Spain targets men's 'deafening silence' in gender violence battle
Feminist activists in Spain say inaction and men's silence are hindering the eradication of abuse, as the country celebrates 20 years of a pioneering law against gender-based violence.
The murder of Ana Orantes, a 60-year-old woman who had reported violence against her to the authorities and on television before being burned alive by her ex-husband in 1997, shocked the nation into action.
Parliament ended up adopting a law that entered into force in 2005 and recognised gender-based violence as a human rights violation for the first time, inspiring other countries.
The legislation laid the ground for a range of new support measures for women, including specialised courts, free legal assistance, emergency housing, prosecution even if the victim did not submit a complaint and tags keeping abusers away from the victim.
It was the first law in Spain to be conceived with an explicit gender-based perspective, punishing abuse perpetrated by males against their partners or ex-partners.
For lawyer and activist Altamira Gonzalo, the law stood out by aiming to "undermine the patriarchal structure of society, which is what allows and perpetuates inequality and therefore violence".
It was the first European law which sought to change different areas including the health system, media, advertising and "all those aspects of life in which inequality between men and women is reflected", Gonzalo added.
The measures helped bring down the number of femicides, which in 2024 dropped to a low of 48 since such records began in 2008, when 76 women were killed by their partner or ex-partner.
But "there is still lots of work to do with men, and especially with young males" and "macho attitudes", said Manuela Carmena, a former judge and mayor of Madrid from 2015 to 2019.
Equality Minister Ana Redondo said the scale of the problem was "enormous" and "inoculated like a virus in society" that spread on social networks.
- 'Deafening silence' -
Socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez recently called out fellow men for their inaction, speaking of "a silence that covers macho culture's most subtle manifestations, but also the most extreme ones".
"Everywhere, this silence must end, because today it remains a deafening silence," he said at an event marking the 20th anniversary of Spain's gender-violence law.
This week, the Spanish bar awarded an equality prize to Gonzalo and French lawyers Stephane Babonneau and Antoine Camus, who represented Gisele Pelicot in her notorious mass rape trial that generated much soul-searching in Spain.
Pelicot was raped for years by her husband and dozens of men recruited by him online while sedated, and her insistence that the trial in France be made public made her a global feminist icon.
"Under how much silence was the continual rape of Gisele Pelicot maintained for years? How many men knew and kept quiet?" said Sanchez.
Sexual violence is "under-reported in Spain", agreed Gonzalo, a member of the national observatory against gender-based violence.
Nonetheless, the ground-breaking 2005 law has allowed more than three million women to report their suffering and escape from their ordeal, the lawyer added.
Spanish authorities are now widening the law's scope to include newer offences such as online and economic violence as well as "vicarious violence" -- abuse meted out to children with the aim of making the mother suffer.
we/imm/phz
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Will South Korea's New President Launch a New Era for Crypto?
South Korea's presidential election is under way and exit polls project a win for Lee Jae-Myung, a pro-crypto leader from the liberal party. Plus, Robinhood completes the $200 million acquisition of European crypto exchange Bitstamp and what's behind the slowdown of activity on the XRP Ledger? CoinDesk's Jennifer Sanasie hosts 'CoinDesk Daily.'
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bernie Sanders Says, 'There Is A New Breed Of Uber Capitalists Who Really Believe They Are Superior Human Beings'
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) is calling out America's wealthiest and most powerful, saying that a new kind of billionaire class sees itself as inherently superior. In a wide-ranging interview on the 'Flagrant' podcast, Sanders took aim at everything from campaign spending deregulation and corruption to healthcare, education and the future of the Democratic Party. 'There is a new breed of uber capitalists out there who really believe, and they write about this as well, that they are superior human beings,' Sanders told the podcast hosts Andrew Schulz and Akaash Singh. He said many of today's billionaires view themselves not only as financially successful but as more deserving of power. Don't Miss:Invest where it hurts — and help millions heal:. Sanders continued, explaining there was 'writing on the right, on the far right, which really diminishes democracy, and that really the smart and the wealthy and the powerful have the right to rule.' Sanders pointed out that this mindset reflects an old worldview dressed up in new clothes. 'Back in the 19th century... I am the king, God made my family king... Sorry you're starving to death but that's the way life goes,' he said. 'God told me my family rules.' Schulz noted a trend among the ultra-wealthy: they often pledge to give away their fortunes late in life. 'Upon their death, a lot of them have decided to give away their money,' he said. 'As they get closer to death, they're like, 'Our goal is to give away all our money,' which seems to tell me that they think that there is an issue with them having all that money.' Trending: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . 'They're like, 'It's kind of wrong that we should just keep all this in our family,'' he finished. Sanders criticized what he sees as a system rigged to benefit a few at the top. He said the country has enough money to fix its biggest problems, but refuses to do so. 'We are the richest country in the history of the world,' he said. And yet '60% of people live paycheck to paycheck.' He blamed decades of corporate influence, broken campaign finance laws and political cowardice for the decline of the American middle class. According to him, the Democratic establishment wants to maintain the status quo, and President Donald Trump's solutions will make it emphasized that Americans are paying more for less across key services. 'We are spending twice as much per person on healthcare as most of the European countries,' he said, adding that tens of thousands die every year because they can't afford medical care. His examples include going to a doctor too late, avoiding the co-pay and the deductible. He also mentioned the U.S. treats child care and education as afterthoughts while claiming to love kids. 'We pay child care workers McDonald's wages,' Sanders said. While he confirmed he won't run for president again, Sanders said the work is far from over. He sees hope in a growing movement of younger politicians, many of whom refuse corporate political action committee money. He said there are dozens in the House now who are standing up for the working class, citing Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and others. Read Next: Can you guess how many retire with a $5,000,000 nest egg? .Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Bernie Sanders Says, 'There Is A New Breed Of Uber Capitalists Who Really Believe They Are Superior Human Beings' originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
The Hill
32 minutes ago
- The Hill
Judge Boasberg rules migrants at Salvadoran megaprison can contest gang accusations
A federal judge on Wednesday ruled a group of Venezuelans deported to a Salvadoran megaprison under the Alien Enemies Act must be provided a legal avenue to contest the Trump administration's accusations that they are gang members. U.S. District Judge James Boasberg did not outline specific steps the administration must take, providing one week to propose how it intends to comply. Boasberg said he realized the ruling 'may implicate sensitive diplomatic or national-security concerns' but said the administration 'also has a constitutional duty to provide a remedy that will 'make good the wrong done.'' It's a complex scenario for the administration to carry out. The Trump administration has argued they have no ability to secure the return of anyone held at CECOT, a notorious Salvadoran prison known by its acronym in Spanish. And Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele has said he will not return a mistakenly deported man sent to the facility under regular immigration authorities. That raises the prospect he would decline to do so for Venezuelans being incarcerated in a country that has also been criticized for due process violations in locking up gang members. But the situation spurred an unusual ruling from Boasberg, who turned to literature in determining the men must be given the opportunity for due process. Boasberg described the process of carrying out Trump's removals under the Alien Enemies Act as being akin to a scene from the Franza Kafka novel 'The Trial,' as the Venezuelan men deported through the law were given few answers about what was about to happen to them. 'In the early morning hours, Venezuelans held by the Department of Homeland Security at El Valle Detention Facility in Texas were awakened from their cells, taken to a separate room, shackled, and informed that they were being transferred,' Boasberg wrote. 'To where? That they were not told. When asked, some guards reportedly laughed and said that they did not know; others told the detainees, incorrectly, that they were being transferred to another immigration facility or to Mexico or Venezuela.' Boasberg noted that migrants 'reportedly began to panic and beg officials for more information' only to arrive and learn they were being sent to a Salvadoran megaprison. The migrants were flown out of the country on March 15, shortly after President Trump signed a proclamation invoking the Alien Enemies Act. The law has only been used three previous times, all during declared wars, but Trump has looked to the statute to justify rapidly deporting alleged gang members. Boasberg noted evidence suggesting many of the deported Venezuelans have no gang connection 'and thus languish in a foreign prison on flimsy, even frivolous, accusations.' 'Perhaps the President lawfully invoked the Alien Enemies Act. Perhaps, moreover, Defendants are correct that Plaintiffs are gang members,' Boasberg wrote. 'But — and this is the critical point — there is simply no way to know for sure, as the CECOT Plaintiffs never had any opportunity to challenge the Government's say-so.' One of the lead plaintiffs in the case, Andry Hernandez Romero, came to the U.S. to seek asylum. Romero is a gay makeup artist who said he was facing persecution by the Maduro regime both for his sexuality and political activism. The Trump administration has pointed to tattoos on each of his wrists displaying crowns with the words mom and dad written in Spanish to argue he is a gang member, saying the crowns are signifiers of the Tren de Aragua gang. Experts, however, have said the gang doesn't rely on tattoos to indicate membership, and friends of Hernandez Romero say the tattoos were a nod to Three Kings Day celebrations in his hometown in Venezuela. Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act has sparked a legal battle spanning more than a dozen lawsuits across the country, but Boasberg has been involved since the beginning. In mid-March, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) rushed to Boasberg's court when Trump first invoked the law, quickly securing an order to halt or turn around any flights. Boasberg on Tuesday again condemned the administration for allowing the flights to land in El Salvador that weekend, writing his 'mandate was ignored.' Trump and his allies have publicly accosted Boasberg for his ruling, including calling for his impeachment. The Supreme Court twice ruled the administration must give migrants sufficient notice before deporting them, but it has left it to the lower courts to take a first pass at determining exactly how much notice is required. 'In light of those Supreme Court holdings, this Court ultimately agrees with the CECOT Plaintiffs that they are likely to succeed on the merits of their due-process claim. Defendants plainly deprived these individuals of their right to seek habeas relief before their summary removal from the United States,' Boasberg wrote.
