No changes to drug laws even if consumption room is a success, says minister
The Thistle Centre opened earlier this year after a decade-long wrangle between the UK and Scottish governments, with the latter seeking an exemption from the Misuse of Drugs Act to ensure users of the facility are not prosecuted.
Eventually, Scotland's top law officer ruled it would not be 'in the public interest' to seek to prosecute users of the service, which allows people to inject drugs, paving the way for it to open.
Appearing before the Scottish Affairs Committee at Westminster on Wednesday, Home Office minister Dame Diana Johnson said the law will not be changed.
Asked if the Government could rethink that stance if the Thistle proves to be a success in driving down Scotland's high drug death rates, the minister said: 'We look at evidence, we have experts, we have the ACMD (advisory council on the misuse of drugs) who offer advice, we look at evidence all the time.
'But I just really want to be clear with you, we do not support drug consumption facilities, it's not our policy and we will not be amending the Misuse of Drugs Act.'
Liberal Democrat MP Angus MacDonald said his 'jaw just dropped open' at the minister's statement.
'If the Thistle turns out to be a great success within a year, I would be so excited about rolling that out everywhere,' he said.
He added that it is 'the most wonderful way' of stopping people dying and can act as a pathway to rehabilitation.
After the minister repeated the Government's stance, Mr MacDonald said: 'You're basically condemning thousands of people to death, in my opinion.'
But Dame Diana rejected his assertion, saying: 'I don't accept that, with the greatest of respect.
'This is not the only thing that we can do to deal with drug misuse and I think the UK Government is very clear that there are a number of measures that can be used.'
Labour MP Chris Murray also pointed out that it was Dame Diana who chaired the Home Affairs Select Committee which in 2023 released a report supporting a drug consumption room pilot.
Picking up on that point, SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn questioned what evidence she had to have changed her view.
'Mr Flynn, you're a very experienced member of this House and you know that when a Member of Parliament becomes a minister, their personal views are irrelevant because they are there to represent the views of the Government,' she said.
'The recommendation that was made in that Home Affairs Select Committee report in the previous parliament was based on a group of politicians, cross-party, including your own party, that sat down and reached those recommendations together.
'That is very different to a Government policy that I am setting out today.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sunday Post
35 minutes ago
- Sunday Post
£80m for carbon capture shelved after Greens threatened SNP pact
Get a weekly round-up of stories from The Sunday Post: Thank you for signing up to our Sunday Post newsletter. Something went wrong - please try again later. Sign Up Vital funding to accelerate a carbon capture and storage project that could create thousands of jobs in Scotland was shelved after the Scottish Greens threatened to put their power-sharing agreement with the SNP at risk, we can exclusively reveal. It is one of a series of stark revelations uncovered by a Sunday Post investigation into why £80 million promised by the Scottish Government for the landmark Acorn project has yet to materialise. The Acorn project would see harmful greenhouse gas emissions piped under the North Sea and then stored, creating almost 5,000 long-term jobs and billions of investment for the Scottish economy. But we found squabbling between political factions and attempts to shift blame have caused the money to be held up at a time when the north east is haemorrhaging jobs. The SNP offered up the cash to encourage the UK Government to rethink after the Scottish Cluster, a group of decarbonisation projects focused on Peterhead Power station, missed out on funding in 2021. But earlier this year, SNP energy secretary Gillian Martin admitted there were no plans to pay out and claimed that investors do not currently need the cash. Previously unseen private communications, memos and briefing notes show: The Scottish Greens threatened to publicly disagree with the government's energy strategy if it handed out the £80m for carbon capture – a move that could have put the Bute House agreement in jeopardy. Emails sent between senior SNP figures and notes issued by special advisors indicate the funding was not originally conditional on UK Government support – as SNP ministers now claim. There was nearly three months of delay in discussing the funding at ministerial level while jobs were placed at risk. Net Zero secretary Michael Matheson was rebuked by UK energy minister Greg Hands for releasing details of their 'confidential' meeting so he could make an announcement ahead of an Environmental Information Request going public. Last night the GMB union described the revelations as 'shocking confirmation of ministers' inertia as a jobs catastrophe looms in the North Sea'. Meanwhile, nearly £22 billion has been promised over the next 25 years for Merseyside and Teesside, supporting thousands of roles. What does the Bute House memo say? A Bute House memo dated December 2022 – nearly a year after the £80m was announced – illustrates the power the Greens held over government energy policy at the time. It states the group had already been handed assurances of changes made in 'several areas'. The author, Green MSP Mark Ruskell, notes this is particularly the case in the Just Transition chapter of the government's plans. © KATIE NOBLE The note says the Greens would 'likely need to publicly disagree' with elements of the Energy Strategy and Just Transition Plan if it was published in its current form. It states the party would like to see any financial support for carbon capture and blue hydrogen come out of UK Government money, 'reallocating Scottish Government funding for other pressing priorities'. It adds that this includes reallocating the £80m projected spend from the Emerging Energy Technologies Fund on the Scottish Cluster. The Scottish Government had previously warned withdrawing the funding would give the impression that it no longer supports Acorn and would be contrary to the Bute House Agreement – an argument refuted by the Greens in the memo. Jobs 'still at risk' Scottish Conservative energy spokesman Douglas Lumsden said: 'This internal memo, hidden until now, shows the extremist Greens have had a veto on SNP energy policy for years. 'Although the Emerging Energy Technologies Fund promised £80m to develop the Scottish Cluster, the Greens said no. Then it was canned. 'Tens of thousands of Scottish jobs remain at risk because Patrick Harvie's paw prints are still all over Scottish Government policy.' © DC Thomson Environmental groups are sceptical of carbon capture and argue it props up the fossil fuel industry by hiding emissions, rather than cutting them. But the energy firms behind Acorn estimate the project will add £17.7 billion to UK GDP by 2050, create over 10,800 jobs during construction and sustain 4,700 long-term operational roles. It has been listed since 2023 as one of two new carbon capture projects awaiting formal backing by the UK Government following approval of the two clusters in England. Greens stand by carbon capture stance Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie said his party has always been sceptical about both the Scottish and UK governments putting too much reliance on 'untested' carbon capture technology, adding that it is firmly opposed to using it as an excuse for more fossil fuel extraction or burning. He said: 'At best – if it ever works – it could reduce emissions from the residual use of fossil fuel while we do everything we can to shift to renewables. 'But it's too often being used as an excuse for business as usual, which is why it's no surprise to see the anti-environment Conservatives backing it.' © Jane Barlow/PA Wire The Scottish Government claims the delay in handing over the money is linked to the UK Government taking so long to approve the project. However, internal memos and correspondence reveal no such conditions were in place when the money was first allocated. In a letter to Shona Robison in December 2021 – six weeks before the Acorn funding announcement – Michael Matheson said the Scottish Cluster would be supported without caveat by the same £80 million from the same fund. This is parroted in a number of other pieces of correspondence sent by Matheson that have subsequently been obtained by The Sunday Post. Around six weeks later, advisers began to gameplan the 'conditionality of funding point', adding that the 'key point to make would be that the £80m is not enough, and UKG support is still required in terms of access to business models etc.' SNP minister rebuked We can reveal officials were then left scrambling to put out an announcement because a letter from Matheson to UK energy minister Greg Hands referencing the cash was set to be released to the public through an Environmental Information Request. But Matheson was given a dressing down by Hands on January 19 2022 for making the announcement following what was supposed to be a confidential meeting. Hands wrote: 'You had been seeking a meeting with me for some days, which I agreed to, but at no point during what I understood to be a confidential meeting between two ministers, was it said that a media notification would follow the meeting. 'Instead, we had I thought, agreed at the meeting that the two governments would work together, which is what I believe the Acorn project would want, and the people of Scotland would expect.' © PA Hands says he told Matheson during the meeting that the £80m funding 'needs careful consideration but does not address some of the key challenges'. These include the likely burden of ongoing revenue support payments and practical constraints of supporting multiple carbon capture projects in three different areas of the UK to launch at the same time. Further correspondence reveals the Scottish Government was not notified the Scottish Cluster would not be included in a list of fast-tracked projects before the announcement was put out publicly. © Thomas Krych/ZUMA Press Wire/Shu Three meetings between Matheson and Hands were arranged and then cancelled around this time and there was no direct response to the funding offer in Matheson's letter to the Chancellor in October 2021 or a subsequent letter from the first minister to the prime minister the following month. This meant there was a nearly three month delay in discussing the funding proposal at a ministerial level. 'Inertia and inaction' GMB Scotland secretary Louise Gilmour said needless delays in driving through investment for Acorn exposes the abject failure of UK and Scottish governments to protect the sector or deliver new jobs in green energy. She said: 'Offshore production and onshore supply chains are in crisis with thousands of skilled jobs on the line but, behind the scenes, our ministers are apparently spending their time on spin and squabbles. 'There is clearly no joined-up thinking between our governments and no concerted plan of action. Instead, there are politicians playing games. © Andrew Cawley 'There is only inertia and inaction while thousands of well-paid jobs are in peril along with the families and communities that rely on them.' The Scottish Government said its Programme for Government 'made clear' that it is committed to the £80 million of support. However no actual funding was allocated and the project was not even mentioned in the 2025-26 Scottish Budget. The government added that the funding is 'contingent upon the UK Government confirming a full-funding package and timeline for the Acorn project at the Spending Review'.
The Herald Scotland
44 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Teaching post at remote island school 'vacant since 2019'
In addition, the party noted that Western Isles Council has advertised a PE teacher role nine times, while a post for a home economics teacher in Aberdeen was advertised six times – with East Ayrshire Council also adverting a teaching post six times. Lib Dem education spokesman Willie Rennie said action is needed to 'make teaching an attractive role if we are to tackle these shortfalls'. He said: 'Qualified teachers are enduring years of short-term, zero hours contracts yet some schools are advertising roles over and over again without success. 'This data suggests that there are acute shortages in rural areas and in key subjects like maths. 'Terrible workforce planning has resulted in missed opportunities for so many young people and so many teachers too. If we want every young person to reach their potential, they need teachers who can inform and inspire.' He said the Lib Dems would introduce three-year packages for probationer teachers 'who are willing to take on hard-to-fill roles', and would also bring in 'teacher premiums' in a bid to 'reward the best teachers in schools with the greatest need'. 692 teaching positions had to be readvertised in 2022-23 (Image: Kieran Dodds) However he warned: 'No-one believes education is high up the SNP's agenda. That's why we need a change of government to get Scottish education back to its best.' A spokesperson for local government body Cosla accepted there are 'long standing recruitment and retention challenges in remote, rural and island areas, and in some secondary school subjects'. The spokesperson said: 'Local authorities work hard to fill vacancies to meet the needs of learners in all areas of Scotland, but there are challenges. 'For example, we know that newly qualified teachers tend to seek posts within the central belt of Scotland. 'Many of the areas which struggle to recruit teachers are beautiful and exciting areas of the country to work in, with unique opportunities for learning and development. 'Cosla and Scottish Government have committed to working together on medium and long-term joint workforce planning, taking into account the importance of responding to issues in a way which addresses differing local needs.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'The number of teachers in Scotland's classrooms has increased by more than 2,500 over the past decade as a result of direct funding from the Scottish Government, with the number in permanent posts remaining stable at more than 80% over this period. 'However, we are working hard to ensure that teaching remains an attractive profession, with Scotland's teachers continuing to be the best paid in the UK, and our teaching bursary scheme provides funding to career-changers wishing to undertake a teaching degree in the hardest to fill subjects. 'Ministers have been clear they are laser-focused on improving education and supporting Scotland's teachers. That is why we are providing councils with £186.5 million this year to increase teacher numbers, and why ministers continue to engage regularly with local government and teaching unions. 'The Education Secretary also met School Leaders Scotland this week and agreed to host a roundtable with them, the General Teaching Council for Scotland, Cosla and other professional associations to discuss challenges around teacher recruitment in more detail.'
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Cuts to BBC World Service funding would ‘make us less safe', MPs tell ministers
Hours before Rachel Reeves stood up to deliver her budget last year, government officials were still in tense negotiations with bosses at the BBC over how much the World Service would be given. The amount they were haggling over was relatively small – just £5.5m out of a total budget of £400m. But BBC chiefs warned the government that if the cuts were imposed on them, they would have to close several language stations in parts of the world where the Russians already hold influence. Doing so would be a gift to Moscow, they added. The argument worked, and the BBC got the extra cash it was asking for. But executives at the corporation worry that their appeal to Britain's soft power might not prove so effective this time, especially in light of the government's recent cuts to the aid budget. 'The government is asking the World Service to model cuts that would definitely mean having to close important parts of the service,' said one person familiar with the negotiations. 'The BBC's lobbying worked last time, but this round is proving harder.' The Guardian recently revealed the government had asked the World Service to model two scenarios: one where their funding remains the same in cash terms; and one where it would be cut by 2% each year in cash terms. Each scenario would see the budget fall behind inflation, and could mean it ends up to £70m short of what its bosses believe it needs. Jonathan Munro, the global director of the BBC, said: 'When it comes to international impact and influence, the BBC World Service is the UK's most powerful asset. 'While we currently deliver news in 42 languages to over 400m people every week, at the greatest value for money compared to other international news providers, we are ambitious about going further to provide independent news where there is a vital need.' The service is just one institution promoting Britain's soft power abroad, but it is arguably the most powerful, reaching 450m people a week, according to the broadcaster's own figures. When pollsters asked people from around the world about various British exports and organisations, the BBC came out well ahead of any other, with nearly 80% having heard of it and nearly 50% saying it made them feel more positively about the UK. In comparison, only about 55% had heard of the monarchy, and only 25% said it made them view the UK more favourably. According to the same research, which the BBC commissioned, the organisation is also the most trusted of any global news outlet, ahead of CNN, Al Jazeera and Sky News. Jonathan McClory, the managing partner at Sanctuary Counsel and an expert on soft power, said: 'It's a gratuitous accident of history that we have the BBC World Service. You couldn't recreate it if you were starting from scratch, but it enables us to shape a global information landscape and promote British values, such as a free press, transparency and broad support for human rights.' Ministers say they understand this. Jenny Chapman, the international development minister, told the Guardian: 'The World Service do tremendous work, work that nobody else can do … They are soft power, an absolute gold standard resource. We respect that.' But supporters of the organisation fear that budgetary pressure has left its influence on the wane. In 2014, the coalition government stopped funding the world service, leaving the BBC to pay for it purely out of the licence fee. Two years later the government restored some direct funding, which was ringfenced for certain language services, but at a much lower level. Most of the service's £400m budget still comes from licence fee money – a situation the director general, Tim Davie, has warned is not sustainable, especially when domestic operations are being cut. Both scenarios that the government has asked BBC bosses to draw up for the World Service would involve closing certain parts of it. While it will not shut down operations in entire countries, BBC insiders say they are likely to have to close certain foreign language services where there are relatively few people who speak that language. Those services in places close to Russia – which corporation bosses warned last year would be closed if more money was not forthcoming – are once more on the chopping block. The problem with closing operations, even those with relatively small audiences, is that it can give Russia and China a perfect opportunity to push their own propaganda. When the BBC ended its long-wave BBC Arabic radio service in Lebanon, for example, Russian-backed media took over that exact frequency and began broadcasting on it instead. And on the day that thousands of pagers used by Hezbollah all simultaneously exploded in Lebanon, BBC monitors said they picked up what Davie later called 'unchallenged [Russian] propaganda' on that station. The BBC's research has found that its trust level was largely unchanged from four years ago at 78%. Trust in both Russia Today and China Global Television Network had jumped however, from 59% to 71% and from 62% to 70%, respectively. Last week Caroline Dinenage, the Conservative chair of the culture, media and sport select committee, wrote to cabinet ministers warning: 'Without sufficient resources, it could lead to more situations where the world service withdraws or reduces its services and Russian state media fills the vacuum, as in Lebanon. 'Ahead of the spending review, I invite you to reassure us that the government is not seeking to make a 2% cut to its funding of the World Service, at a time when it is vital to our strategic priorities, and that the government will not require cuts that will lead to the BBC having to close one or more language services.' Such arguments have worked with Reeves and her officials in the past. But the chancellor is hemmed in like never before, having already promised major funding increases for defence, the health service and local transport. Dinenage said: 'Ministers have told us that the world service bolsters UK security. Cutting its funding now would undoubtably make us all less safe.' A Foreign Office spokesperson said: 'Despite a tough fiscal situation, we continue to back the World Service, providing a large uplift of £32.6m this year alone, taking our total funding to £137m. 'The work they do as an independent and trusted broadcaster is highly valued by this government, as our continued financial support shows.'
