logo
Tesla's robotaxi will compete with Waymo in Austin. Here's how the two companies compare.

Tesla's robotaxi will compete with Waymo in Austin. Here's how the two companies compare.

In June, Tesla is set to roll out its robotaxi service in Austin, going bumper to bumper with Waymo.
Austin is the first city where Tesla plans to test its tech with consumers. Alphabet-backed Waymo launched its robotaxi service in the city in March after already rolling out the service in three other cities over the past five years.
Ahead of the launch, Elon Musk has taken several digs at Waymo, including joking during the carmaker's earnings call earlier this month that Waymo costs "'way mo' money."
"I don't see anyone being able to compete with Tesla at present," Musk said.
Meanwhile, Waymo's former CEO, John Krafcik, accused Tesla of being all talk and no action.
"Although Tesla hopes to compete with Waymo someday, they've failed utterly and completely at this for each of the 10 years they've been talking about it," he said in an emailed statement to Business Insider.
Tesla's Austin launch will mark a crucial chapter in a yearslong debate over the best self-driving training methods and whether success will come from Tesla's big swings or Waymo's gradual deployment.
Take a look at how Tesla and Waymo compare when it comes to autonomous driving technology.
Tesla did not respond to a request for comment. A Waymo spokesperson referred BI to previous blog posts on the company's early rides and continued testing in cities across the US.
Training
Tesla and Waymo have taken radically different approaches to training their AI systems for self-driving. Tesla has relied on a vision-based approach that uses a suite of eight cameras and minimal reliance on external sensors.
Musk has said that Tesla began removing lidar sensors from its test vehicles in 2021, calling the technology an expensive "crutch." The carmaker has a lidar- and radar-equipped vehicle called the Ground Truth Machine that it uses for training purposes, but only for edge cases of rare or unusual driving scenarios, BI previously reported.
Waymo's Jaguar I-PACE robotaxis are outfitted with five lidar sensors, six radars, and 29 cameras that help its AI software navigate its environment, a company spokesperson said. The company says its next-generation Waymo Driver will have a reduced and cheaper sensor suite.
Before Waymo robotaxis are deployed for public rides, Waymo uses safety drivers to map out a city like San Francisco or Tokyo, creating highly detailed maps.
Autonomy level
The Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) ranks self-driving vehicles on a scale from zero to five — five being the holy grail of autonomous driving in which a driverless vehicle can go anywhere under any environmental conditions, according to SAE. Tesla has said it operates as a Level 2 vehicle, meaning that it operates as a driver-assist software with a human driver still behind the wheel.
In California, where Tesla does much of its in-house testing, the carmaker is required to secure a permit for Level 3 and above testing. Tesla has not reported using the permit, which allows the self-driving software to operate with a safety driver but even more autonomy, since 2019. The company told the California DMV in December that it was currently operating as a Level 2 vehicle in the state, according to documents viewed by BI.
Waymo, along with Zoox and Nuro, is one of the few companies that has deployed Level 4 autonomous driving in the real world, which means the vehicle does not require a driver behind the wheel and is fully autonomous.
Waymo robotaxis have limitations. The vehicles cannot travel beyond areas programmed into their system, and the company hasn't yet offered robotaxi service in cities that experience more extreme weather, such as snow. A Waymo spokesperson said the company has invested in weather testing.
Business models
Tesla has a more consumer-focused business model. The company sells beta versions of its Full Self-Driving software for $8,000, or $99 a month. The software requires a licensed driver to supervise the vehicle, but it can switch lanes, recognize stop lights, and enter and exit highways.
While the company is also working on building up a commercial robotaxi fleet, Musk has said Tesla owners will one day be able to rent out their cars as a self-driving service, akin to Uber or Airbnb.
Waymo's business is primarily focused on delivering an autonomous rideshare service through Waymo One or through its partnership with rideshare platforms such as Uber.
Unlike Tesla, Waymo does not manufacture cars in-house and instead relies on partnerships with OEMs to build out its robotaxi fleet, partnering with Jaguar, Chrysler, Hyundai, and Toyota.
Waymo has signaled interest in bringing its autonomous technology to personally owned vehicles. On April 29, Waymo revealed that it was in early talks with Toyota to explore bringing autonomy to consumer cars.
Geographic deployment
Tesla has said it aims to roll out the service in Austin in June and in other US cities within the year. The company is still getting regulatory approval in California, but has several in-house test drivers operating in cities across the country, including Phoenix, Dallas, New York, and Miami.
During the carmaker's earnings call in April, Musk said that Tesla owners would be able to drive their vehicles autonomously within the year. Musk has said that Tesla will eventually deploy its services globally.
Waymo has chosen to gradually roll out its service in select cities. As of April, Waymo's robotaxis are offering fully driverless rides to the public in limited parts of the San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles, Phoenix, and Austin.
The company is currently testing in Atlanta, Washington, DC, Las Vegas, Miami, San Diego, and Tokyo.
Miles driven autonomously
It's difficult to compare Tesla and Waymo's mileage reports.
Tesla has not released any information on how often humans need to take control of its self-driving systems or how many miles its cars have driven without intervention. In its most recent earnings report, the company said users of its beta FSD software have driven a cumulative 3.6 billion miles. The company also released an update in April that Tesla engineers had driven about 15,000 miles using an internal version of its robotaxi app.
Waymo has said that its robotaxis have traveled 56.7 million miles as of January, miles driven without human supervision. The company said it provides over 250,000 rides a week as of April.
Cost of a robotaxi ride
Tesla has not said how much the service will cost, but has said the price will be comparable to booking an Uber. Right now, Tesla owners pay a $8,000 flat fee or $99 a month to use the beta version of FSD.
As with Uber and Lyft, Waymo's price can vary depending on the city and demand.
One study conducted last year by Evercore ISI of 1,000 trips offered by Waymo, Uber, and Lyft found that Waymo's price point had essentially reached parity with existing rideshare platforms by the fourth quarter of 2024.
While Waymo was more expensive at about $24 per ride in mid-2024, Waymo's average fare dropped nearly 10% to around $22 by the end of 2024.
This brought Waymo in line with traditional rideshare options, with UberX at about $21 and Lyft at roughly $22 during the same period. The analysts noted that the Uber and Lyft prices didn't include driver tips, unlike the all-inclusive Waymo fare.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Here's How Much It Costs To Maintain a Tesla vs Other Electric Vehicles
Here's How Much It Costs To Maintain a Tesla vs Other Electric Vehicles

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Here's How Much It Costs To Maintain a Tesla vs Other Electric Vehicles

Teslas and other EVs don't need oil changes, but that doesn't mean they're maintenance-free. And when service is needed, the costs still add up. Learn More: Try This: So, how do Tesla's long-term maintenance costs compare to those of other electric vehicles? Let's take a closer look at what you can expect. When it comes to maintenance, EVs and combustion engines have some similarities. According to CarEdge, they both require: Tire monitoring and replacement Battery replacement HVAC maintenance Brake maintenance Cabin air filter replacement But there are also key differences. EVs don't require oil changes, timing belts, radiator fluids or fuel filters. There are fewer moving parts, which means there's less of a chance of mechanical failure, and brakes wear more slowly due to regenerative braking. Trending Now: On the other hand, tires wear out more quickly, and battery or motor work will need to be done at the automaker's service center. EV maintenance can vary depending on the brand, model, how you drive and even where you live. Tesla notes that aggressive driving can wear down tires faster and put more strain on the brakes. If you live in an area with rough roads or colder weather, you might see more frequent maintenance needs. And if service centers are limited in your area, that can drive up both wait times and costs. According to Consumer Reports and CarEdge, Tesla has the lowest maintenance costs over a 10-year period compared to other major car brands, with an estimated average of $5,050. Here are CarEdge's estimated 10-year maintenance costs for different Tesla models: Tesla Model 3: $3,257 Tesla Model S: $3,974 Tesla Model Y: $3,994 Tesla Model X: $4,847 Tesla Cybertruck: $5,359 However, there are other brands and models with similar maintenance costs. According to CarEdge, the estimated 10-year maintenance cost for the Toyota Mirai is $3,222 — slightly lower than the Tesla Model 3. Here is the complete list of EVs, besides Tesla, and their estimated 10-year maintenance costs: Toyota Mirai: $3,222 Nissan LEAF: $3,236 Toyota bZ4X: $3,496 FIAT 500e: $3,549 Hyundai IONIQ 6: $3,930 Honda Prologue: $4,600 Nissan ARIYA: $4,671 Hyundai Kona Electric: $4,727 Volkswagen ID.4: $4,811 Subaru Solterra: $4,825 Kia EV6: $5,029 Hyundai IONIQ 5: $5,043 Chevrolet Equinox EV: $5,096 Volkswagen ID. Buzz: $5,102 Hyundai IONIQ 5 N: $5,265 Kia EV9: $5,285 Ford Mustang Mach-E: $5,331 Chevrolet Blazer EV: $5,403 GMC HUMMER EV SUV: $5,821 GMC HUMMER EV Pickup: $6,384 GMC Sierra EV: $6,253 Ford F-150 Lightning: $6,574 Chevrolet Silverado EV: $6,653 Ford E-Transit-350 Cargo Van: $6,876 RAM ProMaster 3500 EV: $11,649 More From GOBankingRates 7 Things You'll Be Happy You Downsized in Retirement This article originally appeared on Here's How Much It Costs To Maintain a Tesla vs Other Electric Vehicles

What's Happening With Dogecoin?
What's Happening With Dogecoin?

Forbes

time43 minutes ago

  • Forbes

What's Happening With Dogecoin?

CANADA - 2025/02/23: In this photo illustration, the Dogecoin logo is seen displayed on a smartphone ... More screen. (Photo Illustration by Thomas Fuller/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images) Dogecoin (DOGE) has recently experienced a significant price decline, plummeting over 50% from its January 2025 highs of $0.40 to current levels around $0.18. This sharp downturn underscores the inherent volatility of the cryptocurrency market and highlights Dogecoin's particular susceptibility to external, often non-fundamental, influences. Separately, see – What's Better – Circle Stock or Bitcoin? And, if you are looking for upside with less volatility than individual stocks or cryptocurrencies, the Trefis High Quality portfolio offers an alternative, having outperformed the S&P 500 and delivering returns that exceed 91% since its launch. Dogecoin's price movements are largely driven by a unique interplay of factors that distinguish it from many other cryptocurrencies. Historically, prominent figures, most notably Elon Musk, have exerted immense influence over Dogecoin's price. His tweets and public statements have frequently triggered substantial price surges, establishing a direct correlation between his pronouncements and market performance. This phenomenon extends to other celebrities and viral social media moments, demonstrating the power of community-driven hype in the Dogecoin ecosystem. Also, Dogecoin's low individual unit price and its origin as a "meme coin" have made it attractive to a broad base of casual investors and first-time cryptocurrency buyers. While this accessibility contributes to its widespread popularity, it also creates a potentially unstable investor base, as these investors may be more prone to speculative trading and less concerned with underlying technological advancements or long-term utility. Like all cryptocurrencies, Dogecoin is subject to the broader trends and sentiment of the crypto market. Bearish market conditions or significant downturns in major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum can exert downward pressure on Dogecoin's price. But the current market tells a different story: Bitcoin is nearing its lifetime highs, whereas Dogecoin is nowhere close to its. A recent and significant development introducing substantial risk to Dogecoin's near-term prospects is the political fallout between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump. Musk's public criticism of Trump's fiscal policies has led to escalating tensions, with Trump reportedly threatening retaliation against Musk-affiliated companies. This political conflict is particularly concerning for Dogecoin due to Musk's established role as its primary celebrity endorser. His departure from Trump's advisory circle and the potential for policy repercussions against his business interests could significantly diminish his willingness or ability to publicly promote Dogecoin. The reliance on a single, influential individual for jumps in price creates a vulnerability, and any perceived withdrawal of that support can lead to a loss of investor confidence and further price depreciation. Dogecoin is currently trading around $0.18, reflecting a significant 50% decline from its January highs. This decline can be attributed to a combination of broader cryptocurrency market pressures and the specific, intensified risk stemming from its dependence on celebrity endorsement, particularly the unfolding Musk-Trump political conflict. The political rift represents a significant headwind that could further suppress Dogecoin's price performance and limit its recovery potential in the near future. Cryptos at large, including Dogecoin, remain a risky asset. As a long-term investment option, you can explore the Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio, which is rooted in quality that seeks reliability, predictability, and compounding growth. With a collection of 30 stocks, it has a track record of comfortably outperforming the S&P 500 over the last four-year period. Why is that? As a group, HQ Portfolio stocks provided better returns with less risk versus the benchmark index; less of a roller-coaster ride, as evident in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store