logo
Is this Trump's step towards taking over Greenland?

Is this Trump's step towards taking over Greenland?

First Post2 days ago

The Pentagon is preparing to shift military oversight of Greenland from US European Command to US Northern Command, a move that could draw the Arctic island closer into America's strategic orbit, according to a report read more
The Pentagon is preparing to shift military oversight of Greenland from US European Command to US Northern Command, a move that could draw the Arctic island closer into America's strategic orbit as President Donald Trump continues to show interest in taking control over the Arctic landmass.
According to a Politico report, the shift in oversight, which could come as soon as this week, could also help the US broaden its Golden Dome missile shield by providing more radars for coverage.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Under the plan, Greenland would shift to Northern Command, which is responsible for overseeing the security of North America, added the report, citing a DOD official and two people familiar with the planning.
The switch is the clearest step yet in the Trump administration's effort to gain control over Greenland, an autonomous territory tied to Denmark.
Trump first mentioned buying Greenland during his first term, but has brought it up more often since winning re-election last November. His renewed interest has worried Greenland's 58,000 residents and frustrated the Danish government, which says the island is not for sale.
Moving Greenland under US Northern Command is likely to draw attention in Denmark and among Nato allies, many of whom are uneasy about Trump's ongoing push to take over the island and his refusal to rule out military options.
Meanwhile, Denmark and the Faroe Islands will stay under European Command, creating a symbolic and practical split from Greenland.
'From the perspective of geography, the move makes some sense,' Politico quoted one of the people familiar with the matter as saying.
'From a political perspective, however, this clearly is going to worry Europe,' the official added.
According to the Politico report, the shift in Greenland's oversight comes as part of the Pentagon's broader review of the Unified Command Plan, which defines the responsibilities of the military's six geographic commands.
While the Greenland move doesn't change leadership structures, other proposals — like merging Northern and Southern Commands or moving Africa Command back under European Command — could significantly affect top military roles and the global distribution of US forces.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
For months, the Trump administration has emphasised Greenland's strategic value, citing its North Atlantic location as key for missile defence and tracking Russian and Chinese activity in the Arctic.
The change could pave the way for more Golden Dome radar systems on the island, further integrating Greenland into US and Canadian defence strategies.
US Northern Command is primarily tasked with defending the homeland, overseeing missions like border security, air and missile defense, and military cooperation with Canada and Mexico.
Shifting Greenland under Northern Command would effectively separate it from Denmark in US strategic planning, elevating the island's importance in Pentagon and White House discussions, reported Politico.
According to the report, citing one source familiar with the move, Denmark has not yet been formally briefed about the move.
The US has maintained a military presence in Greenland for decades. In March, Vice President JD Vance and then–national security adviser Mike Waltz visited Pituffik Space Base — home to the Pentagon's northernmost deepwater port and a key site for monitoring Russia and China.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
During the visit, Vance urged Greenland to 'cut a dea' with the US, saying, 'I think that you'd be a lot better coming under the United States security umbrella than you have been under Denmark's.'
Back in January, Denmark pledged an additional $2 billion toward Greenland's defence in part to ease US concerns.
Still, Nato and European leaders remain wary of Trump's growing interest in the island.
Trump's comments on the importance of the Arctic have caught the attention of Nato leaders.
The alliance's secretary general, Mark Rutte, said last week that 'for Nato, we're getting more involved' in Arctic security issues. He added that Trump calling attention to Russian and Chinese moves in the region marked a positive development.
In an interview with NBC last month, Trump said he would not rule out taking Greenland by military force.
'I don't say I'm going to do it, but I don't rule out anything,' he was quoted as saying.
'We need Greenland very badly,' he added.
With inputs from agencies

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Defence alert: Crypto is turning into a geopolitical weapon
Defence alert: Crypto is turning into a geopolitical weapon

Mint

time21 minutes ago

  • Mint

Defence alert: Crypto is turning into a geopolitical weapon

"I am not a fan of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies… Unregulated crypto assets can facilitate unlawful behaviour." That was Donald Trump in 2019, when he still voiced concerns shared by central bankers, International Monetary Fund (IMF) economists and financial crime experts across the world. The consensus was clear: crypto, while technologically innovative, lacked both intrinsic value and sovereign backing, and undermined anti-money laundering regimes as well as monetary integrity. Fast forward to 2025. Better educated perhaps by the America crypto lobby's campaign cheques and the sweat equity gifted to his family, Trump, now US president again, recently signed Executive Order 14178. A stroke of the pen dismantled many of the regulatory guard-rails once deemed essential. Not long after, the Trump family entered the crypto business. One of their earliest strategic partners was Pakistan, a state associated with cross-border terrorism, shady finances and furtive fund diversion. Also Read: The triumph of crypto bros: Don't just shrug and move on What should India make of a superpower whose political leaders launch private currencies? Or of a country where former convicts are rehabilitated as strategic advisors to sovereign crypto councils? Are we witnessing a global power in search of infinite minting rights without democratic oversight but with the full cover of plausible deniability? Changpeng Zhao, former CEO of Binance, pleaded guilty to serious anti-money laundering failures, spent time in US custody and paid $4.3 billion for a settlement. His crypto exchange facilitated transactions for sanctioned groups like Hamas—flows that would never get past a regulated banking system. The Binance blow-up should have ended his financial career. Instead, he now advises Pakistan's official crypto task force. Justin Sun, whose firm invested $30 million in Trump-linked World Liberty Financial, was under investigation by the US Securities and Exchange Commission for civil fraud. Today, he is a front-row guest at US political fund-raisers. Are crypto dealings the new way to buy influence in the US? This seems like a gateway through which otherwise ineligible actors—be it individuals, regimes or rogue states—are quietly admitted into the global financial order, now that the need for institutional legitimacy appears to be receding behind the opacity that once resulted in exclusion. Also Read: Mint Quick Edit | De-dollarization: Trump should target crypto, not Brics It's a return to Cold War-style shadow financing, but with the support of blockchains instead of banks. So much for the superpower that lectures the world on clean governance. When financial opacity is rebranded as innovation, geopolitics takes on a new form we should all be wary of. The IMF and World Bank have been vocal in their concerns. The IMF has warned that widespread adoption of private cryptocurrencies threatens monetary sovereignty, enables illicit flows and undermines capital controls, especially in emerging markets. We saw disruptions in El Salvador, Nigeria, and Lebanon, where crypto experiments coincided with capital volatility and institutional erosion. Terror finance remains an enduring threat to global security. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has repeatedly highlighted how terrorist groups exploit crypto to bypass formal banking oversight. Yet, Pakistan has FATF clearance. For a country like India—on the front-line of cross-border terrorism—this is a real risk. Crypto has operationalized what could be described as 'eHawala': borderless transfers in real time that can stay hidden. A sovereign nation should not let private entities mint currency, however trendy or popular it proves. To its credit, the Reserve Bank of India saw this coming. Its resistance to private cryptocurrency is neither timidity nor technophobia—it is an assertion of monetary sovereignty. In today's world, capital flows can be weaponized. It is therefore a matter of national security to ensure such weapons are not aimed at us. Also Read: Trump's crypto reserve: An odd idea with a silver lining for the world Yet, the pressure to capitulate is mounting. Global crypto platforms, freshly repackaged as fintech innovations, have been pushing for softer regulation. In India, domestic actors have lobbied against India's high tax on crypto gains by arguing that crypto capital must be stopped from fleeing offshore. In matters of financial security, arguing that crypto should remain unchecked because conventional checks aren't flawless is not just illogical, but dangerously juvenile. Even if the US exerts diplomatic pressure, India mustn't oblige. Instead, India should put systems in place for crypto deterrence. Cutting-edge surveillance tools, forensic finance capabilities and offensive digital arsenals could be deployed against adversarial scenarios of crypto being used as a Trojan horse to destabilize our financial system. Just as strategic weapons are kept discreet, so must this. The future of finance may well be digital. But that future must be guided by sovereign plans, not determined by offshore hype or patronage games. In the crypto age, our sovereignty must be defended with the same strategic intent that we apply to borders, seas, airspace and cyberspace. Crypto is now a geopolitical instrument and potentially a vector of strategic harm. It needs to be viewed as a weaponizable tool, even as we secure our financial architecture from any threat it may pose. This is no longer a matter for committees to discuss. It is a political decision—one that cannot be deferred without consequences. The author is a corporate advisor and author of 'Family and Dhanda'

US-China trade tensions threaten tech partnerships
US-China trade tensions threaten tech partnerships

First Post

time28 minutes ago

  • First Post

US-China trade tensions threaten tech partnerships

As both the US and China accuse each other of violating the 90-day trade truce agreed upon in May, tech partnership between the world's top two economies is falling apart brick by brick read more Trade tensions between the US and China have escalated again as the world's two largest economies accuse each other of breaching the 90-day trade truce agreed upon in May. On Monday (June 2), Beijing accused the US of breaching the agreement after US President Donald Trump said China had ' totally violated ' it. The Chinese Commerce Ministry said that while China had upheld the deal, the US introduced 'discriminatory and restrictive measures' that 'severely undermine' the agreement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Tech decoupling in full swing One of the many fallouts of this trade tussle is that the tech partnership between the two countries is falling apart. Last month, the Trump administration intensified its crackdown on Huawei , saying that the use of the Chinese technology giant's artificial intelligence (AI) chips could trigger criminal penalties under US export control laws. In a statement, the US Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) said, 'Using Huawei Ascend chips anywhere in the world violates US export controls.' The BIS maintains that the chips are 'likely to have been designed with certain US software or technology or produced with semiconductor manufacturing equipment that is the direct product of certain US-origin software or technology, or both.' Meanwhile, Reuters reported last month that Washington has ordered a broad swathe of companies to stop shipping goods to China without a license and revoked licenses already granted to certain suppliers. Several US firms have received letters from the Trump administration over the past few weeks, highlighting the new restrictions. The agency quoted sources as saying the letters were sent to firms shipping electronic design automation (EDA) software for semiconductors. China forcing Apple Intelligence rollout delays There are allegations that China might also be doubling down on punitive measures against US firms as trade war leverage. According to media reports, Apple's rollout of intelligence services in China is being held up by regulators. Apple is working with Alibaba to launch Apple Intelligence for Chinese users. The software would also be embedded in Alibaba devices. However, China's internet authority is sitting over approval requests. Experts are linking the approval delays to trade tensions between the two nations. Apple's business interests have been hit hard as these restrictions put local competitors Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo and Vivo in an advantageous position. The firm's business is already shrinking in the world's second-largest economy. At the start of 2023, Apple dominated the Chinese smartphone market with a 70 per cent share, while Huawei languished at 13 per cent. However, by the first quarter of this year, Apple's share dropped to below 50 per cent while Huawei's rose to 35 per cent. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump-Xi talks soon This tech decoupling is expected to continue as long as trade tensions simmer. Trump is expected to talk to China's Xi Jinping in the coming days, as confirmed by US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. 'Maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system; maybe it's intentional. We'll see after the president speaks with the party chairman,' Bessent said, referring to Xi. Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, also hoped that the two leaders would have a 'wonderful conversation'. 'President Trump, we expect, is going to have a wonderful conversation about the trade negotiations this week with President Xi,' he said on the ABC News program 'This Week.'

Trump, Musk bromance in trouble? What's behind Tesla boss' criticism of US President's big tax bill
Trump, Musk bromance in trouble? What's behind Tesla boss' criticism of US President's big tax bill

Mint

time28 minutes ago

  • Mint

Trump, Musk bromance in trouble? What's behind Tesla boss' criticism of US President's big tax bill

Tech billionaire Elon Musk, once a close aide to US President Donald Trump, has launched a campaign against Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill'. Ever since he quit Trump's administration as the head of the US Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Elon Musk has ramped up his attack on Trump's tax bill. To date, he has made a dozen X posts or reports criticising the bill. Trump's self-described "big, beautiful bill" encompasses sweeping tax reductions and expands military expenditure. According to AFP, it is expected to add $2.4 trillion to US deficits over a 10-year horizon, despite deep cuts to health and food aid programs. Trump's big bill seeks to extend tax cuts approved in 2017, during Trump's first term at the White House. The package also includes a massive buildup of $350 billion for border security, deportations and national security. It further includes $4 trillion increase to the nation's $36 trillion debt limit, which the Treasury Department says is needed by this summer to pay the nation's bills. The bill is expected to decrease federal spending by $1.3 trillion, but also see a $3.7 trillion drop in revenues, according to the Congressional Budget Office 's (CBO) latest analysis. It would leave some 10.9 million more people without health insurance, the CBO said earlier. The Bill narrowly passed the House of Representatives and is now awaiting a Senate vote. In his latest salvo, Musk urged Americans to lobby Congress to "KILL the BILL". He also cautioned that "America is in the fast lane to debt slavery". In his many posts and retweets, Musk dubbed the 'trillion-dollar Big Beautiful Bill' as 'Debt Slavery Bill' or 'The Big Ugly Bill.' Musk had also called the bill a "disgusting abomination" on Tuesday. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore," Musk posted on X. Musk has criticised Trump's signature bill before, but before Tuesday afternoon, his rhetoric had been far more restrained and muted. The SpaceX and Tesla CEO announced his departure from the Trump administration on May 29. Musk, who became Trump's 'first buddy' during the 2024 US election campaign, had told CBC news, 'I think a bill can be big or it could be beautiful. I don't know if it could be both.' The White House brushed off the criticism, saying Trump "already knows where Elon Musk stood," news agency AFP reported. Meanwhile, Trump has yet to respond personally to Musk's social media rant. He was 'caught off guard' but "not entirely surprised" by Musk's opposition, a senior official told NBC news. 1. Musk believes that Trump's new bill will increase the budget deficit and undermine the work that the DOGE team is doing. "It more than defeats all the cost savings achieved by the @DOGE team at great personal cost and risk," Musk posted on X. At the head of DOGE, Musk helped the Trump administration reduce "wasteful" spending by announcing mass layoff and shutting down of government departments. 2. Musk contends that this "spending bill contains the largest increase in the debt ceiling in US history." A post on X reshared by Musk stated that Trump's bill 'is a multi-trillion debt bomb tied to a tax cut. It's gonna make you a slave.' 3. The' Big Beautiful Bill' is expected to curtail subsidies that benefit Tesla, Musk's electric automaker. Sources familiar with the Trump-Musk relationship told Axios that the tax legislation cuts the electric vehicle tax credit that helps car makers like Musk's Tesla. 4. Axios also reported, citing sources, that Musk had sought to remain DOGE head as a "special government employee" beyond 130 days. "But ultimately, White House officials said he couldn't keep serving in that capacity," the report added. 5. Sources further alleged that Musk also wanted the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to use his Starlink satellite system for national air traffic control. But the administration "balked at it" because of the appearance of a conflict of interest and for technological reason. 6. Most recently (Saturday, May 31), Trump abruptly announced he was withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman, a Musk ally, to be NASA administrator. After Isaacman's nomination was dropped, rumours spread that Sergio Gor — the director of the Office of Presidential Personnel who had clashed with Musk — was behind the decision, Axios reported. Elon Musk, has instead, demanded that "a new spending bill should be drafted that doesn't massively grow the deficit and increase the debt ceiling by 5 TRILLION DOLLARS." He also urged lawmakers to rewrite the bill from scratch. However, US President Donald Trump wants his 'big, beautiful' bill of tax breaks and spending cuts on his desk to be signed into law by the Fourth of July (July 4). Sources told Axios that Musk and Trump "remain friends and allies", but they said Trump was somewhat irked by Musk's social media sabotage. "Elon was butthurt," one source was quoted as saying. However, according to Bloomberg, Musk's public condemnation pits Musk against Trump at a critical time as the President is personally lobbying holdouts on the bill. Musk's remarks could stiffen resistance and delay enactment of the tax cuts and debt ceiling increase. During the 2024 US election campaign, Elon Musk had said he is "happy to be first buddy" to Donald Trump. He even earned "uncle" status in the Trump family. Musk had spent more than $250 million to boost Trump last year and is free to pour money into a midterm campaign season in which control of Congress is up for grabs, NBC news reported. Musk became Trump's advisor and close aide during the latter's second term as President. He emergedd as a core figure in Trump's inner circle.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store