Editorial: In bitter Orland Park mayoral race, Tribune Editorial Board endorses a return to civility
Federal partisanship has gotten so extreme and so ugly that people are cutting family members out of their lives, neighbors aren't speaking and, in general, Americans are likelier to view folks from the opposing political party as either idiotic or wicked.
Local politics are supposed to be different. Candidates are, after all, running to represent their baristas, local business owners, the family down the block and the other parents at their kids' school. In other words, local politics is personal, and the proximity of the candidates to one another — and their constituents — usually breeds a healthy dose of decorum and respect.
Not so in one southwest suburb. The mayoral race playing out in Orland Park has been anything but civil.
Candidates are incumbent Mayor Keith Pekau and former Village Trustee and Clerk Jim Dodge. In a joint virtual appearance before us, the candidates told the editorial board they used to be neighbors, and that Pekau's children used to babysit Dodge's kids. We were left wondering what changed since then.
Pekau has been attacked with ads calling him and his wife racist. Dodge denies involvement in these robocalls. Pekau has been relentless in his own attacks on Dodge, whom he positions as a liar and a stooge of special interests. The level of political discourse is disappointingly low and strikingly personal.
That's surprising given the candidates' commitment to public service. Both candidates are military veterans. Both have served many years in local government. We commend them for their service. We hope they are able to mend fences, both for themselves and for the good of their village.
In some ways, this race feels like a proxy battle between business and unions for control over Orland Park. Dodge has received a number of donations from labor groups while Pekau is backed by local businesses. Both men have poured their own money into their campaigns.
Pekau called for reopening businesses during COVID long before it was popular, and says his efforts increased pressure that ultimately led to reopening. We were glad to see businesses able to reopen too.
But this race also touches the prickliest national political issues.
Pekau attended the December 2024 Republican holiday bash in which border czar Tom Homan told the crowd 'your mayor sucks and your governor sucks.' We not only critiqued that lack of decorum from a high-ranking federal official, but also noted that all this sort of macho bluster will do is make Homan's agents' jobs more difficult.
We're also troubled by the handling of a confrontation after residents asked village officials to adopt a Gaza ceasefire resolution. Pekau has rightly pointed out that in his role as a local official he has nothing to do with foreign policy. But his messaging left many feeling unwelcome. 'First and foremost I'm an American,' he said at the Feb. 5 board of trustees meeting. 'I'm not a German American, I'm an American. That's where my allegiances lie. Period. Dot. End of story. And if you're an American citizen, and you don't feel that way, in my opinion, you're entitled to that opinion, but you can certainly go, and go to another country and support that country, and all the power to you if you choose to do that. I will always support America's interests.' It's that last part about going to another country that set people off.
Dodge, a longtime Republican, is far from perfect. We're suspicious of his endorsements from big labor groups such as the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, which could mean spending and tax growth down the road. We also have grave concerns about the nature of the campaign against Pekau, and we find the personal attacks that have taken place unacceptable.
But given the polarization in village politics at the moment, we can't help but feel like something needs to change.
Jim Dodge is endorsed.
Submit a letter, of no more than 400 words, to the editor here or email letters@chicagotribune.com.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
41 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump's throwing himself a parade while red and blue states join LA in protest
Trump's throwing himself a parade while red and blue states join LA in protest | Opinion I don't know whether June 14 will mark an inflection point, but it will offer a staggering contrast between the power-drunk despotism of Trump and the 'Aw, hell no' attitude of many Americans. Show Caption Hide Caption Armored tanks arrive in DC for Trump's military birthday parade As Washington, D.C. prepares for the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, armored tanks have begun to arrive ahead of Saturday's celebration. The false narrative, since President Donald Trump's administration provoked protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Los Angeles, has been that it's a blue-city problem in a blue state with a liberal governor who can't control his citizens. But when protests over Trump's draconian immigrant crackdown and his authoritarian presidency spread across the country, as they will likely do on June 14 with "No Kings" protests expected in more than 2,000 cities and towns, the California narrative will swiftly go 'Poof!' We've already seen anti-ICE protests bubble up in the deep-red state of Texas, with more to follow June 14. Will the No Kings protest in Abilene, Texas, prompt Trump to send in U.S. Marines, as he has done in Los Angeles? Trump won't send the Marines into red states to deal with protesters Neither will the protests planned for Tupelo, Mississippi, or Eureka Springs, Arkansas, or Sebring, Florida, or Worland, Wyoming. But what they will do is show the president, who will be plunked in Washington, DC, watching an entirely unnecessary $45 million military parade that just so happens to coincide with his 79th birthday, that Americans are angry, and not just the ones in those disreputable blue states. Opinion: After LA, Trump hard launches new First Amendment – only MAGA can protest I don't know whether June 14 will mark an inflection point, but it will certainly offer a staggering contrast between the power-drunk despotism of President Trump and the 'Aw, hell no' attitude of a growing swath of the U.S. population. Sen. Padilla in handcuffs was the latest sign of Trump's authoritarianism On June 12, Americans saw video of a U.S. senator, Alex Padilla, being grabbed and dragged out of an LA news conference featuring Kristi Noem, head of the Department of Homeland Security. Padilla was asking a pointed question before being hauled off and then, in the hallway outside, pushed face first to the ground and handcuffed. That's a good way to boost turnout at this weekend's protests. DHS head Kristi Noem says feds are there to 'liberate' LA Almost as chilling as the administration's manhandling of a sitting U.S. senator was what Noem said during the press conference about the U.S. military presence in Los Angeles: 'We are not going away. We are staying here to liberate the city from the socialists and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that this mayor have placed on this country and what they have tried to insert into the city.' Opinion: Trump's military show of force in LA and DC camouflage his failing presidency That kind of gives away the whole game: Trump administration officials think they can send federal troops into a city and indulge in some causal 'regime change' under the pretense of a bunch of made-up nonsense. That's wildly un-American. Yet U.S. soldiers on June 14 will be forced to take part in a sprawling parade that's at least partially in homage to a man who thinks that's how America is supposed to work? What are we even doing here, folks? 'No Kings' protests will give voice to nationwide disapproval of Trump What has transpired in LA has nothing to do with it being a blue city in a blue state with a Democratic governor. It has to do with the American people, most of whom don't like masked federal goons grabbing their neighbors off the streets and not giving them due process. It has to do with many voters who were promised that President Trump would only target 'dangerous' immigrants, not friends and neighbors, or people who've been part of a community for years. It has to do with Americans who see the handcuffing of a U.S. senator for no justifiable reason as anti-democratic and a dangerous escalation. The big and small protests that will soon envelop small towns and big cities in all 50 states will show Trump and his 'lie first, then lie some more' administration that many Americans reject government-sponsored cruelty. The No Kings events will show the president and his people they can't fool all the people all of the time ‒ not even close. The booing of Trump will only get louder Trump and first lady Melania Trump were booed, rightfully, at the Kennedy Center when they arrived for a musical on June 11. The president's approval rating stinks, and a new Quinnipiac poll found him underwater on every issue, from immigration to trade to the economy. A recent poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found that 60% of Americans don't think Trump's military parade is a good use of taxpayer money. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. So here's what's going to happen Saturday. Trump's narrative that liberal strongholds like Los Angeles are bastions of radical protesters will be soundly derailed by the appearance of protesters in states red, blue and purple. The hypocrisy of his calling out California Gov. Gavin Newsom and claiming the state is out of control will be highlighted by the fact that Trump says the same thing about red-state governors dealing with widespread protests. Trump himself will be scowling, hopefully in the rain if the weather forecast holds, as the soldiers he forced to march in front of him go by, their tanks and other vehicles needlessly tearing up the streets of the nation's capital. That mandated, wildly expensive parade to satisfy one small man's ego will be drowned out by myriad protests that will collectively deliver to Trump a message from a growing number of Americans: 'You stink.' Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at


USA Today
41 minutes ago
- USA Today
How will Trump's immigration crackdown in California impact the economy?
How will Trump's immigration crackdown in California impact the economy? Show Caption Hide Caption National Guard major general clarifies military's role in Los Angeles National Guard Major General Scott Sherman outlined the role of military personnel in Los Angeles and said troops will not conduct arrests. President Donald Trump's administration is stepping up deportation efforts in California with immigration raids at restaurants, traffic stops and routine legal check-ins. The immigration crackdown, while popular with voters in polls, has sparked protests in Los Angeles. Long term, economists warn that fewer immigrants could take a hit to the economy, prompting labor shortages and slowing economic growth. "Immigrants play a huge role in the California economy,' said Giovanni Peri, an economics professor at the University of California, Davis. Without immigrants, 'there will be less economic growth. Less opportunity, also, for local companies and American workers.' 'Wave of panic': Businesses are in crosshairs of Trump immigration crackdown Why the U.S. is 'immigrant dependent' The country's economy has become 'very immigrant dependent,' according to Christopher Thornberg, founding partner at Beacon Economics, a Los Angeles research and consulting firm. About 479,000 U.S.-born workers were added to the labor force over the last five years compared with 3.6 million foreign-born workers, according to an October report from the National Foundation for American Policy, a nonpartisan research organization. The report pointed to a spike in immigration and retirements, coupled with a slowdown in U.S.-born working-age population growth. In California, immigrants make up roughly one-third of workers and comprise an outsized share of the workforce in physically intensive sectors like construction and agriculture. Critics say these workers are lowering wages for American-born citizens or taking away jobs. But Peri said that doesn't pan out in the data. Immigrants may reduce wages for native-born Americans with competing skills, according to Harvard economics professor George Borjas, but it slightly increases the income of native-born citizens overall. A separate 2024 working paper co-authored by Peri found immigrants had no significant effect on wages for those born in the U.S. who are college educated and a positive effect on wages for their American-born peers who are less educated. Instead, Peri said immigrants are filling the holes in industries struggling to hire. Immigrants account for 28% of care workers in long-term care settings, according to the nonprofit health policy organization KFF. In California, immigrants make up 44% of manufacturing jobs and 40% of construction jobs, according to the Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning think tank based in Washington D.C. Some of those jobs are held by undocumented workers. About 1.8 million people, or 17% of immigrants in California, were undocumented as of 2022, according to Pew. The vast majority – 1.4 million – had no legal protections through programs like Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or active asylum claims. "It would be lovely to deal with this with an expansion of the legal immigration system,' Peri said. 'But lacking that, undocumented immigrants are doing a lot of these jobs. And losing some of them would make the situation worse.' Pushing away immigrants, Peri argues, prevents companies from growing and creating more jobs that would benefit U.S.-born workers. One 2024 analysis from Jamshid Damooei, executive director of the Center for Economics of Social Issues at California Lutheran University, found work from undocumented employees created an additional 1.25 million jobs in California. And because the vast majority of undocumented immigrants are not criminals, but people who have been part of their local communities for years if not decades, 'in the majority of cases, the effects of just indiscriminately deporting these people is going to have very little benefit for the American people,' Peri said. Revenue vs. cost It's true that immigrants add costs for the government; they benefit from public education, health services and other state-specific policies. But research generally finds immigration tends to raise the federal government's revenue more than its costs, with immigrants adding an estimated $1.2 trillion in federal revenues between 2024 and 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. State and local governments' costs tend to increase more than their revenues from a surge in immigration, but Peri said the rise in immigration is a net benefit overall. Even undocumented workers, Peri argued, boost the government's coffers because they pay a considerable amount of taxes. At the same time, they are ineligible for most federal benefits like Social Security and food stamps. Undocumented immigrants contributed $8.5 billion in state and local taxes in 2022, according to a 2024 study from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, a nonpartisan think tank. Trump and Newsom: Trump's battle with Newsom, California expands beyond immigration What happens if the immigration crackdown continues? Thornberg doesn't expect Trump to deport every undocumented worker in the country, and views the crackdown in California as 'more of a blown-up spectacle' that 'may get tied up in the courts.' Already, Trump has said he would back off certain deportation efforts to avoid labor shortages in areas like agriculture and hospitality. 'Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace,' Trump said in a June 12 post on Truth Social. 'Changes are coming!' While an immediate labor shortage is unlikely, Thornberg believes we're more likely to see people discouraged from coming to the U.S. in the years to come, resulting in a tighter labor market. That could mean higher wages for workers as companies step up recruitment efforts, but it would slow economic growth overall. Trump's efforts to constrain immigration during his first term played out in a similar fashion; by 2019, the unemployment rate had dropped to 3.5%, its lowest level since 1969, with earnings up 3.5% from 2018. Meanwhile, economic growth slowed to 2.3%, down from 2.9% the year prior, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Peri said a tight labor market could have ripple effects across the economy, such as driving up the cost to produce certain items. Companies may be more inclined to import cheaper goods at a time when the Trump administration is pushing for more U.S. manufacturing through tariffs. 'This could have a cascade of effects,' he said. 'There is no doubt at all that immigration and immigrants who do those simple, manual jobs are very important at making the economy go.'


Axios
44 minutes ago
- Axios
The Elon Musk DOGE legacy that just won't die
Call it zombie management: Each week, federal workers inside a few agencies still dutifully email a report, detailing the 5 things they did in the previous seven days. Why it matters: The emails, born from an out-of-nowhere Elon Musk X post, show how hard it can be undo even the smallest of changes once unleashed on the largest workforce in the U.S. Catch up quick: One Saturday in February, Musk posted that all federal employees would get an email asking them to explain what they'd accomplished over the last week. Failure to respond more than once, he said, would get you fired. The Office of Personnel Management quickly followed up with a email to millions of federal workers, giving them until Monday night to respond (minus the firing threat). The big picture: The request blindsided the White House, including chief of staff Susie Wiles, two senior administration officials tell Axios. It was the first documented time that White House officials, publicly and privately, resisted Musk and chafed at his style of personnel management. "To use a phrase Susie might use, she was fit to be tied at Musk," one of the officials said of Wiles' level of annoyance. Some officials promptly told their staffs to ignore it, starting with FBI director Kash Patel. Other appointees soon followed suit. The Office of Personnel Management pretty quickly said it was discretionary. Zoom in: Like a zombie in a workplace horror movie, these emails live on, a sort of vestigial Muskian management tool. Employees at OPM are encouraged to do it. The folks at NOAA must send it as well, said one agency employee. "We're told to send it every Monday before midnight," says a Social Security employee. "It takes a while," they said. "I have never gotten a response from anyone." An employee at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which has been largely gutted by the White House and had most of its work halted, said they hadn't been told to stop sending them, but stopped anyway. "Got tired of saying I hadn't accomplished anything because we haven't been given any work," they said. For the record: "Commissioner Bisignano is streamlining the Social Security Administration to deliver more efficient service for American taxpayers," Liz Huston, a White House spokeswoman, said in a statement responding to questions about why the agency is still doing this. At least for SSA, the emails are a temporary practice until they get a better system in place, an agency official tells Axios. OPM stands by them too. "This practice is vital to maintain accountability and transparency in employee contributions," says spokeswoman McLaurine Pinover, who says she submits these weekly. "It's an easy way to share my work with leadership." "The mission of eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse is a part of the DNA of the federal government and will continue under the direction of the President, his cabinet, and agency heads to enhance government efficiency and prioritize responsible stewardship of taxpayer dollars," says White House spokesman Harrison Fields.