Surveys show there's one improvement you don't want from the Pixel 10 chip
Google's Pixel 10 series is widely expected to be the first with processors manufactured by TSMC instead of Samsung. This is a good thing in theory as TSMC-made chips have historically been more efficient than Samsung-manufactured silicon.
It also sounds like this could be a long-term arrangement that lasts until the Pixel 14 series . This all got me wondering what people really want from the Pixel 10's processor. So we posted polls on the website , Twitter , and YouTube . It turns out there's one improvement you definitely don't care for.
One thing you really don't want across all three polls is more powerful on-device AI. This accounted for under 8% of the vote across all three polls, and under 6% on our website and YouTube surveys. My first impression is that this means people either don't care about on-device AI or they think Pixel phones are already very capable in this regard. But after reading user comments, it's clear that the former is the case.
YouTube user @ramsaygames9256 was one of several respondents to express their displeasure with AI:
Nobody wants on device AI. Such a fad and a genuine mistake.
This sentiment was echoed by Twitter user @WorryIdoNOT:
Nothing. Maybe less AI. Better yet, NO AI at all.
Meanwhile, YouTube user @jb3839 said Google should take notes:
See Google, No cares about AI (sic).
The most popular wish across all three polls was for improved battery life. The switch to TSMC has historically resulted in smartphone chips with improved battery life, and I'm expecting this from the Pixel 10 series as well. It also doesn't help that older Tensor-powered Pixel phones have often seen mediocre battery life relative to the battery capacity. This has improved with the Pixel 9 series, but colleague Joe Maring still decried the Pixel 9 Pro's battery life.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News24
12 minutes ago
- News24
Market fall-out as Trump doubles steel, aluminium tariffs
• For more financial news, go to the News24 Business front page. Shares in South Korean and Vietnamese steelmakers, major Asian exporters of the metal to the United States, dropped on Monday after US President Donald Trump said he would double tariffs on imported steel and aluminium to 50%. Trump announced on Friday the new steel and aluminium levies, which take effect on June 4, intensifying a global trade war just hours after he accused China of violating an agreement with the US to mutually roll back tariffs and trade restrictions for critical minerals. Steel industry experts said while the increased tariff would cause significant disruption for major exporters to the US, the rates could go down in light of some of Trump's trade policy reversals. "Frequent shifts in the Trump administration's tariff policies introduce considerable uncertainty regarding the actual impact ... I think the final result will be far lower than initially projected, especially concerning its duration," said Chelsea Ye, senior analyst at metals research firm McCloskey. South Korea's Industry Ministry said on Monday it will respond to the 50% tariff on steel products as part of its trade discussions with Washington in order to minimise the impact on industry. South Korea was the fourth-biggest exporter of steel to the United States last year, behind Canada, Mexico and Brazil, according to American Iron and Steel Institute data. South Korea's Industry Ministry said in a statement that it had held an emergency meeting with officials from the country's major steelmakers, including POSCO and Hyundai Steel . Shares of South Korean steelmakers lost ground on Monday, with POSCO and Hyundai Steel falling 3% and SeAH Steel Corp down 6.3% in morning trade. In Vietnam, major steelmakers Hoa Sen Group and Nam Kim Steel fell 2.8% and 3.4% respectively. Vietnam Steel Corp also fell 2.7%. Vietnam's exports of steel and steel products to the U.S. fell 27% in the first four months of this year, government data showed. The 50% tariffs will add to the challenges facing Korean steel exporters, which have refrained from sharply boosting exports to the US to avoid Washington's scrutiny, despite rising US steel prices, an industry executive told Reuters. "It will be a burden to exporting companies, if there are no additional steel price increases in the U.S," he told Reuters, asking not to be identified due to the sensitivity of the issue. Despite tariffs, South Korea's steel shipments to the United States rose 12% in April from a year earlier, according to trade data. Steel and aluminium tariffs were among the earliest Trump imposed when he returned to office in January. The tariffs of 25% on most steel and aluminium imported to the US went into effect on March 12. Industry officials said the tariffs have increased US steel prices, affecting several sectors, including home appliances, cars, and construction. Trade talks South Korea, a major US ally, has called for an exemption from tariffs on steel, autos and others items, during talks with the United States. Seoul agreed in late April to craft a trade package by the end of the 90-day pause on Trump's reciprocal tariffs in July, but it has been difficult for negotiators to make big decisions due to a political leadership vacuum ahead of elections on Tuesday. In late March, Hyundai Steel announced a plan to build a $5.8 billion factory in Louisiana in response to US tariffs, but the factory will not open until 2029. In April, Hyundai Steel's bigger rival POSCO signed a preliminary deal to make an equity investment in the factory project. In India, which relies heavily on the US for aluminium exports, industry experts also warned of a major hit. "This is going to have a detrimental impact," B.K. Bhatia, director-general at the Federation of Indian Mineral Industries, the country's leading mining body, told Reuters. "The US is the biggest market for Indian aluminium. Government has been negotiating so we are hopeful that with talks, the tariffs will come down." The US is the world's largest steel importer, excluding the European Union, with a total of 26.2 million tons of imported steel in 2024, according to the Department of Commerce. As a result, the new tariffs will likely increase steel prices across the board, hitting industry and consumers alike. "The latest hike will prompt these sellers to renegotiate with their US buyers on how to and who will shoulder the extra 25% cost," said Thaiseer Jaffar, founder of Dubai-based steel industry event organiser Global Steel Summit.
Business Insider
29 minutes ago
- Business Insider
3 members of the 'Tesla mafia' share what they learned from Elon Musk's company
Tesla makes EVs, batteries, robots, and startups. A steady stream of employees — the "Tesla mafia" — have left to found companies in everything from EVs and batteries to robotics and electric boats. Electric car startup Lucid was founded by former Tesla executives back in 2007, and the ex-Tesla founders of British EV startup Longbow previously told Business Insider they aimed to deliver a Roadster sports car before Elon Musk's company. Former senior employees who then raised large amounts for their own startups include former senior vice president of energy Drew Baglino, whose energy firm Heron Power reportedly raised a Series A round of over $30 million in April. Automotive tech startup Tekion, founded by Tesla's former chief information officer Jay Vijayan, is now valued at over $4 billion. "The success rate of former Tesla employees starting their own companies, building hard things, is exceptionally high," Chris Walti, Tesla's former Optimus lead, told BI. BI spoke to Walti and two other former Tesla employees about why so many of its former employees have gone on to startup success. 'It's not a Google-like culture, and it's not a 9-to-5 experience' Gene Berdichevsky, CEO of Sila Nanotechnologies and Tesla's seventh ever employee, said what sets working at the company apart is the sense of "radical self-reliance." "It's kind of the belief that when you're doing new things, there are no experts to ask, there are no suppliers who have done it before. If there are, you're probably not doing something particularly novel," said Berdichevsky, who left the company in 2008. Walti, who left the company in 2022 after seven years to start robotics firm Mytra, told BI that Tesla gave engineers unprecedented freedom and responsibility to tackle "really big problems." "You can solve problems without requiring 20 product managers and five VPs for approval. Here's the problem: go figure it out, go solve it, go talk to whoever you need to get it done," Walti said. While Tesla's lack of bureaucracy may be liberating, the company is also known for its intense work culture. Musk and other senior figures have previously slept on the factory floor during crises, and employees are expected to work long hours to meet the billionaires' tight deadlines. "Tesla is not an easy place to work, but it was never intended to be. It's not a Google-like culture, and it's not a 9-to-5 experience," said Berdichevsky. Walti said Tesla employees used to jokingly warn each other not to "fly too close to the sun," with Musk having little tolerance for failure. "Elon has a short fuse. It doesn't matter how many successful projects you've delivered," he said. "You screw up once and you might be out." Walti added that the intensity of working with Musk led some people to "burn out," and said that working in a system where employees had little say over product direction could be frustrating. "If you're not too close to the sun, it's a wonderful place to work because you get to work on really meaty problems. You get the innovation, the scale, the tech risk, and you're surrounded by a bunch of really innovative people," he said. "On the flip side, it doesn't give you a lot of agency over why you're building things. You'll be told ' make the Cybertruck float,' and at no point is there a debate on why; it was like, just go do it," Walti added. Leaving Tesla Tobias Kahnert, who founded powertrain startup EFT Mobility, said that starting a new company is often more attractive than taking a job at a rival for Tesla employees. "We used to call it internally 'the Mount Everest syndrome'," said Tobias Kahnert, who was a senior software engineer at Tesla from 2014 to 2017. Kahnert joined Tesla right out of college and worked there through the "production hell" of ramping the Model 3 mass-market EV. The idea of founding his own company felt like a natural next move, he said. "I couldn't see a more exciting company in the world at that point" than Tesla, he said. "The option was either I stay with that company until retirement, which is a long time away, or I start something myself," he said. Kahnert said the most valuable lesson he learned at Tesla was how to innovate quickly without losing track of the need to scale a product. "The stretch between these two worlds is something you learn quite quickly at Tesla. You need this spirit of challenging the norms, seeing what's possible, and figuring out ways to get it done without being bogged down too much in processes," said Kahnert. "But you also actually need to get on the level of working with the process and alongside regulations to even have a product that you can bring into the market," he added. Walti said Tesla offered a unique experience within engineering of building hard things at scale on a tight timeline, which he called a "trifecta" of speed, scale, and innovation. "Usually, you have to pick two of the three. At places like Boeing or Lockheed, you're building hard things with innovation, but the timelines are, like, 10 years," said Walti. "Tesla is a unique place because of the scale. Startups are fast and innovative, but not yet scaled. Innovating with speed at scale is an interesting nexus that really accelerates learning," he added.
Wall Street Journal
39 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Podcast: Trump's Plan B After Trade Court Setback
Last week, an obscure trade court dropped a bombshell ruling: President Trump didn't have the authority to issue sweeping tariffs under a 1977 law. The government has appealed the court's decision. WSJ's James Fanelli and Gavin Bade dig into the ruling and what it could mean for the future of Trump's trade agenda. Annie Minoff hosts. 🎧 Listen here to The Journal podcast.
