing number of online scams targeting many businesses operating in the e-commerce space. With the rise of AI, cybercriminals are able to create increasingly sophisticated scams.' It said continually invested in cybersecurity technology, and incidents on the platform were rare. The message may say that your payment details need to be verified, or that there has been a problem with your card. It will try to make you panic by telling you your accommodation will be cancelled if you don't respond – it will probably give you a deadline to act by – usually a few hours away. There will be a link in the message for you to click on to give your card details. A separate scam also preying on would-be holidaymakers involves fake web pages which are used to trick people into downloading a malicious file that gives criminals full control of your device. The technology firm HP Wolf Security says scammers are emailing links to the pages and visitors are asked to accept cookies before they can see the full site – it is when they press 'accept' that the file downloads. A payment, or credit card details which the scammers say will just be used to pre-authorise or verify the card before your stay. They then charge it. Try not to panic about your holiday and don't respond until you've checked the message is genuine. advises: 'Always double-check the property's payment policies listed on the booking page or in your confirmation email. If there is no pre-payment policy or deposit requirement outlined, but you're asked to pay in advance to secure your booking, it is likely a scam.' If you are in doubt, contact customer service team and/or the accommodation provider directly. Be suspicious of any links you are sent. Genuine payments will be made on the app or website – you won't be sent to another site. Look out for common fraud tactics and giveaways. 'Scam messages often include urgent language and may contain spelling or grammar errors,' says. If you have put your card details into a site, call your card provider. You may need to block or cancel your card. also advises enabling two-factor authorisation on your account


Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Dispute breaks out as dog owner is warned they are breaking a ridiculous rule after committing a very common act: 'Don't film'
A dog owner has clashed with a council worker over a little-known rule about pets in public. The dispute began when two City of Gold Coast workers told the owner that she wasn't allowed to tie her dog to a tree outside her motorhome. In footage taken by the owner's male friend and shared to TikTok, two council officers approached the vehicle and ordered the man not to video the exchange, saying he was not given 'permission'. He argued it was a 'public place' and continued to film the conversation while one of the officers, who appeared to be wearing a bodycam device, introduced herself as Helen. 'You can't have your dog tethered to this tree. You can have him tethered to your vehicle,' she said. The man filming the exchange challenged the council worker, asking what law she was referring to. Dog owners on the Gold Coast are required to keep dogs on a leash unless in a designated off-leash area. Failure to do so can result in an on-the-spot fine of $806. The dog in question appeared to be securely tied to a tree. 'It's great that you have him on a lead but people are walking past here and somebody said he was barking at them, they were afraid and he was aggressive,' Helen said. She explained a complaint had been made to the council and she, and her colleague, had been asked to investigate. 'I'm recording this conversation as we're in a public space. I'm protecting my rights,' the man said as he questioned the council workers authority regarding the complaint. Helen turned to the dog owner and asked whether she was responsible for three dogs she had seen next to the motorhome 'because this is a public place with people walking up and down'. The cameraman explained the two officers worked for the Gold Coast City Council for the benefit of the recording as Helen turned to him and asked him to be quiet. At this point, the male council worker, who had been standing away from the exchange, told Helen to 'leave it'. 'Keep [the dog] tethered to the truck and that will be fine,' Helen told the owner before walking away. 'The other two dogs when we came around the corner, they were off lead so if they're in [the motorhome] that's completely fine, but once they come outside they've got to be on lead.' Once the workers had walked away, the man behind the camera told his friend that 'when you hit them with the actual law they've got no authority'. A City of Gold Coast spokesman told Daily Mail Australia that 'ensuring a dog is under "effective control" in public is a legal requirement under the Animal Management (Cats and Dogs) Act 2008'. 'In all public places, a dog owner/keeper must be physically capable of controlling the dog, by either having the dog on a leash or securely tethered to a fixed object under continuous supervision,' he said. 'These laws are designed to protect public safety and reduce the risk of dog attacks. 'As of July 2024, failing to maintain effective control can result in an on-the-spot fine of $806, with more severe penalties for serious incidents.' Social media users appeared to side with the dog owner and accuse council of overreach. 'All local councils need to be abolished,' one wrote.


Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Shock details emerge about teenager, 15, accused of stabbing Universal Store co-founder Greg Josephson to death during a house party
A teenager charged over the fatal stabbing of a Universal Store co-founder had attended three different schools - including two of Brisbane 's most exclusive private boys' colleges. Greg Josephson, 58, was allegedly stabbed to death during a teen house party at his three-storey home on Oriel Road in Clayfield, an affluent inner northern Brisbane suburb, on Thursday night. Police allege an altercation took place between the father-of-three and a 15-year-old boy, who are believed to be known to each other. The 15-year-old was arrested in nearby Barlow Street soon after the discovery of the body, before he was charged with one count of murder. CCTV footage shows the moment police arrested the teenager, The Courier Mail reported, with a neighbour saying they witnessed the young man being loaded by officers into the back of a police car. Daily Mail Australia can reveal the teenager had changed several schools. Around 30 teenagers, many of whom are from private schools, had attended the house party to celebrate the end of the school term and unknowingly partied downstairs while Mr Josephson's body lay upstairs. Teenagers oblivious to the tragedy unfolding were rounded up in the backyard of the house as officers searched the grounds of the large block, with Queensland Police later stating they had found the alleged murder weapon at an undisclosed location. CCTV showed the accused boy on the same evening at a cafe in nearby Ascot walking across a patio area while wringing his hands. Neatly dressed in a button-up shirt and dark trousers, the boy proceeded to squeeze his way into a narrow rubbish area at the back of the venue. He then appeared to create a barricade by moving several bins in front of him. Police arrested the 15-year-old at about 8.15pm after he called Triple-0. He was refused bail and later taken to hospital to have a minor injury to his hand treated. His case was listed in Brisbane Children's Court on Friday and adjourned until September 2. The accused will remain in custody until then. On Saturday, forensic police continued to search the Oriel Road property, which the Josephson family had been in the process of selling to move to the Sunshine Coast. Mr Josephson co-founded the Universal Store with his brother Michael in 1999. He built up an Australia-wide network of 53 stores, and sold the business in 2018 to private equity investors in a reported $100million deal. He had also amassed a multimillion-dollar property portfolio, including the $13.9million Noosa Reef Hotel on the Sunshine Coast, and a $3.5million group of boutique cottages in Cooran, in the Noosa hinterland. The Josephson brothers come from a clothing dynasty in Brisbane, their great-grandfather having started Josephson's Clothing Factory in 1910, their grandfather creating the Can't Tear 'Em' workwear brand, and their uncle distributing Lee Cooper jeans. The house where Mr Josephson was allegedly murdered had been on the market for 43 days when he died. He and his wife Tamra, who shared children, had bought the 1930s Art Deco home in 2016, conducted a major renovation and were planning to move to Noosa to live. Queensland Police are urging anyone with information, or with CCTV or dashcam footage from the area, to come forward to assist with the investigation. Police said they had still to interview some of the young people who attended Thursday's party. 'We are still establishing the timeline of what has happened at this address,' inspector Jane Healy said. Acting assistant commissioner Rhys Wildman said police will allege a household implement was used during an altercation between the man and the teen. 'There was some sort of altercation that's resulted in this 58-year-old male tragically losing his life,' he said. 'It's not a case of carrying knives, it's unfortunately occurred in a home.'