Dundee Pride organisers 'rescind' Lord Provost's invite to lead city's equalities march
Dundee Pride organisers have told Lord Provost Bill Campbell he is no longer invited to lead this year's Pride march in the city.
Organisers argue 'there has been a clear and vocal consensus that this year's Pride event should remain entirely free from political representation whether local or national, elected or otherwise'.
Dundee Pride's secretary wrote to the Lord Provost on June 5.
The decision comes as part of a larger political fallout surrounding a recent UK Supreme Court ruling.
The ruling states that a woman is defined by biological sex at birth, meaning transgender women are not considered to be women under the Equality Act.
Following the ruling, national advocacy group Trans Pride Collective issued an open letter urging Pride event organisers to 'show solidarity with the trans community.'
They asked march organisers to 'ban all political parties from officially marching with you and having stalls within your event spaces.'
The ban does not prevent politicians from attending Pride events as individuals, as long as they are not acting in their elected capacity.
On May 25, Dundee Pride joined other Pride events across Scotland in in enforcing the ban at this year's LGBTQ+ protest.
This came after local group Transdonians called out Dundee Pride bosses for not taking action sooner in response to the ruling.
Dundee Pride organisers told The Courier:
'We are deeply saddened and outraged by the Supreme Court's recent decision—a ruling that once again fails the trans community and betrays the fundamental duty of those in power to protect the rights and safety of all people.'
'This decision has emboldened a wave of hateful rhetoric. We must be clear: Pride has always been a protest.
'While it's often portrayed as a celebration of 'Love is Love' wrapped in rainbow colours, the truth is more urgent—our community is still fighting for its very survival.
'This ruling has placed a spotlight on the broader struggle for LGBTQ+ rights at a time when far-right ideologies are gaining momentum. We cannot afford to be complacent.
'Now more than ever, individuals, communities, and allies must stand united in unwavering solidarity.'
In accordance with the ban, Dundee Pride wrote to Lord Provost Bill Campbell to 'rescind' his invitation to lead the Pride protest march through the city.
He was also due to make a speech, which he has done annually since coming into post in 2022.
The organisers emphasised the decision was not personal.
They wrote in the letter: 'While we fully acknowledge and sincerely appreciate your personal support, enthusiasm, and civic leadership, we must honour the values and voices of the LGBTQ+ community we serve.
'We remain thankful for your support and understanding. We hope to continue working together in other ways to champion inclusivity and equality in Dundee.'
Lord Provost Bill Campbell told The Courier: 'It has been an honour and a privilege to lead Dundee Pride events in support of the LGBTQ+ community.
'However, I respect the decision made by Pride events across the country not to involve political and civic representation this year.
'I wish everyone at Dundee Pride the very best for this year's event.'
The Courier reached out to Transdonians for comment via email on June 5 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
7 hours ago
- The Independent
‘We are disappearing': Britain's first trans judge on Supreme Court defeat – and why she's challenging it
I don't think any lawyer would have expected that outcome,' says Britain's first trans judge about the Supreme Court ruling that a woman is defined by biological sex, rather than gender. It means trans women – including those with a gender recognition certificate (GCR) – can be excluded from single-sex spaces for women, such as changing rooms and medical services. 'I wasn't expecting the trans community to lose,' admits Dr Victoria McCloud, who was publicly promoted as a symbol of the modern judiciary's diversity. April's bombshell ruling leaves Britain 'not much better than countries that criminalise trans people', she says. Dr McCloud believes her rights as one of the 8,000 people to have legally changed the sex on their birth certificate have been violated under Article Six of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 'It literally changed my legal sex for discrimination purposes, overnight,' she says. The ruling states sex is binary 'but it has actually created a situation where I am two sexes at once, which is a bit peculiar … for the purposes of the Equality Act, I am male, but for the purposes of everything else I'm female, so if I have to tick a box on a form, I don't know what box to tick.' It is for these reasons that, along with a team, she plans to take the UK government to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). It is not a decision taken lightly, as she expects the ECHR could take six years just to decide the case and, even if she is successful, change would not come automatically. 'If you win, all you get is a declaration that the country's breached your human rights.' The Supreme Court ruling was seen as a victory by the gender critical side; it was campaign group For Women Scotland that brought the case after first challenging the definition of a woman back in 2022. For the trans community and its allies, it is seen as a huge rollback in rights, an outcome that Dr McCloud hoped to avoid. She notes that there were no trans voices heard in the case, even though she relinquished her role as a judge in order to apply last year to intervene in the case (but wasn't allowed to, and wasn't given a reason why). 'I think it becomes embarrassing to law, to have a situation where essentially the people who are the most affected in human rights terms don't actually have any voice at any stage.' Now living in Ireland – which she describes as a 'much safer place' where she can 'go down the pub and no one cares what loo I go to' – she says hearing the Supreme Court ruling was like 'watching a car crash from a distance'. 'My own country has left me as much as I've left my own country. The distance enables you to cushion yourself from a shock, whereas I think a lot of people in the UK are still bewildered and numb from the shock. I'm in an interesting position in that I'm sort of leading this [campaign] and yet I'm in exile.' To Dr McCloud, the dispersal of trans people means 'we are just quietly disappearing'. It's in the physical sense, as trans people are leaving the UK, but also metaphorically as trans rights are being erased at pace both in the UK, the US and around the world. Returning to London for a visit feels like a 'special mission', she says, because she feels unable to use toilets in the airport and instead has to reach where she is staying. 'It now does feel palpably different as soon as you hit the ground [in the UK].' To help other trans people, especially those who do not want to be outed, Dr McCloud has created the Trans Exile Network (TEN), which can be joined by request through her LinkedIn page. 'It's a group of trans, non-binary and intersex people (along with their families) who want to get out,' she explains. 'It's a private group for sharing tips from those who've done it and have the experience of what you need to do.' She also hopes to crowdfund to help those who will financially struggle to move. 'I don't want anyone to be left behind through a lack of means.' For those in Britain, things could worsen further for trans people 'as long as Keir Starmer, Wes Streeting and Bridget Phillips are in charge', she fears. 'I had 25 years, whatever it's been, of a perfectly ordinary, very nice life,' she says, with younger people having a bleaker prospect. And since her legal challenge could take a decade, her commitment to it is less about herself and her peers, 'it's really for people who are the next generation instead'.
Reuters
8 hours ago
- Reuters
Tens of thousands march in Romania demanding LGBTQ equality
BUCHAREST, June 7 (Reuters) - Tens of thousands of Romanians joined an LGBTQ Pride march in Bucharest on Saturday, demanding civil union partnership legislation and equal rights after a highly-contested presidential election last month buoyed the far right. The European Union state has so far ignored a 2023 ruling by the European Court of Human Rights, which found Romania had failed to enforce the rights of same-sex couples by refusing to recognise their relationships. Socially conservative Romania decriminalised homosexuality in 2001, decades later than other parts of the EU, but still bars marriage and civil partnerships for same-sex couples. "We want legal protection for same-sex couples, an easy legal procedure for transitioning, protection against hate speech and prejudice-based crimes," said Teodora Roseti, president of Romanian LGBTQ rights organisation ACCEPT and Pride's organiser. In Bucharest, marchers danced and carried the rainbow flag 20 years after the first Pride parade was held, carrying banners such as "Love is the worst feeling you could hate", "Equality in love, equality in inheritance. Civil partnership for all". Roughly 30,000 people attended the parade, ACCEPT estimated. The march comes at a fraught moment in Central and Eastern Europe, where far right parties have gained ground. Poles held a similar parade on Saturday. Hours before the Romanian march, a smaller anti-Pride protest took place, with participants demanding an Orthodox Christian nation and waving flags carrying the Celtic cross, a known far-right symbol. In Romania, centrist Bucharest mayor Nicusor Dan ultimately won the presidential election against hard-right opposition leader George Simion, a strong opponent of LGBTQ rights. ACCEPT and LGBTQ rights group Mozaiq warned of a rise in hate speech against the community during the election campaign, and their headquarters were defaced. In neighbouring Hungary, parliament passed legislation earlier this year that de facto bans holding Pride marches.
Reuters
8 hours ago
- Reuters
Poles march for LGBTQ+ equality after presidential vote raises fears
GDANSK, Poland, June 7 (Reuters) - Thousands of Poles took part in a Pride march in the northern port city of Gdansk on Saturday, showing their support for the LGBTQ+ community amid fears for its future after nationalist candidate Karol Nawrocki won a presidential election. Participants waved rainbow flags and the blue, pink, and white banners representing the transgender community. Many carried placards bearing messages such as "Love is love" and "12 years together - when civil partnership?". A parallel Pride event was also held in the western city of Wroclaw. Nawrocki, supported by the conservative Law and Justice (PiS) party, has raised alarm among LGBTQ+ advocates. During its time in power from 2015 to 2023, PiS made opposition to what it termed "LGBTQ+ ideology" a central part of its platform, framing it as a threat to traditional values in the predominantly Catholic country. "I was devastated to be honest," 23-year-old student Agata said when asked about Nawrocki's victory. "I am scared. I don't know what our future looks like." Although LGBTQ+ issues were less prominent in Nawrocki's campaign than in that of his PiS-backed predecessor Andrzej Duda in 2020, his platform included commitments to resist "ideology in schools" and to oppose adoption by same-sex couples. He has stated that marriage should remain between a man and a woman and, while rejecting civil partnerships, expressed a willingness to discuss legal recognition for a "close person", regardless of sexual orientation. In contrast, a pro-European coalition that came to power in 2023 introduced a draft bill to legalise civil partnerships. However, with the presidency holding veto power, the bill's future remains uncertain. Agata said that she hoped a law on civil partnerships could come into effect, but that it was unlikely during Nawrocki's presidency. "I want more equality in our society, in our country," she said.
