logo
Mariners win first A-League Women's title in dramatic grand final

Mariners win first A-League Women's title in dramatic grand final

Yahoo18-05-2025

Central Coast Mariners' Sarah Rowe (L) and Melbourne Victory's Claudia Bunge tussle for the ball during the women's A-League football grand final (William WEST)
Underdog Central Coast Mariners claimed their first A-League Women's title on Sunday after prevailing 5-4 in a penalty shootout over Melbourne Victory at AAMI Park.
Scores were deadlocked at 1-1 following regulation and extra time, forcing the first penalty shootout in the competition's grand final history.
Advertisement
Victory's Alana Jancevski hit the crossbar on the first kick before the Mariners calmly nailed five in a row to trigger scenes of jubilation.
"We were very lucky to win and they were unlucky to lose," Mariners goalkeeper Sarah Langman said.
"We were ready (for the penalty shootout) and knew we could do it."
Showing no nerves in their maiden grand final appearance, Mariners defied the partisan crowd with Matildas squad member Isabel Gomez breaking the deadlock in the 46th minute.
Victory were forced into attack mode in a bid to become the first team since Sydney FC in 2009 to come from behind and win a grand final.
Advertisement
After waves of attack, Victory were finally rewarded when New Zealand international Claudia Bunge headed the ball past Langman in the 80th minute.
For just the second time in the competition's history, the grand final went into extra time but neither team could break the deadlock.
Mariners' triumph was a remarkable comeback for the A-League Women's smallest club after they were kicked out of the competition in 2010 due to a lack of funding before making a celebrated return two years ago.
During a regular season where they finished fourth, Mariners showcased tactical discipline under Emily Husband, one of only two women coaches in the 12-team league.
Advertisement
They entered the final on the back of a major semi-final upset to end Melbourne City's hopes of a trophy treble.
It's been a fruitful period for the franchise with the Mariners men's team having claimed back-to-back titles.
The men's A-League grand final will be held on May 31.
tl/mtp

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Athletes express concern over NCAA settlement's impact on non-revenue sports
Athletes express concern over NCAA settlement's impact on non-revenue sports

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Athletes express concern over NCAA settlement's impact on non-revenue sports

Sydney Moore and Sabrina Ootsburg were surrounded by hundreds of college athletes at AthleteCon when news broke that the $2.8 billion NCAA settlement had been approved by a federal judge. In a room full of college athletes, they felt like the only two people who understood the gravity of the situation. 'I'm about to get paid,' Moore said a Division I football player told her. Advertisement 'Yes, you are about to get paid, and a lot of your women athlete friends are about to get cut,' she responded. Moore acknowledged that her response might be a stretch, but the sprawling House settlement clears the way for college athletes to get a share of revenue directly from their schools and provides a lucky few a shot at long-term financial stability, it raises genuine concerns for others. Schools that opt int will be able to share up to $20.5 million with their athletes over the next year starting July 1. The majority is expected to be spent on high-revenue generating sports, with most projections estimating 75% of funds will go toward football. So what happens to the non-revenue-generating sports which, outside of football and basketball, is pretty much all of them? Advertisement It's a query that's top of mind for Ootsburg as she enters her senior year at Belmont, where she competes on track and field team. 'My initial thought was, is this good or bad? What does this mean for me? How does this affect me? But more importantly, in the bigger picture, how does it affect athletes as a whole?' Ootsburg said. 'You look at the numbers where it says most of the revenue, up to 75% to 85%, will go toward football players. You understand it's coming from the TV deals, but then it's like, how does that affect you on the back end?' Ootsburg asked. 'Let's say 800k goes toward other athletes. Will they be able to afford other things like care, facilities, resources or even just snacks?' Moore has similar concerns. She says most female athletes aren't worried about how much – if any – money they'll receive. They fear how changes could impact the student-athlete experience. Advertisement 'A lot of us would much rather know that our resources and our experience as a student-athlete is going to stay the same, or possibly get better, rather than be given 3,000 dollars, but now I have to cover my meals, I have to pay for my insurance, I have to buy ankle braces because we don't have any, and the athletic training room isn't stocked,' Moore said over the weekend as news of Friday night's settlement approval spread. One of the biggest problems, Ootsburg and Moore said, is that athletes aren't familiar with the changes. At AthleteCon in Charlotte, North Carolina, they said, perhaps the biggest change in college sports history was a push notification generally shrugged off by those directly impacted. 'Athletes do not know what's happening,' Ootsburg said. 'Talking to my teammates, it's so new, and they see the headlines and they're like, 'Ok, cool, but is someone going to explain this?' because they can read it, but then there's so many underlying factors that go into this. This is a complex problem that you have to understand the nuances behind, and not every athlete truly does.' Some coaches, too, are still trying to understand what's coming. Advertisement Mike White, coach of the national champion Texas softball team, called it 'the great unknown right now.' 'My athletic director, Chris Del Conte, said it's like sailing out on a flat world and coming off the edge; we just don't know what's going to be out there yet, especially the way the landscape is changing,' he said at the Women's College World Series in Oklahoma City. 'Who knows what it's going to be?' What about the walk-ons? Jake Rimmel got a crash course on the settlement in the fall of 2024, when he said he was cut from the Virginia Tech cross-country team alongside several other walk-ons. The topic held up the House case for weeks as the judge basically forced schools to give athletes cut in anticipation of approval a chance to play — they have to earn the spot, no guarantees — without counting against roster limits. Advertisement Rimmel packed up and moved back to his parents' house in Purcellville, Virginia. For the past six months, he's held on to a glimmer of hope that maybe he could return. 'The past six months have been very tough," he said. "I've felt so alone through this, even though I wasn't. I just felt like the whole world was out there – I would see teammates of mine and other people I knew just doing all of these things and still being part of a team. I felt like I was sidelined and on pause, while they're continuing to do all these things.' News that the settlement had been approved sent Rimmel looking for details. 'I didn't see much about roster limits," he said. 'Everyone wants to talk about NIL and the revenue-sharing and I mean, that's definitely a big piece of it, but I just didn't see anything about the roster limits, and that's obviously my biggest concern.' Advertisement The answer only presents more questions for Rimmel. 'We were hoping for more of a forced decision with the grandfathering, which now it's only voluntary, so I'm a little skeptical of things because I have zero clue how schools are going to react to that," Rimmel told The Associated Press. Rimmel is still deciding what's best for him, but echoed Moore and Ootsburg in saying that answers are not obvious: 'I'm just hoping the schools can make the right decisions with things and have the best interest of the people who were cut.' ___ AP Sports Writer Cliff Brunt contributed. ___ AP college sports: Maura Carey, The Associated Press

How to Watch Sinner vs Alcaraz on a Free Channel: Live Stream French Open Final
How to Watch Sinner vs Alcaraz on a Free Channel: Live Stream French Open Final

Gizmodo

timean hour ago

  • Gizmodo

How to Watch Sinner vs Alcaraz on a Free Channel: Live Stream French Open Final

Sinner faced one of the toughest challenges in this year's French Open — defeating Djokovic — and his victory was nothing short of spectacular. Now, all eyes are on the highly anticipated Sinner vs Alcaraz showdown, which promises to be a fierce and unforgettable French Open final. If you're having trouble finding a stream, we've got you covered. You can watch Sinner vs Alcaraz live on a free channel — no subscription or fees required. Forget overpriced streaming services, there's a better way. Stream Sinner vs Alcaraz online for free on 9Now. All the details are just below. Date and time Sunday, June 8, at 3:00 PM CET / 9:00 AM ET / 6:00 AM PT Free Channels Broadcasting the Match 9now (Australia), France TV (France), RTBF (Belgium) Stream the match live from anywhere with NordVPN Where to watch Sinner vs Alcaraz Live for Free: 9now Okay, so 9Now is the place you so desperately seek. It's an Australian channel, or more precisely, a video-on-demand service. As a Nine Network property, it allows you to watch all of its channels online. Gem, the channel that streams Sinner vs Alcaraz online, is available on 9Now, as well. Since we're discussing Australian TV channels, you'll be able to enjoy the match with English commentary and in Full HD. Watch Sinner vs Alcaraz With NordVPN 9Now requires each user to register an account, however. This shouldn't be an issue, as the channel doesn't need a subscription, and an account is free. There's a catch; 9Now works exclusively in Australia. Users abroad will face a geo-restriction message and be unable to watch the duel. This can be countered with a VPN service, which many people have reported working flawlessly in all locations outside Australia. Accessing 9Now from Anywhere: All You Need to Know To stream 9Now and its channels internationally, people often rely on NordVPN. NordVPN is a logical choice given its popularity. It's like Apple in the VPN world. The provider features hundreds of Australian VPN servers. People often use them to get an Australian IP address and access Australian services on their vacation or business trips. NordVPN allows you to connect with a single click or tap, making it ideal for beginners. It's also compatible with all devices, allowing people to access 9Now even on their phone, tablet, or laptop. With unlimited bandwidth and range-topping speeds, it will enable people to watch Sinner vs Alcaraz for free without hiccups. Additionally, NordVPN is also used for streaming the French Open on free channels like this one. Although this VPN isn't free, it offers a 30-day money-back guarantee, letting you request a refund if you're not satisfied. You can get NordVPN, use it to watch Sinner vs Alcaraz online for free, and immediately be reimbursed, with the excuse that you don't need it anymore. More details are available in our article explaining how to try NordVPN risk-free. Alternatively, you can keep using it for other VPN-related benefits. Try NordVPN risk-free today

Flawless Feeney too fast with Perth back-to-back wins
Flawless Feeney too fast with Perth back-to-back wins

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Flawless Feeney too fast with Perth back-to-back wins

Supercars championship leader Broc Feeney will leave Perth with a pair of victories after a near-flawless display in the final sprint race. Triple Eight ace Feeney survived late drama as he led from start to finish across the 83-lap, 200km race at Wanneroo Raceway on Sunday. It was the 22-year-old's fifth win of the season, adding to his haul of six poles and eight podiums. A safety car with 20 laps remaining threatened to cause chaos for Feeney. The first yellow flag of the weekend was brought out when Erebus rookie Cooper Murray came to a halt on the way to turn six after a suspected mechanical failure. It set up a re-staging of Feeney's showdown with Matt Payne in Tasmania, where the Grove Racing driver won by just 0.0550 seconds. Feeney was unwilling to lose to Payne again and he flaunted blistering pace to win by 0.5671 seconds. "To have the race like we did there, it was pretty - I shouldn't say smooth sailing - but a lot less stressful than it was at the end of the race," Feeney said. Triple Eight team principal Jamie Whincup couldn't say the same. "I was having deja vu, it's going to happen again," Whincup said. "I was just out front yelling ... I was having nightmares." James Courtney was the biggest beneficiary of the yellow flag, crossing the line third after qualifying 13th. It was a surprise podium for one-time Supercars champion Courtney, whose best result this year in the Blanchard Racing Team car was ninth in Tasmania. It is also Blanchard Racing's maiden podium since the team's entry in 2021. "I got so emotional," Courtney said. "It was me crying for a third." Tickford star Cam Waters was unlucky to finish fourth after starting in the first row with Feeney. Ryan Wood, after breaking through for an emotional maiden Supercars win the day before, had been as high as second before being ruled out of the race after a tangle with James Golding. PremiAir Nulon Racing's Golding had run wide at turn one with eight laps to go, allowing Wood to move into fifth. But Golding was determined to regain his spot and ended up running both cars off when they collided side-on. Golding, who finished 22nd, was slapped with a drive-through penalty for the incident. MASSIVE DRAMA IN THE RACE FOR THE SPRINT CUP!GOLDING AND WOOD FIND EACH OTHER AND RUN EACH OTHER OFF THE ROAD.#RepcoSC #Supercars — Supercars (@supercars) June 8, 2025 Reigning champion Will Brown was fifth after another hairy moment with Golding early in the race. Golding had been fourth and assertively defending his position when the nose of Brown's Triple Eight car hit his right rear and sent him wide at turn seven. Meanwhile, Wood's teammate Chaz Mostert was sixth after qualifying in 14th. Local product Brodie Kostecki was 11th after his hopes of a home victory were dashed when a poor qualifying effort condemned him to 15th. Cam Hill, after qualifying seventh, endured a nightmare start when his Matt Stone Racing car stalled at lights out. Suffering a battery issue, his car had to be towed back to pit lane. Hill was able to join the race and finished last. RACE 16 RESULTS: 1. Broc Feeney (Triple Eight Race Engineering) 2. Matt Payne (Grove Racing) 3. James Courtney (Blanchard Racing Team) 4. Cam Waters (Tickford Racing) 5. Will Brown (Triple Eight) CHAMPIONSHIP STANDINGS: 1. Broc Feeney (Triple Eight) 2. Will Brown (Triple Eight) 3. Matt Payne (Grove) 4. Cam Waters (Tickford) 5. Chaz Mostert (WAU)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store