Auckland At 15 – Auckland Is United On What Matters Yet Divided On Delivery
Press Release – Auckland University of Technology
Latest research sets scene for a new Auckland agenda.
A landmark digital survey released today reveals that while Aucklanders are strongly united on the city's big priorities — such as long-term infrastructure planning, environmental protection, and becoming a global innovation hub — many remain unconvinced the Super City model has delivered.
The findings come as diverse Auckland's leaders gather for Auckland at 15, an event that examines the region's progress since the creation of the Super City in 2010 and calls for a new agenda to ensure the region is thriving, sustainable and globally competitive by 2040.
The survey, Auckland@15: Shaping the next fifteen years, shows both shared vision and clear tension — particularly on transport and cultural identity — where support for progress exists alongside significant frustration with how change is being delivered. Most Aucklanders (76%) believe the city lacks a cohesive public transport vision – and while just 28% support sticking with private transport and putting up with congestion, that view reflects a deeply held divide.
The University of Auckland's Complex Conversations Lab conducted the research as Auckland approaches 15 years as an amalgamated council. The innovative Pol.is platform was used showing Aucklanders overwhelmingly support a long-term infrastructure plan (94%), and there is near-universal agreement on protecting the natural environment (up to 95%).
However, only 53% of those surveyed believe amalgamation of the eight former councils has succeeded in unifying Auckland's voice, and just 18% feel they have influence over Auckland Council decisions. Cultural identity remains a sharp point of division with 64% of Aucklanders agreeing the region has a recognisable multicultural identity, however 29% are skeptical about further cultural investment.
Hosted by Auckland University of Technology, the Committee for Auckland, Deloitte, and the Helen Clark Foundation, the Auckland at 15 event will feature four expert panels focused on legacy and political progress, global city success, Auckland's future-readiness, and defining the next 15 years.
Minister for Auckland, Simeon Brown, and the Mayor of Auckland, Wayne Brown, will be joined by former prime ministers, Rt Hon Sir John Key and Rt Hon Helen Clark, alongside business and emerging young leaders, iwi, academics, and international experts.
Committee for Auckland Director Mark Thomas said if Auckland does not reset its direction with a new agenda that focuses on bolder action, smarter investment, and much stronger global competitiveness it will continue to fall behind.
'We must learn more effectively from the best globally and have the courage to back bold, transformative ideas locally or risk continuing to lose the economic opportunity, talent, and quality of life we need to thrive.
'The annual State of the City report shows Auckland is already being overtaken by faster-moving global competitor cities. Without much clearer commitment from central and local government and their partners Auckland's standard of living and growth prospects will continue to suffer,' he said.
Deloitte New Zealand Chief Executive Mike Horne said change is needed to help Auckland make more meaningful progress.
'Auckland has been incremental in what it has achieved since becoming a Super City 15 years ago. Being incremental isn't going to achieve what the city needs.'
'Auckland has a real opportunity to look at itself in a global context — if Auckland isn't competing globally, New Zealand will suffer. Now is the time for the city to look outward, focusing on connections and innovation, instead of looking in the mirror and rehashing its challenges.'
Auckland University of Technology Vice-Chancellor Damon Salesa adds, 'AUT is acutely aware of the need for Auckland to succeed in the next 15 years and beyond. Our city will be home to the greatest number of international students, Māori and Pacific young people and indeed of all youth. They have enormous potential and deserve a city that provides education, infrastructure, and employment opportunities.'
'AUT is focused on partnerships to amplify the impact our university, students and academics can provide for Auckland and beyond so our city's people can thrive. This means focusing on our city's unique combination of talented people with diverse and cosmopolitan experiences and viewpoints.'
Reflecting on the purpose of amalgamation, Helen Clark, Patron of the Helen Clark Foundation, said that there had been concern that Auckland's potential could not be maximised with its governance dispersed across a number of territorial councils. 'The Royal Commission was established to look at better options, and I have no doubt that the single city has been the right outcome,' she said.
Auckland at 15 is being described by organisers as a catalyst for sustained action, partnerships, and dialogue about Auckland's direction.
Key deliverables from the event include an annual legacy youth event hosted by AUT, and a mentoring programme for aspiring youth leaders provided by Committee for Auckland from its Future Auckland Leaders' Alumni. Deloitte will produce a written summary of the event and Auckland Council's Auckland Conversations will make the full recording of the event available.
In April 2025, Aucklanders were invited to share their views and vote on others' ideas in the survey 'Auckland @15: Shaping the next fifteen years'
#It was conducted via Pol.is, a dynamic online platform that reveals areas of common ground as the conversation evolves. This is a type of 'wiki-survey'. It is shaped by the participants themselves. It provides rich knowledge about group support for ideas in a way that helps to identify common ground among diverse.
How it works:
The conversation was initially framed by a set of 25 'seed' statements covering a range of issues relevant to the topic
Participants contribute by voting on statements (agree/disagree/pass) and by adding their own statements for others to vote on. Those who vote similarly on multiple statements are grouped together to form an 'opinion group'
Automated opinion mapping finds areas of common ground while also identifying differences between opinion groups
Pol.is helps identify the different ways people think about issues that affect them and their communities
575 Aucklanders actively participated in the conversation, which generated over 46,000 votes and nearly 1,000 crowd-sourced statements, providing a rich digital snapshot of Aucklanders' sentiments on the state of their city
This is an initial release of the headline survey information. A further full report will be available from University of Auckland in due course.
Survey summary findings:
Cultural Identity and Diversity:
Cultural identity remains a sharp point of division however 64% agree Auckland has a recognisable, multicultural identity.
Around 70% strongly support celebrating Auckland's Māori and Pacific heritage and investing in cultural diversity and the arts.
About 30% expressed caution or scepticism about prioritising further cultural investment.
Environment Protection and Sustainability Action:
Up to 95% support stronger environmental protections, including improved water quality and urban greenery.
87% think Auckland's trees and urban greenery need better protection to stop our suburbs becoming unappealing, hot and sensitive to flooding.
Decision making capacity and engagement:
Only 53% overall felt amalgamation successfully unified Auckland's voice to central government.
Only 18% felt connected to Council decision-making and just 20% felt amalgamation had improved public engagement.
Only 32% think Council is providing more strategic and region-wide responses to problems, with most saying there are more ad hoc responses,
Housing and Urban Development:
91% of those surveyed believe housing intensification must be balanced with green spaces and liveability.
90% Participants expressed support for high-quality, best-practice high density development in appropriate locations with supporting services like public transport.
Infrastructure Planning:
94% support a long-term infrastructure strategy that transcends political cycles.
93% think Auckland needs to consider retreating from flood-prone areas and should prohibit new building in these locations.
92% think infill housing development needs to be balanced with green spaces and community amenities.
Innovation and Economic Development:
77% believe Auckland must position itself as a global innovation city to attract talent and strengthen its economy.
77% also believe Auckland must position itself as a global innovation city to attract talent and strengthen its economy but expressed concern that the city doesn't maximise this advantage compared to overseas cities.'
Transport:
61% think reducing congestion should be Auckland's top transport priority, even if it means introducing charges on some roads at times when they are most congested.
60% think it's easier to get around Auckland on public transport than it used to be.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
The David Seymour ‘bots' debate: Do online submission tools help or hurt democracy?
ACT Party leader David Seyour in studio for an interview on season 3 of 30 with Guyon Espiner. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly A discussion document on a Regulatory Standards Bill is not, on the face of it, the sort of thing that might have been expected to prompt 23,000 responses. But in an age of digital democracy, the Ministry for Regulation was probably expecting it. The bill , led by ACT Party leader David Seymour, is controversial. It sparked a response from activists, who used online tools to help people make their opposition known. Of the 23,000 submissions, 88 percent were opposed. Seymour this week told RNZ's 30 with Guyon Espiner , that figure reflected "bots" generating "fake" submissions. He did not provide evidence for the claim and later explained he wasn't referring to literal bots but to "online campaigns" that generate "non-representative samples" that don't reflect public opinion. Seymour has previous experience with this sort of thing. The Treaty Principles Bill got a record 300,000 submissions when it was considered by the Justice Committee earlier this year. Is Seymour right to have raised concerns about how these tools are affecting public debate? Or are they a boon for democracy? Submission tools are commonly used by advocacy groups to mobilise public input during the select committee process. The online tools often offer a template for users to fill out or suggested wording that can be edited or submitted as is. Each submission is usually still sent by the individual. Taxpayers' Union spokesperson Jordan Williams said submitting to Parliament used to be "pretty difficult". "You'd have to write a letter and things like that. What the tools do allow is for people to very easily and quickly make their voice heard." The tools being used now are part of sophisticated marketing campaigns, Williams said. "You do get pressure groups that take particular interest, and it blows out the numbers, but that doesn't mean that officials should be ruling them out or refusing to engage or read submissions." The Taxpayers' Union has created submission tools in the past, but Williams said he isn't in favour of tools that don't allow the submitter to alter the submission. He has encouraged supporters to change the contents of the submission to ensure it is original. "The ones that we are pretty suspicious of is when it doesn't allow the end user to actually change the submission, and in effect, it just operates like a petition, which I don't think quite has the same democratic value." Clerk of the House of Representatives David Wilson said campaigns that see thousands of similar submissions on proposed legislation are not new, they've just taken a different form. "It's happened for many, many years. It used to be photocopied forms. Now, often it's things online that you can fill out. And there's nothing wrong with doing that. It's a legitimate submission." However, Wilson pointed out that identical responses would likely be grouped by the select committee and treated as one submission. "The purpose of the select committee calling for public submissions is so that the members of the committee can better inform themselves about the issues. They're looking at the bill, thinking about whether it needs to be amended or whether it should pass. So if they receive the same view from hundreds of people, they will know that." But that isn't to say those submissions are discredited, Wilson said. "For example, the committee staff would say, you've received 10,000 submissions that all look exactly like this. So members will know how many there were and what they said. But I don't know if there's any point in all of the members individually reading the same thing that many times." Jordan Williams co-founded the Taxpayers' Union in 2013 with David Farrar. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly But Williams said there were risks in treating similar submissions created using 'tools' as one submission. "Treating those ones as if they are all identical is not just wrong, it's actually undemocratic," he said. "It's been really concerning that, under the current parliament, they are trying to carte blanche, reject people's submissions, because a lot of them are similar." AI should be used to analyse submissions and identify the unique points. "Because if people are going to take the time and make a submission to Parliament, at the very least, the officials should be reading them or having them summarised," Williams said. Labour MP Duncan Webb is a member of the Justice Committee and sat in on oral submissions for the Treaty Principles Bill. He said he attempted to read as many submissions as possible. "When you get a stock submission, which is a body of text that is identical and it's just been clicked and dragged, then you don't have to read them all, because you just know that there are 500 people who think exactly the same thing," he said. "But when you get 500 postcards, which each have three handwritten sentences on them, they may all have the same theme, they may all be from a particular organisation, but the individual thoughts that have been individually expressed. So you can't kind of categorise it as just one size fits all. You've got to take every single case on its merits." Webb said he takes the select committee process very seriously. "The thing that struck me was, sure, you read a lot [of submissions] which are repetitive, but then all of a sudden you come across one which actually changes the way you think about the problem in front of you. "To kind of dismiss that as just one of a pile from this organisation is actually denying someone who's got an important point to make, their voice in the democratic process." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
12 hours ago
- RNZ News
Deputy Mayor endorses Wayne Brown for re-election
After toying with the idea of challenging him for the top job, Auckland's deputy mayor has instead endorsed Wayne Brown in his bid for re-election. In a joint press conference Desley Simpson said she was supporting the mayor's campaign for a second term, despite disagreeing with him on certain issues. If Mr Brown wins the mayoralty and Ms Simpson is re-elected as a councillor, he has agreed to make her his deputy again. Jessica Hopkins reports. Tags: To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
Scoop
14 hours ago
- Scoop
Space Scholarships For Seven University Students
Press Release – New Zealand Government The students, Asif Rasha (Auckland University of Technology), Shivam Desai (University of Auckland), Felix Goddard, Jack Patterson (University of Canterbury), Mark Bishop, Sofie Claridge and Taran John (Victoria University of Wellington), received their … Minister for Space Seven university students have been awarded New Zealand Space Scholarships to intern at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in California, Space Minister Judith Collins announced today. 'This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for these incredibly capable students. They will gain invaluable experience working on projects alongside scientists and engineers who are part of world-leading NASA missions,' Ms Collins says. 'These three-month internships will equip them with real-world skills to kick-startexciting careers in New Zealand's fast-growing space industry.' The students, Asif Rasha (Auckland University of Technology), Shivam Desai (University of Auckland), Felix Goddard, Jack Patterson (University of Canterbury), Mark Bishop, Sofie Claridge and Taran John (Victoria University of Wellington), received their scholarships at a ceremony today. The students will work on projects across the space spectrum, from deep space communication, the Big Bang and the early universe, to mission analysis. 'These scholarships, along with the Prime Minister's Space Prizes, help us encourage the next generation of talent to ensure we have an aerospace-capable workforce. This is a key part of our plan to double the size of our space and advanced aviation sectors by 2030,' Ms Collins says. 'Last month I released an economic report that shows New Zealand's space and advanced aviation sectors are thriving – growing by 53 percent in the five years to 2024. The space sector contributed $2.47b to the economy in the 2023-24 financial year, while the advanced aviation sector, which overlaps with the space sector, contributed $480 million.' More information about the 2025 NZ Space Scholarship recipients and the projects they'll work on is available on the MBIE website. Applications are open now for the 2025 Prime Minister's Space Prizes, which recognise and encourage innovative expertise through the Professional Excellence category and the Student Endeavour category.
