Concerns over 'reckless' plans to add ChatGPT to Barbie dolls
Proposals to install ChatGPT into a range of toys including Barbie dolls have sparked alarm from experts who branded it a 'reckless social experiment' on children.
US toymaker Mattel unveiled plans to collaborate with OpenAI to add the chatbot to its future editions of popular lines.
While not confirming specifically how the new application would work, Mattel promised the development would 'bring the magic of AI to age-appropriate play experiences'.
However, child welfare experts have condemned the idea, saying it would run the risk of 'inflicting real damage on children', the Independent reported.
Robert Weissman, the co-president of advocacy group Public Citizen said Mattel's plans could inhibit children's social development.
He said: 'Mattel should announce immediately that it will not incorporate AI technology into children's toys. Children do not have the cognitive capacity to distinguish fully between reality and play.
'Endowing toys with human-seeming voices that are able to engage in human-like conversations risks inflicting real damage on children.
'It may undermine social development, interfere with children's ability to form peer relationships, pull children away from playtime with peers, and possibly inflict long-term harm.
'Mattel should not leverage its trust with parents to conduct a reckless social experiment on our children by selling toys that incorporate AI.'
It comes amid broader concerns over the impact of AI on vulnerable and young people.
Sewell Setzer III, from Orlando, Florida took his own life in February 2024.
His mother Megan Garcia has since sued Google-backed startup Character.ai, whose software her son used extensively in the months leading up to his death.
Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, said his company was working to implement measures to protect vulnerable users from harmful content such as conspiracy theories.
He added the technology would direct people to professional help if and when sensitive topics such as suicide crop up and took over-reliance on AI 'extremely seriously'.
Asked how people could be steered away from dangerous content, Altman told the Hard Fork Live podcast: 'We do a lot of things to try to mitigate that.
'If people are having a crisis that they talk to ChatGPT about, we try to suggest that they get help from a professional and talk to their family.'
But Altman, who recently welcomed his first son, said he still hoped that his child would make more human friends that AI companions. More Trending
He said: 'I still do have a lot of concerns about the impact on mental health and the social impact from the deep relationships that they're going to have with AI, but it has surprised me on the upside of how much how much people differentiate between [AI and humans].'
Mattel said that its first products using the technology would have a focus on older customers.
It said it was committed to responsible innovation, which protects users' safety and privacy.
Metro has contacted Mattel and OpenAI for comment.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: I asked ChatGPT for a 'glow up' – the results were terrifying
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
The flaw in Wes Streeting's AI NHS app plan
Speaking at Blackpool Football Club earlier this week, Wes Streeting announced his latest bid to modernise the NHS: bold new additions to the NHS app. Artificial intelligence would be used to empower people, turning them into experts on their own conditions, while another feature would 'show patients everything from their nearest pharmacy to the best hospital for heart surgery across the country, with patients able to choose based on their preference'. These features will reportedly be introduced within the next three years, with an extra £10 billion allocated by Rachel Reeves in her spending review to fund NHS technology. How exactly will NHS providers be 'inspired' by patients being offered choice? Given the impressive capabilities of freely available AI tools, the need to spend £10 billion on bespoke NHS software appears questionable from the outset. Streeting's optimism about the NHS's skill with large IT projects is impressive. I have the NHS app on my phone, and it reliably opens without crashing. With a finger I can ask it to arrange repeat prescriptions or to show me my GP records, although in both cases it responds by saying it can't help as it can't connect to my surgery. The app also offers to transfer me seamlessly to 111 for medical advice where, after only five or six pages of warnings, it asks permission for it to pass on my medical history. With that granted, it passes me to 111 which, having received all my information, starts by asking me my sex at birth. £10 billion, coincidentally, is the amount the Public Accounts Committee said, in 2013, had been wasted on an abandoned attempt to introduce an electronic patient record system to the NHS. 'The biggest IT failure ever seen', Dan Poulter, back then a Conservative health minister, condemned Labour's incompetence and responded with 'a £1 billion technology fund to help the NHS go paperless by 2018'. Perhaps readers will be unsurprised to hear that the NHS is not, in fact, now paperless. Or to hear that we're already using artificial intelligence without the government's help. Some colleagues are shy about their use of ChatGPT for clinical knowledge but it's widespread and so it should be. Medical knowledge expanded beyond the bounds of a single person's memory generations ago, and knowing the best ways to look things up has been a key skill ever since. For patients, ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, and others already help. I used to sometimes advise people not to look certain matters up, confident that a quick Google would yield them the wrong end of a needlessly frightening stick. Today's large language models are better. For all their hazards, they respond to clinical questions not only with a decent chance of accuracy, but also with a high degree of useful context. They are the best products of some of the world's finest – and most highly paid – minds. Our NHS IT experts may well be poised to do a better job, but history suggests they are more likely to take ChatGPT and ineptly make it worse, wasting another £10 billion in the process. Notably, Streeting's Blackpool speech was not chiefly about technology. He introduced the NHS App's new features as methods for tackling his real focus of inequality. Beveridge, in 1942, spoke of the need for a welfare state to fight the five giants of idleness, ignorance, disease, squalor and want. Streeting attributed today's inequality to 'poverty, a lack of good work, damp housing, dirty air, and the sporting, travel and cultural opportunities which are afforded to the privileged few being denied to the many'. The shift worth noticing, because it is society's and not just Streeting's, is that people, and particularly the less fortunate, have ceased being spoken of as though they possess responsibility or control. Both, instead, rest wholly with the state. Streeting is right to care most for the least fortunate, whose opportunities are most constrained, but encouraging them to believe that what freedom they do possess is an illusion, and that they are not active agents but helpless victims, is harmful. Compassion, when sufficiently misguided, can be unkind. When it comes to My Choice, the app's feature to 'democratise' the NHS, Streeting's thinking seems equally flawed. 'If NHS providers know that their waiting times, health outcomes of their patients and patient satisfaction ratings will all be publicly available,' he said in his speech. 'They will be inspired to respond to patient choice, raise their game and deliver services that patients value.' This sounds attractive, just as it does to hold the state responsible for everything that's wrong in the world, but it makes as little sense. How exactly will NHS providers be 'inspired' by patients being offered choice? Here in the NHS almost everyone has a job for life, and equality means that within each field we are paid the same, regardless of talent or industry. And the senior managers, the only ones whose jobs are tenuous, almost invariably seem to fail upwards, leaving one post where they've been harmful in order to take another at a higher rate. Odd, to invoke the invisible hand of market forces in a context that effectively bans them. Streeting appears to be a bright & decent man genuinely trying to improve the NHS. Against an admittedly dire collection of colleagues, he seems to be the highlight of Labour's benches. It is hard not to root for him, especially as any success he has will be our success too. Harder still, sadly, to see him pulling it off.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Cambridge Spark
Rank 89Annual sales growth over three years 61.39%Education technology company More than 5,000 people from organisations including Virgin Atlantic, Lloyds Bank and the NHS have learnt about data science and AI through courses provided by Cambridge Spark. Raoul-Gabriel Urma, 34, founded the company in 2016 to provide the data skills needed to succeed in the AI era and led it to sales of £18.6 million last year. In March it announced the launch of what it says is the UK's first apprenticeship scheme for AI engineers. Explore the Sunday Times 100 — interviews, company profiles and more
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Denmark to tackle deepfakes by giving people copyright to their own features
The Danish government is to clamp down on the creation and dissemination of AI-generated deepfakes by changing copyright law to ensure that everybody has the right to their own body, facial features and voice. The Danish government said on Thursday it would strengthen protection against digital imitations of people's identities with what it believes to be the first law of its kind in Europe. Having secured broad cross-party agreement, the department of culture plans to submit a proposal to amend the current law for consultation before the summer recess and then submit the amendment in the autumn. It defines a deepfake as a very realistic digital representation of a person, including their appearance and voice. The Danish culture minister, Jakob Engel-Schmidt, said he hoped the bill before parliament would send an 'unequivocal message' that everybody had the right to the way they looked and sounded. He told the Guardian: 'In the bill we agree and are sending an unequivocal message that everybody has the right to their own body, their own voice and their own facial features, which is apparently not how the current law is protecting people against generative AI.' He added: 'Human beings can be run through the digital copy machine and be misused for all sorts of purposes and I'm not willing to accept that.' The move, which is believed to have the backing of nine in 10 MPs, comes amid rapidly developing AI technology that has made it easier than ever to create a convincing fake image, video or sound to mimic the features of another person. The changes to Danish copyright law will, once approved, theoretically give people in Denmark the right to demand that online platforms remove such content if it is shared without consent. It will also cover 'realistic, digitally generated imitations' of an artist's performance without consent. Violation of the proposed rules could result in compensation for those affected. The government said the new rules would not affect parodies and satire, which would still be permitted. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion 'Of course this is new ground we are breaking, and if the platforms are not complying with that, we are willing to take additional steps,' said Engel-Schmidt. Other European countries, he hopes, will follow Denmark's lead. He plans to use Denmark's forthcoming EU presidency to share its plans with his European counterparts. If tech platforms do not respond accordingly to the new law, they could be subject to 'severe fines', he said, and it could become a matter for the European Commission. 'That is why I believe the tech platforms will take this very seriously indeed,' he added.
