
Airlines must ink long-term deals on greener fuels to boost volumes: Bayer exec
MONTREAL, June 3 (Rtrs) - Airlines need to reach long-term agreements to buy bigger quantities of sustainable aviation fuel if they want to boost global volumes of the lower-emission fuel required for industry climate targets, a Bayer executive said on Tuesday.
Airline members of the International Air Transport Association are sticking to a target of net zero emissions by 2050 despite warnings that carriers will struggle to meet such sustainability goals due to low production of SAF, which is more expensive than conventional jet fuel. IATA, which wrapped up a summit in India on Tuesday, expects the amount of sustainable aviation fuel produced to double in 2025 to reach 2 million tonnes, representing 0.7% of airlines' fuel consumption.
While airlines have called for greater action by energy companies and other partners to boost SAF volumes, Matthias Berninger, a Bayer executive vice president and sustainability head, said in Montreal there needs to be more long-term purchases of the fuel, similar to some commitments in the renewable energy sector.
Bayer's Monsanto unit sells seeds and pesticides to farmers who produce crops for biomass-based feedstocks used to develop biofuels.
'If they (airlines) commit to buy a certain amount over a certain period of time, we can guarantee that farmers will grow it and processors will process it,' Berninger told Reuters on the sidelines of the International Civil Aviation Organization's aviation climate week. "And the question whether or not that supply meets the market (demand) depends on long-term purchasing contracts of the airline industry sending a very clear demand signal comparable to what we have in the renewable space.'
SAF can be produced from plants, used cooking oil or wastes, among other products.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE How Justin Bieber could end up with HALF of Hailey's $1B Rhode cosmetics sale if they divorce
Justin Bieber could be entitled to a major payday from his wife Hailey Bieber 's massively successful cosmetics company if they should ever divorce. The 28-year-old model's Rhode cosmetics company was sold late last month to E.L.F. Beauty for a reported $1 billion, and a source close to the couple recently told that her friends and family are worried that the 31-year-old pop star could try to take advantage of her windfall to help cover his reported millions in debt. That's because the couple reportedly never signed a prenuptial agreement to determine how to split their assets up in the event of a divorce. Divorce Attorney and Certified Family Law Specialist Stephanie Blum - who does not represent either spouse - tells that, should the couple divorce amid concern for their marriage, Justin could walk away with half of Hailey's earnings from selling Rhode because of the lack of a prenup. A spokesperson for Hailey declined to comment when contacted by and a rep for Justin has not yet responded. 'Since Hailey founded Rhode cosmetics during the marriage, the money she receives for the sale would be considered community property and thus a court would order the monies divided equally between them,' Blum explains. However, it could be complicated by 'the extent the money she receives for the sale is tied to her future work efforts,' in which case 'that money should go to her,' which Blum says could lead to a fight in court over how the money should be allocated. Bieber had his own massive sale in December 2022, when he sold off nearly 300 songs from his catalog dating up to late 2021, which earned him a reported $200 million from the buyer, Hipgnosis Songs Capital. However, in the event of a divorce, Hailey might not have the same rights to that sum that he would have to her newly acquired fortune. According to Blum, 'If Justin's song catalog consists of songs written and recorded prior to marriage, the money he receives from selling off that song catalog would be considered his separate property.' However, that assumes that he kept those earnings separate. If he 'mixed it up with monies earned by the parties during marriage, there could definitely be some fights about how the money should be divided,' she says. Blum also notes that it is 'not common for people of Justin and Hailey's wealth and prominence to not have a prenuptial agreement.' People in similar situations can usually count on 'business managers and lawyers' to council them to get a prenup. Technically, Hailey's deal to sell Rhode is only for $800 million, but an extra payment of $200 million is on the table depending on how well the brand performs in the next three years after being acquired by E.L.F. Beauty But she might not receive anything from his $200M sale of his songs. 'If Justin's song catalog consists of songs written and recorded prior to marriage, the money he receives from selling off that song catalog would be considered his separate property,' Blum says That could upend the dynamic in the couple's wealth, as Justin may now be worth less than his wife. According to Celebrity Net Worth, the hitmaker is worth around $200 million, and Forbes reported that he was worth around $83.5 million in 2017, before the sale of rights to some songs. 'Without a prenuptial agreement, the lesser earning spouse is potentially advantaged if they get divorced, but of course no one has a crystal ball when they get married so it can be hard to tell which one of the spouses that will be!' Blum warns. 'Probably when they got married, Justin had greater wealth. Would anyone have anticipated that Hailey would end up being the richer spouse?' she adds. 'Probably not, but good for her.' The LA-based divorce attorney also notes that there could be a dispute between Hailey and Justin in a potential divorce if 'there ends up being a huge disparity in the amount of money' they each end up with, and if 'one of them continues to work while the other doesn't. A source close to the couple has revealed to the that Hailey's family and friends are worried that Justin might ' take advantage of her kindness.' They also feared that she might end up using her hundreds of millions from the sale of Rhode to wipe out her husband's alleged debts. 'Friends of Hailey are concerned that she has been so ride or die with Justin that she might get enveloped into bailing him out of financial struggles,' the insider told the Daily Mail. 'Without a prenuptial agreement, the lesser earning spouse is potentially advantaged if they get divorced, but of course no one has a crystal ball when they get married so it can be hard to tell which one of the spouses that will be!' Blum warns 'She is happy to help Justin in any way she can, but friends want her to look out for herself and Jack,' they added. 'They don't want to see Justin take advantage of her kindness.' The source added that Hailey hoped Justin would get back to making music and touring, rather than spending most of his time at home, as he has been doing lately. However, they said her friends feared that he might opt to rest on his reputation, in which case Hailey might not be able to 'take it anymore and [it will] end up being the catalyst of a future breakup.' Justin hasn't one out on tour since he canceled his Justice tour midway through in September 2022 after he fell victim to Ramsay Hunt syndrome, which temporarily caused him to suffer facial paralysis Although Hailey's deal for Rhode could be worth up to $1 billion, a finance expert recently claimed on TikTok that Hailey could end up making far less when accounting for payouts to investors and other company employees. Earlier this week, an insider revealed to the real reason the model had decided to sell her cosmetics company. Last month, Justin was widely criticized by fans after he admitted telling Hailey that she would never be on the cover of Vogue in order to hurt her during an argument. He made the bizarre revelation in a post intended to celebrate his wife for finally achieving a cover story on the magazine, and fans blasted him in the comments for sharing something he should have instead kept to himself. An insider subsequently revealed to that Justin and Hailey are regularly 'at each other's throats,' and the bruising argument the pop star described isn't out of the ordinary for them. Because of that earlier argument, fans were unmoved when Justin again tried to celebrate his wife's accomplishments by reposting a photo on Sunday that Hailey's Rhode Beauty products will soon be sold at Sephora locations. Instead of another take on complimenting his wife, Justin just left the caption blank this time, which only fueled further criticism in the comments section. Even his apparent attempt at a sweet conclusion to the bizarre post couldn't help but bring up the painful insult again. 'So baby u already know but forgive me for saying u wouldn't get a vogue cover cuz clearly i was sadly mistaken,' he wrote. Commenters on the post were shocked that he would admit to such behavior. Once user wrote that it was 'Giving Kanye,' and another added, 'A simple congrats would've been fine I fear.' Several fans suggested Justin should have just kept the argument a 'secret.' One person savaged him by commenting, 'brother you'll never beat the hates his wife allegations like this.' Another fan urged him to just 'put that phone down please.' In the wake of Justin's confession, fans of his wife highlighted past incidents in which he had allegedly displayed 'unsupportive behavior' toward his wife to contextualize the Vogue controversy. Some fans claimed that the disheveled way he often dresses for public events with Hailey betrays a lack of respect.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Landmark Supreme Court ruling sides with Marlean Ames, a straight woman who was 'passed over' for jobs for gay colleagues
The Supreme Court has sided with a straight woman who alleged that she was passed over for positions that went to her gay colleagues. Marlean Ames said she was the victim of bias in an agency overseeing Ohio 's youth correctional facilities, with her case being decided in a rare unanimous ruling as all justices agreed. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who wrote the opinion for the court, agreed that a ruling used in almost half the nation's federal circuits that forced people who are not white, male or gay to meet a higher bar to prove workplace discrimination. Brown wrote that it was unconstitutional for courts to have different standards for different groups, and said ' Congress left no room for courts to impose special requirements on majority-group plaintiffs alone.'


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Tariffs prompt record plunge in US imports, cutting trade deficit
Goods brought into the US plunged by 20% in April, recording their largest ever monthly drop in the face of a wave of tariffs unleashed by US President Donald retreat reflects the abrupt hit to trade, after firms had rushed products into the country earlier this year to try to get ahead of new taxes on imports Trump had purchases from major trade partners such as Canada and China fell to their lowest levels since 2021 and 2020 respectively, the Commerce Department collapse helped to cut the US trade deficit - the gap between exports and imports - in goods by almost half, a record decline, according to the report. "The April trade report indicates the impact from tariffs has well and truly arrived," said Oxford Economics, while noting that the latest figures should be interpreted with caution, given the surge in activity earlier this year. Since re-entering office in January, Trump has raised import taxes on specific items such as foreign steel, aluminium and cars and imposing blanket 10% levy on most goods from trading partners around the world. He had briefly targeted some countries' exports with even higher duties, only to suspend those measures for 90 days to allow for talks. Trump has said the moves are intended to rebuild manufacturing at home and strengthen its hand in trade negotiations. White House officials are now engaged in intense talks aimed at striking deals before that 90-day deadline expires next President Xi Jinping and Trump spoke by phone on Thursday to try to reach a breakthrough in those negotiations, as the fragile truce between the two sides showed signs of deteriorating. In a social media post, Trump said it had been a "very good phone call" focused on trade and that teams from the two sides would be meeting again media in China reported that they had agreed to further talks and extended an invitation of a visit to Trump. Trump's barrage of tariffs have brought the average effective tariff rate in the US to the highest level since the 1930s, according to a surge in activity earlier this year, the abrupt changes have led to a sharp slowdown in trade as firms weigh how to Mexico, the steel industry said its exports to the US had been cut in half last month. In Canada, the trade deficit hit an all-time high last month, widening to C$7.1bn, as exports to the US shrank for a third month in a row. Thursday's report from the US Commerce Department showed few categories of products were unaffected by the changes. Imports of passenger cars dropped by a third from March to April. Pharmaceutical products were hit and imports of most consumer goods also fell, including cell phones, artwork, furniture, toys and apparel. But imports surged from Vietnam and Taiwan, which saw their exports briefly targeted with higher rates before Trump suspended those levies, according to the the big monthly decline, overall US goods imports in the first four months of the year are up about 20% compared with the same period in 2024. Exports so far this year are up about 5% compared with overall goods and services deficit in April was $61.6bn, down from $138.3bn in March.