logo
Winter fuel cuts could be Starmer's poll tax moment, warns Diane Abbott

Winter fuel cuts could be Starmer's poll tax moment, warns Diane Abbott

Telegraph21-05-2025

Sir Keir Starmer's winter fuel raid risks becoming his poll tax moment, Diane Abbott has warned.
The veteran Labour MP said the decision to remove the benefit from 10 million pensioners could prove as politically damaging as Margaret Thatcher's most controversial policy.
It comes as Sir Keir faces a potential rebellion from more than 100 of his own backbenchers over separate cuts to the welfare budget.
The poll tax was a forebear of council tax and proved catastrophic for Thatcher, sparking widespread rioting as well as dissent from her own cabinet ministers.
Ms Abbott, the MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington, said in an interview on Wednesday that the winter fuel cuts introduced by Sir Keir and Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, could not be justified.
She told ITV's Good Morning Britain: 'Everybody knows an old person, people think of old people as a vulnerable group, and it just wasn't worth it for the money that Rachel got out of it.'
She added: 'I don't know you if you remember the poll tax with Mrs Thatcher. Mrs Thatcher did a lot of things which people didn't like but it's the poll tax that upset people.'
Asked whether the winter fuel raid amounted to Sir Keir's own poll tax, she replied: 'It could be Keir Starmer's poll tax. And, you know, [Thatcher] tried to drive through the poll tax and she was gone within the year.'
Pressed on whether the political damage had already been done, she replied: 'I think in some ways the damage has already been done.'
Senior Labour figures have acknowledged the unpopularity of the winter fuel raid but insisted that the Chancellor had to take difficult decisions.
Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, admitted the policy cost Labour support in this month's Runcorn and Helsby by-election, which the party lost to Reform UK by six votes.
Earlier this week, Ms Reeves appeared to open the door to reversing the controversial cuts, although Treasury sources later insisted that the current policy stands.
The Telegraph understands that about 100 Labour MPs have put their name to a letter saying they cannot support the separate welfare reforms being pushed by Sir Keir and his Chancellor in their current form.
Ms Abbott, one of the most prominent figures on the Left of the Labour Party, went on to suggest Sir Keir did not appear to believe in anything.
'He's done quite well with international stuff but basically he's a manager rather than a politician,' she said.
'And he's very good at being a manager but being a politician has got to be something else. And it doesn't seem quite to have the 'something else'. I could be wrong.'
Noting that Sir Keir had only joined the party in 2014, she continued: 'He was director of public prosecutions, and then the next year he became an MP.
'So he hasn't come through the Labour movement and maybe that's why he doesn't appear to have a set of beliefs.'
Sir Keir's recent crackdown on immigration, widely seen as a response to the rise of Reform, has prompted further criticism from Left-wing MPs such as Ms Abbott.
Much of this has been focused on a speech in which the Prime Minister said recent levels of net migration were unsustainable and that Britain risked becoming an 'island of strangers'.
Ms Abbott said the remarks had proven highly damaging for Sir Keir, arguing that while immigration was an issue his use of language had not been appropriate.
She went on to claim it was 'very, very unwise' for Labour to attempt to 'steal Reform's clothes' as Sir Keir seeks to win over voters who have fallen in behind Nigel Farage's party.
'If you like Reform's type of hardline, anti-immigrant policies, you're going to vote Reform,' she said. 'Why are you going to vote for a second-rate copy?'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kemi Badenoch refuses to kick Liz Truss out of Conservative Party
Kemi Badenoch refuses to kick Liz Truss out of Conservative Party

BreakingNews.ie

time28 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Kemi Badenoch refuses to kick Liz Truss out of Conservative Party

Kemi Badenoch has refused to kick former UK prime minister Liz Truss out of the Conservative Party. The Tory leader suggested such a move would be 'neither here nor there' for voters' perception of the party. Advertisement In a speech on Thursday, shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride sought to distance the Conservatives from Ms Truss' mini-budget, saying the party needed to show 'contrition' to restore its economic credibility. In a furious response, Ms Truss accused Mr Stride of having 'kowtowed to the failed Treasury orthodoxy' and being 'set on undermining my plan for growth'. Asked by the BBC on Friday whether she would consider throwing former prime minister Ms Truss out of the Conservatives in a symbolic break with her short-lived, turbulent time in No 10, Mrs Badenoch replied: 'Is she still in the party?' Ms Truss, the former Conservative MP for South West Norfolk, is understood to be a Tory party member still. Advertisement Speaking to the BBC, Mrs Badenoch said: 'What is really important is what Mel was saying yesterday. What he was saying was that the mini-budget did not balance. It wasn't tax cuts, it was the … £150 billion of spending increases on energy bills that did not make sense.' Pressed whether she believed the mini-budget had damaged the Conservative brand, Mrs Badenoch said: 'Well, look at what happened, people didn't understand why we had done that, and so our reputation for economic competence was damaged.' Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said the party needed to 'focus on how we're going to get this country back on track' (Stefan Rousseau/PA) When asked again why she would not consider kicking Ms Truss out of the party, the Tory leader said: 'It is not about any particular individual. I don't want to be commenting on previous prime ministers. 'They've had their time. What am I going to do now? Removing people from a political party is neither here nor there in terms of what it is your viewers want to see.' Advertisement After insisting Ms Truss was not in Parliament anymore, Mrs Badenoch said her party needed to 'focus on how we're going to get this country back on track'. 'What we have right now is a Labour Government, it's Keir Starmer. We need to stop talking about several prime ministers ago and talk about the Prime Minister we've got now and what he's doing to the country,' the Tory leader said. Ms Truss this week appeared in a video to promote the Irish whiskey brand of bare-knuckle fighter Dougie Joyce, who was once jailed for attacking a 78-year-old man in a pub in 2022.

Why Britain must not recognise Palestine
Why Britain must not recognise Palestine

Telegraph

time38 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Why Britain must not recognise Palestine

The West Bank was never taken from the Palestinians. When Israel conquered the territory in 1967 it was from the Jordanians, who had occupied it since 1948 before trying their luck at a genocide of the Jews. Regardless, if Jerusalem gave up the land in return for peace, it would make Israel just nine miles wide at its centre. Known as the 'Hadera-Gadera rectangle', that narrow waist holds half the population and much of the country's vital infrastructure, including Tel Aviv. A new Palestinian state would lie just over the border. After October 7, would you do it? The Palestinian leader, Mahmoud Abbas, is famously incompetent, and is currently enjoying the 20th year of the four-year term to which he was elected in 2005. He presides over a system of corruption and brutality; he holds a PhD in Holocaust revisionism from a Moscow university; and he offers cash incentives to those convicted of terror offences, with higher payments awarded for more serious crimes. Fancy the odds? When Israel pulled out of Gaza in 2005, it was in the naive belief that, from then on, even a single rocket from the Strip would meet with international condemnation, since the settlements and 'occupation' were no more. So that worked out well. A two-state solution would see the same policy applied on the West Bank. What could possibly go wrong? Sir Keir Starmer presumably thinks it's a great idea, because in nine days' time, Britain will join France and the Saudis in New York in talks about recognising a state of Palestine. Far easier to gamble with the lives of someone else's children than your own, I suppose. This would form the natural culmination of Britain's escalating hostility towards our ally, as it battles to defeat the jihadi group that carried out that orgy of butchery, mutilation and rape two years ago and has vowed to do the same again. Hostages are still in the catacombs. Yet Sir Keir dreams of a state of Palestine. War is hell. Israel – which neither wanted it nor started it – evacuates civilians before attacks and provides them with aid. Yet in Parliament last week, amid nods from MPs who have never known the inside of a bomb shelter, the Prime Minister branded Israel 'appalling'. As ever, Starmer's petty politicking blinds him to his own moral bankruptcy. Unilaterally recognising a state of Palestine is a contemptuous proposal. Dismissing Israel's existential security concerns is insult enough, but providing a reward for October 7 creates awful incentives for the future. Worse still, perhaps, is the narrative it would create. Britain's official policy would be to blame Israel for the lack of a Palestinian state, when the historical truth is the opposite. The Palestinians were first offered self-determination in 1947, but rejected it in favour of attempted genocide. They were offered it again during the Oslo Accords in the 1990s, but derailed it with a spate of suicide bombs that claimed the lives of many Israelis. In 2000, at Camp David, they were offered 96 per cent of the West Bank but turned it down. In 2008, prime minister Ehud Olmert offered 94 per cent of the territory with land swaps for the remainder, East Jerusalem as a Palestinian capital, and the Old City turned over to international control. Again, Abbas rejected it. Why? Because the true problem is the very existence of a Jewish country, which is seen as a rebuke by some to Arab honour. The Palestinians don't want a state alongside Israel. They want a state instead of it. This is what Britain would be supporting.

Jeremy Corbyn amongst thousands at rally to protest Labour ‘austerity'
Jeremy Corbyn amongst thousands at rally to protest Labour ‘austerity'

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Jeremy Corbyn amongst thousands at rally to protest Labour ‘austerity'

Thousands protested in central London against government spending cuts and welfare reforms, organised by The People's Assembly and attended by former Labour leader and independent MP Jeremy Corbyn. Organisers, including The People's Assembly, criticised the government for implementing spending cuts that disproportionately affect vulnerable members of society. Various organisations, such as the National Education Union, Green Party, and RMT union, participated in the march from Portland Place to Whitehall. Protesters held signs with slogans like 'Tax the rich, stop the cuts – welfare not warfare' and 'Nurses not nukes'. A People's Assembly spokesperson stated that adherence to 'fiscal rules' traps the UK in a public service funding crisis, advocating for taxing the rich to fund public services and investment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store