
As US trade truce gets back on track, some Chinese exporters are 'slowly dying'
SHANGHAI/BEIJING, June 11 (Reuters) - Jacky Ren, who owns a kitchen appliance factory in China, says exporters in his industry are now selling at a loss to keep their U.S. clients, with little power to say "no" to requests for lower prices on products facing higher tariffs.
If an exporter does not take such orders, Ren said, "you will die immediately. So, people think it's better to die slowly."
U.S. and Chinese officials agreed on Tuesday on ways to restore a trade truce and roll back duelling export restrictions, including on rare earths, where China has a near-monopoly in production and major leverage in the negotiations.
But in the meantime, the pain from U.S. tariffs is deepening in China, especially among smaller exporters such as Ren's Gstar Electronics Appliance Co., which did not move part of their production abroad after U.S. President Donald Trump imposed tariffs in his first term in office.
The growing pressure on companies to sell at a loss or to cut wages and jobs to stay afloat gives Washington a pain point to press Beijing in coming weeks and months as talks continue between the two sides to rebalance their trade relationship.
"If it lasts more than three or four months, I think many of these small and medium-sized enterprises will not be able to bear it," said Zhiwu Chen, chair professor of finance at the University of Hong Kong.
"This is definitely a bargaining chip for the United States."
This week's talks in London are expected to bring the two sides back to where they were after an initial discussion in Geneva last month, when they agreed to cut back tariffs from triple-digits to levels that are still damaging for both sides, but at least allow trade flows to resume.
U.S. levies on Chinese goods remain 30 percentage points higher than last year.
In April, when tariffs were at their highest, the number of loss-making Chinese industrial firms rose 3.6% year-on-year to 164,467 - a whopping 32% of the total, official statistics show.
Industrial capacity utilisation dropped to 74.1% in the first quarter of this year - when Washington began raising tariffs - from 76.2% in the last quarter of 2024, according to Chinese government data. It remains near record lows.
And while China's overall export growth rate of 4.8% in May might be interpreted as a sign of resilience - even as U.S. exports shrank by more than 30% - the intense competition among Chinese manufacturers looking for a slice of the subdued external demand is evident in falling prices.
"People forget, but the current tariff level is already quite painful," says Alicia Garcia-Herrero, chief economist for Asia Pacific at Natixis.
"This is a weakness" for Beijing, she said, but cautioned "it's not a big card" for Washington, which has its own worries over high inflation and product scarcity.
Beijing was also confident it can bear more pain than its rival, she said.
Before the meeting in Switzerland, Beijing had grown increasingly alarmed about internal signals that Chinese firms were struggling to avoid bankruptcies, including in labour-intensive industries such as furniture and toys, Reuters reported last month.
The subsequent rollback in tariffs may have saved China from a nightmare scenario of mass layoffs, but analysts say millions of jobs remain at risk.
Candice Li, a marketing manager for a medical devices maker in southern China, says her employer has not paid wages for the past two months due to cashflow issues caused by new demands from U.S. clients who want to protect themselves from the tariff uncertainty.
Li says U.S. buyers no longer offer an advance deposit for their orders and demand to only make payments 120-180 days after delivery. And because other Chinese firms accept such terms, her employer is not in a position to fight back.
"They have us under their thumb," Li said. "It looks calm on the surface, but it's really hard to do business now."
"The company can't even manage to pay wages," she said, adding a quarter of the staff left as a result. "It's really hard to keep the company running."
To be sure, not all Chinese firms are under such strain. In the short term, neither the United States nor other countries can significantly reduce their reliance on supply chains from an economy that produces about a third of the world's goods.
The pain is being felt mostly among small firms in sectors that don't make essential products, such as Christmas decorations or where China can easily be replaced by other producers - for instance, in household appliances and other low-to-mid-range electronics.
Across the economy, industrial profits in China still rose 1.4% year-on-year in January-April, according to official statistics that capture data from firms with annual revenue of at least 20 million yuan ($2.78 million).
China's headline resilience has been helped by U.S. importers frontloading orders ahead of higher tariffs, while Beijing ramped up fiscal spending and cut interest rates, said Shuang Ding, Standard Chartered's chief Greater China and North Asia economist.
But as these mitigating factors wane in coming months, Beijing might grow increasingly uncomfortable, analysts warn.
"They still rely on low-end manufacturing sectors, in particular exporting sectors, to support their general macroeconomy," said He-Ling Shi, economics professor at Monash University in Melbourne.
"The American government has to react to pressure from industries. China's central government ... doesn't need to react immediately, but in the long term, it's still a big concern."
($1 = 7.1859 Chinese yuan renminbi)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
17 minutes ago
- Reuters
Britain ready to implement US tariff deal, trade minister says
LONDON, June 12 (Reuters) - Britain is ready to implement its side of a tariff deal with the United States and is hopeful for a proclamation from U.S. President Donald Trump to put the agreement into effect in the coming days, trade minister Jonathan Reynolds said on Thursday. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Trump on May 8 agreed to reduce tariffs on UK imports of cars and steel to the U.S., with Britain agreeing to lower tariffs on beef and ethanol, but implementation of the deal has been delayed. Reynolds met U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Tuesday and discussed the implementation of the deal. Asked on Thursday if there would be an update by the end of the week, Reynolds said he was "very hopeful". "We're ready to go, and as soon as the president and the White House are ready to go on their side, we'll implement (our) part of the deal," Reynolds told reporters. Reynolds said he would issue a government order known as a statutory instrument to implement the changes to reciprocal tariffs. Officials said that the update on implementation was likely to come early next week. One of the details to be ironed out before the deal can be implemented is steel quotas. Reynolds added that he wanted to make sure the tariff reductions applied to every bit of the UK steel industry, as the U.S. finalises quotas that will place supply chain requirements on British steel exports to the United States. The bioethanol industry has warned its future is under threat, with Associated British Foods (ABF.L), opens new tab deciding on the fate of a plant later this month. Reynolds acknowledged the deal could increase competition but said the industry was already struggling. "We are very sensitive to the ethanol issue... (but) they're losing a lot of money already," Reynolds said, adding regulatory tweaks could help, but that for financial support: "any intervention I make has to be a clear route to profitability." "So there are much wider issues for these partners than just the U.S. trade deal."


Reuters
17 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump's tax-cut bill could hold back US critical minerals projects
WASHINGTON, June 12 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill would make it harder for American critical minerals companies to compete with China because it eliminates a tax credit for boosting domestic production of nickel, rare earths and other materials used in advanced electronics and weaponry. With Trump and Republican lawmakers aiming to cut government support for green energy projects, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a version of his "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" last month that eliminates the so-called 45X credit. The Senate is now debating the bill. Former President Joe Biden's 2022 climate change law, the Inflation Reduction Act, created the 10% production credit - a reduction in corporate taxes for critical minerals extraction and processing. The tax break also covers solar, battery and wind projects. The version of the bill that passed the House treats government incentives for wind turbines the same as those for mining projects that many view as crucial for national security. Critical minerals companies now say their projects are collateral damage to the political feud over renewable energy. The tax credit is already law and part of the current federal budget. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which scores the cost of legislative proposals when asked by Congress, has not studied how much would be saved by removing the credit. The Republican majority in Congress is seeking savings to fund other priorities such as tax cuts, defense and balancing the budget. This month, the hard-right House Freedom Caucus said it "will not accept", opens new tab attempts to "water down, strip out, or walk back the hard-fought spending reductions and IRA Green New Scam rollbacks achieved in this legislation." Miners, though, say they need the credit to compete with China. Beijing has halted exports of some critical minerals, used its control of rare earths to strike a trade agreement with Washington, and flooded global markets with cheap supply of nickel, cobalt and lithium. The traditionally conservative mining industry now finds itself in the unusual position of needing Washington's support to grow and, in some cases, survive. The owner of the only U.S. cobalt mine went bankrupt this year after Chinese miners depressed global prices of that metal. "If we do not have that tax credit, critical minerals producers in the U.S. are at risk of succumbing to closures," said KaLeigh Long, founder and CEO of Westwin Elements, which is building the country's only commercial nickel refinery. Westwin might not be able to service its debt without the tax credit, Long said, noting the company's loans were modeled using the expectation it would be permanent. Last month, Long wrote a letter asking the Senate to keep the credit. It was co-signed by 30 industry executives. Any changes the Senate makes to the bill must be reconciled with the House version before being sent to Trump. Several House members have admitted they did not read the entire bill before voting for it, including Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Green, a Georgia Republican, and Congressman Mike Flood, a Nebraska Republican. House Democrats unanimously voted against the bill but their criticism has focused on tax cuts they say will widen the deficit while requiring cuts in health care, food assistance, education, scientific research and other programs. "There's so many issues right now under consideration in Congress and this one isn't breaking through, but it will certainly break through when we have a shortage of minerals in five years," said Jeff Green, a critical minerals industry consultant. Senator John Hickenlooper, a Colorado Democrat who voted for the IRA in 2022, said in a statement to Reuters that cutting the credit would "kill jobs ... just to fund tax breaks for the ultra-weathy" and would be a "bad deal" for the country. Trump, who has issued several executive orders aimed at boosting U.S. minerals production, has not commented publicly on the 45x debate. The White House did not respond to requests for comment. "The tax credit just adds a phenomenal bump to a project's economics and gives us advantages that China already gives its own companies," said Alex Grant, CEO of magnesium processing startup Magrathea, who signed the letter. China controls most of the world's production of the metal, used in alloys for steel and aluminum. Abigail Hunter, executive director of SAFE's Center for Critical Minerals Strategy, described the tax credit as the "only tool currently available to support industry exposed to market manipulation." The House version also removes any remaining IRA funding for the U.S. Department of Energy's Loan Programs Office (LPO), which under Biden awarded billions of dollars in loans to Nevada lithium projects from ioneer ( opens new tab and Lithium Americas ( opens new tab. Potential for the LPO's closure led miners to rush to finalize loans last year, as Reuters reported in August. Republican senators this week said they were in discussions about how to extend some green energy tax credits, especially for businesses with large capital investments. No firm commitments have been made. For Mahesh Konduru, CEO of minerals processing startup Momentum Technologies, the credit is one way for Washington to show industry support. "We need to have the appropriate tools to build, nurture and grow that supply chain inside the United States," he said.


Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
US household wealth dropped in first quarter as tariff concerns hit stocks
June 12 (Reuters) - U.S. household wealth fell at the end of the first quarter, Federal Reserve data showed on Thursday, dragged down by a stock market rout that has since reversed course. The net worth of households and non-profit groups had declined to $169.3 trillion as of March 31, the Fed said in its quarterly U.S. financial accounts report, down from $170.9 trillion as of the end of last year. It was the first decline in household net worth since the third quarter of 2023. A slide in real estate values during the first quarter added to the equities-driven decline. The S&P 1500 Composite index, which encompasses the vast majority of the U.S. stock market, shed about $2.5 trillion in value in the first three months of 2025 as investors worried that President Donald Trump's tariffs could drive up inflation, send the economy into recession, or do both simultaneously. The drop in wealth may prove short-lived - the S&P 1500 is currently up about $1.2 trillion on a year-to-date basis and is essentially unchanged since Trump took office for a second time on January 20.