Pam Bondi fires three DOJ prosecutors who were involved in prosecuting January 6 rioters, report says
The Department of Justice has reportedly fired at least three career prosecutors who worked on cases against January 6 rioters.
The prosecutors included two supervisors who oversaw the sweeping DOJ case against the pro-Trump mob that stormed the Capitol in early 2021, as well as a third attorney, the Associated Press reports.
The attorneys were fired on Friday in a letter signed by Attorney General Pam Bondi informing them they were 'removed from federal service effective immediately,' NBC News reports.
The Independent has contacted the Justice Department for comment.
The reported firings come after the administration axed about a dozen lower-level DOJ officials who worked on the January 6 cases, and pardoned more than 1,500 people convicted in Capitol riot cases, including violent offenders.
Separately, earlier this year, the administration removed more than a dozen prosecutors involved in prior criminal investigations into Donald Trump, including several who worked for Jack Smith, the special counsel bringing a now-dismissed election subversion case against the Republican.
'You played a significant role in prosecuting President Trump,' a letter to these officials, obtained by CNN, said.
The White House has also sought to penalize law firms tied to perceived opponents of the president, including Smith and prominent Democrats, attempting to strip their security clearances and punish federal contractors that did business with them.
On the campaign trail, Trump referred to the mob that stormed the Capitol to overturn the certification of his 2020 election loss, injuring about 150 police officers in a riot that ultimately led to at least seven deaths, as 'hostages.'
The January 6 case was the largest in Justice Department history, netting over 1,500 convictions and requiring scores of federal attorneys, many of whom remain with the government.
Despite erasing this prosecution against mass disturbance from the books, since taking office, the Trump administration has sought a firm response to civil unrest targeting his policies, deploying federal agents, Marines, and the National Guard for a nearly unprecedented civil law enforcement role in response to Los Angeles protests against immigration raids.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
3 minutes ago
- Fox News
Caroline Downey warns Iran 'cannot keep crossing the red line'
All times eastern FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: Senate convenes over President Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump threatens Senate Republicans who defy him as Elon Musk attacks ‘utterly insane' megabill
President Donald Trump threatened Senate Republicans who defy him and his 'Big, Beautiful Bill' as the legislation cleared a key test vote in a dramatic night in the upper chamber of Congress. After negotiations dragged on for hours Saturday evening, the Senate voted 51 to 49 to open a debate on the legislation, moving one step closer to landing the bill on Trump's desk by his self-imposed Fourth of July deadline. Trump targeted Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who voted against opening the debate after he argued the package would 'result in tens of billions of dollars in lost funding' for his state. The president said 'numerous people have come forward wanting to run' in a primary election against Tillis, Trump wrote on Truth Social after returning to the White House to watch senators scramble for votes. 'I will be meeting with them over the coming weeks, looking for someone who will properly represent the Great People of North Carolina,' Trump said. Before votes were underway, Trump's 'first buddy' Elon Musk momentarily re-entered politics when he attacked the bill as 'utterly insane and destructive' in a post on X. The world's wealthiest man said the bill will 'destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country' and give 'handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future.' The motion to proceed with the legislation — which includes sweeping spending cuts to pay for Trump's tax cuts he signed into law in 2017, as well as increased spending for the military, oil exploration, and immigration enforcement — came down to the wire, as Vice President JD Vance showed up at the last moment in the event of a tie break. Senate Republicans scrambled for sufficient support to pass the motion to proceed with votes on the mammoth bill. Final text for the sprawling 940-page bill was released Friday evening. Budget analysts predict the bill — if approved — could explode the national debt by more than $4 trillion. The bill's tax cuts would amount to $4.5 trillion in lost revenue, according to the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation. If the bill does pass the Senate, it will return to the House of Representatives, which passed it last month. But plenty of House Republicans have objected to the Senate's changes, teeing up yet another legislative battle over Trump's massive bill. Trump lobbied senators on Saturday while playing golf with Senators Rand Paul of Kentucky and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. Democratic Senate Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Democrats would object to the bill moving forward without the text being read on the Senate floor. 'We will be here all night if that's what it takes to read it,' he said Saturday. Reading the nearly 1,000-page bill on the floor is estimated to take 15 hours. Republicans, who have 53 seats in the Senate, plan to pass the bill using the process of budget reconciliation. That would allow them to sidestep a filibuster from Democrats as long as the legislation relates to the budget. For the past week, the Senate parliamentarian's office has issued advisories about which parts do not comply with the rules of reconciliation. The biggest sticking point was major changes to Medicaid, with Republicans proposing the steepest cuts to the federal healthcare program in history. The legislation would add work requirements for certain Medicaid recipients and limit how much money states can tax health care providers like hospitals and nursing homes to raise money for Medicaid. But the American Hospital Association said this would devastate rural hospitals that rely on Medicaid dollars. The parliamentarian removed the provider tax provision, but the new version of the bill simply delays when the cap goes into effect. Hospitals in House Speaker Mike Johnson's home state of Louisiana were compelled to write to him Saturday to warn that the Medicaid cuts 'would be historic in their devastation.' Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, also warned that the bill would cut funding for Medicaid by $930 billion, citing an upcoming Congressional Budget Office analysis. Wyden accused Republican senators of pushing a 'rushed and reckless' process. 'Just as before, these cruel cuts to Americans' health care will strike a mortal blow to rural health care, and threaten the health and safety of kids, seniors, Americans with disabilities, and working families across the country,' he wrote. Tillis, who hails from a state with a large number of rural hospitals and that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act in 2023, said he was a 'no' on the motion to proceed because of Medicaid. 'It will cause a lot of people to have to be moved off of Medicaid,' he told The Independent Friday evening. 'It's just inescapable. The price tag's too high.' Tillis, who is up for re-election in 2028, outlined his opposition to the bill again on Saturday, saying in a statement that the bill would 'result in tens of billions of dollars in lost funding' for his state, including hospitals and rural communities. 'This will force the state to make painful decisions like eliminating Medicaid coverage for hundreds of thousands in the expansion population, and even reducing critical services for those in the traditional Medicaid population,' he added. The bill would see Trump gain some $350 billion to pursue his anti-immigration agenda, including $46 billion for the U.S.– Mexico border wall and another $45 billion to build capacity to detain another 100,000 people in immigration detention centers. In order to meet his goal of deporting some 1 million people per year, the bill would also allocate money to hire 10,000 Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, with $10,000 signing bonuses and a surge of border patrol agents. The legislation, which contains roughly $3.8 trillion in tax cuts, would extend the 2017 cuts that Trump signed into law during his first administration, which are set to expire at the end of the year. The existing tax rates and brackets would become permanent under the bill. The bill also would include some measures Trump campaigned on, including up to $25,000 in deductions on tipped wages and $12,500 for overtime pay through 2028. Americans who receive food stamps through the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program, or SNAP, would face new 'hardship' under the current legislation as billions would be slashed from the scheme, advocacy groups warn. The bill increases the age at which 'able-bodied' adults without dependent children must work to receive food assistance from 54 to 64 years old, the year before many seniors become eligible for Social Security and Medicare. It also would mandate that parents with children 14 and older must work at least 20 hours per week to receive SNAP benefits. 'Already, states like Texas have opted out of programs like Summer EBT and denying thousands of children critical food benefits during the summer because of concerns over state obligations to cover SNAP benefit costs,' the Food Research and Action Center warned. 'It's unimaginable the number of children who would miss out on the nutrition they need if this harmful bill is passed.' Rep. Angie Craig of Minnesota, the ranking Democrat on the House Agriculture Committee, previously told The Independent that changes to SNAP in the House version of the bill 'may be one of the most egregious items in the entire markup.'
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump threatens to force journalists to reveal who leaked report undermining his narrative on Iran bombing
Donald Trump threatened in an interview Sunday to force journalists who published an initial U.S. intelligence assessment of his administration's strikes on Iran to reveal their sources or face prosecution as his effort to plaster a positive narrative over the aftermath continues. The U.S. president spoke on Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo, and insisted once again that U.S. airstrikes targeting three Iranian facilities last weekend completed the task of disabling the Iranian nuclear weapons development program. The strikes, Trump claimed, obliterated the Iranian government's entire (or a majority) of its supply of enriched uranium — he denied claims from Iranian officials that it was moved out of the area before the Fordow site was hit. And the president vowed legal action against Democratic members of Congress and journalists he blamed for publishing parts of a U.S. intelligence assessment of the effects of the three attacks. The administration spent the past week decrying it as one-sided, incomplete, and aimed at producing a narrative critical of the Trump White House. 'You go up and tell the reporter, 'national security, who gave it [to you]?'' Trump told Bartiromo, adding: 'You have to do that. And I suspect we'll be doing things like that.' More to follow...
