logo
U.S. Sen. Duckworth visits Taiwan to discuss regional security and trade

U.S. Sen. Duckworth visits Taiwan to discuss regional security and trade

Yahoo2 days ago

Strongly pro-Taiwan U.S. Sen. Tammy Duckworth is visiting the self-governing island democracy to discuss regional security and relations with the U.S.
Duckworth, an Illinois Democrat, will hold a series of high-level meetings with senior Taiwan leaders to discuss U.S.-Taiwan relations during her visit Wednesday and Thursday, said the American Institute in Taiwan, which acts as the de-facto American embassy in Taiwan in liu of formal diplomatic relations.
Trade, investment and 'other significant issues of mutual interest' also are on the schedule, the institute said.
'The visit underscores the United States' commitment to its partnership with Taiwan and reaffirms our shared commitment to strengthening a Free and Open Indo-Pacific,' the institute said.
China routinely protests such visits, which it views as a violation of U.S. commitments.
Duckworth and her staff are the second U.S. congressional delegation to visit Taiwan in as many days, demonstrating concerns in Washington over the island's security in the face of Chinese threats to invade, as well as its importance as a trade partner, particularly as the producer of 90% of the world's most advanced computer chips.
Taiwan also faces 32% tariffs under the Trump administration, a figure the government in Taiwan is attempting to negotiate to a lower level without angering sectors such as agriculture that fear lower tariffs could open their markets to heightened competition from abroad.
Duckworth is visiting at the same time as Lourdes A. Leon Guerrero, the governor of Guam, the U.S. Pacific territory that would almost certainly be a key player in any Chinese military moves against Taiwan.
Taiwan and China split during a civil war in 1949 and Beijing still considers the island its own territory to be annexed by force if necessary. China refuses all contact with the government of President Lai Ching-te, whom China brands as a separatist, and seeks to maximize diplomatic pressure on Taiwan.
While China sends military aircraft, ships and spy balloons near Taiwan as part of a campaign of daily harassment, special attention has been given this week to the location of the Liaoning, China's first aircraft carrier, whose hull was bought from Ukraine and then fitted out by China more than a decade ago. China has two aircraft carriers including the Liaoning, a third undergoing sea trials and a fourth under construction.
'What I can tell you is that the activities of the Chinese warship in the relevant waters are fully in line with international law and the basic norms of international relations,' Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said.
Col. Hu Chung-hua of the Taiwanese Defense Ministry's' intelligence department told reporters Wednesday that the carrier was currently in waters southeast of Taiwan and has been under close surveillance by Taiwan's monitoring stations since leaving its home port in China.
There are concerns the carrier might stage military drills close to Taiwan that could be a further step toward a blockade, an act the U.S. would be required to respond to under its own laws. While the U.S. provides much of Taiwan's high-tech military hardware, the law is unclear whether it would send forces to aid Taiwan in the event of a conflict.
Hu said the ministry would not comment on the possibility of drills near Taiwan, but considers all options while monitoring the Chinese military.
The ministry 'anticipates the enemy as broadly as possible and defends against the enemy strictly. We also carefully evaluate and act accordingly,' Hu said.
China is considered a master of 'grey-zone encounters' that bring tensions just to the point of breaking out into open conflict.
Col. Su Tong-wei of the ministry's operation of planning said the armed forces were constantly evaluating threat levels to consider whether to 'activate a response center, or to increase our defense readiness to perform an immediate readiness drill.'
'We will also react accordingly to safeguard national security,' Su said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lender Pathlight Sues Saks After Clearing the Way for the Neiman's Deal
Lender Pathlight Sues Saks After Clearing the Way for the Neiman's Deal

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Lender Pathlight Sues Saks After Clearing the Way for the Neiman's Deal

Saks Global has fallen out with Pathlight Capital, which helped clear the way for the luxury retailer's $2.7 billion acquisition of Neiman Marcus last year, but has now sued the company, claiming it's still owed $8.8 million in fees. In turn, Saks alleges that Pathlight's 'lack of good faith' led to the Hudson's Bay restructuring. More from WWD Hudson's Bay Signs Lease Deal With Chinese Billionaire Saks Global's Emily Essner on Navigating Luxury Amid Uncertainty Resurrecting Hudson's Bay, in a Limited Way While the money at stake is relatively small, the suit, filed May 21 in New York Supreme Court, comes at a delicate time for Saks, which declined Wednesday to comment on the case. The deal to acquire Neiman's marked the start of Saks' attempt to reset the U.S. luxury retail scene. The combination has spurred on big changes at both Neiman's and Saks, generated millions in costs and led to a luxury storefront on Amazon. But vendors have chafed at past-due bills and new, slower payment terms. Bondholders, meanwhile, have soured on debt the company raised just six months ago, trading some of the $2.2 billion in junk bonds used to fund the Neiman's acquisition down to as low as 38 cents on the dollar. The Pathlight suit, which shines a light on how the retail buyout came together last year, is one more moving part and potential expense. Pathlight has been a partner to Saks for years, extending it and its former parent company, Hudson's Bay Co., a senior secured term loan facility in 2020. The suit said that Hudson's Bay and Saks Global requested that Pathlight 'restructure the outstanding debt of HBC and…Saks Global,' a switch that was 'critical to facilitating the complex purchase-and-spinoff transaction' with Neiman's. In return for amending the credit facility and giving Hudson's Bay a $65.6 million term loan, Pathlight said Saks agreed to pay it $5 million on Jan. 6. That payment was made. But Pathlight said Saks also agreed to pay $4.4 million in March and another $4.4 million in April if its term loans to Hudson's Bay were not repaid. 'Pathlight fully performed its obligations,' the suit said. 'But the term loans were not repaid; therefore, Saks Global was required to timely pay the second and final installments but has failed to do so.' The suit includes a March 26 letter from Saks' chief legal officer Andrew Woodworth to Pathlight refusing to pay the remaining $8.8 million and alleging that the lender tripped up Hudson's Bay's efforts to refinance the term loan, which would have gotten the company off the hook for the follow-up payments. 'Pathlight failed to reasonably support opportunities presented by HBC, and such failure and lack of good faith cooperation has been the direct cause for HBC's inability to secure this much-needed refinancing. As a result of these actions and inactions by Pathlight, HBC was forced to initiate restructuring proceedings under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) in Canada,' which is akin to bankruptcy. 'Pathlight's ongoing intransigence further frustrated HBC's CCAA proceedings, and, on March 21, 2025, forced HBC to announce a near total liquidation,' Woodworth wrote for Saks. 'Pathlight has not acted in good faith, has frustrated HBC's ability to refinance the specified term loan transactions, and has thereby deprived HBC of the opportunity to obtain much-needed financing. Pathlight cannot and should not benefit from its own actions, which deprived HBC of its ability to finance its operations.' Pathlight's managing director Matt Williams shot back the next day and said 'Pathlight's alleged bad-faith dealings with HBC…have no bearing on Saks Global's obligation to pay the structuring fee.' Now the two are in court and Saks' lawyers have promised to respond to the company by July 22. In Saks world, that's a lifetime away. In the meantime, the retailer owes bondholders a $120 million interest payment on June 30, needs to start paying vendors for new shipments and also has to start making back payments to brands who were owed money for shipments made over the past two years. Best of WWD The Biggest Legal Battles Shaping the Fashion Industry Today PETA Asks Lululemon About Slaughterhouse Practices China's Livestreaming Star Viya Fined $210 Million for Tax Evasion Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Judge pauses IU protest policy, says it likely violates First Amendment
Judge pauses IU protest policy, says it likely violates First Amendment

Indianapolis Star

time36 minutes ago

  • Indianapolis Star

Judge pauses IU protest policy, says it likely violates First Amendment

An Indiana University policy enacted in response to pro-Palestinian protests will be paused after a federal judge ruled the policy may be violating students' First Amendment rights. IU revised its "expressive activity" policy in mid-2024 to ban overnight camping and use of structures, such as tents, without approval — hallmarks of the pro-Palestine protest movement. In response, the Indiana Chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit challenging the policy last August. In its complaint, the ACLU alleged the university policy violates the First Amendment and is overly broad. Judge Richard Young of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana agreed and granted a preliminary injunction May 29. "The Policy likely burdens substantially more speech than necessary to further the University's interest in public safety and thus lacks narrow tailoring," the preliminary injunction reads. "The Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that the Policy violates the First Amendment." During the 2024 spring semester, protesters established an encampment in Dunn Meadow for several months. The protests drew national attention, resulted in dozens of arrests and required 'extensive repairs' of the area. Under the now-halted section of the policy, students, faculty and staff could not engage in protests and other expressive activities from 11 p.m. to 6 a.m. without permission. If violated, one could face a range of disciplinary actions, including suspension, expulsion, loss of university employment and a responsibility to pay for damages. "While IU supports everyone's right to protest, camping or using any item to create a shelter is not a permitted form of expressive activity," the university said in paid content published in the Herald-Times last fall. "This ensures campus safety and accessibility for all community members." IU did not provide a reaction to the injunction since the university does not comment on pending litigation, spokesperson Mark Bode said. The USA TODAY Network - Indiana's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store