Natural England accused of favouring rewilding over saving farmland

Telegraph

13-02-2025

Natural England has been accused of favouring rewilding over saving farmland.
The row centres on rules stipulating that when new homes are built in certain parts of the country, developers must offset any extra water pollution created.
Natural England advises councils on how to do this and runs its own schemes.
Most solutions involve taking nearby farmland out of food production and rewilding the land.
However, a company has developed an alternative method which can save farmland.
The company, Biocore Agri, claims that the scheme has been effectively blocked by Natural England, which is run by rewilding campaigner Tony Juniper and has been accused of having an 'anti-farming culture' over its push for reducing livestock and rewilding.
The row comes amid concern over a Government net zero push that could mean a tenth of all farmland is taken out of food production.
Mark Spencer, the former Conservative farming minister, said Natural England lacked accountability for its decision-making and called for the body to be scrapped.
'Natural England has become one of those monsters that is now uncontrollable,' he said. 'And I don't know how you escape from that, because the second you try and touch it as a politician, you're accused of being sort of anti-environmental or destroying wildlife.
'But they seem to be sucking all the common sense out of some of these decision-making moments.'
'Nutrient neutrality' rules
He added: 'They are ideologically wedded to this concept of conservation and removing food production and farmers from the countryside and rewilding.'
Local authorities consult Natural England on which schemes they should approve to provide offset credits to developers when approving new homes in their area.
The rules are known as 'nutrient neutrality' rules and were introduced by the EU.
Biocore Agri manufactures an organic alternative to chemical fertiliser and says this can satisfy the rules.
The company says its scheme provides a cheaper alternative to Natural England's nutrient neutrality schemes while avoiding farmland being taken out of food production.
Natural England's approach to reducing nutrient pollution focuses on turning farmland into woodland or wetland in the long term or ending agricultural activity in the short term.
A calculation from the Housebuilders Federation has estimated that more than 12,000 hectares of farmland could need to be taken out of production to offset some 140,000 homes planned in areas with nutrient neutrality rules.
That equates to around 126,000 sheep or enough wheat for nearly 35 million boxes of Weetabix.
However, Biocore Agri says that its scheme has been effectively blocked by Natural England after it secured interest from Somerset Council.
Conflicts of interest
Somerset farmer and developer Angus Macdonald had hoped to use the Biocore Agri product to switch away from chemical fertiliser on his farmland as a 'win-win-win' solution for homes he plans to build on his land
'I wanted to carry on food production and be able to reduce the phosphate that's going into our water systems, and to be able to build the houses,' he said.
Biocore Agri was initially told by Natural England in May 2024 that the watchdog had no objection in principle to the use of the company's approach and methodology to be used for nutrient neutrality projects.
The decision followed a months-long technical review, with input from relevant Natural England scientists, according to correspondence seen by The Telegraph.
However, objections were later raised by Natural England over the methodology following a later assessment from a local advisor after an approach from BioCore Agri at the request of Somerset Council.
The council were interested in using the scheme for projects including the land on Mr Macdonald's farm.
Mr Macdonald has now been forced to take fields that produce around 360 tonnes of wheat per year out of production to build 37 homes.
Biocore Agri founder Henri Willmott has made a complaint to the Competition and Markets Authority, asking it to investigate whether there are conflicts of interest in Natural England's decision-making.
Natural England does not have an official role in deciding which schemes get the green light, but local authorities rely on its advice to make their decisions on which offset methods should be used.
The quango is also an effective provider of credits through its nutrient mitigation scheme, launched in 2022 with £30m of taxpayer money to create new wetlands.
'We should be encouraging innovation'
Land equivalent to 442 football pitches on six farms in the Tees and Poole Harbour has been acquired to be converted into wetland and woodland habitats since the scheme was launched.
This includes what NE has called 'low-grade farmland' bought up by the Durham Wildlife Trust that is now part of a rewilding project.
In total, land on six farms has been taken out of production so far for Natural England's nutrient neutrality scheme, according to a Freedom of Information request seen by the Telegraph.
Biocore Agri's case for a CMA investigation has been backed by Labour MP, Lorraine Beavers, in whose Blackpool North and Fleetwood constituency Biocore Agri is based.
'The issue clearly appears to be one for the Competition & Markets Authority, who I have written to urging them to open a case urgently,' she said. 'The Government's mission for growth and our ambition to build 1.5 million homes means we should be encouraging innovation, not stifling it.'
Adam Robbins, an environmental consultant who assessed Biocore Agri's methodology, said there was a risk that nutrient neutrality and a similar biodiversity net gain scheme would lead to a drop in food production.
'You'll end up with a situation where you can build a house, but then you've got to sacrifice your food for the biodiversity gain and nutrient balancing,' Mr Robbins said.
'We were trying to find solutions where you could continue producing food, and achieve that nutrient and biodiversity balance, which is why Biocore, we thought, was a great option.'
'Different levels of risk'
Sources within the farming and land use industry told The Telegraph there is a perception that Natural England is reluctant to trust farmers to switch their fertilising methods to ensure pollution is reduced.
Local authorities have the final say in deciding whether or not to use a particular approach but rely on expertise from Natural England.
This influential role is acknowledged by Natural England in internal correspondence seen by the Telegraph from one of the body's advisers.
'LPAs [local planning authorities] will have different levels of risk but their acceptance of the scheme and its enforceability will inevitably be led by our response,' it reads.
'If we say fine they may well rely on that approval, if we ask how the LPA intend to monitor and enforce they may not.'
Natural England told The Telegraph that its advice does not constitute approval of any nutrient neutrality scheme and that it was happy to continue engaging with Biocore Agri on its methodology, and did not consider that its advice had been inconsistent.
Mike Burke, Natural England director, sustainable development, said: 'We are working across government and businesses like Biocore Agri to help restore nature and sustain food production while tackling the housing crisis.
'Nutrient mitigation schemes are a successful example of that - enabling much-needed homes to be built and tackling harmful pollution in our rivers.'
'Our role in this planning process is advisory, and decisions on accepting mitigation measures are made by Local Planning Authorities.
'Natural England has provided advice on many mitigation measures, this is always based on scientific evidence and how effective it will be in reducing nutrient pollution.'