
Will Blues try to incorporate Dalibor Dvorsky and Jimmy Snuggerud? Or keep their mojo going?
ST. LOUIS — Dalibor Dvorsky made his NHL debut Sunday night. Is he sticking around?
'That's a Doug Armstrong question,' Blues coach Jim Montgomery said. 'It's not a Monty question.'
Jimmy Snuggerud will play with the University of Minnesota in the NCAA Frozen Four on Thursday night, and if the Golden Gophers get eliminated from the tournament, he could be ready to sign with the Blues.
Advertisement
That's a Jimmy Snuggerud question, but he won't be ready to answer that until the Gophers' season is over, and he hopes that will be after a championship at the NCAA hockey tournament in St. Louis on April 10 and 12 at Enterprise Center.
Remember not too long ago when all that seemed to matter with fans was when Dvorsky and Snuggerud were getting here? Well, that's still important, but after the Blues won a season-high sixth straight game on Sunday — 4-1 over the Nashville Predators — and if the club continues to play well there may not be as big of a rush to see them in the lineup.
Don't read that wrong. Certainly, Dvorsky and Snuggerud could be penciled into the third line and improve the Blues' skill level. But considering how the players who've been on the roster all season have come together, that camaraderie may be hard to break up with the team that's 12-2-2 in its last 16 games and playing its best hockey at the moment.
'That's the time you want to do it — you want to feel good,' said Blues defenseman Justin Faulk, who had a goal and an assist Sunday and has 10 points (two goals, eight assists) in his last nine games. 'It's good, it's not enough, we know we need to win more games. There's a big task ahead of us here. We've got to keep focusing on playing good hockey and making it tough on opponents, especially at home. We know Montreal is coming in, they're playing well and it's going to be a tough game on Tuesday, but we're up for it.'
You only get one rookie lap.
Enjoy tonight, Dalibor Dvorsky! pic.twitter.com/z7JHO9OUhg
— St. Louis Blues (@StLouisBlues) March 23, 2025
Sunday's win gave the Blues 81 points, and they remained in the second wild-card spot in the Western Conference. But they're still in a desperate situation — just four points ahead of the Calgary Flames (77), who have three games in hand, and the Vancouver Canucks (76) and Utah Hockey Club (75), who have two games in hand.
Advertisement
After playing six games in the last nine days and seven games in the last 11, Montgomery's group will take Monday off before hosting the Montreal Canadiens on Tuesday at Enterprise Center.
Will Dvorsky still be with the Blues then? The 19-year-old center, who was the Blues' first-round pick (No. 10 overall in 2023) has played well enough for a call-up. He had 20 goals and 43 points in 57 games with AHL Springfield this season, which is tied for the third-most goals and fifth-most points among rookies in that league.
'The American Hockey League is the toughest league to score in just because the schedule is not favorable,' Montgomery said. 'Besides that, he's improved in the areas you need to work on when you're a talented offensive player. You need to work on pace, puck protection, getting above pucks and being responsible defensively. All of those areas have improved.'
But Dvorsky was called up because Pavel Buchnevich missed his second straight game with what the club is calling a day-to-day situation. It's not known whether he's sick, or if there are any lingering effects from the heavy hit he absorbed from Nashville's Michael McCarron last week. He was seen leaving the rink after Sunday's game.
'Buch is good,' Montgomery said. 'He's not himself right now, like feeling healthy. We all get viral infections and stuff.'
Meanwhile, as part of a pre-planned maintenance schedule, Oskar Sundqvist wasn't supposed to play Saturday against the Chicago Blackhawks or Sunday against Nashville. But with Buchnevich out and no other healthy forward, Sundqvist was forced to play Saturday, and then he was able to sit out Sunday when Dvorsky was called up.
Montgomery had never been on the ice with Dvorsky or seen him skate. But the coach put him in as the third-line center and told him before the game, 'Do what got you here. Play to your strengths.'
Advertisement
Dvorsky, who is wearing No. 54 for the Blues, took his first shift just 1:54 into the game. It was an offensive-zone face-off against McCarron, which he lost, but that's not what he'll remember.
'It was so fun,' said Dvorsky, who became the 12th Slovakian to play for the franchise. 'I'll never forget it.
Then late in the first period, Dvorsky helped set up a power-play goal that gave the Blues a 2-0 lead. He pulled the puck off the wall in the offensive zone and made the first of three passes by the unit that led to the goal by Alexandre Texier.
'I liked him … really good,' Montgomery said. 'He made plays, moved pucks on first touch. That play he makes on the power play, which leads to the goal, that's high-end. It's a good start to his career. He knew what he was going to do with the puck before he got it. That's usually a sign for really good hockey sense.'
Dvorsky had 10:40 of ice time, didn't have a shot attempt and was 2-for-5 on faceoffs.
'He was smart and patient with the puck,' said Blues center Robert Thomas, who had three assists in the game. 'I thought he showed a lot of poise with it. He made a couple of really good backhand passes, and that power-play goal, he's under pressure and he makes a calm play to Boldy (Zack Bolduc). To have that kind of patience, especially in your first game, is really impressive.'
Faulk recalled another sequence with Dvorsky that impressed him.
'There was a play that won't show up on tape, but I'll explain it,' he said. 'In the second period, there was a play where the puck was getting chipped into the neutral zone and all he did was hold up their third man that was trying to join the rush. He just held him up a little bit and made it a 2-on-2 (instead of) a 3-on-2.
Advertisement
'That's a play that shows you have some hockey smarts. It's tough to learn that. A lot of guys are just worried about the puck, trying to make plays. It's a selfless play. It doesn't help himself at all. But it makes the (defensemen's) job and everyone else a lot easier. I was really impressed to see a play like that happen in his first game.'
After the game, Dvorsky said that he felt comfortable.
'I had to adjust to it a little bit,' he said. 'The pace is faster. The players, the opponents, are better. It's a little different. But it was awesome. I enjoyed every second of it. It was amazing.'
After the game, he was presented with the team's MVP award, given after each win, Kelly Chase's shoulder pads, which are about 20 years older than Dvorsky, who was born in 2005. The night was made even better because his dad, who is also named Dalibor, was visiting his son in Springfield, Mass., and was scheduled to return home to Slovakia, but extended his stay so that he could be in St. Louis on Sunday and see the debut.
'Amazing timing that I got called up at this time,' Dvorsky said.
These shoulder pads are older than Dalibor Dvorsky pic.twitter.com/2UWZZJqL71
— St. Louis Blues (@StLouisBlues) March 24, 2025
But Montgomery indicated that Sundqvist would be back in the lineup against Montreal, so there's a chance Dvorsky could be returned to the AHL. The team has 10 games remaining, and if Dvorsky were to play in nine more, it would count as one year toward the three-year, entry-level contract he signed in 2023 and thus wouldn't 'slide' to next season.
Meanwhile, Snuggerud, who was the Blues' first-round pick (No. 23 overall) in 2022, could be joining the Blues when his college season comes to an end. If Minnesota beats the University of Massachusetts on Thursday, the Gophers will advance to the quarterfinal round on Saturday.
Advertisement
After hosting Montreal, the Blues travel to Nashville on Thursday and Colorado on Saturday before returning home for a three-game homestand.
If Snuggerud, 20, is eliminated from the NCAA hockey tournament and enticed to sign his entry-level contract with the Blues, it will almost assuredly mean joining the NHL team and playing before the end of the season. But all that remains to be seen.
The matchups are set!
We'll take on UMass on Thursday night in Fargo on ESPN2.
Let's make it another Maroon & Gold takeover in North Dakota ⤵️
Season Ticket Holder 🎟: https://t.co/sLXZX24AYhNon-Season Ticket Holder 🎟: https://t.co/FRQIJWOn7j pic.twitter.com/DFnO3Nqx2l
— Minnesota Men's Hockey (@GopherHockey) March 23, 2025
Few would have thought that when Dvorsky and Snuggerud were ready to play the Blues would be in this position and playing so well.
Nathan Walker had the Blues' sixth fight in their last five games on Sunday and later got a 10-minute misconduct. Bolduc got a five-minute major for cross-checking and a game misconduct penalty after sticking up for Thomas when he was hit by the Predators' Nick Blankenburg. Thomas and Jake Neighbours slashed Kiefer Bellows after he took a couple of whacks at Bolduc.
'Yeah, guys are bought in, standing up for each other,' Faulk said. 'It's good. No team can come in and push us around. Teams like to see what they can get away with and guys are standing up for each other. The guys are playing as a team and that's what you need.'
(Photo of Dalibor Dvorsky controlling the puck against the Predators: Jeff Curry / Imagn Images)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Montreal Canadiens' Lane Hutson Dominates NHL Calder Trophy Voting
Montreal Canadiens rookie Lane Hutson is the NHL's 2024-25 winner of the Calder Trophy, and it wasn't all that close. Hutson, 21, had more than 50 family and friends at a dinner in Lake Barrington, Ill. Rob Hutson, Lane's father, said the group was there to celebrate the rookie's nomination for the Calder Trophy, but mostly everyone else had no idea he actually won it and the Calder Trophy would show up. Advertisement The Professional Hockey Writers Association selected Hutson as the NHL's most proficient player in their first year of competition. He is the second Canadiens player to win the Calder Trophy since 1967-68 after Ken Dryden won it in 1971-72. He's also the fifth active D-man to win the award, with Detroit Red Wings blueliner Moritz Seider being the last one in 2021-22. But Hutson didn't just win – he won in a landslide. Of the 191 ballots, Hutson received 165 first-place votes and 26 second-place votes. Nobody had him below second. Hutson had 150 more first-place votes than Calgary Flames netminder Duston Wolf, who finished second in the voting. Wolf had the most second-place votes, with 96, while the San Jose Sharks' first-overall pick in 2024, Macklin Celebrini, finished third. Advertisement Only three other defensemen since 1943-44 led the NHL's rookies in scoring: Bobby Orr, Brian Leetch and Quinn Hughes. Of that group, Hutson's 66 points rank second, and his 0.80 points per game also rank second. Lane Hutson (Eric Bolte-Imagn Images) Hutson set a Canadiens franchise record for most points by a rookie defenseman, while only forwards Kjell Dahlin and Mats Naslund had more points, with 71. Hutson's 60 helpers also tied Larry Murphy for the most by a rookie defenseman in NHL history. The 5-foot-9, left-hand shot stepped up his production against the Canadiens' opponents in their own division. Hutson recorded one goal and 28 assists for 29 points in 26 games against teams in the Atlantic Division, which comes to around 1.12 points per game. Against teams in the rest of the NHL, he had five goals and 32 assists for 37 points in 56 games, or 0.66 points per game. Advertisement As for the rest of the rookies to receive votes, Philadelphia Flyers sniper Matvei Michkov finished fourth, with zero first-place votes but eight in second place, 26 in third, 151 in fourth and six in fifth. Michkov led all rookies in goals, with 26. Anaheim Ducks left winger Cutter Gauthier finished fifth, followed by the Sharks' Will Smith, Carolina Hurricanes' Logan Stankoven and St. Louis Blues' Zack Bolduc. Five players only received fifth-place votes, including the Hurricanes' Jackson Blake and Red Wings' Marco Kasper. The NHL will recognize Hutson's rookie of the year honors again during the 2025 NHL Awards show, a one-hour program airing on June 12 at 6 p.m. ET. Get the latest news and trending stories by following The Hockey News on Google News and by subscribing to The Hockey News newsletter here. And share your thoughts by commenting below the article on

NBC Sports
5 hours ago
- NBC Sports
With its season in balance, Thunder prove more clutch than Pacers to take Game 4 111-104, even series 2-2
INDIANAPOLIS — Oklahoma City did to Indiana what the Pacers have done to everyone else all playoffs and season long. Indiana led by seven entering the fourth quarter in a game where it had largely been in control but it could never quite pull away. Then, with its season hanging in the balance, Oklahoma City played at its peak. The Thunder defense held the Pacers to one bucket from the floor in the final five minutes of the game, while Shai Gilgeous-Alexander took over and scored 15 points in the fourth quarter. Down 7, facing a 3-1 series deficit... OKC DELIVERED A MASTERCLASS IN THE 4TH QUARTER. 'We got stagnant, their second shots were a big problem,' Pacers coach Rick Carlisle said postgame, referencing the four offensive rebounds the Thunder had in the fourth quarter. The result was only the second clutch game the Pacers lost this postseason, a 111-104 Thunder win that ties the series up at 2-2. What has been a highly entertaining, well-played Finals will see Game 5 Monday night in Oklahoma City. It also feels like a series that is going to go seven games. The Pacers have focused their defense this series on denying Gilgeous-Alexander the ball, then when he does get the rock and drives they make it hard to get his teammates involved and get their offense flowing. They did that in Game 4. The problem was that SGA took on the challenge and scored 35 on the night. SGA COMES UP HUGE IN GAME 4 ⚡️🚨 35 points. 15 in the 4th. 3 steals. THE #KiaMVP DELIVERS IN A MASSIVE MOMENT FOR OKC! This is the loss Indiana will regret if it does not win the series, on the night the Thunder were just 3-of-17 from beyond the arc (Indiana was 11-of-36, just 30.6%, but they still outscored OKC by 24 from beyond the arc). While Pacers fans in the building (and online) want to complain about foul calls the Thunder shot just five more free throws than the Pacers, and that was bolstered by some intentional fouling at the end. Thunder coach Mark Daigneault made the first big adjustment of the series, returning to the double-big starting lineup of Chet Holmgren and Isaiah Hartenstein, which had been effective throughout the Western Conference postseason. It didn't work — for the first time this series it was Indiana getting off to the fast start leading 20-12 behind fast starts from Pascal Siakam and Myles Turner (the Thunder starting five was -2 for the night). SIAKAM THROWDOWN! He's got 10 points and FOUR steals in the 1st quarter 😲 Indiana had the ball moving a step ahead of Oklahoma City's rotations and it was getting great looks. Indiana was also knocking down its jumpers (only six of their first 24 points came in the paint). Despite the hot start by the Pacers and some cold shooting from 3 by the OKC, the Thunder were hanging around, and at the end of a high-scoring first quarter, the Pacers were only up one, 35-34. Midway through the second quarter, Obi Toppin was hit with a flagrant foul on Alex Caruso for what was a non-basketball play (but might have been just a hard playoff foul in another era). Hartenstein had a few words for Toppin after that, but nothing came of it. Obi Toppin was charged with a Flagrant 1 foul on this play. Toppin and Isaiah Hartenstein received double technicals after review. Toppin drew a flagrant himself on Lu Dort later in the quarter. Lu Dort received a flagrant 1 for this foul on Obi Toppin (via @TSN_Sports) Indiana led 60-57 at the half and the difference was 3-point shooting: The Pacers were 7-of-19 from 3, while the Thunder were 1-of-10. The Thunder were 6-of-21 on shots outside the paint in the first half. In the third quarter, the Pacers played like sharks smelling blood in the water — the crowd could sense it, their defensive pressure seemed to ramp up and the shots kept falling. Indiana led by 7 after three and Pacers fans were ready to celebrate being closer to an NBA title than the franchise had ever been. Then came the Thunder's fourth quarter and everything is even again.


Hamilton Spectator
7 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Hockey Canada sex assault trial ends as Crown lays out why each player should be convicted
As the Crown wrapped up its closing arguments Friday at the high-profile trial of five professional hockey players accused of sexual assault, they ended with the complainant's own words from her marathon nine days on the stand. The jury has heard — in graphic detail — her allegations about what took place inside a London, Ont., hotel room in 2018. The jury has heard — in graphic detail — her allegations about what took place inside a London, Ont., hotel room in 2018. 'They were objectifying me, they were literally in there laughing at me,' the woman had testified. 'Literally any one of those men could have stood up and said, 'This isn't right.' And no one did ... They didn't want to think about if I was actually OK, or if I was actually consenting.' After hearing nearly six weeks of evidence and a full week of closing arguments from the five defence teams and the Crown, it's now up to Superior Court Justice Maria Carroccia to decide the guilt or innocence of Alex Formenton, Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Dillon Dubé and Cal Foote, in a judgment set to be delivered July 24. The prosecutors and defence lawyers shook hands as the trial finally came to an end Friday afternoon at the London, Ont., courthouse, after having originally started in April as a jury trial, but is now a judge-alone case . Carroccia thanked the lawyers for the 'very professional manner' in which they handled the case, 'which we all know has garnered a lot of public attention.' A pair of stills from videos showing the dance floor inside Jack's Bar in London, Ont., on the night of June 18-19, 2018, show the complainant with world junior team members Dillon Dubé, circled left, and Michael McLeod, right. All members of the 2018 Canadian world junior championship team — and most of them playing in the NHL by the time of their arrests last year — the five men stand accused of sexually assaulting the then-20-year-old complainant in a room at the Delta Armouries hotel in London in the early hours of June 19, 2018, while the team was in town to attend the Hockey Canada Foundation's annual Gala & Golf fundraising event. The complainant had met McLeod at Jack's Bar and returned to his room where they had consensual sex, only for multiple men to come in afterward, some prompted by a group chat text from McLeod about a '3 way.' The Crown has alleged that McLeod had intercourse with the complainant a second time in the hotel room's bathroom; that Formenton separately had intercourse with the complainant in the bathroom; that McLeod, Hart and Dubé obtained oral sex from the woman; that Dubé slapped her naked buttocks, and that Foote did the splits over her head and his genitals 'grazed' her face. Prosecutors have argued that the men failed to take reasonable steps to confirm the woman's consent to each act, and that she never made an 'affirmative, voluntary choice.' A screenshot of a group chat involving members of Canada's 2018 world junior championship team. The Crown contends the complainant either didn't voluntarily consent, or her consent was cancelled by the fact she was scared and intimidated to be in a hotel room full of men she didn't know while she was intoxicated as well as naked after having had sex with McLeod. The defence, meanwhile, has argued that the complainant was consenting throughout the night and fabricated her version of events as she tried to make stick her allegations from a $3.5-million sexual assault lawsuit filed against Hockey Canada in 2022, which the sports organization quickly settled for an undisclosed sum. The prosecution further alleges that through the use of a group chat, the players created a false narrative that the complainant was the aggressor and repeatedly demanded to have sex with men in the room — a Crown argument that has faced resistance from the judge. The Crown has also asked the judge to reject some of the testimony of their own player witnesses, something Carroccia described as 'interesting' on Friday. 'Effectively, what you're saying is where it doesn't help the Crown, don't accept it, and where it does help the Crown, accept it,' the judge said. On Friday, the prosecution finished its closing arguments by outlining its case for a conviction against each accused man. 'This is a unique case where, in the Crown's submission, no matter which facts you accept amongst the sometimes challenging puzzle of evidence, there is a clear path to conviction for each of the five accused,' Crown attorney Heather Donkers told Carroccia. 'Mr. McLeod is the one who orchestrated this whole sordid night,' Crown attorney Meaghan Cunningham said Friday. Michael McLeod arrives at court with his lawyers. 'Knowing that (the complainant) had expressed no interest in, or willingness to engage in, sexual activity with anyone other than him, he then begins a campaign to bring men into the room to do that very thing.' McLeod is the only accused man facing two charges — sexual assault and being a party to a sexual assault, for allegedly encouraging his teammates to engage in sexual activity with the complainant when he knew she wasn't consenting. In a 2018 police interview, he told a detective he received oral sex from the complainant and engaged in intercourse with her again before she left the hotel room, but omitted the fact he texted a players' group chat to come to his room for a '3 way,' as well as messaging others directly. The Crown argued Friday that McLeod is one of three men the complainant testified she performed oral sex on while she was on a bedsheet on the ground, although she herself did not identify McLeod as one of the three. The Crown said there were no words spoken between McLeod and the complainant at that time to confirm her consent. The Crown also asked that Carroccia accept that another instance of oral sex happened while McLeod was on the bed. To this, the judge pointed out that court heard testimony about the complainant getting up on the bed and placing McLeod's penis in her mouth without him actually doing anything — evidence that Donkers described as ambiguous and not an indication of consent. 'You can't possibly be saying that a woman who puts a man's penis in her mouth is not communicating that she wishes to,' Carroccia said in response. This led to a back-and-forth between the judge and Crown attorney. 'That is what I'm saying,' Donkers replied. 'Otherwise, there would never be a sexual assault that involves oral sex.' 'That's not true,' Carroccia shot back, saying Donkers misunderstood the point. The judge then put it in the form of a question: 'If a man does nothing and a woman takes his penis and puts it in her mouth, he's committing a sexual assault without asking her if that's OK?' Donkers apologized. She explained the Crown position that doing the act doesn't communicate consent, but agreed that if the judge were to find it was 'one-directional entirely,' that may raise a doubt as to whether that particular allegation had been proven. Donkers did not address at all the allegation involving intercourse, deferring instead to the Crown's brief written arguments. McLeod had told police he had hopped in the shower and the complainant came in with him and they had sex. In court, the woman testified about being tired by that point and that she felt it was a 'continuation' of the other sexual acts in the room — 'I didn't look at it as something I really wanted to do, just felt like one last thing I needed to do to go.' The Crown argues in its written materials that there is no evidence McLeod took any steps to ascertain the complainant's consent. As for being a party to sexual assault, Cunningham argued that McLeod can still be found guilty as long the judge concludes that a sexual assault happened in the room, regardless of whether any specific person is convicted. For example, she referred to the complainant's testimony of multiple men slapping and spitting on her. The whole reason the men knew to come to the room was because of McLeod, Cunningham argued, and he ensured throughout the night that the sexual activity could continue by calming the complainant down when she became upset, or by telling other players in the room not to take out their phones to record anything. McLeod made two cellphone recordings of the complainant; in one, she says 'I'm OK with this,' while in another, she says 'It was all consensual.' Cunningham argued the videos cannot be used as evidence of consent. 'They are also not evidence of any reasonable steps taken to sincerely ascertain valid consent in law,' she said. 'At their highest, they're the kind of token, lip-service, box-checking that the Court of Appeal says is not a reasonable step.' The first video doesn't actually establish to what the complainant was consenting and with whom, Cunningham said, while the second video was taken after the sexual activity and, the Crown highlighted, consent can't be given after the fact. The complainant herself testified she was just saying what she thought the men wanted to hear. The only accused man to testify in his own defence, Hart told the judge that in response to the complainant's demands for intercourse while she was on the ground, he asked for a 'blowie, meaning blowjob,' she said 'yeah' or 'sure,' moved toward him, helped pull down his pants, and performed oral sex about 30 seconds to a minute. Carter Hart outside court with his lawyers. Should the judge accept his account, Donkers argued he should have taken more steps to confirm the complainant's consent, given her obvious vulnerability. He could have taken her aside, asked for her name, her desires, her limitations, or whether this was something she truly wanted. In response to that, Carroccia pointed out the testimony of the Crown's witnesses about the complainant demanding to have sex. 'You just said to me he could have talked to her to find out more about her wants,' Carroccia said, 'but if I accept the evidence from your own witnesses, she was saying what her wants were, correct?' Donkers said that the witnesses testified about the complainant demanding intercourse, not oral sex. While Hart could only recall that instance of oral sex, he later said it was possible it happened again , after the Crown pointed out in cross-examination that McLeod told police he saw Hart receive oral sex twice. The complainant herself testified about giving oral sex to about three men in quick succession, though she never identified Hart to the police, nor that she performed oral sex on him twice. Players Brett Howden and Tyler Steenbergen identified Hart and McLeod as two of the three, while Dubé identified himself to police as the third. Howden testified he believes he saw Hart receive oral sex twice while in the room. 'So I should accept their evidence that Carter Hart probably got oral sex twice, but then find they're mistaken about Dillon Dubé?' the judge asked. 'If they're watching Carter Hart getting oral sex twice, they blink and miss Dillon Dubé? I just don't follow that argument.' Donkers countered that they might not have noticed Dubé because it happened so quickly. Formenton told police in 2018 that he followed the complainant into the bathroom after she had been demanding to have sex with men. There's a lack of evidence as to whether there was any conversation in the bathroom between the two, but Donkers argued that again, no steps were taken to confirm the complainant's consent before they had vaginal intercourse. Alex Formenton and his lawyers. But Carroccia had a question: What to make of Howden's testimony that he recalled that in response to the complainant's demands, Formenton said something along the lines of not wanting to do it front of everybody, and then he followed the complainant into the bathroom. 'Not so ambiguous, is it, in those circumstances?' Carroccia said. 'It's consistent with what she's offering, what she said, if I find that that was the sequence of events.' The judge reminded Donkers that Formenton doesn't have to prove that scenario, but rather the onus is on the Crown 'to disprove that that's what happened.' Donkers said the Crown doesn't have to prove or disprove 'any particular fact and issue beyond a reasonable doubt, what we have to prove is he's guilty of sexual assault.' 'I know that, Ms. Donkers,' the judge replied. While the Crown has argued that the defence has engaged in myth-based reasoning when questioning the complainant's behaviour in the room, Formenton's lawyer Hilary Dudding countered that, in fact, the prosecution was doing that. The Crown's reasoning 'really implies that for a woman to be assertively asking for sex in a group scenario is so inherently bizarre and odd that it requires some explanation other than that woman is consenting,' Dudding said. 'It's stereotypical thinking about what types of sex people like and don't like, what a woman might choose or not choose.' Dubé acknowledged in his 2018 police interview that he briefly received oral sex from the complainant, but omitted the fact that he slapped her naked buttocks. He did admit to slapping the complainant once or twice to a Hockey Canada investigator in 2022, in a statement that was excluded from the trial due to the 'unfair and prejudicial' way it was obtained. The complainant testified that multiple men were slapping her buttocks and that it hurt. The Crown argued that Carroccia should find Dubé slapped her twice — while she was on the ground after giving him oral sex, as witnessed by Steenbergen and on the bed while she was performing oral sex on McLeod, as witnessed by Howden. Dillon Dubé outside court. Dubé told police the oral sex happened in quick succession as the complainant performed on him, Hart, and McLeod — 'No chance for subjective consent,' Donkers said, but even if there was, it was cancelled by the complainant's fear of being in the room. Donkers argued that Dubé only mentioned getting oral sex to police because he 'knew he could try and portray that as consensual, based on comments he says (the complainant) was making about sex,' while he didn't mention the slapping because he knew that went too far as there is 'absolutely zero evidence' that the woman consented to that. 'He could not have had any legitimate belief she had communicated a willingness to be touched on her buttocks, gentle or hard, it does not matter,' Donkers said. 'That belief would have had to come from the myth that just because she had agreed to other things or appeared to agree to other things, that she would be OK being slapped. That is not a defence in law.' It's undisputed that Foote did the splits over the woman, Donkers said, but what's disputed is whether he was naked from the waist down, over which part of her body he did the splits, and whether his genitals touched her face. Court heard that the spits was a 'party trick' Foote often did, including on the dance floor at Jack's earlier that evening in June 2018. Cal Foote, centre, with his lawyers. Steenbergen partially witnessed Foote doing the splits, but couldn't tell if he was clothed below the waist, while Hart was adamant that Foote was wearing clothes and he did not physically touch the complainant, whom Hart said was laughing. The complainant 'viscerally testified' about someone doing the splits 'and having a penis in my face,' Donkers pointed out, although the complainant wasn't able to identify Foote. Given that this was a hotel room full of men 'amped up from a night of drinking' and who knew sexual activity with the woman was the focus in the room, it is 'abundantly clear' that Foote was called to the room to engage with the woman sexually as well, and specifically by doing the naked splits over her body, Donkers argued. 'This extraordinary event of June 19 for them called for extraordinary measures, not just an ordinary party trick they had seen as early as the night before at Jack's,' Donkers said. Cal Foote does the splits at Jack's Bar in London on the night of June 18-19, 2018, while teammates Brett Howden (on the far side of Foote, in white with a lighter-coloured backwards ball cap) and Dillon Dubé (in white on the near side of Foote) clear space on the dance floor. But even if the judge were to accept Hart's version that Foote did the splits while clothed and didn't touch the complainant, the judge should still conclude it was a sexual assault, Donkers said — even though the complainant maintained she was touched. 'It's reasonable to assume that in (Hart's) version of events, she thinks the touching is about to happen and in vulnerable circumstances of a sexual nature,' Donkers said. In the excluded statements from the Hockey Canada 2022 investigation that cannot form part of Carroccia's decision, both Formenton and Dubé said they witnessed Foote doing the splits, with Formenton specifying he wasn't wearing pants. 'So she's laying on the ground parallel between the beds,' Formenton said. 'I remember he takes pants off, top clothes still on, does splits over her upper body.' The players were 'compelled' to sit for an interview with Hockey Canada. But they weren't told Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .