
Labour MP warns proscribing Palestine Action would be ‘kneejerk reaction'
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has unveiled plans to proscribe the organisation, which armed forces minister Luke Pollard described as 'not a protest group'.
Counter-terror police are investigating the break-in last Friday, when activists damaged two RAF Voyager aircraft using paint.
Palestine Action claimed responsibility for the incident, and the organisation posted footage from the Oxfordshire base on its X account, claiming that the planes help to 'collect intelligence, refuel fighter jets and transport weapons to commit genocide in Gaza'.
Labour MP for Liverpool Riverside Kim Johnson told the Commons that she was 'concerned by the Government's kneejerk reaction to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation'.
She told MPs: 'This country has a long history of protests, as I mentioned in this chamber last week, some on British military sites, and none have been branded as terrorists.'
Ms Johnson added that authorities could pursue those responsible for 'criminal damage, but not as a terrorist', and asked: 'Can the minister set out what steps his department will take to ensure peaceful protest activity is not wrongly categorised as a national security threat?'
Mr Pollard replied: 'The proscription of Palestine Action has been something that has been considered over a long period of time by my colleagues in the Home Office.
'It is a decision that they have taken after considering the facts, those in the public domain and those perhaps held privately, and we are certain that this is the right course of action to keep our country safe in these difficult times.'
Liz Saville Roberts, Plaid Cymru's Westminster leader, said: 'Direct action at military bases is nothing new. We remember with respect the women who marched from Wales to Greenham Common, and the thousands of women who joined them.
'They didn't just march, they pulled down fences. They criminally damaged infrastructure.
'So, does the minister recognise the risk implicit in proscribing protest groups calling out war as terrorist organisations?'
Ms Saville Roberts was referring to a demonstration between 1981 and 2000, when anti-nuclear weapons protesters set up the Greenham Common Women's Peace Camp.
Mr Pollard replied: 'They're not a protest group. They are people that have undertaken severe criminal damage to military assets. They're people who are increasingly using violence as part of their modus operandi.
'The decision that the Home Secretary has taken has not been taken lightly and reflects the seriousness of the intent of that organisation.
'I welcome free speech, I welcome debate and challenge, but vandalising RAF jets is not free speech – that is criminal damage, that is interventions on a military base, that is – as I say in my statement – not only epically stupid but also a threat to our national security and the Home Secretary was right to proscribe them.'
In his statement, Mr Pollard had earlier told MPs that personnel at Brize Norton 'work tirelessly to support our armed forces deployed across the world to deliver military assistance to Ukraine, and they have been formally recognised for their contribution in flying humanitarian aid into Gaza, so this action does nothing to further the path to peace'.
Sir Julian Lewis, the Conservative MP for New Forest East, warned that 'it would do the country and the Government no favours if they were to lose in court a challenge to the process of proscription, because whereas the secret sabotage of planes would certainly have been an act of terrorism leading to proscription, the fact is, this was a performative act which they announced they had done'.
MPs will have a 'full debate' in Parliament as part of the proscription process, Mr Pollard pledged in response, as he said the bid to proscribe Palestine Action was put together after 'considerable thought'.
MPs also heard that the 'fence is not formidable' at Brize Norton, after Liberal Democrat MP for Witney Charlie Maynard told the Commons that 'security at the base has been really underinvested for a long time'.
Mr Maynard said he had walked around the base's perimeter in his constituency 'quite a few times'.
Mr Pollard said the Government's response had already 'helped identify a number of immediate steps' to bolster security at the site.
The minister added: 'He is right that much of our armed forces estate and our armed forces have been hollowed out and underfunded for far too long.
'It's precisely for that reason that I welcome the increase in defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by April 2027.
'Our armed forces are brilliant but it's time they had first-class facilities.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
34 minutes ago
- The National
Banning a protest group as authoritarian as it gets
It has been a defining catchphrase of his leadership: denigrating protest movements and using it to criticise any form of solidarity or direct action from Labour members and elected representatives – up to and including banning his Cabinet members from joining striking workers on picket lines. It's all part of this right-wing Labour Government's attempts to erode the basic democratic right to protest, whether through its refusal to repeal authoritarian anti-protest and anti-trade union laws brought in by the Conservatives, or their use of these laws – and even anti-terrorism laws – to silence and restrict pro-Palestine voices who are speaking out against our government's complicity in Israel's genocide in Gaza. The latest escalation came yesterday when the Home Secretary set out plans to ban Palestine Action as a proscribed terrorist organisation, after its protests attempting to disrupt the supply chain of the military-industrial complex complicit in genocide. READ MORE: Iran announces it has attacked US forces stationed at air base in Qatar For the Government to use anti-terrorism laws to ban any peaceful protest group which makes life inconvenient for them is as authoritarian as it gets and should scare us all. It may not be a cause you agree with being banned today, but who knows what they'll ban tomorrow? And for this to come from a Labour Government is simply extraordinary. Labour's detestation of protest isn't just morally wrong, it's also deeply foolish. The framing of protest vs power is a false dichotomy – the most radical societal improvements came about due to protest movements. The women's suffrage movement used both peaceful and violent protest methods to fight for their right to vote. Basic employment rights, from the five-day working week to the creation of the minimum wage, came after years of co-ordinated campaigning by the trade union movement. Even the NHS didn't just pop into the government's head without prompting. A number of campaigning organisations including the Socialist Medical Association and the National Union of Students campaigned for a national health service long before it was founded by Aneurin Bevan. (Image: File) It is only because in each of these cases the governments of the day had no choice but to listen to the voices of the people they were elected to represent that we now have rights, freedoms and public services we today take for granted. More recently, we have seen the impact protest movements can have by working alongside political parties to deliver genuine improvement here in Scotland. The Housing Bill making its way through Holyrood contains measures for the implementation of rent controls in the private rented sector, and though the bill is imperfect, we wouldn't even be discussing rent controls let alone being close to implementing them were it not for the tireless efforts of tenants' union Living Rent. It's also true that the bill in its current form wouldn't exist were it not for the Scottish Greens, who were able to amplify the voices of renters across the country by taking the demands of Living Rent and including rent controls as part of the Bute House Agreement. Similarly, free bus travel for under-22s was an issue campaigned for by a number of organisations including student groups and the Scottish Youth Parliament, while the recent commitment for free bus travel for asylum seekers came about after campaigns by the Maryhill Integration Network, the Scottish Refugee Council and others. Both of these campaigns were amplified by the Scottish Greens and won as a result of both on-the-ground protest and campaigns, and political negotiations by elected politicians. Simply put, all of these transformational policies came about because the Greens recognised the need to be both a party of protest and a party of power – whether that is power within government or the power that comes from constructive opposition. Greens uplifted the voices of campaigners and protesters – in many cases with Greens among the ranks of protesters themselves – and helped win genuine, tangible change as a result. In some of these cases, such as free bus travel, the adoption of the policy by the Greens came about as a result of grassroots campaigns by internal groups like the Scottish Young Greens. All of this is to say that any politician – Starmer or anyone else – who denigrates or minimises the role that protest has to play in our politics, either doesn't understand where power lies in a democracy, or they do and they are scared of it. It's no wonder governments in Westminster have sought to attack and minimise the ability to protest – they know it works. The UK Government continues to be complicit in Israel's genocide in Gaza despite it being both morally reprehensible and deeply unpopular among the general public. A YouGov poll last week found that a majority of the UK public opposes Israel's actions in Gaza, with just 15% supporting them. And 65% want the UK to implement the International Criminal Court's arrest warrant for Benjamin Netanyahu should he visit the UK. It makes sense then, for a deeply unpopular Labour Government elected on just 33.7% of the vote to aim to criminalise direct action against its complicity in this genocide by proscribing Palestine Action and cracking down on other forms of protest. They know that if the people of the UK were free to voice what we really think, and act in the moral interest, the Government simply wouldn't stand a chance. Protest is, and always will be, a vital part of our democracy, no matter how much Labour and the Tories try to erode it. It reminds politicians that power in this country belongs to the people – we merely lend it to them at the ballot box. It's the reason for so many of the vital rights we hold today and it'll be the reason for more in the future, not least Scotland's independence. Politicians of all colours would do well to remember this.


Scotsman
36 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Donald Trump's bombing of Iran's nuclear sites risks Middle East conflict escalating out of control
Donald Trump's decision to bomb Iran's nuclear installations has increased the prospect of the Middle East conflict escalating out of control. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Despite his declared ambition to be remembered as a "peacemaker and unifier" and his insistence he does not want America to be embroiled in foreign wars, the US president succumbed to the persuasion of Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and launched the unprecedented attack on Iran in a bid to destroy its potential to build nuclear weapons. No-one yet knows whether President Trump's claim to have "completely and totally obliterated" the sites at Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz is correct. US President Donald Trump addresses the nation, flanked by vice president JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. Picture: Carlos Barria/ AFP via Getty Images | POOL/AFP via Getty Images Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But following the attacks by B2 stealth bombers dropping 'bunker-buster' bombs, retaliation by the Iranian regime is inevitable - possibly targeting US bases in the region or closing the Strait of Hormuz, a vital sea passage which one-fifth of the world's oil exports are shipped through. There are fears that could lead to oil price rises and a global recession. It's not clear that President Trump has public support for his action. A Washington Post poll ahead of the bombing found 45 per cent opposed military strikes, with 25 per cent in support - in marked contrast with the strong public backing for America's previous foreign military adventures in Iraq and Afghanistan. The UK was not involved in the US action - the Americans chose to fly the mission from their base in Guam rather than ask to use the British base in Diego Garcia. But Britain and other western countries are nevertheless US allies and could also be targeted in the retaliation. United Nations secretary general, António Guterres has described the US attack as a dangerous escalation and a direct threat to international peace and security, saying it was crucial to avoid a "spiral of chaos". He said: "There is a growing risk that this conflict could rapidly get out of control, with catastrophic consequences for civilians, the region and the world." Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And meanwhile the terrible suffering of the people of Gaza at the hands of the Israeli regime continues. Donald Trump may see the US operation against Iran as 'one and done' but history suggests conflicts in the Middle East usually have widespread repercussions and long-lasting consequences. The world waits anxiously.


Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Scots Labour MP urges colleagues to vote against DWP benefit cuts next week
Brian Leishman said asked his fellow Labour MPs "to do the right thing and stop the proposed changes to our welfare system." A Scottish Labour MP has urged his colleagues to vote against the UK Government's benefit cuts next week. Brian Leishman asked his fellow Labour MPs "to do the right thing and stop the proposed changes to our welfare system." He warned the "vote will define careers." The UK Government's plans to tighten eligibility for Personal Independence Payment (PIP) and Universal Credit will go to the House of Commons next week. Alloa and Grangemouth MP Leishman said: "The welfare reforms the government are proposing will impoverish some of the most vulnerable people in our society. Of that there is no doubt. "I joined Labour because I believe the party is the way to achieving an equal, fair and socially just country that looks after the most disadvantaged people. "Goodness knows that after 14 years of austerity and politics that was designed to make people poorer and has ripped the heart out of communities that the country needs to be rebuilt. "But it has to be rebuilt in a way that is caring and compassionate and shaped by real Labour Party values. "Labour MPs have a choice to make. Do they believe that the most vulnerable people should be looked after, or not? That's what the vote on these welfare reforms ultimately boils down to. This vote will define careers and this Labour government. "I urge Labour MPs to do the right thing and stop the proposed changes to our welfare system. Let's build the country we need and work with disability charities and organisations that have frontline experience of the struggle faced by disabled people so we then create a welfare system that truly looks after people." The UK Government wants to change who is eligible for PIP so only the most severely disabled can make claims. Ministers also want to cut the sickness related element of universal credit and delay access to it, so only those aged 22 and over can claim it. Most working Scots on disability benefit receive the devolved Adult Disability Payment (ADP), but SNP Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville confirmed that ADP will not be cut. She did not explain where the money would come from, even though the UK cuts will likely mean the Scottish Government receives less money A UK Government source said: "Our reforms will protect the most vulnerable, help those who can work into good, secure jobs and ensure the safety net is there in the future for those who need it most."