New pandas show ‘encouraging' mutual interest, National Zoo says
At the National Zoo, the new pandas, still too young for romance, have nevertheless given welcome indications that they are interested in each other, staff members say.
The female bleated at the male, and the male bleated back. For the normally solitary creatures, that meant something. There were other clues, too. All of which seemed to bode well for the possibility that the two pandas on exhibit since the start of the year could become three. In time.
Over the long history of the beloved black and white bears in Washington, their admirers here and around the world have learned of the frustrations inherent in panda breeding programs.
So the sonic signals of mutual interest demonstrated recently by the two young immigrants from China seemed especially welcome.
Two staff members who worked closely with the animals, giant panda keeper Mariel Lally and assistant curator Laurie Thompson, wrote a Friday update on the pandas' progress.
The indicators of interest were particularly noticeable given the essentially solitary nature of the animals, which come together only during the brief hours of reproductive possibility.
In a nutshell, in late April, the female, named Qing Bao, bleated at the male. And the male, whose name is Bao Li, bleated back. There was also Qing Bao's chirping. (According to the zoo staffers, a panda bleat sounds like a sheep's 'baa' but with a higher pitch and longer trill.)
Beyond the bears' baas, more signs emerged of incipient panda affection, or at least attraction.
From the time of the sudden oral outbursts, things seemed to take off. When they were outdoors, the pandas remained near the 'howdy window,' the mesh-covered opening between their separate quarters.
Unable to touch through the screen, they tried to get as close to each other as possible.
'They rolled around, put their paws up and vocalized back and forth—intensely.' the zoo staffers wrote.
Qing Bao went further. She pressed her back against the mesh and allowed Bao Li to sniff it.
'If one of them walked away, the other ran over and called for them,' said the keepers, calling the gesture 'adorable—and a sure sign that our bears' hormones were changing!'
That was confirmed by testing. Hormonal changes are important. They indicate that the female is going through her first biological cycle that permits pregnancy, which the zoo called 'very encouraging.' The cycle is short-lived, only two or three days.
But it does not mean the zoo can soon anticipate the patter of little panda paws. The two are young and still growing.
Also, males mature more slowly than females and generally do not breed before they are 5. The panda pair is a couple of years from that milestone.
But even if breeding is a while off, the zoo said, the positive interest they showed 'is a great sign for the future!'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Miss Manners: Minister must learn to juggle conversations
Dear Miss Manners: I am a ministry leader at my church and am well-known within the congregation. After the church service, many people like to stay in the lobby for a few minutes to chat. I find myself often in an embarrassing situation that I don't know how to handle: Suppose I've been chatting with someone, let's call them Person A, for just a minute. Then I feel someone, Person B, touch my shoulder or arm to get my attention. I turn to see that it's another friendly person who wishes to chat.


Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Asking Eric: Hoarder's friend wants to help but doesn't want to shame
Dear Eric: I have a friend of several decades and recently learned she is a hoarder. We always met outside our homes for coffee or lunch. I just assumed it was more convenient. A few months ago, she texted to tell me she's been embarrassed for me to find out her 'secret.' She also asked me for help. I was thrilled and offered to help, but she refused to make a commitment.


Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Carolyn Hax: After visits to their mom's, stepkids unleash on their stepmom
Adapted from an online discussion. Dear Carolyn: My stepkids don't like me. I suspect it's due to alienation from their mother. My husband has full custody, and they see their high-conflict mother every other weekend. Every time they come back, they are different — hostile and nasty to me, despite my caring for them and providing for their needs. I'm thinking of pulling back and letting their father lead. As of right now, I do a lot of the house managing, cooking and making sure chores get done. My husband is resentful and thinks it'll reinforce their negative opinions about me. How do I do this delicately? — Loving, Caring Stepmom Loving, Caring Stepmom: I think you're jumping to the most negative conclusion (they 'don't like me') when the same facts also support a different one. That they dump on you after they've been to their mom's suggests their hostility is about her, not you. Maybe they're coming home full of nasty things she said about you — the obvious interpretation. Or, they are stressed in her home, and they come home wrecked. And the home you made with their dad feels safe, so that's where they let out the ugly stuff. If this is true, then of course that would feel awful for you — like punishment for your good deeds. (That should be parenting's tagline.) Nor is it good that they do this. I'm not excusing it. Soon, as adults, they will bear full responsibility for behaving civilly and doing their emotional work. But kids are still emotional works in progress and can't be expected to do graceful things — yet — with some seriously complex feelings. Especially with so many adults so publicly making a mess of it. They may, for example, feel intense guilt for preferring their stepmother's care to their mother's. I'm not saying this is true — it's a for-instance. I'm just suggesting they may trust you and count on you in ways you don't understand, or have reasons they come home angry that you aren't privy to. What I propose is a visualization that can help all of you regardless of who resents whom and why: Imagine you're a giant rock on a shoreline. The stepkids are the sea. You are there, doing what you do, being who you are, no matter how the waters roil and crash around you. 'That hurts,' you might say, but no punishing back. It's the long game, and it is powerful. As for your husband — he is resentful, why? If it's about your washing your hands of everyone and letting him deal with it, then, okay. I imagine you both entered marriage and full custody as a team commitment. If he resents that you expect him to get more involved than he feels like being, though, then I'll start to suspect a more problematic backstory than just a problematic ex and their problematically acting-out kids. A reader's thought: · When I brought my now-spouse into my kids' lives after divorce, I spoke to each kid separately and said, 'You don't have to like X, but you do have to treat them with the same respect everyone is due.' My kids were free to reject every overture to do something with X, but only with 'No, thank you.' And when they crossed the line, I made them apologize. Also, it was my job to do this, not X's, and I thanked X repeatedly for their patience. Each kid softened in their own time. I felt I had to honor how little agency my kids had in the shifting family dynamics but also teach them there are right and wrong ways to treat people.