Veterans Speak Out Against Trump's Military Parade
Veteran Rebecca Roberts speaks outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., during a protest by veterans on June 13, 2025, over Trump's military parade. Credit - Leigh Vogel—Getty Image
Thousands of troops will march through Washington, D.C. as a part of President Donald Trump's national military parade on Saturday to honor the 250th birthday of the U.S. Army. The day also coincides with the President's 79th birthday. But the parade arguably couldn't come at a more precarious time. The Trump Administration is engaged in a legal battle with California, after deploying National Guard troops to Los Angeles without the request or approval of Gov. Gavin Newsom. There is also grave concern about what's happening overseas, as Israel and Iran trade deadly missiles after Israel launched a military operation targeting Iran's nuclear facilities and personnel.
Amid all this, protests are expected throughout the country as organizations and individuals take part in 'No Kings Day' demonstrations. While the protests have long been arranged, they've been largely spurned on by Trump's actions regarding the L.A. protests, which have since spread to other cities across the U.S. The protests are 'taking action to reject authoritarianism—and show the world what democracy really looks like,' per the 'No Kings' website, which also states 'in America, we don't do kings.'
Dissent against the parade is also coming partly from within one of Trump's most reliable support bases: veterans. Although former U.S. military personnel have historically voted with wide margins in favor of Trump and the Republican Party, there is a growing discontent among some within the community.
Read More: Veterans Condemn Trump's 'Misuse of Military Power' Amid L.A. Protests
On Friday, a group of roughly 60 veterans and military family members protesting both the deployment of the National Guard in L.A. and Saturday's military parade were arrested by the Capitol Police, after they breached a police line of bike racks.
'President Trump threatened Americans coming to exercise their first amendment rights would be met with 'great force,'' said Michael T. McPhearson, veteran and director of Veterans for Peace, an organizer of the protest. 'We are the actual people who put uniforms on because we believe in the freedoms this country is supposed to be about and we will not be intimidated into silence.'
McPhearson's words echo the sentiments of others, including Chris Purdy, a U.S. Army National Guard veteran who served from 2004 to 2012 and was deployed to Iraq in 2011.
Purdy maintains values of military might and respect set to be displayed in the parade exist in 'stark contrast' to how Trump is treating both veterans and also 'our neighbors and our allies that have helped build the peace.'
'[Veteran Affairs] announced an end to the VASP [Veterans Affairs Servicing Purchase] program. This is a program that kept around 13,000 veterans in their homes last year, and there are 90,000 vets who are at financial risk through their [VA] loans that would have benefited from this program,' says Purdy, highlighting the reported $45 million cost of the parade. 'I'm seeing a lot of attacks on the apolitical nature of the military, on the veteran community itself. And then, to kind of wrap it all up in this parade, it feels gross.'
Purdy recounts a lesson from a sergeant in the Army, who told him that 'respect is built by coalitions, by relationships.' Purdy points to a defining factor of Trump's first months of Presidency, which has included contentious relationships with multiple U.S. allies, including Canada.
'I think about my time in Iraq and the coalition partners that I served alongside—the British, Polish, and Lithuanian soldiers—we built these coalitions to help us accomplish the mission,' Purdy says. 'We [veterans] believe that America can lead the world without being oppressive. So this kind of ostentatious display of American might feels unnecessary. It feels like the bully on the playground that needs to kind of go around and flex his muscles to prove like he's the biggest kid on the block.'
And Purdy is not alone in his concerns. A survey conducted by Data for Progress and Common Defense, conducted in April, found that around 70% of the veterans approached said they are opposed to the Trump Administration 'ordering active-duty U.S. military troops to perform a parade in honor of President Trump's birthday.'
Janessa Goldbeck agrees with Purdy's assessment, pointing to both the VASP cut, as well as Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' which proposes cuts to Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), that Goldbeck says many military and veteran households 'rely on.'
'And then you pair that with this complete endangerment and misuse of the National Guard and the active-duty military. Clearly, there's no regard for veterans or people in uniform from this Administration,' Goldbeck claims. 'All of this is an attempt to reshape the United States military as a tool of domestic power for the sitting President… it is certainly not in line with the principles enshrined in the Constitution that I swore to uphold and defend.'
But not all veterans are in agreement that the parade is a 'gross' display of strength.
Read More: What To Know About Trump's Military Parade
Many veterans have traveled to Washington, D.C. for the festivities to celebrate the active-duty military members who are choosing to serve their country.
'It's good for Americans to see what their tax dollars are paying for and what the troops who are protecting them are using,' said veteran John Norton, who was on the bomb squad in the Army and served in Athens, Greece, and Vicenza, Italy. Norton was referencing the Army tanks and aircraft that will be displayed during the parade, during an interview with ABC News.
Veteran Ana Salazar is attending the parade to 'thank' the active-duty military members for their service. 'Proud to be a fellow brother and sister-in-arms with my fellow veterans and active-duty service members,' she said. Salazar served in the military from 2003 to 2014, and was stationed in Belgium, Kansas, Missouri, and Hawaii, and did tours in both Iraq and Afghanistan.
Still, Libby Jamison, military spouse and former President of the Military Spouse J.D. Network, says veterans she knows may agree with different aspects of Trump's policies, but those 'across the political spectrum' in her community are 'concerned about this level of spending on this type of pageantry.'
Currently, Jamison is working on bringing down the 20% unemployment rate among active-duty spouses, and says the messaging of the parade as a celebration feels in conflict with the conditions she sees many veterans and military personnel existing in.
'I think if you ask [those] families what they need at this moment, it wouldn't be a parade. It would be, 'I need a job' or 'I need child care,'' Jamison argues. 'Who is this parade really for? Because it doesn't feel like it's for service members or families.'
Contact us at letters@time.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
18 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Live updates: Israel and Iran trade heavy strikes for a fourth day, with attacks expanding
Israel and Iran exchanged bloody strikes for a fourth day Monday as casualties mounted on both sides and international pleas for diplomacy went unheeded. Iran launched missiles at Israel early in the day, killing at least eight and injuring dozens more, according to the prime minister's office. The attack came after the Israel Defense Forces said it was striking surface-to-surface missile sites in central Iran. In one attack, Israel said, it hit command centers for Iran's Quds Force, the branch of the Revolutionary Guard that coordinates support for proxy forces across the region. The claim could not be immediately verified but would be the latest blow to Iran's military prowess. In Iran, at least 224 people have been killed, local media reported, quoting Health Ministry spokesman Hossein Kermanpour. The Israeli prime minister's office has reported 24 deaths in total. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Sunday that regime change in Iran 'could certainly be the result' of Israel's military campaign. Netanyahu made the remarks on 'Fox News Sunday' after anchor Bret Baier asked if 'regime change' was one of Israel's objectives. 'Clearly, some of these strikes have targeted Iranian leadership, military, nuclear scientists. … So, is regime change part of the effort here?' Baier said. A month ago, President Donald Trump went to the Saudi capital and spoke grandiosely of peace. Before a gathering of Arab leaders, he heralded the 'dawn of a bright new day for the great people of the Middle East.' Fractious conflicts would end, broken fences would mend. Trump decried the past generation of failed U.S. interventions and nation-building projects in the region. He offered 'a new path' to the theocratic regime in Tehran and said he would be 'happy' to forge a deal with Iran to make 'the world a safer place.'
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Trump administration is offering 3 different scenarios for how 'Liberation Day 2.0' may play out
A key deadline in President Trump's trade war is getting closer, with a 90-day pause on his "Liberation Day" tariffs set to expire on July 9. But what will actually happen when the clock strikes midnight on what some are calling "Liberation Day 2.0" is anyone's guess. A series of comments from Trump and his officials this week — even within a 12-hour span on Wednesday — were notable for the variety of scenarios they have on the table. It could be a nonevent with additional deadline extensions in the offing. It might be a day of celebration of long-promised trade deals that have yet to materialize. And it could also be a day when the hammer comes down and tariffs are simply dictated. Trump himself has indicated he is open to all three, telling reporters Wednesday evening that he will be sending letters to tell nations, "This is the deal, you can take it or leave it," but also acknowledging that some deadlines could be extended, and on other fronts, "We're rocking in terms of deals." The scenarios laid out this week by the president, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick aren't necessarily mutually exclusive, but which countries get which outcome will be closely watched by investors, as some outcomes are decidedly more market-friendly than others. As for what will actually happen, Henrietta Treyz of Veda Partners offered a prediction in a Thursday morning note to Yahoo Finance suggesting a combination of all three. "I think this is going to be like a potluck: There's going to be a little bit of everything," she said. On the menu for about 130 nations will be letters, she suggested, "and I'm optimistic their rate will be in the 10-25% range." Other nations may be able to secure limited deals — such as a recent pact with the UK — but with plenty of tariffs staying on or being added. Others may get an extension for now. Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet The uncertainty facing markets revolves around which scenario takes center stage in the coming weeks. The divergences were in stark relief Wednesday as the day unfolded. In the morning, during a CNBC appearance, Lutnick suggested the centerpiece would be a flood of new deals. He said that with China tensions on the back burner for the moment, negotiators will able to find areas of agreement on other fronts. "You're going to see deal after deal," he said. "This is going to start coming next week and the week after and the week after." But observers have grown increasingly unmoved by these promises after the administration has been suggesting imminent deals for months now, with only a limited pact with the UK materializing so far. By midday, Bessent was testifying before Congress and offered a somewhat different portrait of the weeks ahead. He indirectly acknowledged the slower pace of deals and said Trump is "highly likely" to push back his deadline for at least some top trading partners. He said the administration is prepared to "roll the date forward" for the 18 major partners that are negotiating in what the administration views as good faith. "If someone is not negotiating, then we will not," Bessent added. During his testimony, the Treasury secretary also floated the notion of regional trade deals, where a group of countries may get similar terms. By the evening, Trump offered a third focus, announcing that he is going to send letters to trading partners in the next one to two weeks to simply set new unilateral tariff rates. The letters are "telling them what the deal is," Trump told reporters Wednesday during a stop at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, D.C. But the president's comments also offered a mix of his aides' other messages from the day. The president said he would be willing to extend the deadline for certain nations, "but I don't think we're going to have that necessity." He also suggested that deals could be imminent on at least a few fronts, noting that "we're dealing with Japan, we're dealing with South Korea. We're dealing with a lot of them." Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Los Angeles curfew to continue for 'couple more days': mayor
A nightly curfew in Los Angeles will continue for "a couple more days," Mayor Karen Bass said Sunday, the ninth day of protests that have seen US President Donald Trump launch a military-backed crackdown. Demonstrators began protesting on June 6 against immigration raids launched by the Trump administration to round up undocumented migrants in the heavily Latino city in Democrat-led California. The rallies have been mostly peaceful and confined to a small area of Downtown Los Angeles, but marred by sporadic and eye-catching violence which Republican Trump has used as a pretext to send in 4,000 National Guard and 700 Marines. The extraordinary deployment came over the protests of local officials who have insisted that the situation was under control. Bass issued an overnight curfew on June 10 on the downtown area at the heart of the protests to stop incidents of vandalism and looting. On Sunday she said she is hoping that the number of people behind the violent incidents "will taper off". "So I know the curfew will be on for at least a couple more days," she said in a televised interview with local news channel KTLA, adding that she cannot predict how many more days exactly. "We don't know how many raids are going to happen, we don't know what the character of the raids will be, and every time that happens it really generates a lot of anger in the city," she said. Trump, seeminly unfazed by the protests, on Sunday directed federal authorities to ramp up their deportation efforts, including in Los Angeles. Bass noted the anger and fear that the raids by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency have generated in Los Angeles. "People are afraid to leave their homes," she said, adding that raids have at times felt "indiscriminate." "This is the United States. You are not supposed to have to show your papers if you go out in public," she said. "It's hard for me to believe it's targeted." Trump said on social media that ICE agents had been subjected to "violence, harassment and even threats" and ordered them to "do all in their power" to effect mass deportations. Los Angeles was mostly calm on Sunday after a massive rally and march a day earlier -- part of the "No Kings" series of anti-Trump protests across the country -- saw thousands of people turn out to condemn the raids and the military crackdown. A small group of demonstrators marched around City Hall during the sunny afternoon under the watchful eye of law enforcement, including several woman clad in bikinis carrying signs with slogans including "Hot Girl Summer Melt ICE". bur-st/dhw