'They play a vital part in our healthcare system, but this care is at risk'
Hospices throughout Greater Manchester are in urgent need of extra funding, leaders have urged MPs.
Since 2020, operators have seen their total costs increase by a third, with most of this cost having to be met by fundraising from the local community.
Now, the Greater Manchester Hospices Provider Collaborative, made up of adult and children's hospices, is requesting MPs sign a joint letter to the Minister of State for Health and Social Care, calling for the government's new 10-year health plan to include commitments to improving palliative and end of life care, and reforming the hospice funding model.
READ MORE: Vast shopping centre dominated a town centre for more than 50 years – now it's going to take a year to knock down
READ MORE: On her second day at work, she got the call many dread - and hasn't been able to work since
More than 10,000 patients, and their loved ones, are cared for by hospices in Greater Manchester each year.
In the UK £11.7bn is spent on healthcare for people in the last years of their life, but 80 percent of that funding is spent in hospitals - while hospices are allocated around four per cent.
An additional hospice 57 bed spaces are needed in Greater Manchester to meet the current needs of the community according to the Health Innovation Manchester Report. Yet in 2043 there are expected to be 5,000 (21 per cent) more deaths and 3,500 (17.5 per cent) more deaths requiring palliative care each year in Greater Manchester than in 2019.
Leigh Vallance, Chief Executive of Bolton Hospice and Chair of GM Hospices Provider Collaborative, said: 'Hospices play a vital part in our healthcare system, but this care is at risk. Increasing demand, long term underinvestment and rising costs, mean many hospices are struggling to maintain their services. This, in turn, places more demands on the NHS.
'The new 10-year health plan provides an opportunity to put this right. Currently £11.7bn is spent on health care for people in the last year of life in the UK, but 80% of that funding is spent in hospitals. We believe this money could be better used by investing in hospice care, which currently only receives 4% of this funding.
'We know from experience that hospice care reduces hospital admissions, speeds up hospital discharges, keeps care in the community and makes it more likely that people can die in the place of their choosing. This is better for the patient, better for their loved ones and better for the NHS.'
In Greater Manchester, hospices rely on their local communities to raise two thirds of their total funding. Demands on hospice services are only set to increase and the current funding model means they need to ask more and more of their communities every year - at a time when the cost of living is at an all time high.
The Government has made a commitment to invest £100m in additional capital spend in hospices over the next two years, which has been welcomed by Greater Manchester's hospices, but only offers a short term solution. Long term reform is needed to protect hospice services.
Today's parliamentary event has been sponsored by Josh Simons MP, Member of Parliament for Makerfield.
The GM Hospices Provider Collaborative is a partnership of Greater Manchester's adult and children's hospices, working together to deliver "high-quality, accessible and sustainable specialist palliative care for all who need it."
Hospices attending the event in Westminster today were Bolton Hospice, Bury Hospice, Derian House Children's Hospice, Dr Kershaw's Hospice, Springhill Hospice, St Ann's Hospice, Wigan & Leigh Hospice, Willow Wood Hospice.
Almost half of deaths in Greater Manchester are in hospitals. Only three percent of people have a preference to die in hospital (Office for National Statistics Voices Survey). In Greater Manchester, one third of people will have more than three admissions to hospital in the last year of life.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Family doctors could run hospitals under NHS shake-up
Family doctors could run NHS hospitals under plans being considered by Wes Streeting. The Health Secretary said he would overhaul the 'traditional expectations' about how services should be run in the 10-year health plan, which is due to be published within weeks. In a speech to NHS leaders in Manchester, Mr Streeting said he was open to wholesale changes in how local NHS services operate. He said this could mean family doctors leading local hospitals and NHS hospital trusts running more patient services such as GP practices if it would improve patient care. Multiple reports, including the gold-standard British Social Attitudes Survey, have found getting a GP appointment is the public's biggest issue with the NHS. 'The NHS should not be bound by traditional expectations of how services should be arranged,' he told delegates at the NHS ConfedExpo conference. 'I am open to our strongest acute trusts providing not just community services, as many already do, but also primary care, whatever services will enable them to meet the needs of their patients in a more integrated and efficient way.' Primary care includes services such as general practice, dentistry, eye appointments and pharmacies. The 10-year health plan will lay out how the NHS can reform to become a 'neighbourhood health service' with care delivered closer to home. Moving care from hospitals to the community is one of the Government's three big shifts for the NHS, along with moving from systems of analogue to digital and treatment to prevention. Mr Streeting said he hoped such terms as acute and community care 'become increasingly meaningless' and that there was also 'no reason why successful GPs should not be able to run local hospitals, or why nurses should not be leading neighbourhood health services'. The plan will give more power to NHS foundation trusts, which were created under the last Labour government and hailed by Mr Streeting as 'one of the most successful reforms in the last 25 years'. He said it would 'reinvigorate' and 'reinvent' the model, which could now include them running GP services, and will see them take on more responsibility for how to run healthcare in their local areas. It comes after the NHS was given a record £29 billion funding injection in Wednesday's spending review, with officials declaring the health service had been the 'winner', while other public services lost out. Mr Streeting said that it was right to think 'that's a hell of a lot of money' but that think tanks were also right in saying it 'is nowhere near enough'. 'The truth is both are right. It is objectively a substantial settlement that puts wind in our sails,' he said. 'The investment alone isn't enough.' Matthew Taylor, the chief executive of the NHS Confederation, said: 'Redesigning services is essential to the future of the NHS and many providers are already breaking down their traditional silos to offer patients truly personalised and integrated care. 'The extra funding announced at the spending review is very welcome and as Mr Streeting says, it is both a lot of money and not enough,' he said. 'Our members will welcome Mr Streeting confirming he will support them to make the difficult decisions needed to redesign services. This is something we have been calling for and will be a weight off the minds of many system and provider leaders. 'We also welcome his announcement that the upcoming 10-year plan will put an end to central control and place more power into the hands of local leaders to lead and innovative to benefit their populations.' Earlier on Thursday, NHS figures revealed that the overall waiting list had fallen to 7.39 million – its lowest in two years. However, the number of people waiting longer than a year for a hospital appointment or procedure was up by about 10,000 to 190,000, having previously fallen for 10 months in a row. Waits of longer than 18 months also grew. Meghana Pandit, NHS England's co-national medical director, said NHS staff were working to 'turn the tide for patients waiting for care'. She said while huge pressure on services remains, 'we are starting to see a real difference across our services – this is just the start of the work we're doing to reform care and deliver improvements for patient'. The data also showed fewer people are getting a diagnosis of cancer or having it ruled out within four weeks. A total of 76.7 per cent of patients urgently referred for suspected cancer were diagnosed or had cancer ruled out within 28 days in April, down from 78.9 per cent in March and 80.2 per cent in February. The Government and NHS England had set a target of March 2026 for this figure to reach 80 per cent. The proportion of patients who had waited no longer than 62 days in April from an urgent suspected cancer referral, or consultant upgrade, to their first definitive treatment for cancer was 69.9 per cent, down from 71.4 per cent in March. GPs in England made 264,880 urgent cancer referrals in April, down from 272,165 in March but up year-on-year from 260,516 in April 2024. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Wes Streeting: £29bn NHS boost ‘substantial' but reform still needed
A £29bn investment into the National Health System (NHS) is 'substantial', but reform of the system is essential to 'fix the NHS', says UK Secretary of Health and Social Care Wes Streeting MP. Speaking at the NHS ConfedExpo conference in Manchester on 12 June, Streeting emphasised that while the investment is crucial, it is not sufficient on its own. Streeting said: '[£29bn] is objectively a substantial funding settlement that puts wind in our sails. The investment alone isn't enough. As I've consistently argued, you cannot fix the NHS problems by simply pouring more money into a broken system. It's only through the combination of investment and reform that we will succeed in getting the NHS back on its feet and make it fit for the future." As a result, the funding will be used alongside the NHS 10-year plan that will look at improving all areas of the NHS including community care, technology and staffing, adding that it is to prepare the NHS for the future instead of simply dealing with the current challenges. 'That is the job of the 10-year plan. It's not just to get the NHS back on its feet, but to prepare it for the world of genomics, artificial intelligence, predictive and preventative medicine,' Streeting said. Streeting outlined his hopes that the NHS could become a global leader and attract big pharmaceutical and technological companies to work more with the NHS. The desire to attract more technology companies is highlighted by the 50% technology spending uplift, equivalent to £10bn of the total funding. Streeting said that this funding is secured due to fiscal rules, meaning it will not be reallocated to other areas, ensuring that the NHS is advancing and able to modernise. He added that some of this funding will be used to increase the utilisation of artificial intelligence (AI) in the NHS, including investment into software for patient note-taking to allow clinicians more face-to-face time with patients. Finally, Streeting highlighted the importance of international workers in the NHS, and how without their contributions the NHS would 'collapse'. 'With the NHS, as with so many other walks of life, our country has been shaped by migration. It has been a positive thing for our country… The NHS will always be an international workforce, and I think it makes us stronger for that global experience, perspective and talent,' Streeting said. He countered, however, that there has been an 'over-reliance on overseas recruitment', stating that some of the staff that are employed in the NHS have been taken from World Health Organization (WHO) red list countries, which he said to be 'unethical' and 'immoral'. "Wes Streeting: £29bn NHS boost 'substantial' but reform still needed" was originally created and published by Pharmaceutical Technology, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Women's Prize for Fiction ‘greatest honour' as an intersex woman, says winner
The winner of the Women's Prize for Fiction has said the award is 'the greatest honour of my life as a woman' as she reflected on her experience growing up intersex. Dutch author Yael van der Wouden won the accolade for her debut novel, The Safekeep, and used her winner's speech to champion the trans community, who have 'changed the system' and 'fought for health care'. The book, which explores repressed desire and the unresolved aftermath of the Holocaust in post-Second World War Netherlands, was described as an 'astonishing debut' by the head of the judges. The ceremony, held in central London on Thursday, saw the non-fiction prize awarded to physician Dr Rachel Clarke for The Story Of A Heart, which explores the human experience behind organ donation. In her winner's speech, after thanking the judges, van der Wouden said: 'I was a girl until I turned 13, and then, as I hit puberty, all that was supposed to happen did not quite happen. 'And if it did happen, it happened too much, and all at once my girlhood became an uncertain fact. 'I won't thrill you too much with the specifics, but the long and the short of it is that, hormonally, I'm intersex. 'This little fact defined my life throughout my teens, until I advocated for the health care that I needed. 'The surgery and the hormones that I needed, which not all intersex people need. Not all intersex people feel at odds with their gender presentation. 'I mention the fact that I did, because in the few precious moments here on stage, I am receiving, truly, the greatest honour of my life as a woman, presenting to you as a woman, and accepting this Women's Prize. 'And that is because of every single trans person who's fought for health care, who changed the system, the law, societal standards, themselves. I stand on their shoulders.' The NHS website says intersex, or differences in sex development (DSD), is a group of rare conditions involving genes, hormones and reproductive organs that mean a person's sex development is different to most. In contrast, people who are transgender identify as a gender separate to the sex they were born in and sometimes go through gender-affirming surgery. Van der Wouden's novel follows Isabel, a young woman whose life in solitude is upended when her brother's girlfriend Eva comes to live in their family house in what turns into a summer of obsession, suspicion and desire. The chairwoman of the judges for the fiction prize, writer Kit de Waal, said: 'This astonishing debut is a classic in the making, a story to be loved and appreciated for generations to come. Books like this don't come along every day.' Van der Wouden will receive £30,000 and a limited-edition bronze statuette known as the Bessie, which was created and donated by artist Grizel Niven. The judging panel for the Women's Prize for Fiction included novelist and journalist Diana Evans, author and journalist Bryony Gordon, writer and magazine editor Deborah Joseph, and musician and composer Amelia Warner. Clarke said she has 'literally been a feminist since I was too young to know what that word even meant', as she collected her award. The physician's book recounts two family stories, documenting how medical staff take care of nine-year-old Kiera in her final hours after a car accident, while offering a new life to nine-year-old Max who is suffering from heart failure from a viral infection. Clarke, who is behind the books Breathtaking and Your Life In My Hands: A Junior Doctor's Story, will receive £30,000 and a limited-edition piece of art known as the Charlotte, both gifted by the Charlotte Aitken Trust. The judging panel for the non-fiction prize included writer and broadcaster Dr Leah Broad, whose work focuses on women's cultural history, and novelist and critic Elizabeth Buchan. Previous winners of the fiction prize include Tayari Jones for An American Marriage and Madeline Miller for The Song Of Achilles, while the first non-fiction prize was awarded last year to Naomi Klein for Doppelganger: A Trip Into The Mirror World. The awards were announced by the Women's Prize Trust, a UK charity that aims to 'create equitable opportunities for women in the world of books and beyond'.
