logo
Looking at COVID-19, five years later

Looking at COVID-19, five years later

Yahoo16-03-2025

Mar. 16—On Jan. 21, 2020, the state of Washington reported its first confirmed case of COVID-19. On March 13 of that year, Idaho would do the same.
By the time the World Health Organization announced the end of the global Public Health Emergency to COVID-19 in May of 2023, the world, for many, felt fundamentally changed.
Public demonstrators had stormed Idaho's Capitol building and shut down school board meetings by refusing to mask. Health care workers reported record levels of burnout, and the industry saw an exodus of professionals.
Political activism in the middle of it all galvanized some, and revealed fault lines within American communities. And across the United States, more than a million people died from COVID-19.
Two years after the official end of the pandemic, The Tribune caught up with local residents and doctors to talk about moving forward, how the experience changed them, and wisdom they've gleaned along the way. These are their reflections.
Dr. Pete Mikkelsen
Dr. Pete Mikkelsen is the chief medical officer for Pullman Regional Hospital, an emergency physician, and medical director for the hospital's emergency department.
In his work, he juggles health care administrative tasks with caring for patients. When the pandemic began, he said, health care workers dealt with a lot of fear for their patients, and for themselves.
"There were stories of young, otherwise healthy, physicians who died of COVID early on," he said. "That hit home for a lot of us. There were a lot of unknowns."
Mikkelsen said in many ways, the pandemic brought out the best in providers as they worked together to take care of their community. But that focus also meant health care workers couldn't work toward other goals. That's something they're still catching up on, he said.
"I think a lot of people felt like they had all these things on their agenda that they wanted to achieve that we had to put on the back burner," Mikkelsen said. "A lot of organizations went through this, where they had to start becoming more strategic because you can't do everything."
Post-pandemic, doctors are seeing more patients than ever, Mikkelsen said. He estimates at his emergency department, there is a 20%-25% higher patient volume than before the pandemic.
At Pullman Regional, where administrators are preparing for an expansion, patients in the emergency department are often treated on gurneys in the hallway as rooms fill up. That expansion is still about two years away, he said.
"We have six patients in the hallway and eight in rooms, and a few more in the waiting room," Mikkelsen said during his early March interview. "That's the reality right now. We have one nurse who's taking care of three patients with acute behavioral health crises."
Health care providers, especially in emergency care, are also increasingly concerned with workplace violence post-pandemic, he said. Some research suggests the pandemic may have contributed to an increase in violence against health care workers.
Some proposed legislation would establish federal criminal penalties for attacking health care workers. Many efforts within hospitals focus on de-escalation and response plans.
"A lot of it has to do with predicting and preventing (violence)," Mikkelsen said. "De-escalation efforts, having an organized response when we have a patient who is agitated."
Providers also faced a general increase in mental health challenges during the pandemic, Mikkelsen said. Today, he thinks medical professionals are better equipped to seek help when they need it.
"Physicians are certainly talking more about their own mental health care. They're getting treatment for depression and anxiety and other mental health things," he said. "So, I think that's probably a positive to come out of this," he said.
Dr. Jacques Bouchard
Dr. Jacques Bouchard is a family medicine doctor and the owner of Link Family Medicine, which is a direct primary care clinic in Moscow.
When the pandemic started, Bouchard was working in a local fee-for-service clinic. He said normal health services ground to a halt.
"We essentially combed through our schedules and whoever was not urgent, we called those patients and said, 'Hey, we're gonna reschedule you,'" Bouchard said.
One of the most stressful experiences for him, Bouchard said, was when a patient needed surgery in the middle of the pandemic but couldn't find a hospital with the resources to take him.
"Three or four of his vessels were blocked and he needed the intervention of a bypass graft," Bouchard said. "He went up to Kootenai (Health). And was all ready. And they're like, yep, you need the surgery. You probably needed the surgery yesterday."
But because no ICU beds were available to transfer someone after his surgery, Bouchard said, his patient had to wait at least a month. All the other hospitals had the same problem, Bouchard said.
"They had the ready space to do the operation. They had the manpower to do it. They had the resources, but they didn't have the hospital space to take care of him.
Bouchard was also a first step for many people seeking mental health care, he said. In a small town with only a few psychiatrists, he said, family medicine doctors are often the first point of contact for people with mental health problems.
"I encountered a lot more anxiety and depression that I treated," he said.
Looking back, Bouchard said, the lessons from the pandemic reinforced his understanding of how people make their medical decisions, about things like vaccinations, and how he can help them make those decisions.
Bouchard can't change what people believe, he said. But what he can do is share what choices he makes for his own health and his family.
"When I tell patients about COVID and how it can be prevented by a vaccine, I tell them in the same breath, 'I get the vaccine. My wife gets the vaccine. All our kids get the vaccine,'" he said. "By telling them personally that you're invested in this, most studies (show), as well as anecdotally with my patients, that goes a long way."
Melyssa Andrews
Two years ago, Melyssa Andrews, 47, spoke with the Tribune about her time during the pandemic.
A health care worker, Andrews also suffered her own losses during the pandemic, including the deaths of several grandparents and friends.
Five years later, Andrews said, her family is still recovering from the pandemic. Andrews is still a working mother, supporting her own mother, and now-17-year-old daughter.
One of the hardest things has been helping her daughter move on and cope with negativity in online spaces, Andrews said.
"It's hard on our kids. They don't have the ability to cope and adapt, because it's all they know," she said. "Even adults got locked into the electronic age."
Andrews has been trying to pull herself and her daughter away from electronics, she said. She goes on trips with her family to places like the Wallowa mountain ranges, boat rides on the Snake River, and stops at Lake Coeur d'Alene and Palouse Falls.
In her work in health care, Andrews said, she saw a shift where more people seemed willing to act aggressively toward workers even after the pandemic ended.
"We're in a new normal where there's less accountability for actions and people are finding it acceptable to be rude in public," she said. "It's hard working in any field that you deal with customer service because people do find that it's OK to treat people badly."
Andrews said she's also seen hostility toward people who still wear masks. But often, those who mask up are doing so because they're more susceptible to disease.
"There's a reason that people are still wearing masks. It's not because they're one political party or another, it's because they have medical ailments," she said. "I just think that people need to be kinder to others."
Daily headlines, straight to your inboxRead it online first and stay up-to-date, delivered daily at 7 AM
Jared Edmonds
In 2022, Jared Edmonds spoke with the Tribune for the first time about his experience after contracting COVID-19 in July 2020, and the ordeal that followed. About a week after getting sick, Edmonds woke up with a racing heart rate and couldn't feel his arms or legs.
Two years after getting sick, Edmonds had shared he still struggled with fatigue and a racing heart rate from mild exertion. That's still the case today, he said.
Now 33, Edmonds has struggled being someone who often felt sick, but didn't look sick. Since his last interview, Edmonds was diagnosed with chronic fatigue syndrome, which affects some people experiencing long-term side effects from COVID-19.
He said the biggest thing that helped him was working on acceptance, and grace for medical professionals.
"Being ready to accept the unknown and the 'I don't know' (is important)," he said. "Those are a part of life."
Edmonds said going to therapy helped him accept how his life changed from the pandemic.
"Tackling the mental side of things helped me the most," he said. "There was no avenue for me to go down that was going to wave a magic wand and make life go back to the way it was."
Since 2022, Edmonds has taken on a less physically strenuous job. He said leaning on his faith, friends and family has helped him find acceptance for his new life.
"I also found out I have a family friend who has chronic fatigue and fibromyalgia. So we've grown closer through our illness," he said.
Oluwaseyi Arogudade
Oluwaseyi Arogudade is a sophomore at the University of Idaho from Lewiston. She spoke with the Tribune two years ago about her experience during the pandemic, which started when she was just 14 years old.
She said the changes she underwent during the pandemic were closely tied to the political movements of the time.
Arogudade recalled being shocked and confused as she watched the people around her react to the murder of George Floyd, a Black man killed by police, and the Black Lives Matter movement.
"It's hard when you really just want people to understand you as like, who you are as a human being, and they've just been so ingrained with 'it's me versus you' and that type of mentality," she said.
The experience spurred Arogudade to be heavily involved in student government and organizations. Two years since her first interview, she's chief of staff for the Associated Students of University of Idaho, and vice president of the Black Student Union.
"I think that the pandemic, in and of itself, wouldn't have been as impactful for me if all of those other social issues didn't happen at the same time," she said.
In the years following the pandemic, she said, Arogudade would learn more about how to sustain herself and others in her community through emotional ups and downs.
"Providing spaces for us not to have to be strong for us not to have to have to get over it, spaces where we can be angry and upset without worrying like how we're perceived is a luxury we're trying to afford to each other," she said. "Because it's not a luxury that we are given in day-to-day life."
That lesson was tested this winter when the Black Student Union lost its meeting spot after UI closed its Black and African American Cultural Center ahead of policies targeting diversity, equity and inclusion programs on university campuses in Idaho.
Arogudade said to her, it felt like taking a step back. That's where another post-pandemic lesson for her younger self comes in, she said.
"Change isn't gonna happen overnight," she said. "It's OK to feel joy and feel happiness. ... Finding joy and finding happiness in everything you do is the motivation for you to keep going."
Chris Skidmore
Chris Skidmore is the director of Whitman County Public Health. When the pandemic started, Skidmore had been serving as deputy director of the organization.
But after his predecessor left at the end of 2020, Skidmore said, he found himself learning how to direct a public health agency in the middle of a pandemic.
"I was just kind of drinking from a fire hose," he said.
Skidmore became director about a month before COVID-19 vaccinations became available. He'd never managed a mass vaccination. The pandemic necessitated a public health response at a scale no one had been prepared for.
Skidmore and his staff managed to distribute the vaccine with help from community partners, he said, but shortly thereafter many of the county's public health workers, facing burnout, left their job.
"I lost about 60% of my staff during that time," Skidmore said. "I was making lots of mistakes. I was learning, a lot of times the hard way."
That period put a heavy strain on public health workers, Skidmore said, and was hard on his own mental health.
"I'll never be the same person I was before the pandemic," he said. "It has put some scars on us that you're not going to erase. They're going to be with you for the rest of your life. But you can't go back. You got to look forward."
Five years later, looking forward means catching up on community health programs that fell to the wayside during the COVID-19 response. Skidmore said his biggest priorities are childhood immunization programs.
During the last check that measured data from 2019 to 2021, children 0-3 years old in Whitman county saw a roughly 17% decline in childhood immunizations, Skidmore said, while the rest of the state as a whole declined by about 5%.
That's especially significant as communicable diseases such as RSV, pertussis and measles have risen. Skidmore said during the pandemic, the public was bombarded with false and misleading information. That's still something he still has to combat today.
"Trying to arm our residents with the tools so they can filter through that and get what the real, is, I think, important," Skidmore said.
He hopes the information from state and federal agencies stays consistent with evidence-based medicine, Skidmore said, but acknowledged there can be discrepancies.
Just this past week, Secretary of Health Robert F. Kennedy Jr. touted unproven treatments for measles, and suggested negative side effects from the measles, mumps and rubella vaccines were more common than they are.
When it comes to public health information, including vaccines, building trust within the community is important, Skidmore said. He feels his team has done that.
"I will tell you that the majority of the residents have a lot more trust in their local health departments more so than they do in their state and federal folks," he said.
Skidmore said he doesn't think things will ever be the same. But working in public health during the pandemic left him and his team better prepared for the challenges ahead.
Even with the recent measles outbreak in Texas, everything feels more doable than before the COVID-19 response, he said.
"We did things during the pandemic we never thought we would be able to do," he said. "Prior to the pandemic, a measles outbreak ... we would be freaking out. But COVID is just as virulent as measles. And we've dealt with that at a much higher level."
Sun may be contacted at rsun@lmtribune.com or on Twitter at @Rachel_M_Sun. This report is made in partnership with Northwest Public Broadcasting, the Lewiston Tribune and the Moscow-Pullman Daily News.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Groups begin lobbying N.S. government over potential booze sale changes
Groups begin lobbying N.S. government over potential booze sale changes

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Groups begin lobbying N.S. government over potential booze sale changes

With the provincial government launching consultation on whether to expand sales points for alcohol in Nova Scotia, interested parties are not waiting for a phone call. Organizations on both sides of the issue have started issuing news releases and open letters to Finance Minister John Lohr, whose department is overseeing the process. Lohr announced last week that Infuse Public Relations and Crestview Strategy will collectively manage the public opinion polling of 1,500 random people and stakeholder engagement with 194 groups. The contract for the work is worth $300,000. A news release this week from the Atlantic division of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business said 77 per cent of small businesses in Nova Scotia support allowing convenience stores and grocery stores to sell alcohol. "This moment is the government's chance to support local retailers at a time when over six in 10 are experiencing lower demand, and provide much-needed shelf space to local producers," Duncan Robertson, the federation's director of legislative affairs, said in the release. The CFIB's recommendations include allowing the sale of beverages that do not exceed alcohol by volume of 7.1 per cent in convenience and grocery stores — similar to steps taken in Ontario — and opening those rules to all small businesses, not just large retailers. Nova Scotia already permits alcohol to be sold in some private wine and specialty stores, in on-site stores at breweries and wineries, and farmers' markets. Lohr also received an open letter this week from a group of 14 doctors who specialize in addiction medicine, urging the government not to expand alcohol sales because it would increase consumption and "worsen individual and societal harms." "Every day we care for patients and families suffering from alcohol use disorder and medical complications of alcohol use," the letter said. "Alcohol causes more than 500 deaths, 5,000 hospital admissions, and 35,000 emergency department visits in Nova Scotia each year, and creates more health care and social costs to our province than any other substance." The doctors went on to say that revenue earned through taxation on alcohol sales does not compensate for society-wide costs of health harms, violence and driving accidents attributable to alcohol. They wrote that alcohol is already widely available in Nova Scotia Liquor Corporation retail and agency stores. "It is crucial that the government keeps control of alcohol distribution to minimize further public costs and health harms," they said. Finance Department officials said 194 groups are included in stakeholder engagement so far. That includes 126 craft breweries, wineries and distillers, along with another 11 groups or agencies also in favour of opening things up, such as the Retail Council of Canada. Jim Cormier, the group's Atlantic director of government relations, said members have been looking at this issue particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. "They've been looking at any way to try and get more people to get away from online shopping, using their smartphones to shop, and get them to come out to go into bricks-and-mortar stores," he said in an interview. Cormier said there can be extended benefits for the local economy by getting people into retail stores where it's possible to cross-promote Nova Scotia craft beer, wine and spirits with other products, such as cheese, berries and glassware. "Obviously it would be more than just Nova Scotia products, but that's the pitch we're making," he said. Council members are looking for things to be as open as possible so there are no winners or losers, said Cormier. "If you're in a rural community and there happens to be a hardware store and they think that they could make a case that they could sell beer and do so in a responsible manner and meet all the rules and regulations, why shouldn't they be allowed to at least apply to do that?" Dr. Kirstin Weerdenburg, a pediatric emergency physician and a trauma team leader at the IWK Health Centre, said it is vital that the government not make any changes without first speaking to the people responsible for caring for those most impacted by alcohol. During her 10 years working in Nova Scotia since moving from Ontario where she also practised medicine, Weerdenburg said she's seen an increase in the number of young people presenting to the emergency department with intoxication. Data needs to be reviewed under the current regulatory regime to understand what's happening before access is expanded, she said. "I do start to get more concerned nowadays, if kids have more access, what their futures will look like." Weerdenburg is also a member of the Nova Scotia Alcohol Policy Coalition, which recently wrote to the government outlining its concerns. The group is one of several dozen representing interests related to health care, intimate partner violence prevention, addictions and marginalized communities slated to be consulted. Although the stakeholder list does not include Nova Scotia Health, the IWK Health Centre or Public Health, a Finance Department spokesperson said the three agencies would be consulted as part of an internal engagement process for government departments. MORE TOP STORIES

RFK Jr. has promoted 'freedom of choice' while limiting vaccines, food
RFK Jr. has promoted 'freedom of choice' while limiting vaccines, food

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

RFK Jr. has promoted 'freedom of choice' while limiting vaccines, food

Prior to becoming Health and Human Services Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. had espoused the idea of "medical freedom," the ability of people to make personal health decisions for themselves and their families without corporate or government coercion. It's an idea supported under Kennedy's Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement to reduce the prevalence of chronic disease in the U.S. by making healthier lifestyle choices. On topics, such as vaccines, Kennedy has said he wouldn't prevent children from being able to receive vaccines but would leave the choice up to parents. MORE: CDC official who oversaw COVID vaccine recommendations resigns "I'm a freedom-of-choice person," Kennedy told Fox News host Sean Hannity during an interview in March. "We should have transparency. We should have informed choice, and if people don't want it, the government shouldn't force them to do it." Some public health experts told ABC News, however, that the HHS has been limiting choices on some products for many Americans despite Kennedy's talk about "freedom of choice." Just last week, Kennedy announced the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention would no longer recommend the COVID-19 vaccine for certain groups. Additionally, Kennedy has called on states to ban recipients of food stamps from being able to use them to purchase soda. He has also praised states for banning fluoride from public drinking water and indicated he will change federal guidance on recommending adding fluoride. The public health experts said Kennedy's actions are setting up a dichotomy on public health. "I think that RFK Jr. has done a really good job of identifying some of the problems [in public health], but it's the solutions that are problematic," Dr. Craig Spencer, an associate professor of the practice of health services, policy and practice at Brown University School of Public Health, told ABC News. "What you're seeing with RFK Jr. and his approach to health is an individualization of public health. It's this idea that you can make decisions for your health, and that's always been true." He went on, "We need to be able to follow their guidance, not just have them tell us, 'Follow your own science.' As the focus shifts from community to individuals, we're losing a lot of that underpinning, which has led to a lot of the gains in public health." Kennedy has repeatedly stated that he is not anti-vaccine and that he supports vaccination. Shortly after Trump's election, Kennedy said in an interview with NBC News that "if vaccines are working for somebody, I'm not going to take them away. People ought to have choice, and that choice ought to be informed by the best information." MORE: CDC official who oversaw COVID vaccine recommendations resigns During his confirmation hearings, Kennedy said he supported the childhood vaccination schedule and that he would not do anything as head of HHS that "makes it difficult or discourages people from taking vaccines." Separately, in an opinion piece Kennedy wrote for Fox News in March on the nationwide measles outbreak, he said the measles vaccine helps protect individuals and provides "community immunity" but also called the decision to vaccinate a "personal one." However, last week, Kennedy announced the removal of the COVID-19 vaccine from the CDC's immunization schedule for "healthy children and healthy pregnant women." The CDC's immunization schedule is not just a guide for doctors but also determines insurance coverage for most major private plans and Medicaid expansion programs. Following Kennedy's announcement, the schedule was updated noting all children would be eligible for COVID vaccines, but now under a shared-clinical decision-making model -- allowing parents to choose whether their children are vaccinated alongside advice from a doctor. "Regarding the vaccines, HHS is restoring the doctor-patient relationship," HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon told ABC News in a statement. "We are encouraging those groups to consult with their health care provider to help them make an informed decision. This is freedom of choice." "If you restrict access, you necessarily restrict choice," Dr. Matthew Ferrari, a professor of biology and director of the Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics at Pennsylvania State University, told ABC News. "Those two things are antithetical. You can't do both. You can't say you're allowing choice if you're restricting access." Ferrari said the idea of "medical freedom" is catchy, but public health recommendations are made based on how to protect the most vulnerable individuals. "If you look at the outcomes, if you look at the consequences of that movement, it has been to disproportionately restrict access to -- and restrict support and infrastructure to allow people to access -- preventive medicine," he said. "It's sort of easy to say, 'Well, take the vaccine away. But [vaccines] prevent a future outcome of illness for yourself and for others in the community." Traditionally, the CDC's Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices decides if there is a benefit to a yearly vaccine and who should get it. The independent advisory committee then makes recommendations to the CDC, which has the final say. The committee was set to meet in late June to vote on potential changes to COVID vaccine recommendations. Spencer said Kennedy's bypassing of traditional avenues when it comes to changing vaccine recommendations is also taking away choice from people. "This did not go through the normal process that it should have, and he basically just made a decision for people while at the same time saying that he's going to let people make a decision," Spencer said. Kennedy has also campaigned to prevent Americans from using food stamps -- provided under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program -- to buy candy and soda. "It's nonsensical for U.S. taxpayers to spend tens of billions of dollars subsidizing junk that harms the health of low-income Americans," Kennedy wrote in an opinion piece for The Wall Street Journal last September. MORE: RFK Jr. to tell medical schools to teach nutrition or lose federal funding At a MAHA event in late May, Kennedy said the governors of 10 states have submitted waivers to the United States Department of Agriculture requesting permission to ban SNAP recipients from using benefits to buy candy and soft drinks. "The U.S. government spends over $4 trillion a year on health care," Nixon said in a statement. "That's not freedom -- it's failure. Secretary Kennedy is unapologetically taking action to reverse the chronic disease epidemic, not subsidize it with taxpayer dollars. Warning Americans about the dangers of ultra-processed food isn't an attack on choice -- it's the first step in restoring it." Nutrition experts agree that sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are unhealthy. Frequent consumption of SSBs is linked to health issues such as weight gain, obesity, type 2 diabetes, tooth decay, heart disease and kidney diseases, according to the CDC. Kristina Petersen, an associate professor in the department of nutritional sciences at Pennsylvania State University, told ABC News there is a crisis of diet-related diseases in the U.S., which increase the risk of disability and reduces lifespan. However, she said there needs to be strong evidence of the benefits of restrictive policies if they are to be put in place. "In terms of limiting people's choices, it is important to consider all the different roles that food plays in someone's life, and so obviously we want people eating nutritious foods, but also we need to acknowledge that food is a source of enjoyment," Petersen said. "A lot of social situations revolve around food. So, when we're thinking about reducing people's access to given foods, we need to think about the consequences of that." One unintended consequence could be an eligible family not signing up for SNAP benefits because of the restrictions, she said. Even if a ban on buying candy and soda with SNAP benefits does occur, Petersen said she is not aware of any evidence that shows banning certain foods leads to healthier diets. She added that the nation's dietary guidelines are written to emphasize healthy foods like fruits and vegetable rather than telling people to avoid or restrict less healthy foods. "All foods can be consumed as part of a healthy dietary pattern. It's really just the amount and the frequency that determines whether that pattern is helpful overall or less helpful," Petersen said. "People can have small indulgences, but really, we're interested in what is their pattern over a period of time." Providing incentives for purchasing healthier foods may be more effective and still allow people to have choice, Petersen said. A 2018 study used a model simulation to study the effects of food incentives, disincentives or restrictions in SNAP. One of the simulations involving incentives for foods such as fruits, vegetables, nuts, whole grains, fish and plant-based oils found to have the most substantial health benefits and be the most cost-effective. "Things like fruits and vegetables, they do tend to be more expensive, so if you incentivize them by providing more benefits … that's making the dollar go further, and it's kind of making the economic piece of this a bit stronger," Petersen said. "A lot of this is framed around personal choice. Rather than restricting access to, how can we give people more access to healthy foods? I think that's going to have the greatest benefit here." ABC News' Youri Benadjaoud and Cheyenne Haslett contributed to this report. RFK Jr. has promoted 'freedom of choice' while limiting vaccines, food originally appeared on

RFK Jr. has promoted 'freedom of choice' while limiting vaccines, food

timean hour ago

RFK Jr. has promoted 'freedom of choice' while limiting vaccines, food

Prior to becoming Health and Human Services Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. had espoused the idea of "medical freedom," the ability of people to make personal health decisions for themselves and their families without corporate or government coercion. It's an idea supported under Kennedy's Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement to reduce the prevalence of chronic disease in the U.S. by making healthier lifestyle choices. On topics, such as vaccines, Kennedy has said he wouldn't prevent children from being able to receive vaccines but would leave the choice up to parents. "I'm a freedom-of-choice person," Kennedy told Fox News host Sean Hannity during an interview in March. "We should have transparency. We should have informed choice, and if people don't want it, the government shouldn't force them to do it." Some public health experts told ABC News, however, that the HHS has been limiting choices on some products for many Americans despite Kennedy's talk about "freedom of choice." Just last week, Kennedy announced the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention would no longer recommend the COVID-19 vaccine for certain groups. Additionally, Kennedy has called on states to ban recipients of food stamps from being able to use them to purchase soda. He has also praised states for banning fluoride from public drinking water and indicated he will change federal guidance on recommending adding fluoride. The public health experts said Kennedy's actions are setting up a dichotomy on public health. "I think that RFK Jr. has done a really good job of identifying some of the problems [in public health], but it's the solutions that are problematic," Dr. Craig Spencer, an associate professor of the practice of health services, policy and practice at Brown University School of Public Health, told ABC News. "What you're seeing with RFK Jr. and his approach to health is an individualization of public health. It's this idea that you can make decisions for your health, and that's always been true." He went on, "We need to be able to follow their guidance, not just have them tell us, 'Follow your own science.' As the focus shifts from community to individuals, we're losing a lot of that underpinning, which has led to a lot of the gains in public health." Limiting access to COVID-19 vaccines Kennedy has repeatedly stated that he is not anti-vaccine and that he supports vaccination. Shortly after Trump's election, Kennedy said in an interview with NBC News that "if vaccines are working for somebody, I'm not going to take them away. People ought to have choice, and that choice ought to be informed by the best information." During his confirmation hearings, Kennedy said he supported the childhood vaccination schedule and that he would not do anything as head of HHS that "makes it difficult or discourages people from taking vaccines." Separately, in an opinion piece Kennedy wrote for Fox News in March on the nationwide measles outbreak, he said the measles vaccine helps protect individuals and provides "community immunity" but also called the decision to vaccinate a "personal one." However, last week, Kennedy announced the removal of the COVID-19 vaccine from the CDC's immunization schedule for "healthy children and healthy pregnant women." The CDC's immunization schedule is not just a guide for doctors but also determines insurance coverage for most major private plans and Medicaid expansion programs. Following Kennedy's announcement, the schedule was updated noting all children would be eligible for COVID vaccines, but now under a shared-clinical decision-making model -- allowing parents to choose whether their children are vaccinated alongside advice from a doctor. "Regarding the vaccines, HHS is restoring the doctor-patient relationship," HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon told ABC News in a statement. "We are encouraging those groups to consult with their health care provider to help them make an informed decision. This is freedom of choice." "If you restrict access, you necessarily restrict choice," Dr. Matthew Ferrari, a professor of biology and director of the Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics at Pennsylvania State University, told ABC News. "Those two things are antithetical. You can't do both. You can't say you're allowing choice if you're restricting access." Ferrari said the idea of "medical freedom" is catchy, but public health recommendations are made based on how to protect the most vulnerable individuals. "If you look at the outcomes, if you look at the consequences of that movement, it has been to disproportionately restrict access to -- and restrict support and infrastructure to allow people to access -- preventive medicine," he said. "It's sort of easy to say, 'Well, take the vaccine away. But [vaccines] prevent a future outcome of illness for yourself and for others in the community." Traditionally, the CDC's Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices decides if there is a benefit to a yearly vaccine and who should get it. The independent advisory committee then makes recommendations to the CDC, which has the final say. The committee was set to meet in late June to vote on potential changes to COVID vaccine recommendations. Spencer said Kennedy's bypassing of traditional avenues when it comes to changing vaccine recommendations is also taking away choice from people. "This did not go through the normal process that it should have, and he basically just made a decision for people while at the same time saying that he's going to let people make a decision," Spencer said. Restricting foods under SNAP Kennedy has also campaigned to prevent Americans from using food stamps -- provided under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program -- to buy candy and soda. "It's nonsensical for U.S. taxpayers to spend tens of billions of dollars subsidizing junk that harms the health of low-income Americans," Kennedy wrote in an opinion piece for The Wall Street Journal last September. At a MAHA event in late May, Kennedy said the governors of 10 states have submitted waivers to the United States Department of Agriculture requesting permission to ban SNAP recipients from using benefits to buy candy and soft drinks. "The U.S. government spends over $4 trillion a year on health care," Nixon said in a statement. "That's not freedom -- it's failure. Secretary Kennedy is unapologetically taking action to reverse the chronic disease epidemic, not subsidize it with taxpayer dollars. Warning Americans about the dangers of ultra-processed food isn't an attack on choice -- it's the first step in restoring it." Nutrition experts agree that sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are unhealthy. Frequent consumption of SSBs is linked to health issues such as weight gain, obesity, type 2 diabetes, tooth decay, heart disease and kidney diseases, according to the CDC. Kristina Petersen, an associate professor in the department of nutritional sciences at Pennsylvania State University, told ABC News there is a crisis of diet-related diseases in the U.S., which increase the risk of disability and reduces lifespan. However, she said there needs to be strong evidence of the benefits of restrictive policies if they are to be put in place. "In terms of limiting people's choices, it is important to consider all the different roles that food plays in someone's life, and so obviously we want people eating nutritious foods, but also we need to acknowledge that food is a source of enjoyment," Petersen said. "A lot of social situations revolve around food. So, when we're thinking about reducing people's access to given foods, we need to think about the consequences of that." One unintended consequence could be an eligible family not signing up for SNAP benefits because of the restrictions, she said. Even if a ban on buying candy and soda with SNAP benefits does occur, Petersen said she is not aware of any evidence that shows banning certain foods leads to healthier diets. She added that the nation's dietary guidelines are written to emphasize healthy foods like fruits and vegetable rather than telling people to avoid or restrict less healthy foods. "All foods can be consumed as part of a healthy dietary pattern. It's really just the amount and the frequency that determines whether that pattern is helpful overall or less helpful," Petersen said. "People can have small indulgences, but really, we're interested in what is their pattern over a period of time." Providing incentives for purchasing healthier foods may be more effective and still allow people to have choice, Petersen said. A 2018 study used a model simulation to study the effects of food incentives, disincentives or restrictions in SNAP. One of the simulations involving incentives for foods such as fruits, vegetables, nuts, whole grains, fish and plant-based oils found to have the most substantial health benefits and be the most cost-effective. "Things like fruits and vegetables, they do tend to be more expensive, so if you incentivize them by providing more benefits … that's making the dollar go further, and it's kind of making the economic piece of this a bit stronger," Petersen said. "A lot of this is framed around personal choice. Rather than restricting access to, how can we give people more access to healthy foods? I think that's going to have the greatest benefit here."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store