
Let Britain's magical, mythical creatures inspire a patriotism untainted by politics
It is possible to have too much trust in a marriage. The mythic Welsh warrior Lleu Llaw Gyffes, who appears to have been bigger on brawn than brain, once came home to find his wife, the flower-maiden Blodeuwedd, weeping with fear over premonitions of his death. She begged Lleu to prove that he was, as rumoured, invincible.
Lleu, who had clearly not read the story of Delilah, thought it was a good idea to reveal to his wife each of the unlikely and incongruous conditions that would make it possible for a rival to kill him: among other kinks, they required him to be caught outdoors on a riverbank with one foot straddling a thatched cauldron and one on a wriggling goat. Lo and behold, in one year's time Lleu found himself being struck down in exactly that pose by Blodeuwedd and her lover, the hunter Gronw Pebr. The story is still told to explain the peculiar shape of the Stone of Gronw, sitting to this day on the banks of the River Cynfal in Blaenau Ffestiniog.
Blodeuwedd may have been a tricksy wife, but she is one of eight magical creatures celebrated on Royal Mail's collection of stamps, which revive folkloric traditions from regions across the UK. None is fully human: Blodeuwedd herself was reportedly moulded from flowers by two magicians for their friend, Lleu, after a curse doomed him never to find a bride from among his own people.
The subjects of these stamps are all deeply rooted in regional landscape. They include Cornish Piskies (not to be confused with Devonian Pixies); the shapeshifting selkies of Orkney and Shetland (part seal, part woman); and of course, Loch Ness' most famous resident, Nessie. They provide a rare reminder that England has magical creatures to match the smaller home nations. Norfolk is represented by the Black Shuck, the demonic black dog of East Anglia; Lancashire and Yorkshire by the Grindylow, a river monster that drags children into the reeds. They'd deserve attention if only thanks to the lyrical designs by the artist Adam Simpson, packed with mobile storytelling detail in each still image. They are also, in their own quiet way, deeply patriotic.
Patriotism gets a bad rap in modern Britain. The left often struggles to accept that patriotism can be distinguished from nationalist chauvinism, or that there can be any place for it. Liberals of the centre, meanwhile, have a dangerous tendency to vest pride only in institutions that flatter our ideological preferences, forgetting that France, Germany and even Italy make their own claims to have invented Enlightenment values. Secular patriotism – and by that, I mean a patriotism devoid of emotion or aesthetic – can only ever be transactional. If your love of country is conditional upon its strict adherence to the separation of powers, the secret ballot or even the NHS, it will crumble the first time those institutions come under successful attack.
It is almost 20 years since Gordon Brown, as chancellor, staked out this territory as a personal project. Brown had remarkable foresight: in a speech at the 2006 Fabian Society conference, he foresaw the risks that the lack of a confident and coherent British identity posed to the union and Britain's place in Europe. Three years later, Brown commissioned Being British, a collection of essays edited by then-Spectator editor Matthew d'Ancona, and wrote the introduction.
In an accompanying BBC radio programme, he identified the dangers of leaving British patriotism to be defined by the hard right. 'I think everybody wants to be rooted. Everybody wants to feel a sense of belonging,' he told D'Ancona. But when progressives and liberals fail to cater for that need, 'we define ourselves by race or ethnicity – which would be a disaster for a country that has many people with different backgrounds as part of it.' The result, as Brown foresaw, is the anti-immigrant provocation of Tommy Robinson and the racist violence of the Stockport riots.
It is possible to celebrate aspects of Britain that everyone who lives here can share; that are not co-authored by our peers in Europe; that stimulate our senses with a materiality more enduring than the abstract precepts of a civics lecture. (And I'm not talking, like the wretched 'Life in the UK' test, about fish and chips.) A new set of stamps for Royal Mail is not going to transform a nation's self-image, but it should inspire us. What we have in common with each other, and with every other human being who has set foot on these islands, is no more and no less than our experience of place.
Take the selkie. Coastal nations the world over have stories of water-nymphs who come and go from human husbands: the Aarne-Thompson-Uther Index, a categorisation system used by folklorists to define tale types, classes the selkie myth as a subsection of ATU 400, 'The Man on a Quest for His Lost Wife'. (Nothing takes the joy out of fairy stories like reducing them to numbered index cards.) Versions of seal-maiden can be found well beyond the legal boundaries of the UK, in the Faroe Islands and across Scandinavia.
Sign up to Observed
Analysis and opinion on the week's news and culture brought to you by the best Observer writers
after newsletter promotion
It enriches rather than diminishes us to recognise that these boundaries are porous; that human imagination comingles and crosses arbitrary lines. But only in the Shetlands is the motif so closely linked to the geographic challenges of the sea-swells in the Ve Skerries. The folklorist Walter Traill Dennison claimed to have found a different selkie tale shaped around the landscape of each Orkney island. The thrill of these stories is the local detail woven into the universal.
Just as regional folklore can build new communities, it can stoke ethnic conflict. Royal Mail's stamps take a provocative risk by locating Fionn mac Cumhaill, the Gaelic giant also known as Finn McCool, in Northern Ireland's Giant's Causeway, thus inveigling him into a set celebrating the United Kingdom. Yet they also do a brilliant job of reminding us that Britain's legends are everywhere you look in our landscape.
You don't have to share any DNA with the previous generations who have told these tales. You just have to follow in their footsteps over the same earth, and tell the same stories.
Kate Maltby writes about theatre, politics and culture
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Admirable in their awfulness – the siblings Gus and Gwen John
'In 50 years' time,' Augustus John gloomily reflected following his sister's death on 18 September 1939, 'I will be known as the brother of Gwen John.' He was right. In 2004, when the Tate mounted a joint retrospective of Augustus and Gwen John, it was Gwen who had become the major artist. The 'variable strident chords' of the self-styled Gypsy King, likened in his youth to Michelangelo, Rembrandt and Raphael, had been supplanted by the 'sustained minor key' of the nunlike recluse. The first decades of the 20th century were what Virginia Woolf described as 'the Age of Augustus John'; but the praise lathered on him after his own death, aged 83, in 1961 – 'one of the greatest artists in British history', 'a man in the 50-megaton range', 'the last of the Titans' – now seems embarrassing. The reputation of Gus, as Gwen called him, with Judith Mackrell following suit in her absorbing dual biography, had been on the wane since the 1930s. In the 1940s he despaired that 'my work's not good enough'. 'I'm just a legend,' he said in the 1950s, 'I'm not a real person at all.' Again, he was right: Augustus John is remembered now for his flamboyant hats, gold earrings, open marriage and the 100 offspring he is rumoured to have sired. When he walked through Chelsea, it was said, he patted the head of every child he met in case it was one of his own. Aged 82, he wrote to one of his daughters, Amaryllis, that should she 'ever feel the need' to have a baby, 'just give me a nudge and I will do my best'. His suggestion, Mackrell comments, 'might have been judged goatish, or even outlandish, to an outsider', but to Amaryllis, 'it reflected only their private code'. The middle two of four children, Gwen and Gus were raised in the Welsh seaside town of Tenby, where they ran wild with their sketchbooks. Gwen was eight when their mother died in 1884, and Gus six. 'Mama's dead! Mama's dead!' the siblings chanted, charging through the house in a crazed state. The near-demented erotic pursuits of their adulthood were born from this early abandonment. A figure of 'vast carelessness', as Mackrell describes him, Gus was a man on the run, brawling and shagging, while Gwen, inward-looking and fearing attention, lived and painted in slow time. He was 6ft and lavishly handsome; she was a wiry and feral 5ft; he was agnostic and she was a Catholic; he chose a large metropolitan existence and she a small life in rural France. They would appear to observers like the tortoise and the hare, but on closer inspection they were, as Gus put it, 'much the same, really'. Gus described the force of his desire as 'a sort of paranoia or emotional hailstorm' It is the similarities that Mackrell draws out with her customary care. Cut from the same cloth, brother and sister were both monsters. Artists to the core, they were equally selfish, obsessive and dangerous to know, particularly if you had the misfortune to be loved by one of them. Gus described the force of his desire as 'a sort of paranoia or emotional hailstorm'; as soon as he was attracted to one woman, who invariably became his model, she would be 'immediately obliterated' by another. Gwen was less fickle, but more terrifying. Her passions for both men and women were similarly immediate and overwhelming, affecting her, as she put it, 'beyond reason'. She behaved like a stalker, besieging her love objects with daily letters, debasing herself, waiting on their every word. Even her mentor Rodin, with whom she was besotted for a decade, was afraid of her. His death in 1917 freed Gwen from her sickness, but her place in his life had been 'a secret so small', as Mackrell puts it, that she was not even invited tohis funeral. When Gus went to the Slade, aged 16, in 1894, Gwen followed suit, but only after a fight. Doors swung open for Gus, but everything Gwen did involved a struggle, initially with their father, Edwin. When he would not let her go to Paris to be taught by Whistler, Gwen marched round the house singing 'to Paris, to Paris' until he gave in. When Edwin then told her that she looked, in the white dress she had copied from a painting by Manet, like a prostitute, she excised him from her life. Included in the Paris trip was Ida Nettleship, Gwen's best friend at the Slade before she became Gus's wife when they were both aged 23. His maîtresse-en-titre, the beautiful and otherworldly Dorothy 'Dorelia' McNeill, was similarly stolen from Gwen, who then tried to steal her back when Dorelia joined her on a walking tour to Rome. The two women set off together, says Mackrell, like a 'giddy eloping couple', but there was what Dorelia called a 'hard and queer' quality to Gwen's character and, having got as far as Toulouse, she eloped instead with a Belgian called Leonard. No one was allowed to leave Gus, who importuned Dorelia to separate first from Gwen and then from Leonard, and live instead in 'wonderful concubinage' with himself and Ida. Gwen, with nothing left to lose, now sided with her brother. Even Ida, who wanted her freedom back, could see the benefits of including Dorelia in the household. Living with Gus, 'a mean and childish creature', was pushing her towards a breakdown. And so docile Dorelia, who did what others wanted her to do, returned to England and devoted the next 60 years to Gus and his spawn. When Ida died exhausted, aged 30, after giving birth to her sixth son, Dorelia (who died in 1969) took over the household, at which point this once radiant figure disappears from view. It is not surprising, given his raids on her emotions, that Gwen now cordoned herself off from Gus. Moving to France, she refused to visit her nephews and nieces in England or use the studio that Gus built for her in his garden. Family was everything to Gus, while for Gwen, 'the family has had its day. We don't go to Heaven in families now, but one by one'. Gwen behaved like a stalker, besieging her love objects with daily letters, waiting on their every word While Gus's unconventionality became a pose to sell his paintings, Gwen's refusal to conform to any socially acceptable female norm was the cost of competing as an artist on equal terms with men. He was greedy, but she was an extremophile. As a student, she was so poor that she would break into abandoned buildings in order to sleep. When she lost her adored cat, she slept in the forest. She died, aged 63, in Dieppe, where she had gone for an overnight stay without bringing any luggage. In the chaos of war, the cause of her death, which appears to have been starvation, was left unspecified on her death certificate, and the details of where she was buried were lost. Her friend Louise Roche described Gwen at the end as 'treating her body as though she was its executioner… To go to the doctor inconvenienced her, to take solid nourishment inconvenienced her'. As tough and implacable as a medieval saint, Gwen painted for God. Her pictures were 'prayers', not objects to be bought and displayed. Despairing of her unworldliness, her patron, the American collector John Quinn, despatched his mistress, Jeanne Robert Foster, to form a friendship with his elusive genius. 'All the pathetic dramatisation of life has fallen away,' Jeanne reported to Quinn. 'Gwen is real.' Her life, said Wyndham Lewis, was 'chaste and bare and sad'. Why, he wondered, had she kept herself 'so isolated from the influences of her age'? She influenced, however, our own age: the successor of Gwen John is Celia Paul. Gwen's intransigence and resolve, what Mackrell calls her 'stubborn grit', can be seen in her first self-portrait, painted in 1899-1900, when Gus and Ida were falling in love. Here was a woman, hand on hip, who would be no one's wife or mother, who saw anything but the most primitive domestic conditions as 'bourgeoise'. Gwen was not eccentric: she had a demon inside her. It is hard to tell, Mackrell says in her opening pages, if Gus and Gwen were 'admirable or awful'. By the end of this haunting book they seem admirable in their awfulness.


Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Who won Race Across the World today? BBC final recap
See which of the four teams managed to win Race Across the World series 5 🏃♂️ Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Race Across the World has crowned the winners for series 5. The winning pair walks away with the grand prize after the final leg. But which team made it to the last checkpoint first? The fifth winners of Race Across the World have been crowned after a rollercoaster final on the BBC. The remaining teams faced one last dash to reach the last checkpoint on a truly mammoth journey. After eight weeks - and around 14,000km - four pairs successfully completed the journey from the Great Wall of China to Kanyakumari in India. It is an incredible journey that has taken them across two of the most populous countries in the world - via Nepal. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However, all good things must come to an end, as they say. The final of Race Across the World's fifth series took place tonight (June 11) and just over seven hours separated the top three teams heading into the last leg. But which of the pairs managed to run out as victors at the end of the race? Here's all you need to know: Who won Race Across the World series 5? Race Across the World series 5 finalists | BBC Heading into the final leg of the mammoth race from China to the bottom of India, mother and son duo Caroline and Tom were in the lead. They reclaimed the top spot at the end of last week's seventh leg - as then-leaders Brian and Melvyn saw themselves tumble to the bottom of the leader board after opting for the rural route and avoiding Mumbai and falling 17 hours behind. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Caroline and Tom had a nearly seven hour lead over sisters Elizabeth and Letita. Young Welsh couple Fin and Sioned were ever so slightly further behind at seven hours and 48 minutes - having clawed back from a 33 hour deficit earlier in the season. It set things up for a dramatic final dash across the southern states of India. But who made it to Kanyakumari first? Caroline and Tom were the first to reach the last checkpoint and thus were crowned winners of Race Across the World series five. What does the winner of Race Across the World get? The winning couple walk away with a £20,000 jackpot - as well as bragging rights of course. It has been the same prize since the show began back in 2019. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Fortunately for fans, the show is not completely over as there is still one episode left in the season. Race Across the World will be back next week (June 18) with a reunion special that will reunite the five teams six months after the end of the race. It promises unseen footage, behind-the-scenes insights and plenty more. Find out how to watch it here. Have you got a story you want to share with our readers? You can now send it to us online via YourWorld at . It's free to use and, once checked, your story will appear on our website and, space allowing, in our newspapers.


Scotsman
3 hours ago
- Scotsman
Who won Race Across the World today? BBC final recap
See which of the four teams managed to win Race Across the World series 5 🏃♂️ Sign up to our Arts and Culture newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Race Across the World has crowned the winners for series 5. The winning pair walks away with the grand prize after the final leg. But which team made it to the last checkpoint first? The fifth winners of Race Across the World have been crowned after a rollercoaster final on the BBC. The remaining teams faced one last dash to reach the last checkpoint on a truly mammoth journey. After eight weeks - and around 14,000km - four pairs successfully completed the journey from the Great Wall of China to Kanyakumari in India. It is an incredible journey that has taken them across two of the most populous countries in the world - via Nepal. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However, all good things must come to an end, as they say. The final of Race Across the World's fifth series took place tonight (June 11) and just over seven hours separated the top three teams heading into the last leg. But which of the pairs managed to run out as victors at the end of the race? Here's all you need to know: Who won Race Across the World series 5? Race Across the World series 5 finalists | BBC Heading into the final leg of the mammoth race from China to the bottom of India, mother and son duo Caroline and Tom were in the lead. They reclaimed the top spot at the end of last week's seventh leg - as then-leaders Brian and Melvyn saw themselves tumble to the bottom of the leader board after opting for the rural route and avoiding Mumbai and falling 17 hours behind. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Caroline and Tom had a nearly seven hour lead over sisters Elizabeth and Letita. Young Welsh couple Fin and Sioned were ever so slightly further behind at seven hours and 48 minutes - having clawed back from a 33 hour deficit earlier in the season. It set things up for a dramatic final dash across the southern states of India. But who made it to Kanyakumari first? Caroline and Tom were the first to reach the last checkpoint and thus were crowned winners of Race Across the World series five. What does the winner of Race Across the World get? The winning couple walk away with a £20,000 jackpot - as well as bragging rights of course. It has been the same prize since the show began back in 2019. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Fortunately for fans, the show is not completely over as there is still one episode left in the season. Race Across the World will be back next week (June 18) with a reunion special that will reunite the five teams six months after the end of the race. It promises unseen footage, behind-the-scenes insights and plenty more. Find out how to watch it here.