Trump Tariff Ruling Temporarily Paused by Appeals Court
00:00
Yeah, because what was unusual about the city ruling that we got handed down from essentially trade oriented judges last night was that they said the administration had ten days to wind down these tariffs, that they were not going to allow them to stay in effect while the appeals process played out. The administration obviously immediately appealed that. And this appeals court is granting them permission to leave the tariffs in place until there is a final ruling on this. And Caroline Levitt, the White House press secretary, did say today that the administration's view is that the judge's decision last night was judicial overreach, that this administration does have legal authority to use the EPA in this way, and they are willing to take this fight to the Supreme Court, which could, in theory, happen as soon as tomorrow, when it may be up to the nine justices to ultimately hand down the ruling as to whether or not Trump is or is authorized to use these policies in this way and whether or not these tariffs can stay in place on a permanent basis. But this is certainly a win for the administration, at least at this point, knowing that they were feeling quite confident about their legal standing going into this appeals court. Peter Navarro speaking on FOX right now, saying the administration fully expect in favor of a favorable ruling on tariffs, even if this goes to the Supreme Court, They're still other tools in the toolbox, right, to impose tariffs? There absolutely are. So it's just a question of what authority you want to use in the amount of time you want to use to work through that process. So there's section 232, which looks at national security concerns. He's opened those investigations already into areas like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. They're already in place when it comes to steel and aluminum and automobiles tariffs. There's others in terms of section three or one, which looks at unfair trade practices, investigations that could be launched there as well. And he does have an EPA authority granted to him by Congress in the 1970s. It's just a question of what exactly authorizes an economic emergency or justifies an economic emergency and the use of tariffs in this way. But it really is just a matter of what reasoning the administration wants to use, what process they want to go through. Not necessarily can they implement a tariff, but what grounds do they implement that tariff on? Again, the reciprocal tariffs and the tariffs on fentanyl, we'll be able to stand thanks to this appeals court intervention, at least for now.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
16 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
For these Trump voters, a rubber-stamp Congress is a key demand
Advertisement And they reserved their purest aversion for Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the solidly conservative former longtime party leader, whom they described alternately as an 'obstructionist' to Trump's agenda, a 'snake in the grass,' and a 'bowl of Jell-O' with no spine. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Their perspectives offered a striking contrast to the reception that many Republican lawmakers have confronted at raucous town halls throughout the country in recent months. The lawmakers have been grilled and booed by constituents at these events for supporting Trump's policies on tariffs, immigration and, most recently, the domestic policy bill that the GOP pushed through the House in May. And they help explain why most Republican lawmakers have put aside any reservations they may have on key issues and backed the president -- because a critical portion of their party's base is still demanding that they do so. Advertisement 'For loyal Trump voters, they're loving what they see as him 'doing something' and don't want congressional Republicans getting in the way of his agenda,' said Sarah Longwell, the anti-Trump Republican strategist who conducted the focus groups. 'And members of Congress have gotten that message loud and clear.' These voters represent only a piece of the electorate that Republicans must court in the run-up to midterm congressional elections in which their governing trifecta is on the line. Since Trump took office, GOP lawmakers have struggled to defend his executive actions and his efforts to dismantle the federal bureaucracy and unilaterally defund government programs, and to explain to their constituents why they are not doing more to challenge him. In Nebraska this past week, Representative Mike Flood faced an angry crowd grilling him on the Medicaid and food assistance cuts included in the domestic policy bill. And he admitted he had been unaware that the measure included a provision to limit the power of federal judges to hold people, including Trump administration officials, in contempt for disobeying court orders. But Longwell's sessions, videos of which were shared with The New York Times, were a reminder that there is still a powerful pull for Republicans to swallow whatever disagreements they may have with Trump and bow to what he wants. Since the beginning of this Congress, Speaker Mike Johnson, whose too-slim majority in the House leaves him little latitude to maneuver, has positioned himself less as the leader of the legislative branch and more as a junior partner to Trump. That stance is exactly what these voters, whom Longwell identified only by their first names and last initials to protect their privacy, said they liked about him. Advertisement Arthur M., a voter from Arizona, described Johnson as 'loyal,' adding, 'I'm not saying they should never have any other ideas of their own, but they certainly shouldn't have someone dissenting if you're trying to put an agenda through -- and that's what the Congress is.' Jeff B., a voter from Georgia, said Johnson always appeared to be 'in over his head.' But he did not see that as a negative. 'He's not the kind of guy like Mitch McConnell, who was pulling all the strings,' he said. 'He's struggling, and I think that's the way it's supposed to be. He looks like he's in over his head, and I think that's the way it's supposed to be.' The voters who participated in the focus groups, which were conducted May 16 and 19, had uniformly negative views of those House Republicans they viewed as 'rabble-rousers,' which they defined as anyone expressing an opinion that was not in sync with the White House. Jane H., a voter from Indiana, criticized her Congress member, Representative Victoria Spartz, an unpredictable lawmaker who often sides with the hard right, for being 'out of line' when she makes noises about opposing Trump's agenda. Gilbert W. from North Carolina held a similar view of Murkowski, who has routinely broken with her party to criticize Trump. 'Murkowski -- this woman's never found anything on the Republican side she really goes for,' he said, calling her a 'troublemaker.' In contrast, Allen K. from Arizona praised his Congress member, Representative Juan Ciscomani, for never making any waves. Advertisement 'Whatever Trump does, he'll say,' he said of Ciscomani, describing that as a positive. As for Senator John Thune, the new majority leader from South Dakota, he earned kudos mostly for not being McConnell. 'He's pressing Trump's agenda, it seems like,' Gilbert W. said. 'What else can you ask for?' Jane H., a three-time Trump voter, said, 'What I want to see is someone who will work hard and effectively to advance a conservative agenda, and to work closely with the White House to advance at this time Donald Trump's agenda. It's what the American people want, so that's what John Thune should be doing.' Many of the participants in the focus groups had only vague impressions of their own representatives, a reminder that to many voters, Congress remains a faceless institution of 535 mostly anonymous lawmakers about whom they don't have particularly strong feelings. That could help explain why most appeared to judge their elected officials almost exclusively according to how deferential they were to Trump, about whom they expressed potent -- and extremely positive -- sentiments. Asked for his opinions on Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill, Steve C., a voter from Michigan, said, 'I don't have an opinion on anyone specifically.' This article originally appeared in
The Hill
17 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump to meet with Germany's Merz in Washington next week
President Trump is set to meet with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz next week in Washington, marking the first in-person meeting between the two leaders. Merz, the leader of the center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU), who was elected as Germany's leader in early March, is expected to visit Trump at the White House on Thursday, June 5, Germany government spokesperson Stefan Kornelius said Saturday in a press release. The discussions between the two countries' leaders will focus on bilateral relations between the two, along with discussions around the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, developments in the Middle East and trade policy, according to Kornelius. A White House official confirmed the meeting details to The Hill on Saturday. Merz, similar to Trump, has been pushing for a ceasefire deal in the more than three-year-long war between Russia and Ukraine. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky had a meeting with Merz on Wednesday in Berlin. There, Merz said that Germany will bolster its backing of Ukraine as part of a more than $5.5 billion agreement, including sending over more military equipment and increasing weapons manufacturing in Kyiv. Germany's chancellor has clashed with members of Trump's administration over the country's government marking the far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party as an 'extremist' political entity. 'Germany just gave its spy agency new powers to surveil the opposition. That's not democracy—it's tyranny in disguise,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote earlier this month on social media platform X. 'What is truly extremist is not the popular AfD—which took second in the recent election — but rather the establishment's deadly open border immigration policies that the AfD opposes.' Vice President Vance piled on, accusing the government of trying to 'destroy' AfD, which also considers tech billionaire and Trump ally Elon Musk a strong supporter. Merz has pushed back on Trump administration's officials meddling in Germany's domestic politics. 'We have largely stayed out of the American election campaign in recent years, and that includes me personally,' Merz said in an interview with Axel Springer Global Reporters Network that was published on May 7. He added that he told U.S. officials that 'we have not taken sides with either candidate. And I ask you to accept that in return.'
Forbes
17 minutes ago
- Forbes
Affirm Stock Down As Klarna's Buy Now, Pay Later Credit Loss Rises 17%
Despite recent growth, some investors see a darker future for the industry Affirm Holdings stock is down 17% in 2025 after predicting lower-than-expected growth for the current quarter While the default rate on Buy Now, Pay Later loans rises, industry executives say they're not worried A weak first quarter gross domestic product report bodes ill for the industry Shares of Affirm Holdings — a provider of Buy Now, Pay Later loans — have lost 17% of their value in 2025, according to Google Finance. In the last three years, Affirm stock has risen considerably — rising 126% to $52 a share — and the industry has expanded faster than 50% annually. After reporting solid revenue and profit growth in the company's third quarter — while issuing a weak forecast — is the stock a bargain? Earlier this month, the stock fell 13% on Affirm's weak forecast and its bet on 0% loans, according to CNBC. The bearish case is bolstered by rising BNPL default rates at Klarna and a weaker economy which could add to the bad loans. Bulls admire the company's industry leadership and long-term approach to running the company — a view Affirm reinforces. 'It took consumers and merchants and sort of the universe about a decade to figure out what we are and just how different and important what we have found to work really is,' Affirm founder and CEO Max Levchin told CNBC. Wall Street sees the stock as significantly undervalued. Affirm shares trade 29% below $67.18 — the average price target of of 21 Wall Street analysts, TipRanks wrote. In Affirm's fiscal third quarter, revenue met expectations, profit exceeded them and its revenue forecast for the fourth quarter fell short. Here are the key numbers: Affirm's online loans rise or fall depending on the level of consumer spending on electronics, apparel and travel. The company has been aiming to add new customers — reaching 22 million in the third quarter, a 10% growth rate, noted CNBC. Through partnerships with Apple , Amazon and Shopify, GMV for The Affirm Card rose 115% from the year before while the number of active cardholders more than doubled. business is closely tied to consumer spending, as its online loan offering has become popular with sellers of electronics, apparel and travel. The company is also offering 0% interest loans in which merchants — and sometimes manufacturers — boost sales by subsidizing borrowing costs to drive sales. Such loans increased 44% — serving as an alternative to a traditional merchant discount. 'It may be an expensive net discount rate, but it's better than 10% off,' Affirm Chief Financial Officer Rob O'Hare told CNBC. Affirm says these loans extend the lifetime value of its customers. 'Every time we sign someone new through a 0% promo, some number of months or quarters from now, that's a prime candidate for the Affirm Card, and that's a lifetime value booster,' Levchin said on the company's Q3 earnings call. The growth in BNPL loans has been significant in recent years. This growth has drawn new investment into the industry and loan default rates are rising for some large participants. Since 2021, the BNPL business has accelerated at a 55% average annual rate from $97 billion, according to my June 2022 Forbes post, to $560 billion in 2025, according to Research and Markets. To finance that growth, Affirm has been securitizing — bundling and selling — some 30% of its loans. More recently, the rise of private credit has enabled Affirm to sell loans directly to institutions. These include insurers such as Liberty Mutual and Prudential. Moreover, this year private credit firm Sixth Street initiated a three year deal to buy $4 billion of Affirm's loans, according to the Wall Street Journal. Recent data suggest BNPL credit problems could rise. How so? Nearly two-thirds of BNPL loans went to borrowers with risky credit scores, according to a January report from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. 'Americans were using 'buy now, pay later' as a Band-Aid on top of their credit card debt,' Julie Margetta Morgan, a former CFPB official who is now president of the Century Foundation, told the Times. 'We look at it as a kind of bellwether of risks to the overall economy,' she added. BNPL providers downplay these risks. For example, Klarna — the privately held Stockholm-based BNPL provider which recently paused its IPO — suffered a 17% rise in credit losses in May. Klarna said the losses were trivial. 'There's nothing troubling or worrisome from this data,' company spokeswoman Clare Nordstrom told the New York Times. Affirm was similarly upbeat. 'We really aren't seeing anything we would label as signs of stress with our borrowers,' O'Hare said, according to the Times. BNPL customers would be especially vulnerable if the economy worsened — which is why during the Biden era, the CFPB 'called for measures to safeguard them,' the Times wrote. Unfortunately, the economy contracted in the first quarter of 2025 — with gross domestic product falling at a 0.2% rate, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. As U.S. household finances get worse, BNPL consumers and providers could suffer. 'Consumers are going to be squeezed and more reliant on these products,' Morgan explained to the Times, 'and the companies are being offered a free pass to construct those products in ways that are the most profitable to them.' Given the 29% upside implicit in Affirm's price target, the bulls may prevail over the bears. Affirm bears argue the company's profitability fell short of expectations because the lower growth in GMV due to a surge in 0% APR loans was not sufficient to offset their revenue less transaction costs. This is why Affirm fell short of investor expectations. The rise in 0% loans 'led to a lower take rate and RLTC margin than most forecasts,' Citizens wrote, according to CNBC. Two other analysts remain bullish on Affirm. Goldman called the company a 'strong category leader in BNPL and a share gainer vs. legacy credit providers,' noted CNBC. Barclays is bullish on recent partnerships such as the one between Affirm and Costco. Affirm sees consumers continuing to spend despite uncertainty. 'People are stressed out about the economy, yet they're shopping, they're buying, and they're paying their bills — at least they're paying their bills back to us on time,' Levchin told CNBC.
