How to lower your dementia risk as cases expected to rise by 2060
Research shows that dementia cases are going up, with a study released this week estimating that cases in the United States, for instance, will double by 2060.
The study, published in the journal Nature Medicine on Monday, found that the risk of developing dementia after age 55 is double that reported by previous studies, estimating it at 42 per cent. They said this was tied to population ageing.
Previous research has estimated that global cases of dementia will rise due to population ageing and growth including a 2022 study that estimated global cases could rise from 57.4 million cases in 2019 to nearly 153 million in 2050.
Western Europe would see an estimated 74 per cent increase in cases by 2050, central Europe would have an 82 per cent increase, and eastern Europe would see a 92 per cent increase, according to the study.
But people can take steps to reduce their risk of dementia, such as controlling high blood pressure and other bad-for-the-brain health problems, and it's not too late to try even in middle age.
"All of our research suggests what you do in midlife really matters," said Dr Josef Coresh the study's co-author from New York University (NYU) Langone Health in the US.
Dementia isn't only Alzheimer's
Dementia is the progressive loss of memory, language, and other cognitive functions.
Alzheimer's is the most common form, and silent brain changes that eventually lead to it can begin two decades before symptoms appear. Other types include vascular dementia when heart disease or small strokes impair blood flow to the brain.
Many people have mixed causes, meaning vascular problems could exacerbate brewing Alzheimer's symptoms.
Measuring the risk from a certain age over the potential remaining life span can guide public health recommendations and medical research.
"It's not a guarantee that someone will develop dementia," said Dr James Galvin, a University of Miami Alzheimer's specialist. He wasn't involved with the new study but said the findings fit with other research.
Dementia risk is different by age
Prior studies estimated about 14 per cent of men and 23 per cent of women would develop some form of dementia during their lifetime.
Coresh's team analysed more recent data from a US study that has tracked the heart health and cognitive function of about 15,000 older adults for several decades. Importantly, they found the risk changes with the decades.
Only 4 per cent of people developed dementia between the ages of 55 and 75, what Coresh calls a key 20-year window for protecting brain health.
For people who survive common health threats until 75, the dementia risk then jumped to 20 per cent by age 85 and 42 per cent between ages 85 and 95.
Overall, the lifetime dementia risk after age 55 was 35 per cent for men and 48 per cent for women, the researchers concluded.
Women generally live longer than men, a main reason for that difference, Coresh noted. Black Americans had a slightly higher risk, 44 per cent, than white people at 41 per cent.
Ways to lower dementia risk
There are some risk factors people can't control, including age and whether you inherited a gene variant called APOE4 that raises the chances of late-in-life Alzheimer's.
But people can try to avert or at least delay health problems that contribute to later dementia.
Coresh, for example, wears a helmet when biking because repeated or severe brain injuries from crashes or falls increase the risk of later-in-life dementia.
Especially important: "What's good for your heart is good for your brain," added Miami's Galvin. He urges people to exercise, avoid obesity, and control blood pressure, diabetes and cholesterol.
For example, high blood pressure can impair blood flow to the brain, a risk not just for vascular dementia but also linked to some hallmarks of Alzheimer's.
Similarly, the high blood sugar of poorly controlled diabetes is linked to cognitive decline and damaging inflammation in the brain.
Stay socially and cognitively active, too, Galvin said. He urges people to try hearing aids if age brings hearing loss, which can spur social isolation.
"There are things that we have control over, and those things I think would be really, really important to build a better brain as we age," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
a day ago
- Euronews
‘Forever chemicals' exposure before birth raises teenage health risks
'Forever chemicals' may be taking their toll on our health before we are even born, new research suggests. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, are a group of chemicals used in everyday products like food packaging and non-stick cookware. They're known as 'forever chemicals' because they don't degrade easily and can build up in the environment – and in our bodies. Scientists have detected PFAS in people's blood, breast milk, semen, livers, and even brains. They suspect these chemicals harm human health, with studies linking them to higher cholesterol, some cancers, and fertility problems, among other issues. The new research adds another complication to that list: high blood pressure during adolescence. The analysis followed more than 1,000 children in the US. It used maternal plasma collected shortly after they were born to identify their level of prenatal PFAS exposure, and matched it to doctors' records up until their 18th birthdays. Prenatal exposure to PFAS was linked to a higher risk of developing high blood pressure later in childhood, particularly in the teenage years, according to the study published in the Journal of the American Heart Association. The findings indicate that 'these forever chemicals can have long-lasting and potentially harmful effects that may only become apparent years after birth,' Zeyu Li, the study's lead author and a researcher at Johns Hopkins University in the US, said in a statement. The risk of elevated blood pressure was even higher for boys and Black children with higher PFAS levels at birth, the study found. In a surprise to researchers, a handful of forever chemicals were actually linked to lower diastolic, or bottom number, blood pressure in early childhood, though that changed when they entered their teenage years. Evidence on the health effects of PFAS has been mixed so far. While researchers believe these chemicals pose risks, it's difficult to pinpoint their exact impact because there are thousands of PFAS that could all interact in different ways, and because people's exposure changes over time. Even so, Li said the latest study underscores the need for researchers to track people's health and their PFAS levels over a long period of time, from early childhood to adolescence and beyond. Meanwhile, Mingyu Zhang, the study's senior author and an assistant professor at Harvard Medical School, said stronger environmental protections are needed to protect people from PFAS, given they are so ubiquitous that people cannot meaningfully limit their exposure on their own. That could include phasing out forever chemicals from consumer products and in industrial settings, he said, as well as better surveillance and limits on PFAS in water systems. 'This is not something individuals can solve on their own,' Zhang said. The Trump administration is facing backlash from climate scientists who say the US government is bungling basic facts about the impact of industrial emissions on air quality. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a new proposal this week that would roll back restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants for power plants that rely on fossil fuels. The agency claimed in the proposal that heat-trapping carbon gas emissions "from fossil fuel-fired power plants do not contribute significantly to dangerous air pollution". But 19 scientists – experts in climate, health, and economics – told the Associated Press the agency's statement was scientifically incorrect. Many of them called it disinformation. Here's what five of them said. "This is the scientific equivalent to saying that smoking doesn't cause lung cancer," said climate scientist Zeke Hausfather of the tech firm Stripe and the temperature monitoring group Berkeley Earth, adding that the administration's conclusion was "utterly nonsensical". "It's basic chemistry that burning coal and natural gas releases carbon dioxide, and it's basic physics that CO2 warms the planet. We've known these simple facts since the mid-19th century," said Philip Mote, an Oregon State climate scientist. Dr Howard Frumkin, former director of the US' National Center for Environmental Health and a retired public health professor at the University of Washington, said "coal-and gas-fired power plants contribute significantly to climate change," which "increases the risk of heat waves, catastrophic storms, infectious diseases, and many other health threats". 'These are indisputable facts,' he added. "Their statement is in direct conflict with evidence that has been presented by thousands of scientists from almost 200 countries for decades," University of Arizona climate scientist Kathy Jacobs said. Stanford climate scientist Chris Field, who coordinated an international report linking climate change to increasingly deadly extreme weather, summed it up this way: "It is hard to imagine a decision dumber than putting the short-term interests of oil and gas companies ahead of the long-term interests of our children and grandchildren".
LeMonde
3 days ago
- LeMonde
In bed and on the job: How to stay productive while lying down
With the democratization of remote work, our potential workspaces have expanded to include an unexpected area from which it is now accepted that one can move projects forward like Sisyphus in pajamas: the bed. Indeed, when working from home, it is tempting to abandon the uncomfortable sitting posture and, at some point, relocate to that soft and rectangular haven that seems to beckon us. Let anyone who has never attended a remote meeting from their mattress throw the first memory foam pillow at me! Although difficult to quantify, this trend seems to have taken root. A study conducted in 2020 by Tuck Sleep, which researches sleep for commercial purposes, showed that the Covid-19 pandemic had the side effect of increasing the amount of work done from bed. Among the 1,000 Americans surveyed, 8.8% spent between 24 to 40 hours per week in a paradoxical state of being both supine and productive. Even though it evokes a sense of hedonism, calling to mind the tutelary figures of Alexandre le Bienheureux (the indolent hero of the 1968 French cult film Very Happy Alexander) or Playboy founder Hugh Hefner – or even Winston Churchill, who also worked from his bed – this posture is sometimes a necessity, dictated by the lack of a proper desk in small apartments. Despite its promises of an improbable mix between work and leisure, it often proves uncomfortable in practice. As a passive variable in a society where information flows rapidly, you may find yourself at risk for back pain or a stiff neck caused by an excessively static posture. All the micro-efforts you make during a day at the office without even realizing it (walking to the printer, the cafeteria or grabbing a coffee) vanish if you spend the majority of your working life lying down. This extreme sedentarity, which takes you from bed to bed, is accompanied by increased morbidity, exacerbating cardiovascular, metabolic and musculoskeletal issues. Hybrid spaces Despite its risks, this temptation has become a new market, as evidenced by the fact that, on Amazon, one can purchase an intriguing cushion-desk on which to place a laptop and a latte, working while feeling like you're having breakfast at a hotel. Ikea has even launched a section on its website titled "How to work comfortably (and productively) from bed," where the hybridization of spaces dominates, neither truly restful places nor entirely credible work zones. Hence the recurring joke on TikTok, under the hashtag #WorkFromBed, in which an employee emerging from under the covers declares vindictively, "Oh, I'm at the office now!" In a Reddit conversation dedicated to the theme of working from bed, it is clear that the reasons motivating this practice are very eclectic: pain (such as menstrual cramps), fatigue, the comfort provided by blankets, depression, the demand to work from wherever one wishes, the creative necessity to let one's mind wander... Nevertheless, all of this requires certain arrangements to ensure that the realms of work and rest do not become completely indistinguishable. "I just make sure to have a transition between work and sleep: put away the laptop, go to other spaces to do something else before going to bed," shares BostonBluestocking. Is the horizontal worker not, ultimately, the most perfected product of a deverticalized working world, at last?
France 24
3 days ago
- France 24
US restores some medical research grants, says top Trump official
Jay Bhattacharya, director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), made the remarks during a Senate committee hearing examining both recent cuts to his agency and deeper reductions proposed by the White House in next year's budget. Bhattachartya said he had created an appeals process for scientists and laboratories whose research was impacted, and that the NIH had already "reversed many" of the cuts. "I didn't take this job to terminate grants," said the physician and health economist who left a professorship at Stanford University to join the Trump administration. "I took this job to make sure that we do the research that advances the health needs of the American people." The hearing came a day after more than 60 NIH employees sent an open letter to Bhattacharya condemning policies they said undermined the agency's mission and the health of Americans. They dubbed it the "Bethesda Declaration" -- a nod both to the NIH's suburban Washington headquarters and to Bhattacharya's role as a prominent signatory of the 2020 "Great Barrington Declaration," which opposed Covid lockdowns. Since Trump's January 20 inauguration, the NIH has terminated 2,100 research grants totaling around $9.5 billion and $2.6 billion in contracts, according to an independent database called Grant Watch. Affected projects include studies on gender, the health effects of global warming, Alzheimer's disease, and cancer.
