
Protesters rally against Rep. Bresnahan's 'Big Beautiful Bill' vote
May 27—FORTY FORT — Frustrated constituents of U.S. Rep. Rob Bresnahan gathered outside of his 900 Rutter Avenue office in Luzerne County to protest the freshman congressman's vote in favor of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which will almost certainly result in cuts to Medicaid should it become law.
The budget reconciliation bill was passed by a razor-thin 215-214-1 vote in the House of Representatives on May 22.
"Rob Bresnahan promised that he wouldn't support policies that hurt working families, and he said numerous times that he wouldn't support cuts to Medicaid," said protest organizer Megan Kocher. "This reconciliation package is going to cut over $600 billion for Medicaid. I've met with his staff, and I'm just really upset that he lied to us so many times."
The exact financial impact on Medicaid as a result of the bill's potential passage is still undefined, though the cuts to both that program and others, such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), are expected by numerous sources to be devastating. The bill will next be voted on by the U.S. Senate, where Republicans hold a 53-47 advantage over the Democrats and two Independents who caucus with the Democrats.
The effects of the bill will be felt by many in the 8th congressional district, which includes all of Lackawanna, Pike and Wayne counties, as well as large swaths of Luzerne and Monroe counties. Some of those who are fearing the consequences were in attendance at Tuesday's protest.
"I have two autoimmune conditions that [make] it very difficult to wake up and do basic things everyday," said Susan Yugovsky. "Being here is very difficult for me. ... I had to rally, because it's that ... important."
To emphasize her concern over Medicaid's impending changes, Yugovsky told the protesting crowd the specifics of her health care story.
"Medicaid is saving my life," Yugovsky declared. "Previously, I worked for a health insurance company in collections. I still cannot afford to use their health insurance. The deductible was $2,500 — that had to be paid up front. I could not do that. When Obamacare was expanded in our state, I was finally able to get Medicaid and treatment for my health conditions."
Brenna Rabinowitz, another protester, was thinking of her three children, all of whom were adopted from foster care.
"They're all considered special needs. They all have different neurodivergent diagnoses, developmental delays and trauma resulting from their background," Rabinowitz said of her children. "They all receive services through Medicaid that cost more than our family makes in a year, and those services have changed the trajectory of their lives."
Rabinowitz said that her oldest child, who is about to turn 7, has been able to overcome the aforementioned health issues thanks to the services provided by Medicaid.
"Everyone deserves what they need, and Rob Bresnahan pretends that he understands that," Rabinowitz stated, before citing a letter that Bresnahan and 11 other Republicans co-authored, which read:
"We acknowledge that we must reform Medicaid so that it is a strong and long-lasting program for years to come... However, we cannot and will not support a final reconciliation bill that includes any reduction in Medicaid coverage for vulnerable populations."
The full letter was included in a press release from Bresnahan's office on April 17.
"He turns around and votes for cuts to Medicaid every chance he gets. He's a liar and a coward and he needs to go," Rabinowitz said of Bresnahan.
Kocher, who ran unsuccessfully for the 119th District seat in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives in 2024, encouraged protesters to participate in rallying chants, make signs and call Bresnahan's office one at a time to make their voices heard.
Bresnahan's two Pennsylvania congressional neighbors — Republicans Ryan Mackenzie of the 7th District and Dan Meuser of the 9th District — also voted in favor of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
"I'm just grateful to see that they're also being met with protests, and that they're going to be held accountable by their constituents," Kocher said, referring to the representatives in Pennsylvania who joined Bresnahan in supporting the reconciliation bill.
The Medicaid cuts are personal for Kocher. She said that she was on Medicaid as a child.
"Medicaid will be cut," Kocher asserted, "and people will die because of this vote."
Bresnahan team statements
In a response to Tuesday's protest, Bresnahan's office released the following statement:
"Congressman Bresnahan works every day to do all he can to improve the lives of Northeastern Pennsylvanians. That means voting for legislation that secures our borders, maintains tax cuts for working-class families, provides tax relief to service industry and overtime workers, takes care of seniors and protects social safety net programs for those who rely on them most.
"Rep. Bresnahan said from the beginning he would not support something that 'guts the benefits my neighbors rely on,' and he stayed true to that promise. No American citizen who legally receives Medicaid will lose their benefits.
"While Rep. Bresnahan thanks these constituents for making their voices heard, he encourages them to stop listening to left-wing lies. Any constituents with questions on how the legislation impacts them can contact our office."
In addition, Bresnahan's Communications Director Hannah Pope responded to the protesters' concerns with the following statement:
"The individuals mentioned who are concerned about their Medicaid benefits are not going to lose their coverage, nor will they be held to the work requirement. Specifically, those with disabilities, those caring for dependents or disabled individuals, students, disabled veterans, pregnant women and others are exempt from any work requirements. Every American citizen who is eligible for Medicaid will continue to receive those benefits, and this is something Rep. Bresnahan was adamant on ensuring from day one."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
28 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Castro to seek reelection to state Senate rather than make U.S. House bid
State Sen. Cristina Castro, D-Elgin, has announced she will seek reelection to her District 22 post rather than make a bid next year for the Congressional seat being vacated by U.S. Rep. Raja Krisnamoorthi. 'When I first entered public service, it was with a singular goal: to deliver for my community and make life better for the people of the 22nd District, who I've been lucky to call my neighbors for my entire life,' Castro said in a news release. 'Over the past eight years as state senator, I'm proud to have stayed true to that mission — delivering real results and championing the working families of my district. As I think about the future and how I can continue to make the biggest impact, that goal remains my North Star.' In addition to Elgin, Castro's district encompasses all or part of 10 communities in Cook and Kane counties. Her statement came the same week that state Rep. Anna Moeller, D-Elgin, also announced she also would seek reelection to the House instead of making a bid for Congress. Krishnamoorthi, who represents the 8th District in the U.S. House, has announced plans to run in the primary for the seat currently held by U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin, who plans to retire. Both he and Durbin are Democrats, as are two other candidates who have announced they're running for the job: Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton and U.S. Rep. Robin Kelly, D-Matteson. Castro, elected to the state Senate in 2016, is the majority caucus whip for the 103rd General Assembly, chair of the Senate Executive Committee, and a member of the Latino Caucus, according to her website biography. She serves on the Appropriations, Energy and Public Utilities, Insurance, Labor and Revenue committees. Prior to being elected to the state Senate, she served on the Kane County Board from 2008 to 2016. Castro holds an associate degree from Elgin Community College and bachelor's and master's degree in business administration from Northern Illinois University.


Newsweek
33 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Responds To Elon Musk's Comments About A 'New Political Party'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump weighed in Friday on billionaire Elon Musk's threat to form a new political party to challenge Democrats and Republicans. The Context Trump and Musk had a high-profile alliance during the 2024 campaign and during the first few months of Trump's second term, with Musk spending millions of dollars to help Trump get elected in November and Trump later tapping him to lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But their relationship has devolved in the last several days, as Musk excoriated the Trump-backed "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" as "outrageous" and "pork-filled," adding that it's a "disgusting abomination." Trump hit back at his onetime close ally, saying Musk has gone "crazy," accusing him of having "Trump derangement syndrome" and threatening the cancel government contracts with Musk's companies. What To Know The SpaceX CEO on Thursday floated the idea of forming a "new political party in America that "actually represents the 80% in the middle." Fox News reported on Friday that Trump responded to Musk's comments in a phone call with Fox News host Bret Baier, saying he's not worried about the threat. "Trump is not interested in talking to Elon," Fox News host and Trump's former press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said on the network while summarizing the phone call. "Trump is not worried about threats of a third party ... President Trump also pointed to his favorable polls and his strong support among Capitol Hill Republicans." Fox is reporting that Bret Baier just spoke with Trump and Trump said he is not interested in speaking with Elon Musk. Trump also said: Elon Musk has totally lost it — Acyn (@Acyn) June 6, 2025 The White House confirmed Friday that Trump has no plans to contact Musk. Trump also plans to sell the Tesla he bought earlier this year, which was once showcased on the White House lawn as a symbol of the president's alignment with Musk. This story is developing and will be updated as more information becomes available.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Scapegoating entire nations.' Trump's travel ban hurts innocent Columbus families
Farxaan Jeyte is a seasoned political strategist, entrepreneur and advocate with over 20 years of experience in U.S. presidential, gubernatorial and Senate campaigns. He is active in U.S.–Africa policy and supports minority-owned businesses through his work in trade, governance and grassroots advocacy. Donald Trump's administration argues that banning citizens of 12 countries — Somalia included — from entering the United States will fill gaps in foreign vetting and prevent dangerous individuals from slipping through. The move came after an Egyptian national was arrested on charges that he firebombed a pro-Israel rally in Boulder, Colorado. Trump said the attack 'underscored the extreme dangers posed by foreign nationals who are not properly vetted.' White House officials call the move 'commonsense' and say it targets countries with weak screening and high visa overstay rates to 'protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors.' Yet for all the focus on security, the human costs of a blanket ban are impossible to ignore. The policy casts a wide net, halting travel for entire populations because of the actions of a few. It sweeps up people who pose no threat: students, grandparents and refugees. More: Habiba Soliman wanted to be a doctor. Then, her father firebombed Jewish marchers in Boulder Punishing whole nations for the crimes of individuals also raises basic fairness issues. Notably, the Boulder suspect's country of origin, Egypt, isn't even on the ban list, calling into question how effective banning other countries really is. From the administration's view, the Boulder attack was a wake-up call revealing flaws in the immigration system. Officials note the suspect was an Egyptian visitor who overstayed his visa — a failure of enforcement they cite as proof of lax vetting. Supporters of the ban point out that many listed nations are unstable, potentially allowing extremists to slip through. By halting entry from countries such as Afghanistan, Yemen and Somalia — all grappling with terrorism — the administration contends it is closing dangerous loopholes to prevent another tragedy. Critics argue the collateral damage — broken families and lost trust — far outweighs any security benefit. Human rights groups have decried the renewed policy as 'discriminatory' and cruel, saying it 'sows division and vilifies communities' seeking safety. The consequences for innocent families will be devastating. Ohio has roughly 60,000 Somali-American residents in the Columbus area. This vibrant community has contributed enormously — immigrants from Somalia have opened hundreds of local businesses and enriched the city's culture. More: 'Nobody told us about the neighborhood': Somali Americans experiences with youth violence A ban on Somalia strikes at the heart of these families. Grandparents may miss the birth of a grandchild, and students could see siblings barred from graduations. In Columbus, conversations are filled with concern for relatives stranded abroad. People who once fled terror and found refuge in America now worry they're seen as threats. It's a painful irony that has left many feeling alienated in the only country they call home. Trump's 2017 travel ban on Muslim-majority countries like Somalia caused chaos at airports and tore families apart — a history now poised to repeat. One Somali refugee in Ohio was separated from his wife and children for nearly seven years due to that ban. We can protect America without scapegoating entire nations. Rather than broad bans, officials should pursue targeted, intelligence-based measures — stronger background checks, better visa enforcement and vetting individuals based on real red flags, not blanket nationality. U.S. agencies are capable of pinpointing threats without closing the door on innocent travelers. Blanket travel bans offer a false sense of security while breeding resentment. A wiser approach balances vigilance with fairness, preserving goodwill with immigrant communities. Somali-Americans have proven their commitment to this country and should be treated as partners in safety, not suspects. Focusing on genuine threats — instead of scapegoating entire populations — is more just and more effective at keeping America safe. Farxaan Jeyte is a seasoned political strategist, entrepreneur and advocate with over 20 years of experience in U.S. presidential, gubernatorial and Senate campaigns. He is active in U.S.–Africa policy and supports minority-owned businesses through his work in trade, governance and grassroots advocacy. This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: Trump's travel ban lists countries with strong Ohio ties | Opinion