Autocracy Inc: How dictators are teaming up to undermine democracy
Photo:
www.penguin.co.nz
In an era teeming with global crisis liberal democracy is looking increasingly fragile.
According to Pulitzer Prize-winning historian and journalist Anne Applebaum, this is not simply due to social forces like rising inequality, cultural polarisation, or social media-driven disinformation.
Rather, it's the consequence of something far more insidious - an international alliance of autocrats working collectively to undermine democratic societies.
Speaking with
Sunday Morning's
Jim Mora, Applebaum discussed her
latest book,
Autocracy, Inc.,
which reveals how modern dictatorships no longer act alone.
"There is now, in effect, a network of dictatorships-communist China, nationalist Russia, autocratic Iran-that have learned to work together economically, politically, but also in the field of information and propaganda," she said.
This coalition of authoritarian regimes is not united by ideology. Instead, she said, they share a common enemy - liberal democracy.
At the heart of her book, said Applebaum, is the idea that today's authoritarian states are wielding vast financial resources to undermine democratic institutions.
"The autocratic world spends a huge amount of money on information," Applebaum said.
"Not just official TV channels like RT, but also covert information laundering websites that appear to be from Ecuador or Argentina but are really written in Russia."
But it's not just media manipulation.
Authoritarian regimes are buying influence directly through investments, think tanks, lobbying, and even ownership of sports teams.
The goal is to blur the lines between national interest and private enterprise, making liberal societies unwitting participants in their own corrosion.
One example Applebaum pointed to was China's acquisition of a container port in Poland.
While it may have seemed like a neutral business decision, during the war in Ukraine, it posed a significant security risk. The Chinese government could potentially monitor and control what supplies were flowing into the region.
"That has strategic implications," Applebaum warned, noting that the once-prevailing belief that economics could be apolitical "is over."
While autocracies are cooperating, liberal democracies are faltering under the weight of their internal divisions.
A problem compounded by social media, which thrives on outrage and conspiracy.
The sheer scale of disinformation, much of it from foreign states but echoed by domestic actors, is eroding the foundations of democratic debate.
"Democracy really only functions if you can have a public debate conducted according to some kind of rules," said Applebaum.
But when there's no shared reality, democratic compromise becomes nearly impossible.
Autocrats, said Applebaum, are nothing if not ideologically flexible.
Venezuela's Nicolás Maduro, China's Xi Jinping, Russia's Vladimir Putin, and Iran's theocrats may have different political branding, but they are united in their disdain for liberal democracy.
"The far left and the far right are very happy to work together," said Applebaum.
What matters most to these regimes is control.
Liberal concepts like the rule of law, free expression, and checks on power threaten the very foundations of authoritarian rule.
"Both sides have come to an agreement that the real enemy is not one another. The real enemy is liberal democracy."
So, how can democracy fight back? Applebaum offers a three-pronged approach:
Despite their growing influence, said Applebaum, autocracies are not invulnerable.
Their core weakness is their illegitimacy.
Beneath the façade of unity and control lies fear - fear of their own people and fear of democratic ideas.
"The ideals of democracy are intuitively appealing to people," she said.
This is not lost on the dictators themselves.
In 2013, the Chinese Communist Party issued an internal document naming Western constitutional government as the top threat to its survival. These regimes know that once democratic ideas take root, they can be difficult to extinguish.
Autocracy, in Applebaum's view, is a system built for survival, but not for progress.
Its lack of moral legitimacy, reliance on repression, and inability to deliver lasting prosperity may eventually be its undoing.
But if liberal democracy is to survive, she said, it must respond to the coordinated threat now facing it.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Techday NZ
5 hours ago
- Techday NZ
US-China chip export debate highlights risks for AI leadership
DeepSeek. TikTok. Taiwan. And a White House shake-up on AI rules. The spiralling US-China technology rivalry landed at the heart of Johns Hopkins University last week, as a panel of top experts and policymakers took to the stage to debate whether restricting exports of advanced semiconductors to China can help the US maintain its edge in the race for artificial intelligence. The discussion, hosted by Open to Debate in partnership with the SNF Agora Institute, comes at a critical time. In Washington, the Trump administration has announced plans to roll back the Biden-era AI Diffusion Rule and introduce new chip export controls targeting China – a move seen by many as a signal that the technology contest between the two superpowers is only intensifying. On one side of the Johns Hopkins debate were Lindsay Gorman, managing director at the German Marshall Fund's Technology Program, and former CIA officer and congressman Will Hurd. They argued the answer is yes: semiconductor controls can give the US a real advantage in the AI race. Gorman pointed to DeepSeek, a Chinese AI model whose CEO has publicly lamented the impact of advanced chip bans. "Money has never been the problem for us. Bans on shipments of advanced chips are the problem. And they have to consume twice the power to achieve the same results," she quoted, highlighting how China's AI advances still depend heavily on imported hardware. "The United States has significant hard computing power advantages – the ability to produce high-end chips, designed specifically for training AI models," Gorman told the audience. She argued that, together with its allies, the US controls a "strategic choke point" on computing power. "Properly implemented controls can have an effect and also have an increasing and compounding effect over time in retarding China's AI advantages and giving the United States a head start," she explained. Will Hurd, who also served on OpenAI's board before running for US president, compared the AI contest to the nuclear arms race. "Artificial intelligence is the equivalent of nuclear fission. Nuclear fission controlled gives you nuclear power… uncontrolled, nuclear weapons can kill everybody," he said. Hurd emphasised the importance of first-mover advantage, warning that the US cannot afford to lose its technological lead. He also highlighted a lack of reciprocity in the tech relationship between the two countries. "Chinese companies like Baidu, DJI, and TikTok operate freely in the US, but American companies are not allowed to operate in China," Hurd pointed out. "If there was a level of reciprocity between our two countries, we wouldn't be here having this debate about chip controls." Yet, on the opposing side, former senior US diplomat Susan Thornton and technology strategist Paul Triolo insisted the US could not outpace China in AI simply by tightening export controls. Triolo argued that the controls are "not working and will not lead to US dominance in AI", describing them as a blunt instrument that creates confusion for industry and disrupts global supply chains. "Most experts believe that Chinese companies are only three months behind US leaders in developing advanced AI models," Triolo said, suggesting any technological gap is vanishingly slim. Thornton, who spent decades at the heart of US-China diplomacy, warned of unintended consequences. "The main thing we should be asking ourselves about this question… is what is the cost benefit of US policy actions?" she said. "We have to face the reality that China is already building AI… a third of the world's top AI scientists are Chinese. China is one third of the entire global technology market. So it's clearly a player." She cautioned that blocking China from critical technology could backfire, hurting US companies, alienating allies and raising the risks around Taiwan, the global centre of advanced chip manufacturing. "Certainly, the one thing we need to do is avoid going to war," Thornton warned. "Taiwan, the most sensitive issue in US-China relations, has now been dragged right into the middle of this AI issue because they're the place that produces all the cutting-edge chips that we're trying to control." Audience members pressed the panel on whether international collaboration on AI safety was possible, and whether the US could ever match China's data advantage, given the size of the Chinese population and its permissive data environment. Hurd conceded that "the US will always have less data because we have a little thing called civil liberties," but argued that superior algorithms and privacy-protective machine learning could level the playing field. For Triolo, the dynamic nature of the technology means that attempts to wall off China are self-defeating. "There are many ways to get to different ends. The controls have forced Chinese companies to work together, develop innovations, and become more competitive both domestically and globally," he said. Gorman, in closing, rejected what she called "a defeatism that says America can't out-compete China or slow its progress". "Our companies are doing well. There isn't an issue here with demand, it's with supply. Doing better means that we have to throw what we can at this problem now with a smart application of tools," she argued. But Thornton had the last word, urging caution. "Making the AI competition with China a zero-sum game, not only will not work, it is dangerous," she said. "We should focus on the things that are going to matter to our children and their children, which is the long-term AI competition, which if not constrained and bounded by international agreements and by cooperation among countries… it'll be a very dangerous world."

RNZ News
7 hours ago
- RNZ News
Trump-inspired Cantonese opera in Hong Kong aims to bring love and peace
By Joyce Zhou and Jessie Pang , Reuters US President Donald Trump speaks to the press in the Oval Office at the White House. Photo: Getty Images/CNN Newsource In a Cantonese opera inspired by US President Donald Trump, a Chinese actor donning a blond wig spars on a Hong Kong stage with a man playing a double of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky - ridiculing his outfit and firing a water gun at him. The sold-out show, Trump, The Twins President , was performed in the territory's Xiqu Theatre as Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping held a one-hour-long call on Thursday . Written by Edward Li, a Feng Shui master-turned-Cantonese opera playwright, the comedy made its Hong Kong debut in 2019. The three-and-a-half hour show has been through several iterations since with the latest version featuring Trump's attempted assassination and his quarrel with Zelensky in the White House. Cantonese opera is a centuries-old Chinese art form blending singing, acting, martial arts, and elaborate costumes, and is traditionally performed during special occasions. Li's latest production begins with a dream by Trump's daughter, Ivanka, where her father has a twin brother named Chuan Pu, living in China. When Trump is kidnapped by aliens from Mars, Ivanka asks Chuan to pretend to be Trump for a day. In another act, Trump has a dramatic fight with Zelensky's presidential double over his clothing in the White House, and shoots him with a water gun from Chinese online shopping site Taobao while Zelensky pretends to have been shot. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky Photo: SERGEI CHUZAVKOV / AFP The actors perform against a backdrop of photos from the actual events. Li said he chose Trump as the main character because his tariffs and policies had affected everyone's daily life. "I think this opera is quite a special medicine for the whole world," Li said. "If people see this opera they will feel very happy because they think of love and peace." Cantonese opera actor Lung Koon-tin, who portrayed Trump, said the US president was unique. "He increased tariffs and made the whole world speak out." Lung said China and the US should be good friends. "We are Chinese and he is American, but friendship always lives long. That's why we talk about Sino-US friendship in the play." The audience erupted in laughter throughout the performance, breaking into enthusiastic applause at the end. Many of them were younger people, including 28-year-old Thomas Lo. He said that modern youth often felt disconnected from traditional Cantonese opera but the Trump-themed show, infused with contemporary events, offered a refreshing twist. "It's fun and really something special," Lo said. - Reuters

RNZ News
9 hours ago
- RNZ News
Taiwan accuses China of carrying out 'provocative' military patrol near island
By Ben Blanchard , Reuters J-16 fighters flying during a military parade at Zhurihe training base in north China in 2017. Photo: Photo by LI GANG / Xinhua via AFP Taiwan accused China of raising tensions in the region with a "provocative" military patrol involving warplanes and warships near the island, an unusual public rebuke in what are typically routine accounts of Chinese military activity. Taiwan, which China views as its own territory , has complained of repeated Chinese military drills and patrols nearby. Since President Lai Ching-te took office last year China has held three major rounds of war games. Taiwan's defence ministry said that starting mid-afternoon Friday, it had detected 21 Chinese military aircraft, including J-16 fighters, operating with warships to carry out "so-called joint combat readiness patrols" and "harass the airspace and seas around us ". "The Ministry of National Defence stresses that these acts are highly provocative, fail to pay proper attention to the maritime rights of other countries, bring anxiety and threat to the region, and blatantly undermine the status quo in the region," it said. Taiwan regularly reports such Chinese "combat patrols", but does not generally attach such commentary to its statements. China's defence ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The patrol came one day after Chinese President Xi Jinping and US President Donald Trump spoke by telephone, with Xi telling Trump that the United States must "handle the Taiwan question with prudence". This is "so that the fringe separatists bent on 'Taiwan independence' will not be able to drag China and America into the dangerous terrain of confrontation and even conflict", Xi said, according to a Chinese government read-out of the call. China regularly calls Taiwan its most important and sensitive issue in relations with the United States, which is bound by law to provide the island with the means to defend itself. China says democratically governed Taiwan is its "sacred territory" - a position the government in Taipei strongly rejects - and that it has a right to carry out drills in Chinese territory. Lai, who last month marked a year in office, is hated by Beijing, which calls him a separatist and has rebuffed his repeated offers for talks. Lai says only Taiwan's people can decide their future, and that the government is determined to ramp up defence spending and strengthen its military. China has never renounced the use of force to bring Taiwan under its control. On Sunday, Lai will attend drills in the southern city of Kaohsiung for Taiwan's coast guard, whose ships would be pressed into service in combat roles in the event of war with China. - Reuters