logo
Michigan appeals court affirms ban on brass knuckles, says right to bear arms doesn't fit

Michigan appeals court affirms ban on brass knuckles, says right to bear arms doesn't fit

CBS News21-03-2025

A court says there is no constitutional right to possess brass knuckles in Michigan, a weapon typically associated with violent ambushes in dark alleys and banned in nearly two dozen states.
The Michigan Court of Appeals, in an 18-page opinion, declined to interfere with a 1931 law that carries a five-year prison term for simply having brass knuckles, also known as metallic knuckles.
A "ban on the possession of metallic knuckles falls within the historical tradition of prohibiting the concealed carry of metallic knuckles as a dangerous and unusual weapon," Judge Christopher Murray wrote in a 3-0 opinion Tuesday.
Brass knuckles are usually a single set of rings that fits on someone's hand. A punch can inflict serious injuries.
"If you ask everybody out here, probably they'd all say brass knuckles are used by the gangs and the thugs who want to go make a point. The history and tradition of the use is not a glamorous one," Murray said during arguments in November.
Lawyers for a Grand Rapids-area man argued that Michigan's ban violated the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment right to bear arms.
Attorney Ryan Keast told the court opinions have changed over the years about what constitutes a dangerous and unusual weapon. He noted that brass knuckles can be purchased online and are an "excellent self-defense weapon."
Nearly two dozen states have similar bans and 17 others regulate the possession of brass knuckles, according to a summary filed with the court.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gov. Pritzker defends Illinois' sanctuary policies in heated Congressional hearing
Gov. Pritzker defends Illinois' sanctuary policies in heated Congressional hearing

Axios

time7 hours ago

  • Axios

Gov. Pritzker defends Illinois' sanctuary policies in heated Congressional hearing

Gov. JB Pritzker joined other Democratic governors Thursday in a tense hearing over immigration policies in front of the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Why it matters: Illinois' sanctuary state policies are in the crosshairs of the Trump administration, which has threatened to withhold federal funding for the state and the city of Chicago. The big picture: The spotlight on immigration is intensifying as protests continue across U.S. cities, including what could be Chicago's largest single-day anti-Trump demonstration this weekend. What they're saying: " Illinois follows the law, but let me be clear, we expect the federal government to follow the law, too," Pritzker said in his opening remarks. "We will not participate in abuses of power. We will not violate court orders. We will not ignore the Constitution." Context: Pritzker sat on a panel with Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul. The hearing was scheduled last month, before widespread protests erupted across U.S. cities, including Chicago. The original topic was states' sanctuary laws that limit how local law enforcement can work with federal immigration officers. But Thursday's question were largely about border security, the mobilization of the National Guard in Los Angeles and whether the Democratic governors are supporting illegal immigration. Zoom in: Republicans took aim at Pritzker, calling Chicago a haven for drugs and crime and pointing to crimes committed in Illinois by undocumented immigrants. In one heated moment, chair Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) repeatedly interrupted Pritzker while pressing him on a fatal crash involving an undocumented immigrant. Rep. Mary Miller (R-IL), who doesn't sit on the Oversight committee but was allowed to speak, said "illegal aliens in our state have overwhelmed local communities and schools causing untold pain and suffering." She continued by asking Pritzker to apologize to family members of the woman who died in the fatal crash, who were present in the chambers. Pritzker was also asked to comment on border czar Tom Homan's perceived threats to arrest local officials who have sanctuary policies. Pritzker replied, "he can try." The other side: Democrat representatives defended Pritzker, including Oversight Committee member Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.), who took his time to boast about Illinois' overall achievements. He also noted that it was Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner who first created Illinois' sanctuary laws, which allow state agencies to cooperate with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers only when they present a federal warrant. " This is Illinois law," Krishnamoorthi said. "Donald Trump may not like state law as we are seeing in California, but what Donald Trump likes is irrelevant. The law is the law." The intrigue: Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) quizzed Pritzker on transgender bathroom policies and Hamas — not immigration.

MAGA money and manpower running Trump's military parade create a sickening spectacle of shame
MAGA money and manpower running Trump's military parade create a sickening spectacle of shame

Yahoo

time17 hours ago

  • Yahoo

MAGA money and manpower running Trump's military parade create a sickening spectacle of shame

Today was supposed to be a day to honor our armed forces and our flag. It was intended as a day for reflection, reverence, and gratitude. June 14 is also Donald Trump's 79th birthday, so instead of reverence or anything good, for that matter, the day has been hijacked, co-opted by a cult of personality, turned into a grotesque celebration of criminality and authoritarianism. Keep up with the latest in + news and politics. Donald Trump's so-called military parade, allegedly to mark the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary, is nothing less than a thinly veiled birthday bash for Trump, and if things couldn't get any worse, a whitewashed victory lap for the MAGA operatives, and money, that helped ignite one of the darkest days in American history, January 6, 2021. The same criminals and conspirators who organized the 'Stop the Steal' rally on January 6 are behind the scenes orchestrating Trump's dictator-like, self-serving parade, as Mother Jones reports, . The MAGA operatives are not hiding in shame. They are not lurking in the shadows. They are out in the open as planners of a celebration that will see American troops forced to march in the service of Trump's ego, with the stain of MAGA on their boots. Top figures from Trump's Stop the Steal apparatus have been woven into the White House Task Force on America 250, the organization orchestrating the parade, according to the publication. This includes Chris LaCivita, Trump's 2024 campaign co‑manager and America 250 cochair, now helping oversee planning. It also includes shadowy figures like Megan Powers, Hannah Salem Stone, and Monica Crowley, each embedded in the January 6 Stop the Steal movement. They are bringing their extremist credentials to the helm of what should be a nonpartisan celebratory task force. Even the parade's sponsors deepen the influence of Trump's political network: Tech and corporate heavyweights like Palantir (backed by Peter Thiel), Coinbase, and UFC (Trump sycophant Dana White), Coinbase (of course cryptocurrency follows Trump everywhere) have financially propped up America 250's efforts and therefore the parade. All this participation by these MAGA movers and shakers — and their money — undercuts any pretense of neutrality, aligning private interests and campaign assets with a parade planned and executed by individuals tied to an insurrection. In other words, the military gets lost in all of the Trump MAGA hoopla. Obviously, this overlap has alarmed critics who warn that the infrastructure used to equip and transport mobilized crowds for the Capitol attack is now being repurposed for what they see as a politicized, militarized spectacle in Washington. This is not normal. This is not American. And, sadly, very sadly, it has nothing to do with the military. The U.S. military has long stood as an institution above politics, a force committed to defending the Constitution, not acting as a clown show at Trump's backyard birthday party, But today, tanks will roll and troops will march not to honor the Army's service but to feed the fantasy of a man who once suggested soldiers who died in battle were 'suckers' and 'losers.' It is a disgusting perversion of everything the military stands for. Let's take a look back at how tarnished these individuals are by their association with the January 6 National Mall rally. Trump's senior aides were well aware that the Jan. 6 rally could turn violent, as ProPublica reported after the fiasco,. They knew it was 'highly combustible' yet did nothing to stop it. In fact, many cheered it on. And some of those same figures, those who summoned the gun-toting extremists, the Confederate-flag-wavers, the militia thugs and white nationalists, are now reemerging from the muck to plan a 'celebration' of American might. What do you think happens if Trump's military parade turns violent? Will these same aides shriek in horror or applaud with pride? Is it any wonder Trump is so enamored with dictator-style parades? He's long admired the authoritarian pageantry of Kim Jong Un, Vladimir Putin, even Hitler. To him, military power is not a sacred trust. No, there's no such thing as trust in Trump's mind or vocabulary. Instead, it's a personal accessory, and a tool of dominance. And just like any good dictator (I realize that's an oxymoron), Trump is surrounded by not only military soldiers, but foot soldiers from his personal MAGA army, a hodgepodge of criminals, conspiracy freaks, and catalysts for destruction and chaos. And disgustingly, sitting on the dias with him will most likely be Pete Hegseth, Kristi Noem, and Kash Patel. They are Trump's Himmler, Goebbels, and Göring, the mouthpieces of election lies, the peddlers of racism, xenophobia, and homophobia. The fact that the U.S. military is being dragged into this theater is an insult not only to everyoner who has ever worn the uniform but to the principles they swore to defend. This isn't a show of strength. Not even close. It's a demonstration of the betrayal of democracy. These are the people who sent mobs to the Capitol to hang Mike Pence and hunt Nancy Pelosi. These are the people who smeared feces on the walls of the Senate chamber, who beat police officers with flagpoles, who invoked the name of Jesus while desecrating the heart of our democracy. And now they'll smile and wave as U.S. Army soldiers march by them in lockstep. This isn't just offensive. It's dangerous. It will be a performance choreographed not to honor America but to distort it. And let's be real and honest, some, perhaps many of the soldiers in that parade, will not be comfortable taking part. They will march not for pride, not for politics, but for allegiance to a dictatorship. They will be exploited, used as stagecraft for a man who used five deferments to dodge service himself. Sadly, we do not celebrate our military today. That's been lost in all the controversy around Trump's pompous persona parade. Perhaps, today we mourn the way our military used to be. And, we do not wave the flag in pride today on Flag Day. Instead, that flag is being managed by people who have used it to stir hate and division. And sadly, we do not honor freedom. Today, we witness its slow suffocation under the boot of those who would trade justice for loyalty. Voices is dedicated to featuring a wide range of inspiring personal stories and impactful opinions from the LGBTQ+ community and its allies. Visit to learn more about submission guidelines. Views expressed in Voices stories are those of the guest writers, columnists, and editors, and do not directly represent the views of The Advocate or our parent company, equalpride.

Donald Trump is losing. Here's how California can keep the pressure on
Donald Trump is losing. Here's how California can keep the pressure on

San Francisco Chronicle​

time19 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Donald Trump is losing. Here's how California can keep the pressure on

Californians are angry. They should be. President Donald Trump's militarized mass deportation policies aren't just thoughtless and cruel — they have, in many instances, been executed illegally. This includes targeting international college students with legal residence for their political expression. Four undocumented children in San Francisco were also among those rounded up, among them a 3-year-old, whose family was lawfully complying with a scheduled check-in with immigration authorities. Abundant evidence suggests racial profiling is part and parcel of the administration's strategy. Federal agents aren't simply doing the hard work of tracking down the immigrants with criminal records whom Trump has emphasized for deportation. Instead, they've fished for people en masse at places like Home Depot — sometimes masked and without visible identification — sweeping up citizens of color in the process. In some cases, Trump isn't deporting people back to their native lands. He has sent hundreds of undocumented immigrants, the vast majority of whom had violated no other law than coming to the country without authorization, to prisons in places that are not their country of origin — including what could best be described as a gulag in El Salvador. In the fear and confusion that has ensued from these actions, criminals pretending to be Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents are exploiting the chaos to attack vulnerable communities. And so Californians — and increasingly people across the nation — have taken to the streets in protest. The Constitution and the moral imperative are on their side. In response, Trump has sent thousands of federalized National Guard troops and 700 Marines to the streets of Los Angeles in a clear act of intimidation — claiming an insurrection, but notably not invoking the Insurrection Act statue that would give him the legal authority (and the checks and balances that come with it) to mobilize troops. When U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla of California attempted to publicly question Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem about these excesses and injustices, he was shoved and handcuffed by federal agents. It's a perilous time for American democracy. The threat of a descent into unchecked authoritarianism is real. Protestors are correct in their assessment that silence in the face of such tyranny is unacceptable. But as citizens of conscience take to the streets — particularly in California, where the undocumented migrant population is bearing the brunt of our nation's political war — there is something important they should keep in mind: Donald Trump is losing. In recent months, courts have shot down any number of his executive orders, along with his targeting of international students with legal residence. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ruled on Thursday that Trump's federalization and deployment of California National Guard troops was 'illegal — both exceeding the scope of his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.' The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco will consider an appeal of Breyer's ruling on Tuesday. Beyond the legal realm, Trump's economic policies are floundering. His 'big, beautiful' budget is in disarray after an embarrassing public fallout with the world's richest man. His tariff negotiations have gone nowhere. His foreign policy bluster has resulted in heightened global instability. The American people are beginning to widely see Trump for what he is: a failure Only 38% of registered voters approve of his performance, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released on Wednesday. And on immigration, 57% disapprove of his policies. Perhaps recognizing the turning tide, Trump has wobbled on many of his more aggressive stances. After calling for an all-out ban on Chinese students, he suggested this week that he would actually like 500,000 to come to the United States. He further said he had changed his views on migrant farm workers. 'You go into a farm and you look at people — they've been there for 20, 25 years, and they've worked great, and the owner of the farm loves them, and everything else and then you're supposed to throw them out,' Trump said Thursday at the White House. He ultimately backed down from these positions. But the flip-flopping shows his weakness — and the reality that better federal immigration policy, not crackdowns, are needed if we want to better meet the country's workforce needs. The question now for Californians is how to keep the pressure on Trump and defend the rights of immigrants without turning against one another or giving the Trump administration the kind of public spectacle it craves. While Trump is weak, he remains a master manipulator. He has already tried to leverage scenes of carnage stemming from a handful of bad actors at the protests in Los Angeles. California cannot afford to give him more fodder. That danger runs particularly high in Los Angeles, where Trump's federalized troops add an element of unpredictability. 'It's like bringing in a new player to a game and not giving them the playbook,' former Houston police chief and crowd control expert Art Acevedo told the editorial board. 'It's counterproductive. It's theater. And it's not operationally sound.' Acevedo, who drew nationwide praise for his handling of the 2020 protests in George Floyd's native Houston in the wake of his murder by police, said that the best way to protect the public's First Amendment rights is through local organization and communication. Here in San Francisco, Mayor Daniel Lurie has been criticized for his reluctance to even say Trump's name in public. But San Francisco doesn't need him to make fiery speeches. What it needs, Acevedo said, is for officials and the police department to keep lines of communication open with activists and protest leaders and to signal their compassion. San Franciscans are more than capable of speaking for their city. They need to trust that they will be safely empowered to do so. That does not preclude the necessity of weeding out bad actors. Trump is weak. With the discipline to maintain the moral high ground, he can be defeated. As Michael Ansara, who as a student helped organize the March on Washington in 1965, concluded in a recent op-ed: Protesting against Trump is good. Organizing against him is better.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store