Putin tells Trump that Russia has to respond to Ukrainian attacks
Social Sharing
Russian President Vladimir Putin told U.S. President Donald Trump in a phone call Wednesday that he would have to respond to high-profile Ukrainian drone attacks on Russia's nuclear-capable bomber fleet and a deadly bridge bombing that Moscow blamed on Kyiv.
The war in Ukraine is intensifying after nearly four months of cajoling and threats to both Moscow and Kyiv from Trump, who says he wants peace after more than three years of the deadliest conflict in Europe since the Second World War.
After Ukraine bombed bridges and attacked Russia's fleet of nuclear-capable bombers deep in Siberia and Russia's far north, Putin on Wednesday said he did not think Ukraine's leaders wanted peace.
Shortly after Putin discussed the attacks with top ministers in Moscow, Trump said he had spoken by telephone with Putin for one hour and 15 minutes, and that they had discussed the Ukrainian attacks and Iran.
WATCH | Ukraine deploys swarms of drones to target Russian warplanes:
Ukraine deploys swarms of drones to target Russian warplanes
3 days ago
Duration 1:57
"It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate peace," Trump said in a post on his social media platform Truth Social on Wednesday.
Russia has unleashed several massive aerial attacks on Ukraine over recent weeks.
"President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields," Trump said, adding that he hoped Putin could be helpful in U.S. negotiations with Iran over the Islamic Republic's nuclear program.
Trump said he believed Putin agreed with Washington that Iran "cannot have a nuclear weapon," and accused Tehran of "slow-walking" decisions regarding the talks.
Trump has been unusually silent on the Ukrainian attacks on the Russian bombers — one of the three pillars of Russia's nuclear arsenal — though Moscow has demanded that the United States and Britain restrain Ukraine.
The Kremlin said Trump had told Putin that Washington was not informed in advance of the Ukrainian attacks. Trump's Ukraine envoy said the risk of escalation from the war in Ukraine was " going way up" after the strikes.
Russia and the United States are by far the world's biggest nuclear powers: Together they hold about 88 per cent of all nuclear weapons.
Each has three ways of nuclear attack — strategic bombers, land-launched intercontinental ballistic missiles and submarine-launched ballistic missiles — and any attack on any part of the "triad" is considered a grave escalation.
War or peace?
In some of his most hawkish remarks in recent months on the outlook for peace, Putin on Wednesday said the bridge attacks had been directed against civilians, and accused Ukrainian leadership of being a "terrorist organization" supported by powers who were becoming "terrorist accomplices."
"The current Kyiv regime does not need peace at all," Putin said at a meeting with senior officials. "What is there to talk about? How can we negotiate with those who rely on terror?"
Ukraine has not commented on the bridge attacks. It denies it targets civilians, as does Russia, though civilians have been killed by both sides.
Kyiv has similarly accused Moscow of not seriously wanting peace, citing as evidence Russian resistance to an immediate ceasefire. Russia says certain conditions must first be met.
Putin, in his public remarks, did not mention the bomber attacks, which came just before Russia and Ukraine met for direct peace talks in Istanbul where Moscow set out what the United States has called "maximalist" aims.
Before Putin spoke, other Russian officials said military options were "on the table" for its response to Ukrainian attacks deep inside Russia and accused the West of being involved in them.
"We urge London and Washington to react in such a way as to stop further escalation," Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov was quoted by the Interfax news agency as saying. Ryabkov oversees relations with the U.S. and arms control.
British and U.S. officials have said they had no prior knowledge of the weekend attacks on Russian nuclear-capable long-range bombers. The White House has said Trump was not informed of Ukraine's drone attack before it unfolded.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Trump thanked California National Guard before it arrived in L.A.
Social Sharing At 2 a.m. Sunday, U.S. President Donald Trump posted to social media congratulating the work of California's National Guard in response to immigration raid protests in Los Angeles. In fact, the guards only arrived in the city later that morning, according to several news reports. "Thank you to the National Guard for a job well done!" Trump wrote at 2:41 a.m. ET. Just after noon ET (9 a.m. PT), the U.S. Northern Command posted on X that 300 of the California National Guard 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team (IBCT) soldiers were positioned near federal properties at three locations in the greater Los Angeles area — far fewer than the 2,000 soldiers Trump vaunted he would deploy. The discrepancy has prompted reports from U.S. media outlets that Trump and his administration's claims of protest violence have been overblown. MSNBC's Jen Psaki hosted a segment on the contrast between what the federal government had been saying and what has really happened on the ground. "Trump is insisting that this massive escalation in force is completely necessary," Psaki said, also noting that National Guard troops were only reported to have arrived in Los Angeles at 11 a.m. Sunday, more than eight hours after Trump's posted thanking them. Trump deployed California's National Guard without getting consent from California Gov. Gavin Newsom, prompting the governor to later sue the federal government for its decision. When did the Los Angeles protests start? The protests in Los Angeles began Friday evening at federal detention centre in downtown Los Angeles where U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents had detained more than 40 people — including children — following raids across the city, according to ABC News. The Los Angeles Police Department said Friday on X that a "small group of violent individuals are throwing large pieces of concrete" and that it was deeming the gathering "unlawful." Officers in riot gear were then seen throwing tear gas canisters to disperse some crowds. WATCH | Trump tests boundaries of his power: Trump tests boundaries of his power with troops in L.A. 2 days ago Duration 1:33:19 NBC senior correspondent Jay Gray joins Power & Politics from a confrontation between protesters and National Guard troops deployed by President Donald Trump in Los Angeles, as California's governor accuses Trump of the 'acts of a dictator.' Auditor General Karen Hogan says the estimated cost of Canada's F-35 fighter jet program has gone from $19 billion in 2022 to $27.7 billion in 2024, partly because the Defence Department relied on outdated information. Plus, a former Canadian ambassador to Saudi Arabia and an international affairs expert discuss whether Canada was right to invite controversial international players to the G7 summit next week. Protests, as well as the looting of a gas station in Paramount, Calif., continued that day and into Saturday — when Trump decided to federalize the National Guard. Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth applauded the decision on X Saturday, calling the protests a "huge national security risk." Newsom responded that federal government help in preventing violence at the protests was unnecessary and would only lead to escalation. What happened after the National Guard arrived? Sunday afternoon the situation appeared to escalate case when, according to the Los Angeles Times, officers fired tear gas and less-lethal rounds at protesters outside a federal detention centre, where the guards were posted, though it's unclear whether they were the ones to exercise force or local law enforcement. Later that day, protesters streamed onto a highway, blocking traffic. But the Times reported clashes soon died down. Sunday evening, though, Trump called protesters "violent, insurrectionist mobs," in a post on Truth Social. The Times wrote that "Trump administration officials have seized on the isolated incidents of violence to suggest wide parts of L.A. are out of control." Psaki highlighted that, meanwhile, an estimated 300 people have been detained in Los Angeles ICE raids since protests began Friday. Californians say protests have largely been peaceful and led by people whose family members were taken into custody by immigration agents at their workplaces. A retired teacher, Jose Gallegos, told USA Today he attended protests in Paramount on Saturday and was struck by a rubber bullet shot in rounds by law enforcement. "We don't have guns. All we have is prayers and feathers," he told the news outlet. Escalation beneficial for Trump: experts Legal scholars and democracy watchers say it is politically advantageous for Trump to exaggerate the amount of violence tied to the immigration protests because it is one of the issues the president has broad support for. "I don't think the prospect of calling out the National Guard is in any way sincerely motivated by a fear of a loss of public order," said John Carey, a professor of government at Dartmouth College in New Hampshire and the co-founder of Bright Line Watch, a group monitoring threats to American democracy. "We have a long and proud tradition of military remaining neutral and removed from politics," Carey said. "And this administration, I don't think, is committed to that." WATCH | California to sue Trump administration: California to sue Trump administration over National Guard deployment to L.A. 3 days ago Duration 3:09 California will file a lawsuit against U.S. President Donald Trump over his deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles, the state attorney general said on Monday, arguing that the federal administration did so without authorization from Gov. Gavin Newsom and against the wishes of local law enforcement. Trump accused state leaders of being 'afraid to do anything' about protests over immigration raids that roiled the city over the weekend. According to Kim Lane Scheppele, a Princeton professor studying new autocracies, National Guards are a kind of protection for states against possible federal overreaches. They were created based on the Second Amendment, guaranteeing each state's right to a militia. Their troops are roughly equivalent in number to federally-operated military units, such as the Marine Corps — 700 of which were also deployed to L.A. — Scheppele explained. "You don't want it to turn into civil war … but at least you'd have kind of evenly matched sides. It would allow the governors to be able to say no [to federal overreach], backed by a kind of military force," the professor said. At issue is whether Title 10 of the U.S. Code — the legal mechanism Trump used to deploy the Guard — requires the president to consult with a state governor before federalizing their troops and whether the governor can refuse.
Toronto Star
an hour ago
- Toronto Star
Judge promises quick ruling over Trump's use of National Guard in Los Angeles
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A federal judge said Thursday that he plans to rule quickly on whether President Donald Trump exceeded his authority by deploying the California National Guard in Los Angeles against the governor's wishes. 'This country was founded in response to a monarch, and the Constitution is a document of limitations. I'm trying to figure out where the lines are drawn,' U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer said before a packed courtroom.
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Carney should ignore any antics from Trump at G7 and focus on business, Chrétien says
Jean Chrétien says U.S. President Donald Trump is a 'bully' who will likely try to do something 'crazy' to capture headlines at the G7 summit in Alberta, but his advice to Prime Minister Mark Carney is to stay above the fray. Mr. Chrétien, who as prime minister in 2002 hosted a summit for what was then the G8, also in the Kananaskis region of Alberta, said Mr. Carney should stay focused on the work at hand. 'If he has decided to make a show to be in the news, he will do something crazy. So let him do it,' Mr. Chrétien said of Mr. Trump at an event in Calgary on Thursday. 'Just move on with the discussion is the way to handle that. He tends to be a bully once in a while. And don't lose your cool when you have a bully, unless you grab him by the neck,' he added, an apparent reference to his chokehold on a protester in 1996 when he was prime minister. Mr. Chrétien, who participated in a wide-ranging discussion during a G7-themed event at the University of Calgary's School of Public Policy, attended 11 such summits during his time as prime minister and finance minister. He said Canada's role at these meetings is to remain useful to everyone and build bridges – but be low-key and modest about it. Mr. Carney has been criticized for his decision to invite Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the G7 summit. Canada-India relations have been strained since then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau stood in Parliament in September, 2023, and alleged that agents of India were responsible for murdering a Sikh activist in B.C. But Mr. Chrétien said Mr. Carney was right to invite his Indian counterpart. 'It's always good to talk,' he said. 'You cannot always go on your high horse for every problem you're confronted with. So I think the invitation to Mr. Modi, it's a good one.' Mr. Chrétien recalled that his decision to hold the 2002 G8 summit in picturesque Kananaskis, in the foothills of the Rocky Mountains, was intended to save money. He said he called then-U.S. President George W. Bush first to explain that every country would have to limit its number of attending officials to 40 – rather than the 1,000 or so with which the United States would normally show up. That year, organizers had to kill a bear in the vicinity, and some protesters mooned the world leaders, but aside from that Mr. Chrétien remembered it as a peaceful, successful event. And he believes this year's event will also be a success, particularly given Mr. Carney's CV and his time as governor of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England. 'I think he has selected the real subjects that need to be discussed,' Mr. Chrétien said. The only problem will be the unpredictability of Mr. Trump, he added, but he thinks there is a good chance that other leaders around the table won't be reluctant to tell him he's on the wrong track. Emphasizing the importance of dialogue, Mr. Chrétien said one reason he believes this year's summit will be a success is the underlying tenet of the G7: bringing together a small group of political leaders to speak their minds frankly and arrive at solutions to problems facing the world. But it's also a chance for Canada to promote the fact it has everything going for it – energy, resources, land – and is in decent economic shape, he said. Mr. Chretien had advice for Mr. Trump, too. 'Stop that nonsense' about making Canada the 51st state of America, he said. 'We're an independent country. The last time they wanted to take over Canada, it was in 1812, and we burned the White House.'
