Gustavo Petro seeks to impose referendum by decree in Colombia
SANTIAGO, Chile, June 5 (UPI) -- Colombia is at a democratic crossroads as President Gustavo Petro clashes with Congress and civil society over political disputes, legislative gridlock and stalled reforms.
At the center of the dispute is Petro's announcement that he intends to call a national referendum by executive decree to revive parts of his agenda -- particularly a labor reform bill recently rejected by the Senate.
For weeks, Petro's proposal to call a national referendum has polarized the political climate.
His administration says the referendum would allow voters to weigh in on key issues, including healthcare and pension reforms, public debt restructuring and the potential formation of a constituent assembly.
The opposition and several legal experts have called the measure unconstitutional and an overreach of presidential powers.
Colombia's Constitution outlines specific requirements for calling a national referendum, including congressional approval.
Petro's opponents warn that bypassing this step would set a dangerous precedent, weakening democratic institutions and the separation of powers.
The possibility that Petro could issue a decree to call a national referendum without congressional approval may lead to a legal challenge before Colombia's Constitutional Court. The court's final ruling on the legality of such a decree will be critical in determining the future of the initiative and the balance of power among government institutions.
In addition to the referendum controversy, Petro's labor reform proposal suffered a major defeat in the Senate, where it was rejected and shelved. The bill, one of the administration's flagship initiatives to "dignify labor and improve working conditions," failed to secure enough votes to move forward in the legislative process.
The government's proposed labor reform included cutting the standard daytime work shift to eight hours, doubling pay for work on Sundays and holidays, formalizing employment for digital platform workers, extending paternity leave to 12 weeks and ensuring equal pay for men and women.
Business groups, such as the National Business Association of Colombia and the National Federation of Merchants have been outspoken in opposing the bill. They argue the reform would have negative economic consequences, including job losses, reduced investment and a rise in unregulated employment.
Despite the government's efforts and intense debate, the bill failed to win over enough senators, many of whom also raised concerns about the reform's potential impact on job creation and business competitiveness.
Attention now turns to the Constitutional Court, whose decision will be pivotal for the future of the referendum proposal and the broader institutional balance in Colombia.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Another top Paul Weiss lawyer departs firm after Trump deal
Paul, Weiss — the first law firm to strike a deal with President Trump to avoid a punitive executive order — is losing a prominent attorney to a firm that, when targeted by the White House, fought back in court. Damian Williams, former U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, is set to leave Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison after half a year there for a role at Jenner & Block. His departure is the latest in a series of high-profile resignations from the firm in the aftermath of its agreement with the Trump administration. In a Friday statement, Williams praised Jenner & Block for 'fearlessly' advocating for its clients and how it 'lives its values.' 'I'm excited to join a team with an extraordinary depth of legal talent that doesn't shy away from hard fights — and delivers results that matter,' he said. Since returning to the White House, Trump has targeted six big law firms with executive orders aimed at undercutting their business as retribution for their ties to his political adversaries. While four of the firms filed legal action challenging the directives, Trump revoked his executive order against Paul, Weiss after it agreed to provide $40 million in free legal services to support administration initiatives and other perks. The deal set off an avalanche of agreements between the Trump administration and the nation's top law firms. Now, eight other firms have entered agreements with Trump to provide tens of millions of dollars in pro bono work, despite there being no executive orders issued against them. Jenner & Block, meanwhile, sued the administration. A federal judge last month deemed the order against the firm unlawful and blocked it in full. 'This order, like the others, seeks to chill legal representation the administration doesn't like, thereby insulating the Executive Branch from the judicial check fundamental to the separation of powers,' U.S. District Judge John Bates, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, wrote in a 52-page opinion. 'It thus violates the Constitution and the Court will enjoin its operation in full.' Last month, four top lawyers at Paul, Weiss also departed from their roles as partners at the law firm to form their own practice. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Can Resume Restricting AP's Access To Oval Office And Other Spaces, Appeals Court Rules
A federal appeals court ruled that Donald Trump's White House can resume restricting access to the Associated Press to the Oval Office, Air Force One and Mar-A-Lago. 'The White House is likely to succeed on the merits because these restricted presidential spaces are not First Amendment fora opened for private speech and discussion,' the judges, Neomi Rao and Gregory Katsas, wrote in their ruling. 'The White House therefore retains discretion to determine, including on the basis of viewpoint, which journalists will be admitted.' More from Deadline Late Night Hosts Take On Trump-Musk Feud: "Vader Turns On The Emperor Again" Elon Musk Blows Up Internet & Maybe D.C. With Claim That Trump Is In Epstein Files: "Holy Sh*t" All-Out Feud Erupts Between Trump And Musk: POTUS Threatens To End Government Contracts, Tesla Titan Invokes Epstein Files - Update Read the Trump-AP decision. In their decision, the judges granted a stay to part of a lower court judge's order that the White House had to restore access to the AP at events where other media outlets also are invited. The judges, though, made an exception for events in the East Room, meaning that the Trump administration must allow the AP access to events there, where all pre-credentialed media is typically invited. An AP spokesperson said in a statement, 'We are disappointed in the court's decision and are reviewing our options.' Trump wrote on Truth Social about the ruling, 'Big WIN over AP today. They refused to state the facts or the Truth on the GULF OF AMERICA. FAKE NEWS!!!' In February, the White House banned the Associated Press from pooled events in the Oval Office and elsewhere, punishing the outlet because it declined to shift its style guidance from identifying the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America. The AP sued on First Amendment grounds. In April, U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden ruled that the Trump administration could not allow some journalists access to spaces like the Oval Office but deny the AP based on its content. McFadden wrote, 'The Court simply holds that under the First Amendment, if the Government opens its doors to some journalists — be it to the Oval Office, the East Room, or elsewhere — it cannot then shut those doors to other journalists because of their viewpoints. The Constitution requires no less.' The White House has since allowed the AP into events. But instead of being a regular part of the White House pool, the news organization is part of a rotation of print journalists, while its photographers have been allowed on a more consistent basis as part of the photo pool. In a dissent to the appeals panel decision, Judge Cornelia Pillard wrote that 'the issue here is whether, when the White House authorizes the press pool to travel with the president or observe an Oval Office meeting or signing, the White House may exclude journalists or news organizations based on their expression outside the pool of views the president disfavors. Neither this court nor the Supreme Court has ever upheld the exclusion from a forum or denial of a benefit based on a private recipient's viewpoint outside the forum or benefit program. Because the district court correctly enjoined just such an exclusion here, I see no basis for a stay pending appeal.' Even though the Trump White House has continuously attacked the AP, in other instances it has cited its reporting on stories that it favors. In its lawsuit, the AP said that, as one of the country's 'oldest and most trusted news organizations,' it has been known for 'its accurate, factual and non-partisan reporting.' It noted that it has participated in the White House pool since its creation more than 100 years ago. Best of Deadline 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery 'Stick' Soundtrack: All The Songs You'll Hear In The Apple TV+ Golf Series
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kilmar Abrego Garcia: Maryland man mistakenly deported to El Salvador back in U.S. now
June 6 (UPI) -- Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the Maryland man mistakenly deported to El Salvador, is back in the United States after being indicted in Tennessee on two federal charges involving migrant smuggling, Attorney General Pam Bondi said Friday. Bondi said Abrego Garcia, 29, is in the United States to "face justice." He made his first court appearance Friday afternoon in Nashville. The Justice Department said in a court filing that he should be held in pretrial custody because "he poses a danger to the community and a serious risk of flight, and no condition or combination of conditions would ensure the safety of the community or his appearance in court." On May 21, a grand jury in the Middle District of Tennessee returned an indictment, charging Abrego Garcia with criminal counts of alien smuggling and conspiracy to commit alien smuggling, Bondi said at a news conference. Abrego Garcia is the only member of the alleged conspiracy indicted. El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele was presented with an arrest warrant for him and he agreed to return him to the United States, Bondi said. "We're grateful to President Bukele for agreeing to return him to our country to face these very serious charges," Bondi said. Bondi said that if Abrego Garcia is convicted of the charges and serves his sentence, he will be deported back to his home country of El Salvador. "The grand jury found that over the past nine years, Abrego Garcia has played a significant role in an alien smuggling ring," Bondi said. "They found this was his full-time job, not a contractor. He was a smuggler of humans and children and women. He made over 100 trips, the grand jury found, smuggling people throughout our country." Ben Schrader, the chief of the criminal division in the office for the Middle District of Tennessee in Nashville, resigned the same week of the grand jury indictment last month, CNN reported. Schrader's post on LinkedIn does not mention the Abrego Garcia case. On April 17, Democratic U.S. Sen. Chris Van Hollen met with his constituent in El Salvador. "After months of ignoring our Constitution, it seems the Trump Admin has relented to our demands for compliance with court orders and due process for Kilmar Abrego Garcia," Van Hollen posted on X Friday. "This has never been about the man -- it's about his constitutional rights & the rights of all." In the indictment unsealed Friday afternoon, Abrego Garcia and others are accused of participating in a conspiracy in which they "knowingly and unlawfully transported thousands of undocumented aliens who had no authorization to be present in the United States, and many of whom were MS-13 members and associates." The allegations from 2016 to this year involve a half-dozen alleged unnamed co-conspirators. Abrego Garcia and others worked to move undocumented aliens between Texas and Maryland and other states more than 100 times, according to the indictment. They "ordinarily picked up the undocumented aliens in the Houston, Texas area after the aliens had unlawfully crossed the Southern border of the United States from Mexico," the indictment said. Abrego Garcia and someone referred to a CC-1 "then transported the undocumented aliens from Texas to other parts of the United States to further the aliens' unlawful presence in the United States." To cover up the alleged conspiracy, prosecutors say Abrego Garcia and his co-conspirators "routinely devised and employed knowingly false cover stories to provide to law enforcement if they were stopped during a transport," including claims that migrants being transported were headed to construction jobs. In November 2022, Abrego Garcia is accused of driving a Chevrolet Suburban and was pulled over on a Tennessee interstate highway, with nine other Hispanic men without identification or luggage. Prosecutors allege that Abrego Garcia transported narcotics to Maryland, though he wasn't previously charged with any crimes. "For the last 2 months, the media and Democrats have burnt to the ground any last shred of credibility they had left as they glorified Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a known MS13 gang member, human trafficker, and serial domestic abuser," Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement on X. "Justice awaits this Salvadoran man." Abrego Garcia and his family have denied allegations that he's an MS-13 member, and he fled gang violence in El Salvador. Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, an attorney for Abrego Garcia, said his client should appear in immigration court, not criminal court. "The government disappeared Kilmar to a foreign prison in violation of a court order," Sandoval-Moshenberg Now told CNN. "Now, after months of delay and secrecy, they're bringing him back, not to correct their error but to prosecute him. This shows that they were playing games with the court all along. Due process means the chance to defend yourself before you're punished, not after. This is an abuse of power, not justice." Abrego Garcia deported in March Abrego Garcia was living in Maryland since he arrived in the United States in 2011 unlawfully. The government earlier, through a confidential informant, said his clothes had alleged gang markings when he was arrested in 2019. Abrego Garcia was living with his wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, and children when he was arrested in March and deported to El Salvador to the maximum-security Terrorism Confinement Center, known as CECOT. He was with a group of more than 230 men, mostly Venezuelans, accused of being gang members. In April, the State Department said Abrego Garcia was moved to a lower-security facility in Santa Ana. The Trump administration has acknowledged that Abrego Garcia's deportation was a mistake because he had been granted a legal status in 2019. The Department of Homeland Security is banned from removing him to his home country of El Salvador because he was likely to face persecution by local gangs. He didn't have a hearing before his deportation. The government has utilized the Alien Enemies Act, a 1798 wartime immigration law, to quickly deport migrants from the United States. In an April hearing, District Judge Paula Xinis in Maryland ordered the Trump administration to comply with expedited discovery to determine whether they were complying with the directive to return Abrego Garcia to the United States, which was upheld by the Supreme Court earlier this year. The high court and district judge said the Trump administration must "facilitate" his return for due process. On Wednesday, Xinis ordered seven documents to be unsealed in the deportation. The criminal charges could impact his immigration case, John Sandweg, a former acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, told CNN. "I think what we're going to see is on the back end of this criminal prosecution - now that they're prosecuting him for these immigration-related offenses - if they get a conviction, they will go back to the immigration court and argue that now there are those changed circumstances," Sandweg, who is now a partner at law firm Nixon Peabody.
